President Obama Prevents Sheriff Joe Arpaio From Checking If Inmates Are Illegal

[earlycuyler]

President Obama Prevents Sheriff Joe Arpaio From Checking If Inmates Are Illegal

And ‘Sheriff Joe’ has only himself to blame, an appropriate measure given the abundant evidence of Arpaio’s illegal and un-Constitutional activity.

And this is a non-issue, given the fact one’s immigration status is irrelevant since suspects are detained for suspicion of committing crimes other than entering the country illegally.

Or are Arpaio and his supporters admitting that they detain persons only for ‘suspicion of being illegal,’ which, again, is illegal and un-Constitutional.

Yet he gets reelected over and over again. And if he is breaking the law, how has he gotten away with it for so long ? He is not breaking any law, more like your president trying to protect what he sees as a potential voting block.

 

[Zoom-boing]

According to bleeding hearts, entering the U.S. illegally isn't a crime.

Hey leftists, what's it like living in whack-a-doo land?

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

President Obama Prevents Sheriff Joe Arpaio From Checking If Inmates Are Illegal

In fact, Arpaio has no need to access immigration records at all, that’s the sole purview of the Federal government per the Supremacy Clause:

Under the De Canas rationale, S.B. 1070 would fit the definition of an “immigration regulation.” As previously stated, the purpose of the Arizona statute is to “deter the unlawful entry and presence of aliens.”[41] Unlike the statute in De Canas, the Arizona law does not limit itself to merely regulating the employer-employee relationship. Instead, S.B. 1070 attempts to determine “who should or should not be” admitted into the United States. The Arizona law is a more expansive regulation of immigration than the statute at issue in De Canas, and a compelling argument can be made that S.B. 1070 intrudes into a “field” where the federal government has passed extensive legislation—leaving no room for state action

The Supremacy Clause v. S.B. 1070: Can Arizona

According to bleeding hearts, entering the U.S. illegally isn't a crime.

Hey leftists, what's it like living in whack-a-doo land?

It has nothing to do with ‘bleeding hearts’ or ‘leftists,’ it has only to do with the Constitution and the fact that all persons are entitled to fundamental due process rights, including those allegedly in the country illegally. See: Plyler v. Doe (1982).

 

[Caroljo]

Actually, the suit was started by the ACLU for violations of Hispanic citizens' rights.

Me personally? I hope they investigate the shit outta this asshole. If he's guilty? Give him pink underwear and make HIM live in a tent.

You don't think the Sheriff should investigate if his immates are illegal?

by "inmates" do you mean brown people standing on the street not committing any criminal act?

The key word is his "inmates"...which indicates that they're already in jail for doing something ILLEGAL. He has every right, and actually it's his job, to check if they're here legally. "Inmates" normally don't stand on the street at all....

 

[old navy]

The sheriff is a national hero that keeps getting re-elected by the People.

Also, the nunber of border crossings is down quite a bit due to the ef'd up Obama economy. The unemployment rate in Mexico is about half that of the US UE rate.

 

[LoneLaugher]

I have contacted certain members of congress to see if this can be reversed. This is not necessary and Sheriff Joe Arpaio is doing his constitutional duty to uphold the law and I hope he continues. What the president has done is step in on a local jurisdiction and hinder the local law enforcement from doing it's job. Their job is to uphold the law and detain any lawbreakers, especially illegal immigrants and deport them. I am privy to information and I have found out that this is a personal vendetta against Sheriff Arpaio for launching a investigation into the presidents background and the validity of his recently released birth certificate in order to see if he is constitutionally able to hold the office of the presidency. I will update you all on any information that becomes available on this situation.

Ariz. prosecutor wants immigration checks restored - Atlantic Broadband.net

APNewsBreak: Feds say Arpaio violated civil rights - Yahoo! News

Why especially?

 

[FA_Q2]

President Obama Prevents Sheriff Joe Arpaio From Checking If Inmates Are Illegal

In fact, Arpaio has no need to access immigration records at all, that’s the sole purview of the Federal government per the Supremacy Clause:

Under the De Canas rationale, S.B. 1070 would fit the definition of an “immigration regulation.” As previously stated, the purpose of the Arizona statute is to “deter the unlawful entry and presence of aliens.”[41] Unlike the statute in De Canas, the Arizona law does not limit itself to merely regulating the employer-employee relationship. Instead, S.B. 1070 attempts to determine “who should or should not be” admitted into the United States. The Arizona law is a more expansive regulation of immigration than the statute at issue in De Canas, and a compelling argument can be made that S.B. 1070 intrudes into a “field” where the federal government has passed extensive legislation—leaving no room for state action

The Supremacy Clause v. S.B. 1070: Can Arizona

According to bleeding hearts, entering the U.S. illegally isn't a crime.

Hey leftists, what's it like living in whack-a-doo land?

It has nothing to do with ‘bleeding hearts’ or ‘leftists,’ it has only to do with the Constitution and the fact that all persons are entitled to fundamental due process rights, including those allegedly in the country illegally. See: Plyler v. Doe (1982).

As of this date, I was unaware that this case has actually reached the supreme court. You linked to a law review, essentially an opinion of one legal institution. That does not mean that it was actually ruled on.
Also, why is it illegal to check the status of INMATES and how is it violating the supremacy clause by doing so. They are not deporting people. They are checking their status and giving them to ICE. It seems that you have an aversion to the state governments working with the federal government. That is as asinine concept. Of course, Obama seems to like that idiocy as well.
Still waiting for sanctuary city laws to be challenged as they directly oppose federal law and are clearly unconstitutional.

 

[earlycuyler]

Actually, the suit was started by the ACLU for violations of Hispanic citizens' rights.

Me personally? I hope they investigate the shit outta this asshole. If he's guilty? Give him pink underwear and make HIM live in a tent.

You don't think the Sheriff should investigate if his immates are illegal?

by "inmates" do you mean brown people standing on the street not committing any criminal act?

Only the ones who broke the law to get to that spot they are standing on.

 

[earlycuyler]

President Obama Prevents Sheriff Joe Arpaio From Checking If Inmates Are Illegal

In fact, Arpaio has no need to access immigration records at all, that’s the sole purview of the Federal government per the Supremacy Clause:

Under the De Canas rationale, S.B. 1070 would fit the definition of an “immigration regulation.” As previously stated, the purpose of the Arizona statute is to “deter the unlawful entry and presence of aliens.”[41] Unlike the statute in De Canas, the Arizona law does not limit itself to merely regulating the employer-employee relationship. Instead, S.B. 1070 attempts to determine “who should or should not be” admitted into the United States. The Arizona law is a more expansive regulation of immigration than the statute at issue in De Canas, and a compelling argument can be made that S.B. 1070 intrudes into a “field” where the federal government has passed extensive legislation—leaving no room for state action

The Supremacy Clause v. S.B. 1070: Can Arizona

According to bleeding hearts, entering the U.S. illegally isn't a crime.

Hey leftists, what's it like living in whack-a-doo land?

It has nothing to do with ‘bleeding hearts’ or ‘leftists,’ it has only to do with the Constitution and the fact that all persons are entitled to fundamental due process rights, including those allegedly in the country illegally. See: Plyler v. Doe (1982).

Can you post the part of the constitution that protects federal criminals from state law ? And encase you did not hear, a good many states check the status of there non English speaking inmates. Arpaio is being singled out for political reasons and nothing more. He has been doing his thing for years, and only now Obamas hitters are getting around to dealing with him ?This is nothing more then pandering for cheap votes.

 

[Seawytch]

Sheriff Arpaio was abusing his power...that's why he has been under investigation. The guy is the epitome of the power drunk authoritarian. He's practically a fucking caricature. Those guys seldom end well in the movies.

 

[Salt Jones]

As a resident of Maricopa County, Arizona I find the total lack of knowledge displayed by posters on this topic hilarious. Did any of you read the 22 page report? Have any of you researched the amount of money that has been paid out to settle lawsuits brought by U.S. citizen/legal residents of Hispanic origin who were rounded up and jail for days because they were in the vicinity of Joe's sweeps?

Do you know anything about the critics of Sheriff Joe who were arrested or harassed for criticizing him or about those lawsuits, since none of the charges stuck?