CurveLight
Rookie
- Oct 16, 2009
- 9,768
- 317
- 0
- Banned
- #101
Ollie, where's the link for your quote?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
CurveLight, you are being very disingenuous and misleading about the word "know" in the Bible.
Sure, most of the time "know" is used as a word to mean that you are aware of a person or event.
But "know" is also a biblical euphemism for describing having sexual intercourse.
Just like in our society, we use the euphemism "sleep together" when describing two people engaging in sexual activity.
When in reality, there is no sleeping going on.
CurveLight you seem to have bypassed this rebutal post.ROTFLLMAO! You homophobes always provide a good laugh. I don't even have the morbid curiosity to ask how you convert the term dog to male homosexuals.
Revelation 22:15 states, For without are dogs, and sorcerers, and whoremongers, and murderers, and idolaters, and whosoever loves and makes a lie. This is plainly referring to the various types of people who will not enter Gods kingdom, because of their unwillingness to repent of their degenerate lifestyles. Galatians 5:19-21 also describes those who will not be part of Gods kingdom.
Strongs Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible shows that the meaning of the word dog (#3611), as used in this context in the Hebrew, is a male prostitute, or homosexual. Verse 17 of Deuteronomy 23 makes the meaning plain: There shall be no whore of the daughters of Israel, nor a sodomite of the sons of Israel. The two verses are clearly talking about sexual sins.
By your interpretation the people at Lot's door wanted sex with Lot's guests. The first point is there were women as well as men at Lot's door. How do you conclude homosexuality with women present?
By your interpretation the people at Lot's door wanted sex with Lot's guests. The first point is there were women as well as men at Lot's door. How do you conclude homosexuality with women present?
Read the surrounding verses CurveLight.
Lot offered women to the men surrounding his house.
They refused his offer and demanded the male guests be sent out to them.
Face it CurveLight,
The mob surrounding Lot's house was a bunch crazed homosexuals.
Who were driven insane by their perverted lust for other men.
CurveLight you seem to have bypassed this rebutal post.ROTFLLMAO! You homophobes always provide a good laugh. I don't even have the morbid curiosity to ask how you convert the term dog to male homosexuals.
Revelation 22:15 states, “For without are dogs, and sorcerers, and whoremongers, and murderers, and idolaters, and whosoever loves and makes a lie.” This is plainly referring to the various types of people who will not enter God’s kingdom, because of their unwillingness to repent of their degenerate lifestyles. Galatians 5:19-21 also describes those who will not be part of God’s kingdom.
Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible shows that the meaning of the word dog (#3611), as used in this context in the Hebrew, is “a male prostitute,” or homosexual. Verse 17 of Deuteronomy 23 makes the meaning plain: “There shall be no whore of the daughters of Israel, nor a sodomite of the sons of Israel.” The two verses are clearly talking about sexual sins.
I used Strong's Exhaustive Concordance just like you did on another topic.
So you couldn't claim I was using a biased source.
Ollie, where's the link for your quote?
Ollie, where's the link for your quote?
You aren't worth me looking them up again. You will only deny deny deny, because as we all know curvelight is the only person who can be right. I showed you 2 examples where it is used as a reference to sex. And you deny. Lot offered his own daughters who had not "Known" men. DUH get a life.
And as i have said believe what ever you will. I know what I believe. this is why one shouldn't argue religion with idiots. they just can't understand. Now go tell your partner you are being picked on.
Ollie, where's the link for your quote?
You aren't worth me looking them up again. You will only deny deny deny, because as we all know curvelight is the only person who can be right. I showed you 2 examples where it is used as a reference to sex. And you deny. Lot offered his own daughters who had not "Known" men. DUH get a life.
And as i have said believe what ever you will. I know what I believe. this is why one shouldn't argue religion with idiots. they just can't understand. Now go tell your partner you are being picked on.
Ollie, where's the link for your quote?
You aren't worth me looking them up again. You will only deny deny deny, because as we all know curvelight is the only person who can be right. I showed you 2 examples where it is used as a reference to sex. And you deny. Lot offered his own daughters who had not "Known" men. DUH get a life.
And as i have said believe what ever you will. I know what I believe. this is why one shouldn't argue religion with idiots. they just can't understand. Now go tell your partner you are being picked on.
So you can't provide the links. Thanks. It's also clear your ignore every aspect of the narrative. You also wholly ignore the fact scripture states several times why the destruction happened and not once is homosexuality ever mentioned. I like how you justify failing to support your claim on the basis "I'm not worth it." When you grow up let us know.
Ollie, where's the link for your quote?
You aren't worth me looking them up again. You will only deny deny deny, because as we all know curvelight is the only person who can be right. I showed you 2 examples where it is used as a reference to sex. And you deny. Lot offered his own daughters who had not "Known" men. DUH get a life.
And as i have said believe what ever you will. I know what I believe. this is why one shouldn't argue religion with idiots. they just can't understand. Now go tell your partner you are being picked on.
Not worth it SFC Ollie. He will just pullout his gayboy Bible version and deny and deny what it clearly means to everyone else. That is why I didn't pursue this earlier in the thread. In fact, since he doesn't really make any valid points, I may just put him on ignore. I have yet to regret having Jay C. and Starkey on ignore.
You aren't worth me looking them up again. You will only deny deny deny, because as we all know curvelight is the only person who can be right. I showed you 2 examples where it is used as a reference to sex. And you deny. Lot offered his own daughters who had not "Known" men. DUH get a life.
And as i have said believe what ever you will. I know what I believe. this is why one shouldn't argue religion with idiots. they just can't understand. Now go tell your partner you are being picked on.
So you can't provide the links. Thanks. It's also clear your ignore every aspect of the narrative. You also wholly ignore the fact scripture states several times why the destruction happened and not once is homosexuality ever mentioned. I like how you justify failing to support your claim on the basis "I'm not worth it." When you grow up let us know.
Just to shut this kid up:
AUE: FAQ excerpt: Biblical sense of "to know"
know in the biblical sense - definition of know in the biblical sense by the Free Online Dictionary, Thesaurus and Encyclopedia.
Now do you "know" any more than you did a minute ago? Of course not because you are always right. Now child, run back to your gay lover and leave me alone.
Ollie, where's the link for your quote?
You aren't worth me looking them up again. You will only deny deny deny, because as we all know curvelight is the only person who can be right. I showed you 2 examples where it is used as a reference to sex. And you deny. Lot offered his own daughters who had not "Known" men. DUH get a life.
And as i have said believe what ever you will. I know what I believe. this is why one shouldn't argue religion with idiots. they just can't understand. Now go tell your partner you are being picked on.
Not worth it SFC Ollie. He will just pullout his gayboy Bible version and deny and deny what it clearly means to everyone else. That is why I didn't pursue this earlier in the thread. In fact, since he doesn't really make any valid points, I may just put him on ignore. I have yet to regret having Jay C. and Starkey on ignore.
You aren't worth me looking them up again. You will only deny deny deny, because as we all know curvelight is the only person who can be right. I showed you 2 examples where it is used as a reference to sex. And you deny. Lot offered his own daughters who had not "Known" men. DUH get a life.
And as i have said believe what ever you will. I know what I believe. this is why one shouldn't argue religion with idiots. they just can't understand. Now go tell your partner you are being picked on.
Not worth it SFC Ollie. He will just pullout his gayboy Bible version and deny and deny what it clearly means to everyone else. That is why I didn't pursue this earlier in the thread. In fact, since he doesn't really make any valid points, I may just put him on ignore. I have yet to regret having Jay C. and Starkey on ignore.
Well I actually made a new years resolution not to place him on ignore for at least a week. Of course that week is up.......But I'd like to at least go for 2.
So you can't provide the links. Thanks. It's also clear your ignore every aspect of the narrative. You also wholly ignore the fact scripture states several times why the destruction happened and not once is homosexuality ever mentioned. I like how you justify failing to support your claim on the basis "I'm not worth it." When you grow up let us know.
Just to shut this kid up:
AUE: FAQ excerpt: Biblical sense of "to know"
know in the biblical sense - definition of know in the biblical sense by the Free Online Dictionary, Thesaurus and Encyclopedia.
Now do you "know" any more than you did a minute ago? Of course not because you are always right. Now child, run back to your gay lover and leave me alone.
Rotfl! No wonder you were scared to post the link. I provided two scholarly resources and you ignored those to link some guy named Mark Israel? Who the hell is that and please explain how his COMMENTARY trumps the facts I provided from the two sources? This is just another example of you not being able to support your claim. How do you justify your outright dishonesty?
Not worth it SFC Ollie. He will just pullout his gayboy Bible version and deny and deny what it clearly means to everyone else. That is why I didn't pursue this earlier in the thread. In fact, since he doesn't really make any valid points, I may just put him on ignore. I have yet to regret having Jay C. and Starkey on ignore.
Well I actually made a new years resolution not to place him on ignore for at least a week. Of course that week is up.......But I'd like to at least go for 2.
Damn. Didn't know I was so personally important to you. I don't know whether to be flattered or frightened I am in your thoughts so much you reserved a New Year's Resolution just for me. But, this proves what I said before. Your idiotic personal fixation on me is more important than any topic being discussed.
Just to shut this kid up:
AUE: FAQ excerpt: Biblical sense of "to know"
know in the biblical sense - definition of know in the biblical sense by the Free Online Dictionary, Thesaurus and Encyclopedia.
Now do you "know" any more than you did a minute ago? Of course not because you are always right. Now child, run back to your gay lover and leave me alone.
Rotfl! No wonder you were scared to post the link. I provided two scholarly resources and you ignored those to link some guy named Mark Israel? Who the hell is that and please explain how his COMMENTARY trumps the facts I provided from the two sources? This is just another example of you not being able to support your claim. How do you justify your outright dishonesty?
Hey numbnits, there are no facts to religion, there is simply faith. You have yours and I have mine, and mine says you are wrong, and always will be. Now go away kid you bother me.
Rotfl! No wonder you were scared to post the link. I provided two scholarly resources and you ignored those to link some guy named Mark Israel? Who the hell is that and please explain how his COMMENTARY trumps the facts I provided from the two sources? This is just another example of you not being able to support your claim. How do you justify your outright dishonesty?
Hey numbnits, there are no facts to religion, there is simply faith. You have yours and I have mine, and mine says you are wrong, and always will be. Now go away kid you bother me.
Don't know how you do it but you managed to embarrass yourself again. You have been shown from two different sources yada doesn't simply mean to have sex and you've ignored everything else about the narrative including the fact scripture states why the destruction happened and that homosexuality was never cited as a reason. Holy shit you are one pathetic fucking excuse of a man.