seen that beforedid you watch eots video of the loose change guys vs PM?Popular Mechanics is right.
You all know that...
Yes, I did see the Loose Change video. Here it is.
[youtube]saHs6J0OXVI[/youtube]
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
seen that beforedid you watch eots video of the loose change guys vs PM?Popular Mechanics is right.
You all know that...
Yes, I did see the Loose Change video. Here it is.
[youtube]saHs6J0OXVI[/youtube]
It's basically a few college amateur film makers going up against structural engineers. Is that correct?
Unemployed college amateur film makers living in a cabin in the woods going up against structural engineers. That is correct.
Popular Mechanics is right.
You all know that...
It would appear that I am being confused with those that believe that September 11th was planned by the government, I'm not. I was merely pointing out the fact that something as large as a 767 hitting a building like the World Trade Center at 500 miles an hour would cause extreme damage and would easily cause enough structural damage to bring those buildings down. What I was saying is that the design of the World Trade Center buildings were amazingly strong to withstand such a hit and not get knocked over immediately, with the inherent weakness of the space frame's connections to the vertical structures, it is easy to see why they collapsed from the hits. Once the vertical structure was compromised in such a horrific way, gravity and the sheer weight of the upper floors would account for them falling.
It was a mere observation from someone that works with these aircraft and see first hand the size and the amount of weight that gets put on board them.
well it is a very ill informed opinion and does nothing to explain the free fall speed of the collapse or the collapse of wtc 7 nor does it address all of the unanswered questions of the pentagon or prior knowledge
Not only that but a FACT that the 9/11 Bush dupes always ignore that proves explosives brought the towers down is that some of the coworkers who survived the towers collapse,they came out of the towers several minutes BEFORE the towers came down carrying a coworker who had been severely burned by EXPLOSIONS that went off in the sub basement levels.The film footage shows them carrying a man out of the towers who was on fire and the towers hadnt collapsed yet.just seconds BEFORE the plane struck above they heard an explosion from the sub basement level and saw a man coming out of the elevater on fire yelling out-my god theres EXPLOSIONS going on in the basement below.then about 10 seconds later or so,they then heard the plane strike the tower above them.And as I have said MANY times here before,the footage proves it as well with black smoke billowing from the ground below and you hear explosions going off and the towers havent even collapsed yet.This footage of course was suppressed from the mainstream media but you can see it in those videos at that canada wants the truth site.The 9/11 Bush dupes though wont even tackle this issue cause they of course only see what they want to see. To defend popular mechanics is doing a disservice to those 3000 plus people who lost their lives that day.
Popular Mechanics is right.
You all know that...
this coming from someone who refuses to look at any of those 47 canada wants the truth videos.so far you have proved that you talk nothing but shit.you said you had 3000 plus videos to post.I challenged you to post them,you have YET to do so.what other fairy tales for the day you have to tell us,that elvis presley is alive.Im sure your buddy here elvis wont argue with you on that one.
i'm pretty certain Elvis was in Holywood at the timePopular Mechanics is right.
You all know that...
this coming from someone who refuses to look at any of those 47 canada wants the truth videos.so far you have proved that you talk nothing but shit.you said you had 3000 plus videos to post.I challenged you to post them,you have YET to do so.what other fairy tales for the day you have to tell us,that elvis presley is alive.Im sure your buddy here elvis wont argue with you on that one.
Elvis is dead, you fucknut. Take note of my entire screenname. He is my second favorite singer to Lennon, nothing more. Still, the idea that the towers collapsed from controlled demolitions is about as plausible as Elvis shooting Kennedy. After all, he WAS alive in 1963 and you can't PROVE he didn't kill him.
Popular Mechanics is right.
You all know that...
this coming from someone who refuses to look at any of those 47 canada wants the truth videos.so far you have proved that you talk nothing but shit.you said you had 3000 plus videos to post.I challenged you to post them,you have YET to do so.what other fairy tales for the day you have to tell us,that elvis presley is alive.Im sure your buddy here elvis wont argue with you on that one.
Elvis is dead, you fucknut. Take note of my entire screenname. He is my second favorite singer to Lennon, nothing more. Still, the idea that the towers collapsed from controlled demolitions is about as plausible as Elvis shooting Kennedy. After all, he WAS alive in 1963 and you can't PROVE he didn't kill him.
and there it is for the 3,000th time
this oneand the loose change morons had their asses handed to them
its funny as hell
he posted it as if the loose change guys won the debate
LOL
Note that having certain 'interpretations' of the evidence is 'grounds' in his book for being banned from the Board. :0) In reality they gave me a week suspension (link = "see you in a week") and just decided to leave the sock in my mouth like Killtown at 911Movement and Painter (Michael Anderson above) at PilotsForTruth and Laura at the Cassiopaea Board and ChillZero at the JREF Board (Gravy = Mark Roberts is their DoD Op), so on and so forth. These people all HATE (with a passion) my 9:31/9:32 AM First Explosion (zero replies here) at the Pentagon Explanation, because that wrecks the Official Cover Story these goofballs work everyday to protect and endorse and support along with a dozen other theories. Here is Craig's "No Missile At The Pentagon" OP (link). The DoD is afraid for anyone to wake up and realize the Navy Operations Center was deliberately attacked by the DoD itself, so these guys go to work to convince everyone that ANYTHING hit the Pentagon but the DoD missle. If you want to see a funny sight, Dominick challenges Aldo to debate me by pasting my work on Aldo's thread and the retard refused (here). Dominick pasted my work in Post #2 and Aldo and Craig do everything but debate 'the' 911Truth, because they preaching 'something else.'*Sigh* Still at it Terral? With 'interpretations' like the one above, it's no wonder you got banned at the Loose Change Forum. I help run the Loose Change Board, and have done since April 2007... does that mean I too am a disinformation operative?
you are right, facts dont changeand there it is for the 3,000th time
the facts don't change...the false accusation that the questions of 911 are that of unemployed college kids vs engineers was made ...clearly this view is shared by many people of of the highest levels of education experience and service..so once again I will ;prove that
you are right, facts dont changeand there it is for the 3,000th time
the facts don't change...the false accusation that the questions of 911 are that of unemployed college kids vs engineers was made ...clearly this view is shared by many people of of the highest levels of education experience and service..so once again I will ;prove that
but everything you have posted has already been debunked ad naseum
it is insanity to think repeating the same lies over and over will somehow have a different effect the 100th time you posted it than it had the very first time
OMG, debunked by THOUSANDSyou are right, facts dont changethe facts don't change...the false accusation that the questions of 911 are that of unemployed college kids vs engineers was made ...clearly this view is shared by many people of of the highest levels of education experience and service..so once again I will ;prove that
but everything you have posted has already been debunked ad naseum
it is insanity to think repeating the same lies over and over will somehow have a different effect the 100th time you posted it than it had the very first time
debunked by who ?..a cheap ass privately owned magazine ..the 911 commission ..????
ah, so now loose change is part of a diversionary tactic by the DoD
man, you cant make this comedy up
LOL
you are right, facts dont changeand there it is for the 3,000th time
the facts don't change...the false accusation that the questions of 911 are that of unemployed college kids vs engineers was made ...clearly this view is shared by many people of of the highest levels of education experience and service..so once again I will ;prove that
but everything you have posted has already been debunked ad naseum.
it is insanity to think repeating the same lies over and over will somehow have a different effect the 100th time you posted it than it had the very first time
My uncle gave me a copy of this book in the mid 1970's and my eyes have been open ever since. The problem with having your eyes wide open is the realization that you are surrounded by DUPES . . ."It must be remembered that the first job of any conspiracy, whether it be in politics, crime or within a business office, is to convince everyone else that no conspiracy exists. The conspirators success will be determined largely by their ability to do this. That the elite of the academic world and mass communications media always pooh-pooh the existence of the Insiders merely serves to camouflage their operations. These “artists” hide the boy, the cart and the donkey."
you are right, facts dont changethe facts don't change...the false accusation that the questions of 911 are that of unemployed college kids vs engineers was made ...clearly this view is shared by many people of of the highest levels of education experience and service..so once again I will ;prove that
but everything you have posted has already been debunked ad naseum
it is insanity to think repeating the same lies over and over will somehow have a different effect the 100th time you posted it than it had the very first time
debunked by who ?..a cheap ass privately owned magazine ..the 911 commission ..????
you are right, facts dont change
but everything you have posted has already been debunked ad naseum
it is insanity to think repeating the same lies over and over will somehow have a different effect the 100th time you posted it than it had the very first time
debunked by who ?..a cheap ass privately owned magazine ..the 911 commission ..????
exactly,they were debunked by evil corrupt men on the 9/11 commission and a magazine they hired to investigate it.thats really debunking something all right. funny how they always ignore the FACT that Max Clelland resigned because he was so disgusted with the investgation saying that Zelikow who oversaw much of it, skewed the facts and ignored witness testimony and made critical omissions.the Bush dupes of course will ignore that little fact.
It's just amazing how much effort a bunch of retarded douchebags will go through to demonstrate how planes were not responsible for the destruction of the WTC and the Pentagon, but rather that the government used demolition explosives and/or missiles and then cranked up it's scary propaganda machine to perpetrate this elaborate con, involving thousands of witnesses and experts, to convince us all into believing it was planes--as if our government was competent to engineer such a thing; as if our governement, if it were to do such a thing, had no means to simply get planes, fly them into the respective buildings and then say, . . . well, PLANES WERE FLOWN INTO THOSE BUILDINGS!
Exactly, they were debunked by evil corrupt men on the 9/11 commission and a magazine they hired to investigate it. That’s really debunking something all right. Funny how they always ignore the FACT that Max Clelland resigned because he was so disgusted with the investigation saying that Zelikow who oversaw much of it, skewed the facts and ignored witness testimony and made critical omissions. The Bush DUPES of course will ignore that little fact.
[/FONT][FONT="]Factual errors. I have been investigating this Pentagon case for some time now and have found many errors in the ACAAR where your data contradicts information in other reports, timelines and time stamped News Video footage. All ACAAR page number references are from the PDF counter. Some examples are:[/FONT]Ms. Brown >> Good morning, Mr. Croft. We received your email and would appreciate your sending us examples of the errors so that we may correct them. Are these grammatical errors or factual errors?