Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
"A former aide to Hillary Clinton has turned over to the F.B.I. computer security logs from Mrs. Clinton’s private server, records that showed no evidence of foreign hacking, according to people close to a federal investigation into Mrs. Clinton’s emails.
The security logs bolster Mrs. Clinton’s assertion that her use of a personal email account to conduct State Department business while she was the secretary of state did not put American secrets into the hands of hackers or foreign governments."
Be assured that Bernie Sanders supporters and right wing nuts will become deeply depressed after reading this new New York Times article:
"A former aide to Hillary Clinton has turned over to the F.B.I. computer security logs from Mrs. Clinton’s private server, records that showed no evidence of foreign hacking, according to people close to a federal investigation into Mrs. Clinton’s emails.
The security logs bolster Mrs. Clinton’s assertion that her use of a personal email account to conduct State Department business while she was the secretary of state did not put American secrets into the hands of hackers or foreign governments."
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/04/u...e-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=0
So what if Pagliano is testifying? Did anyone tell you what Pagliano said? Pop another Xanax.Ironic that the OP posts this as Pagliano is spilling his guts today...............I see spilled guts!
Be assured that Bernie Sanders supporters and right wing nuts will become deeply depressed after reading this new New York Times article:
"A former aide to Hillary Clinton has turned over to the F.B.I. computer security logs from Mrs. Clinton’s private server, records that showed no evidence of foreign hacking, according to people close to a federal investigation into Mrs. Clinton’s emails.
The security logs bolster Mrs. Clinton’s assertion that her use of a personal email account to conduct State Department business while she was the secretary of state did not put American secrets into the hands of hackers or foreign governments."
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/04/u...e-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=0
So what if Pagliano is testifying? Did anyone tell you what Pagliano said? Pop another Xanax.Ironic that the OP posts this as Pagliano is spilling his guts today...............I see spilled guts!
Be assured that Bernie Sanders supporters and right wing nuts will become deeply depressed after reading this new New York Times article:
"A former aide to Hillary Clinton has turned over to the F.B.I. computer security logs from Mrs. Clinton’s private server, records that showed no evidence of foreign hacking, according to people close to a federal investigation into Mrs. Clinton’s emails.
The security logs bolster Mrs. Clinton’s assertion that her use of a personal email account to conduct State Department business while she was the secretary of state did not put American secrets into the hands of hackers or foreign governments."
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/04/u...e-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=0
Clinton haters downgrade from "Illegal" to "shitty thing". Haha.Be assured that Bernie Sanders supporters and right wing nuts will become deeply depressed after reading this new New York Times article:
"A former aide to Hillary Clinton has turned over to the F.B.I. computer security logs from Mrs. Clinton’s private server, records that showed no evidence of foreign hacking, according to people close to a federal investigation into Mrs. Clinton’s emails.
The security logs bolster Mrs. Clinton’s assertion that her use of a personal email account to conduct State Department business while she was the secretary of state did not put American secrets into the hands of hackers or foreign governments."
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/04/u...e-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=0
Who cares what PRAVDA is saying.
What she did was a shitty thing and she shouldn't be given the keys to the palace at the very least. She should probably be grounded at the most.
So what if Pagliano is testifying? Did anyone tell you what Pagliano said? Pop another Xanax.Ironic that the OP posts this as Pagliano is spilling his guts today...............I see spilled guts!
What I am saying is that what she did may have in fact been lawful, but in all probability it was illegal. Most Clinton dealings are lawful but illegal. That is how lawyers and the elites operate. That they MAKE the law is of no consequence, it does not matter if what they do is illegal.Clinton haters downgrade from "Illegal" to "shitty thing". Haha.Be assured that Bernie Sanders supporters and right wing nuts will become deeply depressed after reading this new New York Times article:
"A former aide to Hillary Clinton has turned over to the F.B.I. computer security logs from Mrs. Clinton’s private server, records that showed no evidence of foreign hacking, according to people close to a federal investigation into Mrs. Clinton’s emails.
The security logs bolster Mrs. Clinton’s assertion that her use of a personal email account to conduct State Department business while she was the secretary of state did not put American secrets into the hands of hackers or foreign governments."
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/04/u...e-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=0
Who cares what PRAVDA is saying.
What she did was a shitty thing and she shouldn't be given the keys to the palace at the very least. She should probably be grounded at the most.
Be assured that Bernie Sanders supporters and right wing nuts will become deeply depressed after reading this new New York Times article:
"A former aide to Hillary Clinton has turned over to the F.B.I. computer security logs from Mrs. Clinton’s private server, records that showed no evidence of foreign hacking, according to people close to a federal investigation into Mrs. Clinton’s emails.
The security logs bolster Mrs. Clinton’s assertion that her use of a personal email account to conduct State Department business while she was the secretary of state did not put American secrets into the hands of hackers or foreign governments."
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/04/u...e-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=0
I doesn't matter if it is illegal if it broke no law though. Elites, those who make the law, are, ostensibly, above it.The guy she hired to maintain her server has just been offered and reportedly took an immunity offer to testify.
Immunity is not offered lightly, especially if only a 'security review' is being conducted - this officially a criminal investigation.
Now, according to reports, the FBI is investigating whether Hillary allowed others to use her required passwords to access and transfer classified onto her server and into her account. Hillary claims SHE did not put the classified on HER account on HER server. Since there is no signs of hacking (to put classified ON her server instead of taking it off?!), that means someone had to have access to her account / server ... which required her password.
Sharing her password to access a server containing HIGHLY classified info is ILLEGAL.
Is Hillary going to claim she never gave anyone her password and that one of her aides must have taken / used it without her permission?!
Pagliano may have proven he is / was extremely smart by taking the immunity deal...
Clinton haters downgrade from "Illegal" to "shitty thing". Haha.Be assured that Bernie Sanders supporters and right wing nuts will become deeply depressed after reading this new New York Times article:
"A former aide to Hillary Clinton has turned over to the F.B.I. computer security logs from Mrs. Clinton’s private server, records that showed no evidence of foreign hacking, according to people close to a federal investigation into Mrs. Clinton’s emails.
The security logs bolster Mrs. Clinton’s assertion that her use of a personal email account to conduct State Department business while she was the secretary of state did not put American secrets into the hands of hackers or foreign governments."
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/04/u...e-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=0
Who cares what PRAVDA is saying.
What she did was a shitty thing and she shouldn't be given the keys to the palace at the very least. She should probably be grounded at the most.
.........., BTW, is Perez a Cuban name?
