Curried Goats
Platinum Member
- Aug 28, 2021
- 23,941
- 8,967
- 433
They did. Feel free to cry about it.Once again Moron, they gave nothing to Congress.
Go get educated.
Holy shit you are thick.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
They did. Feel free to cry about it.Once again Moron, they gave nothing to Congress.
Go get educated.
Holy shit you are thick.
So what did we need SCOTUS for?How, stupid? The power is already spelled out in Section 5.
What a clown.
The entire Colorado ruling was before them, they could of addressed whatever issues with the ruling they wanted, they chose to only decide on who has the authority to remove a candidate from the ballot. Why are you MAGAts so emotionally soft that you can't accept that courts all around the country, after hearing testimony and seeing evidence, concluded Trump was an insurrectionist? That's not even as bad to me as jury finding him to be a sexually assaulter.
To slap you silly with a 9-0 decision so there is no question. You really are a dumb ass.So what did we need SCOTUS for?
Right, that's what Trump's side wanted them to focus on and the granted that request. They were asked by the other side to address the matter of insurrection and determine once and for all where Trump was an insurrectionist. They denied that. They could of chosen to but they decided not to. What is still confusing you?"We granted former President Trump’s petition for certiorari, which raised a single question: “Did the Colorado Supreme Court err in ordering President Trump excluded from the 2024 presidential primary ballot?”
The court gave the power to politicians, moron. Politicians now have the power to disqualify Trump.To bitchslap your out of control Dimtard hack judges and politicians, Moron.
Man, you are think.
Wrong. The Trump team wanted to get on the Colorado ballot. The Supreme Court said in their decision only congress can keep him off. Article 5. Read it.Right, that's what Trump's side wanted them to focus on and the granted that request. They were asked by the other side to address the matter of insurrection and determine once and for all where Trump was an insurrectionist. They denied that. They could of chosen to but they decided not to. What is still confusing you?
Congress, not the states. Read it.The court gave the power to politicians, moron. Politicians now have the power to disqualify Trump.
That... doesn't dispute anything I said....Wrong. The Trump team wanted to get on the Colorado ballot. The Supreme Court said in their decision only congress can keep him off. Article 5. Read it.
And the people in Congress are politicians.... yes...?Congress, not the states. Read it.
It doesn't say politicians. It's specific. If it said politicians then the Mayor of Loopyville could ban Trump from the ballot. You're an idiot.That... doesn't dispute anything I said....
And the people in Congress are politicians.... yes...?
Show me that petition and the denial. There is nothing in the decision that references your claim.Right, that's what Trump's side wanted them to focus on and the granted that request. They were asked by the other side to address the matter of insurrection and determine once and for all where Trump was an insurrectionist. They denied that. They could of chosen to but they decided not to. What is still confusing you?
For about the tenth time…….Congress already had the power, Dumbass.The court gave the power to politicians, moron. Politicians now have the power to disqualify Trump.
Ya only because one of the most supported bill in our country had the name of a Democrat on it and the worst part was that he was a black American named Obama. Automatic right wing hatred.I fear that most Americans do not understand how the Federal court system works with respect to the Constitutionality of a law.
The Supreme Court CAN NOT just look at a new law, review it, and pronounce it OK or otherwise. They can only deal with actual CASES and CONTROVERSIES. That is to say, if a law is problematic, what must happen is that someone has to be HARMED by the law or be CONVICTED under it. Then they can take it to court and appeal it. They lose the court case, they lose the appeal, it goes to one of the Federal Circuit Courts of Appeals, and lose there. Then the USSC has to agree to take the case. Usually, they don't. This process normally takes YEARS.
The USSC gives much leeway to Congress and the President, and if a law or prosecution can be understood in a way that comes within Constitutional standards, even if that understanding is not obvious, the court will probably let it slide.
So it is very difficult to get even a blatantly unconstitutional law overturned, and often only a tiny section of it will be impacted and the remainder will be in force.
A good example of how it works was the original Affordable Care Act ("Obamacare"). It included a mandate that everyone buy health insurance, and imposed a PENALTY (a thousand bucks or so, as I recall) if they refuse to get insurance. Well, there is nothing the Constitution that allows Congress to compel citizens to buy health insurance (NOTE: A STATE could do that, but Congress has no such power).
So they argued before the Supreme Court, with the Administration saying, "WE damn well CAN penalize people for not buying insurance," and the opponents of the law saying basically, Bullshit.
The Court found that Congress HAD NO POWER TO FORCE PEOPLE TO BUY INSURANCE, BUT, they certainly had the power to impose a tax. So they deemed the "penalty" to be a tax, and let the law slide.
Ultimately, a Republican Congress reduced the TAX/PENALTY to zero, so it's no longer an issue.
to tell the demafascist running certain states they can't keep people from voting for the person they wantSo what did we need SCOTUS for?
wrongNope. Trump would be the elected head of the Executive Branch, if the House passed the 14th barring Trump from holding office, and he refused to leave, the House has no enforcement mechanism. That may be why we all said that the president is excluded from the 14th...