Discussion in 'Clean Debate Zone' started by Chuz Life, Jun 9, 2017.
Please take the poll and let's discuss the details.
All CDZ rules apply.
You can't choose both eh?
I won't make a choice then.
There's no end to the scientific evidence of man made climate change. Yes, its true that oil-owned scientists disagree but 97% of real scientists agree.
The poll is nonsensical. Its not an either-or question or position. Indeed, its not a question or position at all.
Its a false equivalency and since the OP posts only about one thing, its obvious where he/she is going with this.
For those who can not decide... maybe this will jelp.
Which theory requires a greater leap of faith?
Apples and oranges
Phone for sale.
The question is which theory has a more solid basis in scientific fact. If you believe that they have equally solid bases, the correct answer would be "neither."
I voted for life at conception because a human embryo only requires food and shelter to complete its life cycle. Man-made global worming remains speculative.
Separate names with a comma.