Poll on "diversity" vs "security"

Do we want "high risk" immigrants in the US???

  • Yes, "diversity" trumps all

    Votes: 1 10.0%
  • Yes, we need to show muslims kindness so they eventually like us

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • No. Letting them in is not worth the risk to fellow citizens

    Votes: 9 90.0%

  • Total voters
    10
Actually blacks have a 13% higher incidence rate for rape than whites.
Race and crime in the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Columbine, VA-Tech, McVeigh, etc were not religious or politically based terror attacks. They were insane acts by insane people, who probably should have been in asylums somewhere. You simply can't ignore the repeated attacks by Islamic terrorists against America, and its moronic to let them into the US to do terror attacks.
Terrorist Attacks in the U.S. or Against Americans — Infoplease.com

The 13 people at Ft Hood were killed by a doctor who swore to uphold the Hippocratic Oath, but killed for Allah instead, including a pregnant woman. You simply don't get how many innocents can be killed by terrorists that some asshole lets into the US.

Still the MAJORITY of Rapists(raw #, not percentage) are white; therefore, following your "no Muslim immigrants" logic, white men should not be allowed near women.

Second the motivation for those other terror attacks doesn't matter, what matters is their end result: A terror attack. This is what you seek to prevent, yes? So when you #1: Discriminate against Muslims (freedom:fail); and then #2: A terrorist attack still occurs within our borders (it will), you're an epic fail.


The majority of people in this country are white, therefore they must commit the most of any crime you care to mention. Whites however dont commit the same amount of crime per capita when compared to other races, therefore the arguement that they should be kept or kicked out of the country is invalid. You are ignoring obvious facts in order to maintain youre naive arguement. Its disingenuous and just plain stupid.

I'm reciprocating stupidity, the easy tell is that of fucking course I don't agree with profiling at all, ever, if it means limiting the freedoms of the profilees simply because others of their make-up have done some bad shit.
 
Still the MAJORITY of Rapists(raw #, not percentage) are white; therefore, following your "no Muslim immigrants" logic, white men should not be allowed near women.

Second the motivation for those other terror attacks doesn't matter, what matters is their end result: A terror attack. This is what you seek to prevent, yes? So when you #1: Discriminate against Muslims (freedom:fail); and then #2: A terrorist attack still occurs within our borders (it will), you're an epic fail.


The majority of people in this country are white, therefore they must commit the most of any crime you care to mention. Whites however dont commit the same amount of crime per capita when compared to other races, therefore the arguement that they should be kept or kicked out of the country is invalid. You are ignoring obvious facts in order to maintain youre naive arguement. Its disingenuous and just plain stupid.

I'm reciprocating stupidity, the easy tell is that of fucking course I don't agree with profiling at all, ever, if it means limiting the freedoms of the profilees simply because others of their make-up have done some bad shit.

No, you're insisting on stupidity if you think that potential terrorists have a right to be in the US. We are a sovereign nation and if we want to keep certain segments out, we can, and if we want to expel certain segments we should. "The Constitution is not a suicide pact..."
 

Forum List

Back
Top