POLL: Cain, Romney and Perry all beat Obama


Cain won't win a single Primary let alone a general election

I thought the same 4 weeks ago
Election 2012: Republican Presidential Primary - Rasmussen Reports™
Herman Cain is the real deal
 
Cain cannot beat Obama, period. The center believes he is crazy and his economics are swiss cheese. Romney can beat Obama and Perry might be able to. No one else can. Because JoeB can't see beyond his bigoted anti-religious nose, his uninformed opinion does not count.
 
Times are very rough for most Americans. But the worst thing is that most Americans don't see too much hope for the future. $16 Trillion in Debt and climbing and less & less jobs. It's the bleak future outlook that will hurt this current President.
 
Swallow no there you go stating things about me you know nothing about
Hell no I was not pulling for him to go thru trillions with no results, do you know any-one what was?
He is a socialist
that's just a fact. As far as campaigning whats he he going campaign on?
he has a record now, this is not 2008

A socialist would not extend tax cuts, Sir. That makes no sense.

Which begs the question. Are taxes socialist?
Depends, If they raise them for more entitlements then yes. IE HEALTHCARE LAW:cuckoo:
 
Cain is going to convince Americans that they should pay up to 16% in sales tax so that the wealthy and corporations only have to pay 9%?

Is America that stupid?
 
Swallow no there you go stating things about me you know nothing about
Hell no I was not pulling for him to go thru trillions with no results, do you know any-one what was?
He is a socialist
that's just a fact. As far as campaigning whats he he going campaign on?
he has a record now, this is not 2008

A socialist would not extend tax cuts, Sir. That makes no sense.

Taking tax payers wealth with out congress approving and ignoring BK law and giving that tax payers wealth to a private company, to pick the winners and losers in a free market event with cash that was not his to be giving, Gm and Chrysler defined BHO
Tax cuts have nothing to do with a socialist event as that was

You cannot find a better definition than that, and yes GWB sort of done the same thing. It was his intent for GM and Chrysler to go chapter 7, at the end of the day he had no right doing it either
It was not his place in life to have went over what congress said to do. It to me was his worst showing as president

But you single out President Obama as the "dreaded socialist" for continuing the same policies of both parties when it comes to bailouts.

Despite decades of free-market rhetoric from Republican and Democratic lawmakers, Washington has a long history of providing financial help to the private sector when the economic or political risk of a corporate collapse appeared too high.

News Analysis - A History of Public Aid During Crises - News Analysis - NYTimes.com

Does this not mean we are in fact a socialist nation?
 
YOU want a dose of reality?



493.gif
.
493.gif
.
493.gif
.
493.gif
.
493.gif
 
Cain is going to convince Americans that they should pay up to 16% in sales tax so that the wealthy and corporations only have to pay 9%?

Is America that stupid?

I own a corporation that makes 100,000
I spend 100,000 on that corporation in widgets that are taxed @ 9%
I have a salary of 100,000

Is that simple enough for you?
 
A socialist would not extend tax cuts, Sir. That makes no sense.

Taking tax payers wealth with out congress approving and ignoring BK law and giving that tax payers wealth to a private company, to pick the winners and losers in a free market event with cash that was not his to be giving, Gm and Chrysler defined BHO
Tax cuts have nothing to do with a socialist event as that was

You cannot find a better definition than that, and yes GWB sort of done the same thing. It was his intent for GM and Chrysler to go chapter 7, at the end of the day he had no right doing it either
It was not his place in life to have went over what congress said to do. It to me was his worst showing as president

But you single out President Obama as the "dreaded socialist" for continuing the same policies of both parties when it comes to bailouts.

Despite decades of free-market rhetoric from Republican and Democratic lawmakers, Washington has a long history of providing financial help to the private sector when the economic or political risk of a corporate collapse appeared too high.

News Analysis - A History of Public Aid During Crises - News Analysis - NYTimes.com

Does this not mean we are in fact a socialist nation?

Boo what BHO did with GM was not the same. Loaning a company that has assets money is one thing.
To take tax payers wealth an decide that GM and Chrysler is not going to fail and the reason there not going to fail is Obama takes tax payers wealth and GIVES it to them, look Boo GM and Chrysler were done
Toyota, Ford, Honda etc... should have reaped the reward the victor gets in that situation ans well as the bond holders of GM

Imagine you’re one of the bondholders of GM, the people who bought the automaker’s debt in order to invest in the company and keep it running over the last several years. Now that the company is near collapse, the Treasury offers you this deal. Even though you own $27 billion in GM bonds, you’d get 10% of the company. The UAW, which has a claim on $20 billion for its health-care and pensions obligations, would only have to sacrifice half of that to get 39%. The feds, who will invest another $9 billion to bring their total investment to the same level as your bonds, wants 51%.
UAW to get 39% of GM, Obama administration 50% … « Hot Air

it gets worse

The current offer is neither reasonable nor adequate. Both the union and the bondholders hold unsecured claims against GM. However, the union’s VEBA would receive a 50 percent recovery in cash and a 39 percent stake in a new GM for its $20 billion in obligations; while bondholders, who own more than $27 billion in GM bonds and have the same legal rights as the unions, would only receive a mere 10 percent of the restructured company and essentially no cash.

The offer was made unilaterally, without any prior discussion or negotiation with bondholders and in spite of repeated calls for dialogue.

Bondholders and GM have the same basic goal – to restructure the company in a consensual manner, thereby creating a leaner, more competitive GM. In order for GM to emerge from this restructuring process as a profitable entity, all stakeholders should be prepared to make deep, yet equitable, sacrifices. Bondholders remain willing to make such sacrifices and ask only that others do as well.
Statement From Screwed GM Bondholders | Sweetness & Light

None of this happens, Congress said no to it, and Obama ignored them(us) took OUR money and made this happen with a little help fro from Justice Ginsberg
 
There is some really silly Hard Right punksta nonsense here.

Only Romney stands a good chance of beating Obama, Perry a minor chance, no one else any chance.

You far righters are not helping matters with your nattering.

Romney will be nominated, end of story. Hopefully, he will beat Obama.

If the far right messes this up once again, you will never be permitted any say in GOP matters.


If Romney wins the Republican nod the Tea-folks will run one of their own. Shades of 92 I'd say........
 
JRK's sense of "economics" would have put us into the Greatest Depression fohevamoar.
 
Cain is going to convince Americans that they should pay up to 16% in sales tax so that the wealthy and corporations only have to pay 9%?

Is America that stupid?

I own a corporation that makes 100,000
I spend 100,000 on that corporation in widgets that are taxed @ 9%
I have a salary of 100,000

Is that simple enough for you?

Sounds stupid....go on
 
Cain is going to convince Americans that they should pay up to 16% in sales tax so that the wealthy and corporations only have to pay 9%?

Is America that stupid?

I own a corporation that makes 100,000
I spend 100,000 on that corporation in widgets that are taxed @ 9%
I have a salary of 100,000

Is that simple enough for you?

Sounds stupid....go on

Whats your solution?
I mean Obama is kicking ass.
Herman Cain gives the liberal what he is screaming for and they cannot even give it the time of day
lower income and middle man(person) pays little in taxes, the more you make, the more you pay
no loop holes
 
Last edited:
I have been told there are some who claim if Romney wins the tea party will run some-one
to start with, that individual would have to decide that, not no group of some-bodies. Let me remind all of you what happened in 2010 with congress
that was a landslide, a tea party landslide, not a country club republican landslide

Romney is getting further behind as the real candidate for the GOP picks up support. By Jan Romney will be gone, just like 08
Cain Leapfrogs Romney To Vault To Lead In Poll | Fox News
 
JRK remains delusional. A TP candidate in 2012 will lead to a landslide Democratic victory. Anybody who thinks that 15% of the electorate from the Hard Right is going to win is an idiot.
 
I have been told there are some who claim if Romney wins the tea party will run some-one
to start with, that individual would have to decide that, not no group of some-bodies. Let me remind all of you what happened in 2010 with congress
that was a landslide, a tea party landslide, not a country club republican landslide

Romney is getting further behind as the real candidate for the GOP picks up support. By Jan Romney will be gone, just like 08
Cain Leapfrogs Romney To Vault To Lead In Poll | Fox News

Tea Baggers will pay a price for driving the country to the brink of default and causing us to lose our credit rating

Tea Baggers have an even lower approval rating than Congress
 

Forum List

Back
Top