Poll: 63% expect Trump reelection, up from 43%

[francoHFW]

Everyone on the GOP propaganda machine spins everything. Do you need a diagram, super duper? And never a retraction of hundreds of totally phony scandals....

Spins everything? And democrats don't? I don't care for either party, they both spin, they both have serious flaws. I don't believe any poll, even if correct today, it could change tomorrow.

The point is you said your Pole man that 63% expected Trump to win and that is why your disgraceful propaganda machine said also. But actually the poll said 63% believed that Trump re-election was at least likely. That is called spin out of all recognition
.... A lie as usual.

no Democrats don't. And when they do it's a mistake and they apologize and retract. None of which Republicans seem to be able to do at any level.... That's why it's called propaganda. Everything you know is bulshit.

You have got to be kidding! The dems don't??? They make mistakes ON PURPOSE and don't apologize-see Blasey(who am I, who are you, where are we) Ford. We'll wait for THAT retraction. Look, I don't like either party and each side can tell me their guys would NEVER do anything wrong, but I won't believe that. Dirty is dirty and they are dirty.

I don't doubt her story. He is mediocre at best. It wasn't the Democrats idea... Law enforcement and journalists around the world agree with the Democrats and believe everything you know is garbage propaganda by the way. Breaking for dupes semicolon Hillary Obama and Democrats are honest. All your phony scandals go nowhere in the real world... And no it is not a giant conspiracy of every respected person in the world LOL

You believe Ford? Really? Really?

She is a very respected woman and yes I do. The non brainwashed are like that....

But her story is also growing less believable by the day. Here are eight reasons why it’s hardly “anti-woman” for senators to question her account at Thursday’s hearing:

1) For starters, Ford still can’t recall basic details of what she says was the most traumatic event in her life. Not where the “assault” took place — she’s not sure whose house it was, or even what street it was on. Nor when — she’s not even sure of the year, let alone the day and month.

Ford’s not certain how old she was or what grade she was in when she says an older student violently molested her. (But she doesn’t plead inebriation: She described having just “one beer” at the party.)

2) Ford concedes she told no one what happened to her at the time, not even her best friend or mother. That means she can rely on no contemporaneous witness to corroborate her story.

3) Worse, the four other people she identified as attending the party, including Kavanaugh, all deny knowledge of the gathering in question, including Leland Ingham Keyser, who she calls a “lifelong friend.”

Keyser’s lawyer told the Senate Judiciary Committee: “Simply put, Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with or without Dr. Ford.”

The other two potential witnesses — Mark Judge and Patrick “P.J.” Smyth — also deny any recollection of attending such a party. The committee took their sworn statements “under penalty of perjury.” “These witnesses directly contradict Professor Ford’s allegations against Judge Kavanaugh,” Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley advised Ford’s attorneys last week.

FOLLOW THE STORY


In her original letter to Sen. Dianne Feinstein, Ford claimed that Kavanaugh talked to Keyser and Smyth right after he assaulted her. Yet neither shares her memory.

This is, to say the least, highly problematic for her case. No witness corroborates any part of her story.

4) Her own immediate family doesn’t appear to be backing her up, either. Her mother, father and two siblings are all conspicuously absent from a letter of support released by a dozen relatives, mostly on her husband’s side of the family.

The letter attests to her honesty and integrity. “Why didn’t her parents and brothers sign the letter?” a congressional source familiar with the investigation wondered.

5) This summer, Ford tried to reach out to old friends from high school and college to jog her memory. They couldn’t help her. “I’ve been trying to forget this all my life, and now I’m supposed to remember every little detail,” Ford complained to one friend in July, according to an account in The San Jose Mercury News.

6) Yet she still pushed forward with her bombshell charge, contacting The Washington Post tip line and Democratic lawmakers, while hiring a Democratic activist lawyer. Ford is also a Democrat, as well as an anti-Trump marcher, raising questions about the motive and timing of the allegations along with their veracity.

7) Ford contends that notes her therapist took in 2012 corroborate her account. But they don’t mention Kavanaugh.

They also point up inconsistencies in her story. For instance, her shrink noted that Ford told her there were “four boys” in the bedroom, not two as she now says. The notes also indicate Ford said she was in her “late teens” when she was assaulted. But Ford now says she may have been only 15.

8) In another inconsistency, Ford told The Washington Post she was upset when Trump won in 2016, because Kavanaugh was mentioned as a Supreme Court pick. But Kavanaugh wasn’t added to Trump’s list of possibles until November 2017, a full year later.

On top of all that, Kavanaugh “unequivocally denied Dr. Ford’s allegations . . . under penalty of perjury” during a Sept. 17 interview with committee lawyers, Grassley said, adding he was “forthright and emphatic in his testimony” and “fully answered all questions.”

The sworn interview will no doubt be used to test the consistency and veracity of his public statements Thursday.

Yet Democrats have already tried and convicted Kavanaugh of sexual assault. Without hard evidence, without substantiation, some even go beyond Ford’s claims to call him an out-and-out “rapist,” “sexual predator,” even a “child predator.”

As a result, Kavanaugh and his family, “including his two young daughters, have faced serious death threats and vicious assaults,” Grassley said. “And they’re getting worse each day.”

Ford, who also has received threats, is by all accounts a respected scientific researcher in the field of psychology with an impressive pedigree. While that makes her credible, the same can’t be said for her story. Unless she can fill in the many holes, Kavanaugh still deserves the presumption of innocence.
8 good reasons from the New York Post. I also saw some racy pictures she posted at her "rape" age, but that would be accusing her of something without presumption of innocence.

Source?

 

[Third Party]

Spins everything? And democrats don't? I don't care for either party, they both spin, they both have serious flaws. I don't believe any poll, even if correct today, it could change tomorrow.

The point is you said your Pole man that 63% expected Trump to win and that is why your disgraceful propaganda machine said also. But actually the poll said 63% believed that Trump re-election was at least likely. That is called spin out of all recognition
.... A lie as usual.

You have got to be kidding! The dems don't??? They make mistakes ON PURPOSE and don't apologize-see Blasey(who am I, who are you, where are we) Ford. We'll wait for THAT retraction. Look, I don't like either party and each side can tell me their guys would NEVER do anything wrong, but I won't believe that. Dirty is dirty and they are dirty.

I don't doubt her story. He is mediocre at best. It wasn't the Democrats idea... Law enforcement and journalists around the world agree with the Democrats and believe everything you know is garbage propaganda by the way. Breaking for dupes semicolon Hillary Obama and Democrats are honest. All your phony scandals go nowhere in the real world... And no it is not a giant conspiracy of every respected person in the world LOL

You believe Ford? Really? Really?

She is a very respected woman and yes I do. The non brainwashed are like that....

But her story is also growing less believable by the day. Here are eight reasons why it’s hardly “anti-woman” for senators to question her account at Thursday’s hearing:

1) For starters, Ford still can’t recall basic details of what she says was the most traumatic event in her life. Not where the “assault” took place — she’s not sure whose house it was, or even what street it was on. Nor when — she’s not even sure of the year, let alone the day and month.

Ford’s not certain how old she was or what grade she was in when she says an older student violently molested her. (But she doesn’t plead inebriation: She described having just “one beer” at the party.)

2) Ford concedes she told no one what happened to her at the time, not even her best friend or mother. That means she can rely on no contemporaneous witness to corroborate her story.

3) Worse, the four other people she identified as attending the party, including Kavanaugh, all deny knowledge of the gathering in question, including Leland Ingham Keyser, who she calls a “lifelong friend.”

Keyser’s lawyer told the Senate Judiciary Committee: “Simply put, Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with or without Dr. Ford.”

The other two potential witnesses — Mark Judge and Patrick “P.J.” Smyth — also deny any recollection of attending such a party. The committee took their sworn statements “under penalty of perjury.” “These witnesses directly contradict Professor Ford’s allegations against Judge Kavanaugh,” Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley advised Ford’s attorneys last week.

FOLLOW THE STORY


In her original letter to Sen. Dianne Feinstein, Ford claimed that Kavanaugh talked to Keyser and Smyth right after he assaulted her. Yet neither shares her memory.

This is, to say the least, highly problematic for her case. No witness corroborates any part of her story.

4) Her own immediate family doesn’t appear to be backing her up, either. Her mother, father and two siblings are all conspicuously absent from a letter of support released by a dozen relatives, mostly on her husband’s side of the family.

The letter attests to her honesty and integrity. “Why didn’t her parents and brothers sign the letter?” a congressional source familiar with the investigation wondered.

5) This summer, Ford tried to reach out to old friends from high school and college to jog her memory. They couldn’t help her. “I’ve been trying to forget this all my life, and now I’m supposed to remember every little detail,” Ford complained to one friend in July, according to an account in The San Jose Mercury News.

6) Yet she still pushed forward with her bombshell charge, contacting The Washington Post tip line and Democratic lawmakers, while hiring a Democratic activist lawyer. Ford is also a Democrat, as well as an anti-Trump marcher, raising questions about the motive and timing of the allegations along with their veracity.

7) Ford contends that notes her therapist took in 2012 corroborate her account. But they don’t mention Kavanaugh.

They also point up inconsistencies in her story. For instance, her shrink noted that Ford told her there were “four boys” in the bedroom, not two as she now says. The notes also indicate Ford said she was in her “late teens” when she was assaulted. But Ford now says she may have been only 15.

8) In another inconsistency, Ford told The Washington Post she was upset when Trump won in 2016, because Kavanaugh was mentioned as a Supreme Court pick. But Kavanaugh wasn’t added to Trump’s list of possibles until November 2017, a full year later.

On top of all that, Kavanaugh “unequivocally denied Dr. Ford’s allegations . . . under penalty of perjury” during a Sept. 17 interview with committee lawyers, Grassley said, adding he was “forthright and emphatic in his testimony” and “fully answered all questions.”

The sworn interview will no doubt be used to test the consistency and veracity of his public statements Thursday.

Yet Democrats have already tried and convicted Kavanaugh of sexual assault. Without hard evidence, without substantiation, some even go beyond Ford’s claims to call him an out-and-out “rapist,” “sexual predator,” even a “child predator.”

As a result, Kavanaugh and his family, “including his two young daughters, have faced serious death threats and vicious assaults,” Grassley said. “And they’re getting worse each day.”

Ford, who also has received threats, is by all accounts a respected scientific researcher in the field of psychology with an impressive pedigree. While that makes her credible, the same can’t be said for her story. Unless she can fill in the many holes, Kavanaugh still deserves the presumption of innocence.
8 good reasons from the New York Post. I also saw some racy pictures she posted at her "rape" age, but that would be accusing her of something without presumption of innocence.

Source?

Washington Post

 

[hadit]

Are you saying EVERYBODY? Or just some? And everything? Or just some things?

Everyone on the GOP propaganda machine spins everything. Do you need a diagram, super duper? And never a retraction of hundreds of totally phony scandals....

Spins everything? And democrats don't? I don't care for either party, they both spin, they both have serious flaws. I don't believe any poll, even if correct today, it could change tomorrow.

The point is you said your Pole man that 63% expected Trump to win and that is why your disgraceful propaganda machine said also. But actually the poll said 63% believed that Trump re-election was at least likely. That is called spin out of all recognition
.... A lie as usual.

Spins everything? And democrats don't? I don't care for either party, they both spin, they both have serious flaws. I don't believe any poll, even if correct today, it could change tomorrow.

no Democrats don't. And when they do it's a mistake and they apologize and retract. None of which Republicans seem to be able to do at any level.... That's why it's called propaganda. Everything you know is bulshit.

You have got to be kidding! The dems don't??? They make mistakes ON PURPOSE and don't apologize-see Blasey(who am I, who are you, where are we) Ford. We'll wait for THAT retraction. Look, I don't like either party and each side can tell me their guys would NEVER do anything wrong, but I won't believe that. Dirty is dirty and they are dirty.

I don't doubt her story. He is mediocre at best. It wasn't the Democrats idea... Law enforcement and journalists around the world agree with the Democrats and believe everything you know is garbage propaganda by the way. Breaking for dupes semicolon Hillary Obama and Democrats are honest. All your phony scandals go nowhere in the real world... And no it is not a giant conspiracy of every respected person in the world LOL

You believe Ford? Really? Really?

She is a very respected woman and yes I do. The non brainwashed are like that....

Very respected? Where, and by whom? Let me guess, international journalists and law enforcement propagandists.

 

[sparky]

Don't we always give the biggest tard a 2nd shot here? ~S~

 

[Terri4Trump]

Don't we always give the biggest tard a 2nd shot here? ~S~

You mean Biden, who ran back in the 80's ?

Presidents with the current great economy always get re-elected, with one exception: Bush the Elder. He got shafted by Ross Perot.

 

[francoHFW]

The point is you said your Pole man that 63% expected Trump to win and that is why your disgraceful propaganda machine said also. But actually the poll said 63% believed that Trump re-election was at least likely. That is called spin out of all recognition
.... A lie as usual.
I don't doubt her story. He is mediocre at best. It wasn't the Democrats idea... Law enforcement and journalists around the world agree with the Democrats and believe everything you know is garbage propaganda by the way. Breaking for dupes semicolon Hillary Obama and Democrats are honest. All your phony scandals go nowhere in the real world... And no it is not a giant conspiracy of every respected person in the world LOL

You believe Ford? Really? Really?

She is a very respected woman and yes I do. The non brainwashed are like that....

But her story is also growing less believable by the day. Here are eight reasons why it’s hardly “anti-woman” for senators to question her account at Thursday’s hearing:

1) For starters, Ford still can’t recall basic details of what she says was the most traumatic event in her life. Not where the “assault” took place — she’s not sure whose house it was, or even what street it was on. Nor when — she’s not even sure of the year, let alone the day and month.

Ford’s not certain how old she was or what grade she was in when she says an older student violently molested her. (But she doesn’t plead inebriation: She described having just “one beer” at the party.)

2) Ford concedes she told no one what happened to her at the time, not even her best friend or mother. That means she can rely on no contemporaneous witness to corroborate her story.

3) Worse, the four other people she identified as attending the party, including Kavanaugh, all deny knowledge of the gathering in question, including Leland Ingham Keyser, who she calls a “lifelong friend.”

Keyser’s lawyer told the Senate Judiciary Committee: “Simply put, Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with or without Dr. Ford.”

The other two potential witnesses — Mark Judge and Patrick “P.J.” Smyth — also deny any recollection of attending such a party. The committee took their sworn statements “under penalty of perjury.” “These witnesses directly contradict Professor Ford’s allegations against Judge Kavanaugh,” Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley advised Ford’s attorneys last week.

FOLLOW THE STORY


In her original letter to Sen. Dianne Feinstein, Ford claimed that Kavanaugh talked to Keyser and Smyth right after he assaulted her. Yet neither shares her memory.

This is, to say the least, highly problematic for her case. No witness corroborates any part of her story.

4) Her own immediate family doesn’t appear to be backing her up, either. Her mother, father and two siblings are all conspicuously absent from a letter of support released by a dozen relatives, mostly on her husband’s side of the family.

The letter attests to her honesty and integrity. “Why didn’t her parents and brothers sign the letter?” a congressional source familiar with the investigation wondered.

5) This summer, Ford tried to reach out to old friends from high school and college to jog her memory. They couldn’t help her. “I’ve been trying to forget this all my life, and now I’m supposed to remember every little detail,” Ford complained to one friend in July, according to an account in The San Jose Mercury News.

6) Yet she still pushed forward with her bombshell charge, contacting The Washington Post tip line and Democratic lawmakers, while hiring a Democratic activist lawyer. Ford is also a Democrat, as well as an anti-Trump marcher, raising questions about the motive and timing of the allegations along with their veracity.

7) Ford contends that notes her therapist took in 2012 corroborate her account. But they don’t mention Kavanaugh.

They also point up inconsistencies in her story. For instance, her shrink noted that Ford told her there were “four boys” in the bedroom, not two as she now says. The notes also indicate Ford said she was in her “late teens” when she was assaulted. But Ford now says she may have been only 15.

8) In another inconsistency, Ford told The Washington Post she was upset when Trump won in 2016, because Kavanaugh was mentioned as a Supreme Court pick. But Kavanaugh wasn’t added to Trump’s list of possibles until November 2017, a full year later.

On top of all that, Kavanaugh “unequivocally denied Dr. Ford’s allegations . . . under penalty of perjury” during a Sept. 17 interview with committee lawyers, Grassley said, adding he was “forthright and emphatic in his testimony” and “fully answered all questions.”

The sworn interview will no doubt be used to test the consistency and veracity of his public statements Thursday.

Yet Democrats have already tried and convicted Kavanaugh of sexual assault. Without hard evidence, without substantiation, some even go beyond Ford’s claims to call him an out-and-out “rapist,” “sexual predator,” even a “child predator.”

As a result, Kavanaugh and his family, “including his two young daughters, have faced serious death threats and vicious assaults,” Grassley said. “And they’re getting worse each day.”

Ford, who also has received threats, is by all accounts a respected scientific researcher in the field of psychology with an impressive pedigree. While that makes her credible, the same can’t be said for her story. Unless she can fill in the many holes, Kavanaugh still deserves the presumption of innocence.
8 good reasons from the New York Post. I also saw some racy pictures she posted at her "rape" age, but that would be accusing her of something without presumption of innocence.

Source?

Washington Post

New York Post you mean, which is pretty much fos with the spin...

 

[francoHFW]

Everyone on the GOP propaganda machine spins everything. Do you need a diagram, super duper? And never a retraction of hundreds of totally phony scandals....

Spins everything? And democrats don't? I don't care for either party, they both spin, they both have serious flaws. I don't believe any poll, even if correct today, it could change tomorrow.

The point is you said your Pole man that 63% expected Trump to win and that is why your disgraceful propaganda machine said also. But actually the poll said 63% believed that Trump re-election was at least likely. That is called spin out of all recognition
.... A lie as usual.

no Democrats don't. And when they do it's a mistake and they apologize and retract. None of which Republicans seem to be able to do at any level.... That's why it's called propaganda. Everything you know is bulshit.

You have got to be kidding! The dems don't??? They make mistakes ON PURPOSE and don't apologize-see Blasey(who am I, who are you, where are we) Ford. We'll wait for THAT retraction. Look, I don't like either party and each side can tell me their guys would NEVER do anything wrong, but I won't believe that. Dirty is dirty and they are dirty.

I don't doubt her story. He is mediocre at best. It wasn't the Democrats idea... Law enforcement and journalists around the world agree with the Democrats and believe everything you know is garbage propaganda by the way. Breaking for dupes semicolon Hillary Obama and Democrats are honest. All your phony scandals go nowhere in the real world... And no it is not a giant conspiracy of every respected person in the world LOL

You believe Ford? Really? Really?

She is a very respected woman and yes I do. The non brainwashed are like that....

Very respected? Where, and by whom? Let me guess, international journalists and law enforcement propagandists.

all respected journalists and law enforcement outside your bubble of dumb, brainwashed functional moron. Kavanaugh's little assault seems to have really bothered her LOL

 

[Stormy Daniels]

Poll: 63% expect Trump reelection, up from 43%
Poll: 63% expect Trump reelection, up from 43%

A growing number of Americans, now a substantial majority, believe that President Trump is at least “somewhat likely” to win reelection, according to a new survey.
Despite nonstop negative headlines and concerns of an economic stall, 63% believe Trump is heading to reelection in Scott Rasmussen’s latest 2020 poll.

ME: I have known this for a while. Trump will win,. Many stories using many models predict this.

Only 63%? That's surprising. From the looks of it, about 90% of Democrats believe Donald will be re-elected, which is why they are constantly having panicked meltdowns about it.

 

[Third Party]

You believe Ford? Really? Really?

She is a very respected woman and yes I do. The non brainwashed are like that....

But her story is also growing less believable by the day. Here are eight reasons why it’s hardly “anti-woman” for senators to question her account at Thursday’s hearing:

1) For starters, Ford still can’t recall basic details of what she says was the most traumatic event in her life. Not where the “assault” took place — she’s not sure whose house it was, or even what street it was on. Nor when — she’s not even sure of the year, let alone the day and month.

Ford’s not certain how old she was or what grade she was in when she says an older student violently molested her. (But she doesn’t plead inebriation: She described having just “one beer” at the party.)

2) Ford concedes she told no one what happened to her at the time, not even her best friend or mother. That means she can rely on no contemporaneous witness to corroborate her story.

3) Worse, the four other people she identified as attending the party, including Kavanaugh, all deny knowledge of the gathering in question, including Leland Ingham Keyser, who she calls a “lifelong friend.”

Keyser’s lawyer told the Senate Judiciary Committee: “Simply put, Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with or without Dr. Ford.”

The other two potential witnesses — Mark Judge and Patrick “P.J.” Smyth — also deny any recollection of attending such a party. The committee took their sworn statements “under penalty of perjury.” “These witnesses directly contradict Professor Ford’s allegations against Judge Kavanaugh,” Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley advised Ford’s attorneys last week.

FOLLOW THE STORY


In her original letter to Sen. Dianne Feinstein, Ford claimed that Kavanaugh talked to Keyser and Smyth right after he assaulted her. Yet neither shares her memory.

This is, to say the least, highly problematic for her case. No witness corroborates any part of her story.

4) Her own immediate family doesn’t appear to be backing her up, either. Her mother, father and two siblings are all conspicuously absent from a letter of support released by a dozen relatives, mostly on her husband’s side of the family.

The letter attests to her honesty and integrity. “Why didn’t her parents and brothers sign the letter?” a congressional source familiar with the investigation wondered.

5) This summer, Ford tried to reach out to old friends from high school and college to jog her memory. They couldn’t help her. “I’ve been trying to forget this all my life, and now I’m supposed to remember every little detail,” Ford complained to one friend in July, according to an account in The San Jose Mercury News.

6) Yet she still pushed forward with her bombshell charge, contacting The Washington Post tip line and Democratic lawmakers, while hiring a Democratic activist lawyer. Ford is also a Democrat, as well as an anti-Trump marcher, raising questions about the motive and timing of the allegations along with their veracity.

7) Ford contends that notes her therapist took in 2012 corroborate her account. But they don’t mention Kavanaugh.

They also point up inconsistencies in her story. For instance, her shrink noted that Ford told her there were “four boys” in the bedroom, not two as she now says. The notes also indicate Ford said she was in her “late teens” when she was assaulted. But Ford now says she may have been only 15.

8) In another inconsistency, Ford told The Washington Post she was upset when Trump won in 2016, because Kavanaugh was mentioned as a Supreme Court pick. But Kavanaugh wasn’t added to Trump’s list of possibles until November 2017, a full year later.

On top of all that, Kavanaugh “unequivocally denied Dr. Ford’s allegations . . . under penalty of perjury” during a Sept. 17 interview with committee lawyers, Grassley said, adding he was “forthright and emphatic in his testimony” and “fully answered all questions.”

The sworn interview will no doubt be used to test the consistency and veracity of his public statements Thursday.

Yet Democrats have already tried and convicted Kavanaugh of sexual assault. Without hard evidence, without substantiation, some even go beyond Ford’s claims to call him an out-and-out “rapist,” “sexual predator,” even a “child predator.”

As a result, Kavanaugh and his family, “including his two young daughters, have faced serious death threats and vicious assaults,” Grassley said. “And they’re getting worse each day.”

Ford, who also has received threats, is by all accounts a respected scientific researcher in the field of psychology with an impressive pedigree. While that makes her credible, the same can’t be said for her story. Unless she can fill in the many holes, Kavanaugh still deserves the presumption of innocence.
8 good reasons from the New York Post. I also saw some racy pictures she posted at her "rape" age, but that would be accusing her of something without presumption of innocence.

Source?

Washington Post

New York Post you mean, which is pretty much fos with the spin...

We all have our opinion, but I personally have never seen a weaker witness.

 

[Third Party]

Spins everything? And democrats don't? I don't care for either party, they both spin, they both have serious flaws. I don't believe any poll, even if correct today, it could change tomorrow.

The point is you said your Pole man that 63% expected Trump to win and that is why your disgraceful propaganda machine said also. But actually the poll said 63% believed that Trump re-election was at least likely. That is called spin out of all recognition
.... A lie as usual.

You have got to be kidding! The dems don't??? They make mistakes ON PURPOSE and don't apologize-see Blasey(who am I, who are you, where are we) Ford. We'll wait for THAT retraction. Look, I don't like either party and each side can tell me their guys would NEVER do anything wrong, but I won't believe that. Dirty is dirty and they are dirty.

I don't doubt her story. He is mediocre at best. It wasn't the Democrats idea... Law enforcement and journalists around the world agree with the Democrats and believe everything you know is garbage propaganda by the way. Breaking for dupes semicolon Hillary Obama and Democrats are honest. All your phony scandals go nowhere in the real world... And no it is not a giant conspiracy of every respected person in the world LOL

You believe Ford? Really? Really?

She is a very respected woman and yes I do. The non brainwashed are like that....

Very respected? Where, and by whom? Let me guess, international journalists and law enforcement propagandists.

all respected journalists and law enforcement outside your bubble of dumb, brainwashed functional moron. Kavanaugh's little assault seems to have really bothered her LOL

She was a sex kitten as a teen, a drugee as an adult, and addled as an elderly lady. The people propping her up were as political as could be-Feinstein,Lying "DaNang Dick Blumenthal", and Avennatti. Sorry, they just don't pass the smell test.

 

[hadit]

Spins everything? And democrats don't? I don't care for either party, they both spin, they both have serious flaws. I don't believe any poll, even if correct today, it could change tomorrow.

The point is you said your Pole man that 63% expected Trump to win and that is why your disgraceful propaganda machine said also. But actually the poll said 63% believed that Trump re-election was at least likely. That is called spin out of all recognition
.... A lie as usual.

You have got to be kidding! The dems don't??? They make mistakes ON PURPOSE and don't apologize-see Blasey(who am I, who are you, where are we) Ford. We'll wait for THAT retraction. Look, I don't like either party and each side can tell me their guys would NEVER do anything wrong, but I won't believe that. Dirty is dirty and they are dirty.

I don't doubt her story. He is mediocre at best. It wasn't the Democrats idea... Law enforcement and journalists around the world agree with the Democrats and believe everything you know is garbage propaganda by the way. Breaking for dupes semicolon Hillary Obama and Democrats are honest. All your phony scandals go nowhere in the real world... And no it is not a giant conspiracy of every respected person in the world LOL

You believe Ford? Really? Really?

She is a very respected woman and yes I do. The non brainwashed are like that....

Very respected? Where, and by whom? Let me guess, international journalists and law enforcement propagandists.

all respected journalists and law enforcement outside your bubble of dumb, brainwashed functional moron. Kavanaugh's little assault seems to have really bothered her LOL

IOW, exactly what I predicted. You're easy to control.

 

[francoHFW]

Poll: 63% expect Trump reelection, up from 43%
Poll: 63% expect Trump reelection, up from 43%

A growing number of Americans, now a substantial majority, believe that President Trump is at least “somewhat likely” to win reelection, according to a new survey.
Despite nonstop negative headlines and concerns of an economic stall, 63% believe Trump is heading to reelection in Scott Rasmussen’s latest 2020 poll.

ME: I have known this for a while. Trump will win,. Many stories using many models predict this.

Only 63%? That's surprising. From the looks of it, about 90% of Democrats believe Donald will be re-elected, which is why they are constantly having panicked meltdowns about it.

Actually read the link 63% said it was at least likely that he could win LOL not the same thing at all. And there you have GOP spin of absolutely nothing as usual....

 

[Terri4Trump]

O! M! G!
CNN says: 2020 Poll: Rising share expect Trump to win a second term - CNNPolitics

That's twice now in a couple of weeks that CNN told the truth. WTF

 

[francoHFW]

The point is you said your Pole man that 63% expected Trump to win and that is why your disgraceful propaganda machine said also. But actually the poll said 63% believed that Trump re-election was at least likely. That is called spin out of all recognition
.... A lie as usual.
I don't doubt her story. He is mediocre at best. It wasn't the Democrats idea... Law enforcement and journalists around the world agree with the Democrats and believe everything you know is garbage propaganda by the way. Breaking for dupes semicolon Hillary Obama and Democrats are honest. All your phony scandals go nowhere in the real world... And no it is not a giant conspiracy of every respected person in the world LOL

You believe Ford? Really? Really?

She is a very respected woman and yes I do. The non brainwashed are like that....

Very respected? Where, and by whom? Let me guess, international journalists and law enforcement propagandists.

all respected journalists and law enforcement outside your bubble of dumb, brainwashed functional moron. Kavanaugh's little assault seems to have really bothered her LOL

IOW, exactly what I predicted. You're easy to control.

not propagandists, law enforcement and journalist, dumbass. You are the only people with a propaganda machine in the modern world that I know of. Pure crap everybody knows it except people who believe it 25% of the United States in the entire world dumbass.

 

[Third Party]

O! M! G!
CNN says: 2020 Poll: Rising share expect Trump to win a second term - CNNPolitics

That's twice now in a couple of weeks that CNN told the truth. WTF

They got a new guy in the control booth

 

[Third Party]

You believe Ford? Really? Really?

She is a very respected woman and yes I do. The non brainwashed are like that....

Very respected? Where, and by whom? Let me guess, international journalists and law enforcement propagandists.

all respected journalists and law enforcement outside your bubble of dumb, brainwashed functional moron. Kavanaugh's little assault seems to have really bothered her LOL

IOW, exactly what I predicted. You're easy to control.

not propagandists, law enforcement and journalist, dumbass. You are the only people with a propaganda machine in the modern world that I know of. Pure crap everybody knows it except people who believe it 25% of the United States in the entire world dumbass.

I don't care about the so called experts on either side. I just refuse to believe the crap she was dishing out. If I were on a jury, she would be found guilty-not him. And, not for nothing, strong rumor has it she did it just to stop Roe v Wade from being overturned. Sad.

 

[hadit]

You believe Ford? Really? Really?

She is a very respected woman and yes I do. The non brainwashed are like that....

Very respected? Where, and by whom? Let me guess, international journalists and law enforcement propagandists.

all respected journalists and law enforcement outside your bubble of dumb, brainwashed functional moron. Kavanaugh's little assault seems to have really bothered her LOL

IOW, exactly what I predicted. You're easy to control.

not propagandists, law enforcement and journalist, dumbass. You are the only people with a propaganda machine in the modern world that I know of. Pure crap everybody knows it except people who believe it 25% of the United States in the entire world dumbass.

How accurate are American talking heads when they talk about society in other countries? Not very, because they don't live there. So what do they rely on? Voices from those those countries.

Likewise, how accurate are talking heads from other countries when they talk about American society? Not very, because they don't live here. So what do they rely on? Voices from America. And what do the majority of American talking heads say about American society? Why, exactly the same propaganda you already believe. It's a closed loop. They hear it from liberal American talking heads, repeat it back to you and you wet your pants over it.

 

[Terri4Trump]

O! M! G!
CNN says: 2020 Poll: Rising share expect Trump to win a second term - CNNPolitics

That's twice now in a couple of weeks that CNN told the truth. WTF

They got a new guy in the control booth

LOL. A mole.

 

[Terri4Trump]

Poll: 63% expect Trump reelection, up from 43%
Poll: 63% expect Trump reelection, up from 43%

A growing number of Americans, now a substantial majority, believe that President Trump is at least “somewhat likely” to win reelection, according to a new survey.
Despite nonstop negative headlines and concerns of an economic stall, 63% believe Trump is heading to reelection in Scott Rasmussen’s latest 2020 poll.

ME: I have known this for a while. Trump will win,. Many stories using many models predict this.