Play stupid games, win stupid prizes

LinkedIn co-founder backs $35 million voter data project in 'existential threat' to Democratic Party

"— database that would store all of the progressive community’s voter data, according to three sources familiar with the initiative.....The DNC’s top leaders have been telling people that Hoffman’s project represents an “existential threat” to the party, according to two sources with knowledge of the discussion"

Golfing Gator

according to two sources with knowledge of the discussion"

Odd that you do not question such things when they are about the Dems, but if two two sources with knowledge of the discussion said something about Trump you would call it fake.

Your party loyalty keeps you from having any rational thought
 
Yeah, because we want to open the door to allowing legislation to change the Electoral College.


Does anyone think anything through anymore? It's like the term "Unintended Consequences," was never uttered anywhere at any time.

Jeezus. Let's just open the door for everyone to change the foundation of our system.

And for what? A Marxist attempt to remove a political enemy that will be overturned by the SCOTUS.
 
Odd that you do not question such things when they are about the Dems, but if two two sources with knowledge of the discussion said something about Trump you would call it fake.

Your party loyalty keeps you from having any rational thought

Sure. Your TDS makes you sounds silly.
 
That proposed bill should await the re-election of President Trump and his re-Inauguration.

It should also add another provision excepting from its reach any invocation of the 14th Amendment which has been affirmed by the SCOTUS.

And that assumes it should be passed at all.
 

U.S. Rep. Clay Higgins (R-LA) introduced the “Presidential Ballot Integrity Act,” aiming to bar electors from states that remove a major party’s candidate from the presidential ballot.

This bill would amend the Electoral Count Act of 1887, stating that the vote of an elector from a state shall not be counted if the state did not include the major party’s nominee for president on the ballot.

I still think more should be done to go after activist judges trying to manipulate and election.

Not good enough.

Try again.

This would be unconstitutional.
 

Forum List

Back
Top