- Moderator
- #61
absolute nutter talk
Yet it's coming from the left in this thread. Go figure.
This President is going to be going down in history as one of the most corrupt administrations in history before he is through.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
absolute nutter talk
Yeah, but I don't think they read your emails as a matter of course. They interview neighbors, friends, relatives, etc. and check your background. The FBI only started reading P's emails when the other other woman started complaining of being harassed.By running to Cantor (why him is I think a very important question....why not someone on the intelligence committee?) and then Cantor contacting the FBI made it beyond likely that now the cat was out of the bag and the FBI had to do something formally. So the timing has more to do with the FBI "whistleblower" and his vendetta than any other factor.
Well, the FBI investigations I'm speaking of are the ones that are (or at least should be done) to all Presidential Nominations. At least I think that is still the SOP for these things.
Isn't there an FBI background check for people who are going to be part of the NSA not to mention the head of the CIA?
What leads you to think this has anything to do with Obama. The facts so far seem to point to the FBI knowing about it, deciding there was no criminal behavior, and dropping it. Then an FBI agent with a hardon for Petraeus (fueled by jealousy perhaps) tells Eric Cantor, who several days later calls (or has a staffer call) the FBI to make sure they know.
Well, for starters obamalamadingdong stuck his nose in this morning and said Petraues didn't have to testify, the stand in could do it. That's pretty damn telling in and of its self. He's got some serious skin in this game. Serious.
What leads you to think this has anything to do with Obama. The facts so far seem to point to the FBI knowing about it, deciding there was no criminal behavior, and dropping it. Then an FBI agent with a hardon for Petraeus (fueled by jealousy perhaps) tells Eric Cantor, who several days later calls (or has a staffer call) the FBI to make sure they know.
"IF" the POTUS didn't know, well that in and of itself is unacceptable.
Again, I do not think it happened but it sure sounds like a case of either the FBI dropping the ball or the White House and Senate leadership looking the other way.
By running to Cantor (why him is I think a very important question....why not someone on the intelligence committee?) and then Cantor contacting the FBI made it beyond likely that now the cat was out of the bag and the FBI had to do something formally. So the timing has more to do with the FBI "whistleblower" and his vendetta than any other factor.
Well, the FBI investigations I'm speaking of are the ones that are (or at least should be done) to all Presidential Nominations. At least I think that is still the SOP for these things.
Isn't there an FBI background check for people who are going to be part of the NSA not to mention the head of the CIA?
Yeah....they must have ordered the el cheapo version of the background check.
Which Republican has the bigger binder full of women: Romney or Petraeus?
Regards from Rosie
Yeah....they must have ordered the el cheapo version of the background check.
Yeah, Patraeus is taking the fall to protect Obama and Hillary.
Same old same old.
Wait! You saying it was Obama and Hillary having the affair and not Patraeus?????
If there is no compelling reason for the FBI to read someone's emails then they cannot lawfully read someone's emails. They had the compelling reason to do so when it appeared the harassing emails were coming from P's email account.Yeah, but I don't think they read your emails as a matter of course. They interview neighbors, friends, relatives, etc. and check your background. The FBI only started reading P's emails when the other other woman started complaining of being harassed.Well, the FBI investigations I'm speaking of are the ones that are (or at least should be done) to all Presidential Nominations. At least I think that is still the SOP for these things.
Isn't there an FBI background check for people who are going to be part of the NSA not to mention the head of the CIA?
Okay...if they simply were not looking under every rock that would settle it from the standpoint of the FBI knowing X about the DCI nominee, telling the Executive and Senate Leadership and their ignoring the infomation.
But that seems like a pretty big rock not to look under.
Then again, maybe the FBI relies on previous vettings that may have been done by the DoD and the Army specifically...
What leads you to think this has anything to do with Obama. The facts so far seem to point to the FBI knowing about it, deciding there was no criminal behavior, and dropping it. Then an FBI agent with a hardon for Petraeus (fueled by jealousy perhaps) tells Eric Cantor, who several days later calls (or has a staffer call) the FBI to make sure they know.
"IF" the POTUS didn't know, well that in and of itself is unacceptable.
Why would he know who was having an affair? Jesus, you people are a riot.
What leads you to think this has anything to do with Obama. The facts so far seem to point to the FBI knowing about it, deciding there was no criminal behavior, and dropping it. Then an FBI agent with a hardon for Petraeus (fueled by jealousy perhaps) tells Eric Cantor, who several days later calls (or has a staffer call) the FBI to make sure they know.
"IF" the POTUS didn't know, well that in and of itself is unacceptable.
Why would he know who was having an affair? Jesus, you people are a riot.
absolute nutter talk
Yet it's coming from the left in this thread. Go figure.
This President is going to be going down in history as one of the most corrupt administrations in history before he is through.
He'd have a long way to go to top Reagan.
Yeah, Patraeus is taking the fall to protect Obama and Hillary.
Same old same old.
He didn't take a "fall"..
He took a roll in the hay..
I don't see how the Petraeus scandal has anything to do with Obama. Benghazi is a completely different issue. Obama is lying through his teeth in that one. Why did Obama and his administration point to a YouTube video when he knew it was a coordinated attack? Will we ever get an honest answer?