Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Pelosi's district is 100% urban educated dummies.
Is there a problem with living in the city? Oh! I forgot, you are only a true American if you live in a small town.
Pelosi's district is 100% urban educated dummies.
Is there a problem with living in the city? Oh! I forgot, you are only a true American if you live in a small town.
No the problem is us taxpayers paying damn near 19 grand for an apartment ya dumbass!
and the elite just keep eatin' our meat.
San Francisco is a high-rent city. Just ask Nancy Pelosi.
The House Speaker's district office in the new federal building in San Francisco costs a whopping $18,736 a month -- the highest rental paid by any member of the House -- or, more precisely, the highest rental paid by taxpayers on behalf of a member of the House. The rental price was reported by Roll Call on Monday.
FOXNews.com - Pelosi's New District Office Costs $18,736 a Month
and the elite just keep eatin' our meat.
San Francisco is a high-rent city. Just ask Nancy Pelosi.
The House Speaker's district office in the new federal building in San Francisco costs a whopping $18,736 a month -- the highest rental paid by any member of the House -- or, more precisely, the highest rental paid by taxpayers on behalf of a member of the House. The rental price was reported by Roll Call on Monday.
FOXNews.com - Pelosi's New District Office Costs $18,736 a Month
There is also the business aspect to being Speaker of the House. She's second in line of succession to the presidency. Just because you lunkheads and Fox News object to the rent... Lmao!
Who cares?
and the elite just keep eatin' our meat.
San Francisco is a high-rent city. Just ask Nancy Pelosi.
The House Speaker's district office in the new federal building in San Francisco costs a whopping $18,736 a month -- the highest rental paid by any member of the House -- or, more precisely, the highest rental paid by taxpayers on behalf of a member of the House. The rental price was reported by Roll Call on Monday.
FOXNews.com - Pelosi's New District Office Costs $18,736 a Month
There is also the business aspect to being Speaker of the House. She's second in line of succession to the presidency. Just because you lunkheads and Fox News object to the rent... Lmao!
Who cares?
The taxpayers should care.and the elite just keep eatin' our meat.
San Francisco is a high-rent city. Just ask Nancy Pelosi.
The House Speaker's district office in the new federal building in San Francisco costs a whopping $18,736 a month -- the highest rental paid by any member of the House -- or, more precisely, the highest rental paid by taxpayers on behalf of a member of the House. The rental price was reported by Roll Call on Monday.
FOXNews.com - Pelosi's New District Office Costs $18,736 a Month
There is also the business aspect to being Speaker of the House. She's second in line of succession to the presidency. Just because you lunkheads and Fox News object to the rent... Lmao!
Who cares?
and the elite just keep eatin' our meat.
FOXNews.com - Pelosi's New District Office Costs $18,736 a Month
There is also the business aspect to being Speaker of the House. She's second in line of succession to the presidency. Just because you lunkheads and Fox News object to the rent... Lmao!
Who cares?
its your tax $$$$ or did you forget???? well then cough it up. if this idiot gets to the WH we won't need tax's anymore
Republicans with genuine gripes against Obama (and hell, i have a couple myself)...don't you hate namvet and these dumb ass threads?
I would.
....WHEN have you ever bitched about Obama?....oh thats right....you did not like the Suit he was wearing when he was hosting Calderon....ok thats one....whats the other?....YOu mean the jet Bush set up for the speaker of the house after 9/11?and the elite just keep eatin' our meat.
FOXNews.com - Pelosi's New District Office Costs $18,736 a Month
She has to pay that much, no one can stand to look at that scrambled face of hers.
IS the office cheaper per month than her Jet?, she need to get rid of one or the other, that is just crazy.
.
Bet someone she knowns owns it.What makes this extra insane, is that there is a commercial real estate glut in downtown San Francisco right now. One can find Class A space for less than $2 per square foot. Pelosi is paying more than triple the market rate for her space - which is a pretty good metaphor for the cost of every government program.
YOu mean the jet Bush set up for the speaker of the house after 9/11?She has to pay that much, no one can stand to look at that scrambled face of hers.
IS the office cheaper per month than her Jet?, she need to get rid of one or the other, that is just crazy.
.
Don't confuse them with facts.
She had to have the larger plane because it was necessary for security reasons (a C-20, the plane Hastert used, can't fly from DC to California without stopping to refuel).
She had to have the larger plane because it was necessary for security reasons (a C-20, the plane Hastert used, can't fly from DC to California without stopping to refuel).
That's some bullshit, there are SEVERAL military airfields between DC and SF that they could have stopped and refueled at.
You fucking loons will defend anything won't you?
Landing at a military airfield is a security risk?She had to have the larger plane because it was necessary for security reasons (a C-20, the plane Hastert used, can't fly from DC to California without stopping to refuel).
That's some bullshit, there are SEVERAL military airfields between DC and SF that they could have stopped and refueled at.
You fucking loons will defend anything won't you?
It's still a security risk. If you look back at it, Pelosi's request was never for the larger plane. It was simply for a plane capable of cross-country travel without stopping to refuel.
That's some bullshit, there are SEVERAL military airfields between DC and SF that they could have stopped and refueled at.
You fucking loons will defend anything won't you?
It's still a security risk. If you look back at it, Pelosi's request was never for the larger plane. It was simply for a plane capable of cross-country travel without stopping to refuel.
Landing at a military airfield is a security risk?
Ummm...no, it's not. That's absurd.
It's still a security risk. If you look back at it, Pelosi's request was never for the larger plane. It was simply for a plane capable of cross-country travel without stopping to refuel.
Landing at a military airfield is a security risk?
Ummm...no, it's not. That's absurd.
I'm going to take the word of those with actual knowledge of the issue (like the House Sergeant at Arms) over that of some crank with a keyboard.
He recommended a plane with non-stop capability. He didn't recommend any particular airframe.Landing at a military airfield is a security risk?
Ummm...no, it's not. That's absurd.
I'm going to take the word of those with actual knowledge of the issue (like the House Sergeant at Arms) over that of some crank with a keyboard.
The C-20F, the military model of the Gulfstream IV, has the range to make a nonstop DC-to-Frisco flight. And it only costs $5900/hour to operate.I'm going to take the word of those with actual knowledge of the issue (like the House Sergeant at Arms) over that of some crank with a keyboard.
Your point being?
