Pelosi To GOP: A Democratic President Could Declare National Emergency On Guns

[initforme]

Russia isn't going to pay a cent. We were told Mexico will be paying for it.

 

[nat4900]

the people want the border secured....they don't want to surrender their rights....she is a retard...

Just for fun......

Most Americans don't support building the wall - CBS News

[URL='https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/423099-poll-majorities-oppose-trumps-wall-funding-demand-call-for-compromise']Poll: Majorities oppose Trump's wall funding demand, call for ..-[/URL]
Poll: 69% of Americans Think Trump's Wall Isn't a Priority

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

The only way Trump holds on to his base is if the wall starts to get built, and not just 1.6 billion of it either.

Well, Trump can always ask Mexico.....or Russian oligarchs for the extra funding...LOL

And Nancy can go beat a salt bag. Trump doesn't give up this easily. Given the bill is over 1,000 pages long, and gives most of the control over that wall to the Democrats, the less money for the wall--the better. With Trump's money, he gets to control how it's built, where it's built, and the Democrats can't stop that.

 

[depotoo]

With a threat like that from Pelosi, I doubt it. Millions of Dems that carry would defect.

The only "national emergency" that currently exists for Trump, is that he desperately needs to hold on to hls on to his moronic base.

Otherwise, the "emergency" to build a wall would have been declared TWO years ago.

The only way Trump holds on to his base is if the wall starts to get built, and not just 1.6 billion of it either.

 

[Lakhota]

Guns are a constitutional right. There is no constitutional right to enter our country illegally.

There is a constitutional right for immigrants to seek asylum in the U.S. - but Trump is making that difficult to impossible. Do whites really believe they can stop the browning of America with such unpatriotic tactics?

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Ms Pelosi......Its completely different...the people want the border secured....they don't want to surrender their rights....she is a retard...

She knows that. She's just lying to the public using a scare tactic to reduce support by Republican constituents. It won't work any better than racist, sexist, homophobe does.

 

[keepitreal]

The House speaker warned Republicans about the precedent Trump could set by declaring a national emergency to secure border wall funding.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) on Thursday warned about the dangerous precedent President Donald Trump could set if he declares a national emergency to secure funding for his border wall.

“I know the Republicans have some unease about it, no matter what they say,” Pelosi told reporters at the Capitol. “Because if the president can declare an emergency on something that he has created as an emergency, an illusion that he wants to convey, just think of what a president with different values can present to the American people.”

Pelosi said the situation at the U.S.-Mexico border doesn’t constitute an “emergency,” as Trump has framed it, but rather a “humanitarian challenge.”

More: Pelosi To GOP: A Democratic President Could Declare National Emergency On Guns

What goes around comes around. Go Nancy!

I wrote the thread below on January 9th.....and got some cute "funnies" by our myopic right wing posters for the effort....Yep, let Trump set this type of precedent.
_______________________________

Well, the more cynical reason why I would want for Trump to declare a state of emergency (as dumb as it may sound to sane Americans,) is that the court ensuing challenges and results, would simply add one MORE item to the growing list of impeachable offenses......

BUT, the attempt by Trump to spew to his cult that he tried "everything" to fulfill his moronic campaign promise that a wall is the ONLY way to secure our nation from "hordes of invaders" would also set an interesting precedent for the inevitable progressive presidents that will soon follow after this scourge of the oval office becomes infamous history.

What would prevent a future progressive president from declaring "a state of emergency" over global warming and climate changes that endanger our future survival???

What would prevent a future progressive president from declaring "a state of emergency" over the real fact that private health care insurance is bankrupting citizens......while our mortality and morbidity rates increase???

What would prevent a future progressive president from declaring "a state of emergency" over the overwhelming evidence shows that the drastic increase of mass shootings and hare crimes are indirectly facilitated by the easy access to the same assault weapons used by our military???

Points to ponder a bit.....don't you think?

Points to ponder a bit.....don't you think?

Do you ever wonder what life would have been like
had you not been deprived of oxygen at birth?

Ponder that a bit

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Guns are a constitutional right. There is no constitutional right to enter our country illegally.

There is a constitutional right for immigrants to seek asylum in the U.S. - but Trump is making that difficult to impossible. Do whites really believe they can stop the browning of America with such unpatriotic tactics?

What constitutional right is that?

 

[Rambunctious]

the people want the border secured....they don't want to surrender their rights....she is a retard...

Just for fun......

Most Americans don't support building the wall - CBS News

Poll: Majorities oppose Trump's wall funding demand, call for ..-
Poll: 69% of Americans Think Trump's Wall Isn't a Priority

Nat we don't pay attention to fake news...we witness the truth as it is not told to us by a biased news source...so take your links and go home...CBS Buuuuaaaahahahahahahahahaha...open borderCBS...buuuaaaaaahahahahahahahahahahahaha

 

[initforme]

How long will this get hung up in the courts? My bet is two years...

 

[depotoo]

Think of the campaign ads of her saying that? She is a gem to the GOP.

 

[Crepitus]

The House speaker warned Republicans about the precedent Trump could set by declaring a national emergency to secure border wall funding.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) on Thursday warned about the dangerous precedent President Donald Trump could set if he declares a national emergency to secure funding for his border wall.

“I know the Republicans have some unease about it, no matter what they say,” Pelosi told reporters at the Capitol. “Because if the president can declare an emergency on something that he has created as an emergency, an illusion that he wants to convey, just think of what a president with different values can present to the American people.”

Pelosi said the situation at the U.S.-Mexico border doesn’t constitute an “emergency,” as Trump has framed it, but rather a “humanitarian challenge.”

“You want to talk about a national emergency?” Pelosi said. “Let’s talk about today, the one-year anniversary of another manifestation of the epidemic of gun violence in America. That’s a national emergency.”

Pelosi was referring to the Feb. 14, 2018 mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida. She noted that a Democratic president could declare a national emergency on gun violence and warned Republicans to carefully consider the precedent Trump would set by using his executive power to override Congress.

“Democratic presidents can declare emergencies as well,” Pelosi said. “So the precedent that the president is setting here is something that should be met with great unease and dismay by the Republicans.”

More: Pelosi To GOP: A Democratic President Could Declare National Emergency On Guns

What goes around comes around. Go Nancy!

Actually my bet is to the next time a mass shootings incident happens under a democratic president this will be the inevitable reaction.

 

[Crepitus]

Now the drunky is threatening our 2nd Amendment?

No, Cheeto Jesus is.

 

[JGalt]

The House speaker warned Republicans about the precedent Trump could set by declaring a national emergency to secure border wall funding.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) on Thursday warned about the dangerous precedent President Donald Trump could set if he declares a national emergency to secure funding for his border wall.

“I know the Republicans have some unease about it, no matter what they say,” Pelosi told reporters at the Capitol. “Because if the president can declare an emergency on something that he has created as an emergency, an illusion that he wants to convey, just think of what a president with different values can present to the American people.”

Pelosi said the situation at the U.S.-Mexico border doesn’t constitute an “emergency,” as Trump has framed it, but rather a “humanitarian challenge.”

“You want to talk about a national emergency?” Pelosi said. “Let’s talk about today, the one-year anniversary of another manifestation of the epidemic of gun violence in America. That’s a national emergency.”

Pelosi was referring to the Feb. 14, 2018 mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida. She noted that a Democratic president could declare a national emergency on gun violence and warned Republicans to carefully consider the precedent Trump would set by using his executive power to override Congress.

“Democratic presidents can declare emergencies as well,” Pelosi said. “So the precedent that the president is setting here is something that should be met with great unease and dismay by the Republicans.”

More: Pelosi To GOP: A Democratic President Could Declare National Emergency On Guns

What goes around comes around. Go Nancy!

Pelosi is in no position to threaten anyone with anything. She'll be in an even less position after 2020.

 

[Crepitus]

And when that happens, gun owners will declare a national emergency on GOVERNMENT.

No you won't. All you keyboard killers will bend over and take it.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

How long will this get hung up in the courts? My bet is two years...

The Democrats are just showing the world that they will fight for illegal aliens, gangs, drug smugglers and human traffickers, but the only thing that the Democrats will do for the Middle Class is raise their taxes every chance that they get.

 

[nat4900]

Mexico has invaded.

The number of Mexican unauthorized immigrants has been declining since 2007,

 

[conserveguy877]

Now the drunky is threatening our 2nd Amendment?

No, Cheeto Jesus is.

Your bit is getting old.

 

[initforme]

Where are the additional border patrol agents? If they aren't a part of it then people will not be supportive. 5 new agents per mile. That would be a start.

 

[nat4900]

The Democrats are just showing the world that they will fight for illegal aliens, gangs, drug smugglers and human traffickers

".....and FOX news will be back after these commercials....."

IF "illegals" were the MOST pressing problem causing a "national emergency"
WHY WAS A WALL BUILT WHEN GOPers CONTROLLED EVERYTHING???