Pelosi Goes Apoplectic Over Trump sending illegals to HER Sanctuary City Hometown

[Harry Dresden]

What? You mean Nimby Pelosi who hides in her house behind 20 foot walls doesn't welcome the illegals with open arms? Shocked! Shocked am I! Democrats are incredibly consistent. They are oh so generous as long as it isn't their money. And they are oh so welcoming as long as the problems don't land in their backyard.

she welcomes them.....when they come to keep the place clean and looking good...

 

[Harry Dresden]

Democrat House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is so angry that as much as she likes OTHER PEOPLE ON THE BORDER having to foot the bill for educating, hospitalizing, incarcerating, and paying out of their own pockets for free meals for those awaiting their turn to become citizens that now she is saying it is ILLEGAL for President Trump to send them to Sanctuary Cities, namely San Francisco, where little cable cars climb half-way to the stars. What a hypocrit!!! The locals are very angry, too. They worked a long time to get a nice place in the town that wants to be sure you wear some flowers in your hair. tch, tch, tch.

They want those who live near the border to keep going bankrupt and giving up their children's teachers to take care of the border-crossing children.

If you're going to demand that everybody else does something, it doesn't take them long to say "It's your turn," and say it so cheerfully, too. Poor little Nancy.

​

From USA Today: Trump says 'strongly looking at' plan to send immigrants to sanctuary cities

"The Radical Left always seems to have an Open Borders, Open Arms policy – so this should make them very happy!" Trump said. The idea comes at a time of upheaval for Trump's immigration policy, and the Department of Homeland Security, which carries that policy out. The president has made many threats, such as a promise last month to seal the U.S.-Mexican border, that he has not carried out. On the other hand, he declared a "national emergency" at the border to free up more funding for his proposed wall. And many top DHS officials, including Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen, have left their jobs.

Democrats quickly blasted the idea of placing migrants in sanctuary cities, which Trump's own aides said would raise legal and practical questions to carry out. "It's just another notion that is unworthy of the presidency of the United States and disrespectful of the challenges that we face as a country, as a people, to address who we are: a nation of immigrants," House Speaker Pelosi, D-Calif., said Friday.

So-called sanctuary cities are jurisdictions that decline to cooperate with federal immigration agents in certain situations. Many decline to hold immigrants for an extended period in local jails at the request of Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials.​

California should insist on all foreign nationals in the US being known to the general government and federally identified for civil purposes, before being dropped off in "sanctuary cities."

Just dump'em.

There is no provision for excuses in our federal doctrine. Our welfare clause is General not common and we have a Commerce Clause, expressed not implied by right wing fantasy.

danny tell us about your fantasy about Ellis Island being in Arizona......

 

[Harry Dresden]

Republicans don’t understand using poor people who are fleeing danger for the purpose of political punishment.
They don’t really see people as people unless they’re white.

And they have to be a certain kind of white. They can’t be educated or gay or liberal or atheist.

In fact, Republicans don’t even help their own white brothers and sisters in Appalachia.

The only people they feel are worth helping are “needy“ billionaires.

word salad....good example dean...

 

[Harry Dresden]

This was an April 2019 article...

Old news...

Oh, and, by the way...

Has Trump sent all those Illegal Aliens to Sanctuary Cities yet?

No?

What we've come to expect from the bloviating blowhard...

All Talk... No Action.

Oh, so Demmie Dumbos are excused if their dingbatty behavior was 4 months ago.

I'll so try to remember that..... NOT! Nice try for a deflection, Kondor3, but it doesn't pan any more like it used to before the Democrats declared war on the United States of America for not cottoning to their proposals of Communism, so now it's do evil things time for the Demmies/Anturfa.

Oh, for the love of God, take a friggin' chill-pill, eh? I am one of the more strident anti-Illegals posters on this system. Next time, try a more 'current' piece of bait.

Oh, and, anytime you're ready, feel free to give us a link, showing that the Chief Blowhard actually did what he threatened, and sent Illegals to Sanctuary Cities.

California could welcome them and insist all foreign nationals in the US be known to the general Government and federally identified for civil purposes. We should have no illegals or illegal underclass simply Because we have no express immigration clause.

California would welcome them?...you folks had better solve your tent sidewalk city problem first....you dont need more homeless....

 

[Harry Dresden]

We should abolish the seats of Congresscritters who act to destabilize the President of the United States in their quest to ignore separation of powers as part of the Constitution.

Oversight is a job of Congress, assembled.

Oversight-not Overreach

No such thing when it comes to oversight for that Public not private Office.

Yes there is-the old saw "what would a reasonable person think is a reasonable amount or action"? The Democrats AND media have beat it ALL to death. I just hope Barr does not do the same thing out of revenge.

In this case, Congress is authorized to simply remove the chief magistrate of the Union from that public not private office, so that the "wheels of regular justice can operate."

a congress with a 20 something percent approval rating is going to make the wheels of regular justice operate smoothly?....."lol......

 

[danielpalos]

Democrat House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is so angry that as much as she likes OTHER PEOPLE ON THE BORDER having to foot the bill for educating, hospitalizing, incarcerating, and paying out of their own pockets for free meals for those awaiting their turn to become citizens that now she is saying it is ILLEGAL for President Trump to send them to Sanctuary Cities, namely San Francisco, where little cable cars climb half-way to the stars. What a hypocrit!!! The locals are very angry, too. They worked a long time to get a nice place in the town that wants to be sure you wear some flowers in your hair. tch, tch, tch.

They want those who live near the border to keep going bankrupt and giving up their children's teachers to take care of the border-crossing children.

If you're going to demand that everybody else does something, it doesn't take them long to say "It's your turn," and say it so cheerfully, too. Poor little Nancy.

​

From USA Today: Trump says 'strongly looking at' plan to send immigrants to sanctuary cities

"The Radical Left always seems to have an Open Borders, Open Arms policy – so this should make them very happy!" Trump said. The idea comes at a time of upheaval for Trump's immigration policy, and the Department of Homeland Security, which carries that policy out. The president has made many threats, such as a promise last month to seal the U.S.-Mexican border, that he has not carried out. On the other hand, he declared a "national emergency" at the border to free up more funding for his proposed wall. And many top DHS officials, including Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen, have left their jobs.

Democrats quickly blasted the idea of placing migrants in sanctuary cities, which Trump's own aides said would raise legal and practical questions to carry out. "It's just another notion that is unworthy of the presidency of the United States and disrespectful of the challenges that we face as a country, as a people, to address who we are: a nation of immigrants," House Speaker Pelosi, D-Calif., said Friday.

So-called sanctuary cities are jurisdictions that decline to cooperate with federal immigration agents in certain situations. Many decline to hold immigrants for an extended period in local jails at the request of Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials.​

California should insist on all foreign nationals in the US being known to the general government and federally identified for civil purposes, before being dropped off in "sanctuary cities."

Just dump'em.

There is no provision for excuses in our federal doctrine. Our welfare clause is General not common and we have a Commerce Clause, expressed not implied by right wing fantasy.

danny tell us about your fantasy about Ellis Island being in Arizona......

that is your fantasy. we don't need the pressure on our southern border.

 

[danielpalos]

This was an April 2019 article...

Old news...

Oh, and, by the way...

Has Trump sent all those Illegal Aliens to Sanctuary Cities yet?

No?

What we've come to expect from the bloviating blowhard...

All Talk... No Action.

Oh, so Demmie Dumbos are excused if their dingbatty behavior was 4 months ago.

I'll so try to remember that..... NOT! Nice try for a deflection, Kondor3, but it doesn't pan any more like it used to before the Democrats declared war on the United States of America for not cottoning to their proposals of Communism, so now it's do evil things time for the Demmies/Anturfa.

Oh, for the love of God, take a friggin' chill-pill, eh? I am one of the more strident anti-Illegals posters on this system. Next time, try a more 'current' piece of bait.

Oh, and, anytime you're ready, feel free to give us a link, showing that the Chief Blowhard actually did what he threatened, and sent Illegals to Sanctuary Cities.

California could welcome them and insist all foreign nationals in the US be known to the general Government and federally identified for civil purposes. We should have no illegals or illegal underclass simply Because we have no express immigration clause.

California would welcome them?...you folks had better solve your tent sidewalk city problem first....you dont need more homeless....

we are working on it. we have a first world economy.

 

[danielpalos]

Oversight is a job of Congress, assembled.

Oversight-not Overreach

No such thing when it comes to oversight for that Public not private Office.

Yes there is-the old saw "what would a reasonable person think is a reasonable amount or action"? The Democrats AND media have beat it ALL to death. I just hope Barr does not do the same thing out of revenge.

In this case, Congress is authorized to simply remove the chief magistrate of the Union from that public not private office, so that the "wheels of regular justice can operate."

a congress with a 20 something percent approval rating is going to make the wheels of regular justice operate smoothly?....."lol......

all they are authorized to do, is remove the President from Office.

 

[Harry Dresden]

Democrat House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is so angry that as much as she likes OTHER PEOPLE ON THE BORDER having to foot the bill for educating, hospitalizing, incarcerating, and paying out of their own pockets for free meals for those awaiting their turn to become citizens that now she is saying it is ILLEGAL for President Trump to send them to Sanctuary Cities, namely San Francisco, where little cable cars climb half-way to the stars. What a hypocrit!!! The locals are very angry, too. They worked a long time to get a nice place in the town that wants to be sure you wear some flowers in your hair. tch, tch, tch.

They want those who live near the border to keep going bankrupt and giving up their children's teachers to take care of the border-crossing children.

If you're going to demand that everybody else does something, it doesn't take them long to say "It's your turn," and say it so cheerfully, too. Poor little Nancy.

​

From USA Today: Trump says 'strongly looking at' plan to send immigrants to sanctuary cities

"The Radical Left always seems to have an Open Borders, Open Arms policy – so this should make them very happy!" Trump said. The idea comes at a time of upheaval for Trump's immigration policy, and the Department of Homeland Security, which carries that policy out. The president has made many threats, such as a promise last month to seal the U.S.-Mexican border, that he has not carried out. On the other hand, he declared a "national emergency" at the border to free up more funding for his proposed wall. And many top DHS officials, including Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen, have left their jobs.

Democrats quickly blasted the idea of placing migrants in sanctuary cities, which Trump's own aides said would raise legal and practical questions to carry out. "It's just another notion that is unworthy of the presidency of the United States and disrespectful of the challenges that we face as a country, as a people, to address who we are: a nation of immigrants," House Speaker Pelosi, D-Calif., said Friday.

So-called sanctuary cities are jurisdictions that decline to cooperate with federal immigration agents in certain situations. Many decline to hold immigrants for an extended period in local jails at the request of Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials.​

California should insist on all foreign nationals in the US being known to the general government and federally identified for civil purposes, before being dropped off in "sanctuary cities."

Just dump'em.

There is no provision for excuses in our federal doctrine. Our welfare clause is General not common and we have a Commerce Clause, expressed not implied by right wing fantasy.

danny tell us about your fantasy about Ellis Island being in Arizona......

that is your fantasy. we don't need the pressure on our southern border.

sorry danny you are the one who had that fantasy...

 

[Harry Dresden]

This was an April 2019 article...

Old news...

Oh, and, by the way...

Has Trump sent all those Illegal Aliens to Sanctuary Cities yet?

No?

What we've come to expect from the bloviating blowhard...

All Talk... No Action.

Oh, so Demmie Dumbos are excused if their dingbatty behavior was 4 months ago.

I'll so try to remember that..... NOT! Nice try for a deflection, Kondor3, but it doesn't pan any more like it used to before the Democrats declared war on the United States of America for not cottoning to their proposals of Communism, so now it's do evil things time for the Demmies/Anturfa.

Oh, for the love of God, take a friggin' chill-pill, eh? I am one of the more strident anti-Illegals posters on this system. Next time, try a more 'current' piece of bait.

Oh, and, anytime you're ready, feel free to give us a link, showing that the Chief Blowhard actually did what he threatened, and sent Illegals to Sanctuary Cities.

California could welcome them and insist all foreign nationals in the US be known to the general Government and federally identified for civil purposes. We should have no illegals or illegal underclass simply Because we have no express immigration clause.

California would welcome them?...you folks had better solve your tent sidewalk city problem first....you dont need more homeless....

we are working on it. we have a first world economy.

yea if you live along the coast...its great....

 

[Harry Dresden]

Oversight-not Overreach

No such thing when it comes to oversight for that Public not private Office.

Yes there is-the old saw "what would a reasonable person think is a reasonable amount or action"? The Democrats AND media have beat it ALL to death. I just hope Barr does not do the same thing out of revenge.

In this case, Congress is authorized to simply remove the chief magistrate of the Union from that public not private office, so that the "wheels of regular justice can operate."

a congress with a 20 something percent approval rating is going to make the wheels of regular justice operate smoothly?....."lol......

all they are authorized to do, is remove the President from Office.

his ratings are higher than theirs....

 

[danielpalos]

California should insist on all foreign nationals in the US being known to the general government and federally identified for civil purposes, before being dropped off in "sanctuary cities."

Just dump'em.

There is no provision for excuses in our federal doctrine. Our welfare clause is General not common and we have a Commerce Clause, expressed not implied by right wing fantasy.

danny tell us about your fantasy about Ellis Island being in Arizona......

that is your fantasy. we don't need the pressure on our southern border.

sorry danny you are the one who had that fantasy...

historical precedent that actually worked?

 

[danielpalos]

Oh, so Demmie Dumbos are excused if their dingbatty behavior was 4 months ago.

I'll so try to remember that..... NOT! Nice try for a deflection, Kondor3, but it doesn't pan any more like it used to before the Democrats declared war on the United States of America for not cottoning to their proposals of Communism, so now it's do evil things time for the Demmies/Anturfa.

Oh, for the love of God, take a friggin' chill-pill, eh? I am one of the more strident anti-Illegals posters on this system. Next time, try a more 'current' piece of bait.

Oh, and, anytime you're ready, feel free to give us a link, showing that the Chief Blowhard actually did what he threatened, and sent Illegals to Sanctuary Cities.

California could welcome them and insist all foreign nationals in the US be known to the general Government and federally identified for civil purposes. We should have no illegals or illegal underclass simply Because we have no express immigration clause.

California would welcome them?...you folks had better solve your tent sidewalk city problem first....you dont need more homeless....

we are working on it. we have a first world economy.

yea if you live along the coast...its great....

it is a State wide solution.

 

[danielpalos]

No such thing when it comes to oversight for that Public not private Office.

Yes there is-the old saw "what would a reasonable person think is a reasonable amount or action"? The Democrats AND media have beat it ALL to death. I just hope Barr does not do the same thing out of revenge.

In this case, Congress is authorized to simply remove the chief magistrate of the Union from that public not private office, so that the "wheels of regular justice can operate."

a congress with a 20 something percent approval rating is going to make the wheels of regular justice operate smoothly?....."lol......

all they are authorized to do, is remove the President from Office.

his ratings are higher than theirs....

it is supposed to be about true witness bearing because we have a McCarthy era phrase in our pledge.

 

[Harry Dresden]

Just dump'em.

There is no provision for excuses in our federal doctrine. Our welfare clause is General not common and we have a Commerce Clause, expressed not implied by right wing fantasy.

danny tell us about your fantasy about Ellis Island being in Arizona......

that is your fantasy. we don't need the pressure on our southern border.

sorry danny you are the one who had that fantasy...

historical precedent that actually worked?

which precedent is that danny?.....

 

[Harry Dresden]

Yes there is-the old saw "what would a reasonable person think is a reasonable amount or action"? The Democrats AND media have beat it ALL to death. I just hope Barr does not do the same thing out of revenge.

In this case, Congress is authorized to simply remove the chief magistrate of the Union from that public not private office, so that the "wheels of regular justice can operate."

a congress with a 20 something percent approval rating is going to make the wheels of regular justice operate smoothly?....."lol......

all they are authorized to do, is remove the President from Office.

his ratings are higher than theirs....

it is supposed to be about true witness bearing because we have a McCarthy era phrase in our pledge.

i dont trust 20 percenters danny.....

 

[danielpalos]

There is no provision for excuses in our federal doctrine. Our welfare clause is General not common and we have a Commerce Clause, expressed not implied by right wing fantasy.

danny tell us about your fantasy about Ellis Island being in Arizona......

that is your fantasy. we don't need the pressure on our southern border.

sorry danny you are the one who had that fantasy...

historical precedent that actually worked?

which precedent is that danny?.....

Ellis Island.

 

[Harry Dresden]

danny tell us about your fantasy about Ellis Island being in Arizona......

that is your fantasy. we don't need the pressure on our southern border.

sorry danny you are the one who had that fantasy...

historical precedent that actually worked?

which precedent is that danny?.....

Ellis Island.

have you located it yet?....

 

[beautress]

Democrat House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is so angry that as much as she likes OTHER PEOPLE ON THE BORDER having to foot the bill for educating, hospitalizing, incarcerating, and paying out of their own pockets for free meals for those awaiting their turn to become citizens that now she is saying it is ILLEGAL for President Trump to send them to Sanctuary Cities, namely San Francisco, where little cable cars climb half-way to the stars. What a hypocrit!!! The locals are very angry, too. They worked a long time to get a nice place in the town that wants to be sure you wear some flowers in your hair. tch, tch, tch.

They want those who live near the border to keep going bankrupt and giving up their children's teachers to take care of the border-crossing children.

If you're going to demand that everybody else does something, it doesn't take them long to say "It's your turn," and say it so cheerfully, too. Poor little Nancy.

​

From USA Today: Trump says 'strongly looking at' plan to send immigrants to sanctuary cities

"The Radical Left always seems to have an Open Borders, Open Arms policy – so this should make them very happy!" Trump said. The idea comes at a time of upheaval for Trump's immigration policy, and the Department of Homeland Security, which carries that policy out. The president has made many threats, such as a promise last month to seal the U.S.-Mexican border, that he has not carried out. On the other hand, he declared a "national emergency" at the border to free up more funding for his proposed wall. And many top DHS officials, including Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen, have left their jobs.

Democrats quickly blasted the idea of placing migrants in sanctuary cities, which Trump's own aides said would raise legal and practical questions to carry out. "It's just another notion that is unworthy of the presidency of the United States and disrespectful of the challenges that we face as a country, as a people, to address who we are: a nation of immigrants," House Speaker Pelosi, D-Calif., said Friday.

So-called sanctuary cities are jurisdictions that decline to cooperate with federal immigration agents in certain situations. Many decline to hold immigrants for an extended period in local jails at the request of Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials.​

California should insist on all foreign nationals in the US being known to the general government and federally identified for civil purposes, before being dropped off in "sanctuary cities."

Just dump'em.

There is no provision for excuses in our federal doctrine. Our welfare clause is General not common and we have a Commerce Clause, expressed not implied by right wing fantasy.

danny tell us about your fantasy about Ellis Island being in Arizona......

that is your fantasy. we don't need the pressure on our southern border.

"We don't need the pressure on our southern border."

Sir you simply do not know your own Democrats. Several of your Democrat Congresswomen (and Congressmen) made undercover trips to Monterey and other Mexican cities to solicit dreamers to keep on coming, when we had thousands of families waiting on the border to process them into the states. Pelosi made a big stink about not funding the processing, and when asked to at least provide funding for humanitarian purposes, not only did she decline to provide it, she conspired with several Congresspeople to keep the pressure on by sending them to Mexico and for the purpose of soliciting illegally cross just to make matters worse for the Border Patrol. Don't you ever let me see you complain about pressure on our southern border when you have people doing clandestine operations to make matters worse and especially to hound the Executive Branch so they could blame, blame, blame, blame, blame and more blame.

Pelosi and her comrades and comradettes are super sicko.

DEMOCRAT CONGRESSWOMAN SECRETLY SENDING STAFF TO MEXICO TO COACH MIGRANTS HOW TO BEAT SYSTEM, REPORT SAYS

Democrat Congresswoman Secretly Sending Staff To Mexico To Coach Migrants How To Beat System, Report Says – Pelt The Pundits

 

[Third Party]

California should insist on all foreign nationals in the US being known to the general government and federally identified for civil purposes, before being dropped off in "sanctuary cities."

Just dump'em.

There is no provision for excuses in our federal doctrine. Our welfare clause is General not common and we have a Commerce Clause, expressed not implied by right wing fantasy.

danny tell us about your fantasy about Ellis Island being in Arizona......

that is your fantasy. we don't need the pressure on our southern border.

"We don't need the pressure on our southern border."

Sir you simply do not know your own Democrats. Several of your Democrat Congresswomen (and Congressmen) made undercover trips to Monterey and other Mexican cities to solicit dreamers to keep on coming, when we had thousands of families waiting on the border to process them into the states. Pelosi made a big stink about not funding the processing, and when asked to at least provide funding for humanitarian purposes, not only did she decline to provide it, she conspired with several Congresspeople to keep the pressure on by sending them to Mexico and for the purpose of soliciting illegally cross just to make matters worse for the Border Patrol. Don't you ever let me see you complain about pressure on our southern border when you have people doing clandestine operations to make matters worse and especially to hound the Executive Branch so they could blame, blame, blame, blame, blame and more blame.

Pelosi and her comrades and comradettes are super sicko.

DEMOCRAT CONGRESSWOMAN SECRETLY SENDING STAFF TO MEXICO TO COACH MIGRANTS HOW TO BEAT SYSTEM, REPORT SAYS

Democrat Congresswoman Secretly Sending Staff To Mexico To Coach Migrants How To Beat System, Report Says – Pelt The Pundits

Instead of beating the system, we should be beating the illegals and those that help them.