Pelosi Goes Apoplectic Over Trump sending illegals to HER Sanctuary City Hometown

beautress

Always Faithful
Gold Supporting Member
Sep 28, 2018
29,626
21,380
2,445
Walker County, TX
Democrat House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is so angry that as much as she likes OTHER PEOPLE ON THE BORDER having to foot the bill for educating, hospitalizing, incarcerating, and paying out of their own pockets for free meals for those awaiting their turn to become citizens that now she is saying it is ILLEGAL for President Trump to send them to Sanctuary Cities, namely San Francisco, where little cable cars climb half-way to the stars. What a hypocrit!!! The locals are very angry, too. They worked a long time to get a nice place in the town that wants to be sure you wear some flowers in your hair. tch, tch, tch.

They want those who live near the border to keep going bankrupt and giving up their children's teachers to take care of the border-crossing children.

If you're going to demand that everybody else does something, it doesn't take them long to say "It's your turn," and say it so cheerfully, too. Poor little Nancy.



From USA Today: Trump says 'strongly looking at' plan to send immigrants to sanctuary cities
"The Radical Left always seems to have an Open Borders, Open Arms policy – so this should make them very happy!" Trump said. The idea comes at a time of upheaval for Trump's immigration policy, and the Department of Homeland Security, which carries that policy out. The president has made many threats, such as a promise last month to seal the U.S.-Mexican border, that he has not carried out. On the other hand, he declared a "national emergency" at the border to free up more funding for his proposed wall. And many top DHS officials, including Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen, have left their jobs.

Democrats quickly blasted the idea of placing migrants in sanctuary cities, which Trump's own aides said would raise legal and practical questions to carry out. "It's just another notion that is unworthy of the presidency of the United States and disrespectful of the challenges that we face as a country, as a people, to address who we are: a nation of immigrants," House Speaker Pelosi, D-Calif., said Friday.

So-called sanctuary cities are jurisdictions that decline to cooperate with federal immigration agents in certain situations. Many decline to hold immigrants for an extended period in local jails at the request of Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials.​
 
What? You mean Nimby Pelosi who hides in her house behind 20 foot walls doesn't welcome the illegals with open arms? Shocked! Shocked am I! Democrats are incredibly consistent. They are oh so generous as long as it isn't their money. And they are oh so welcoming as long as the problems don't land in their backyard.
 
This was an April 2019 article...

Old news...

Oh, and, by the way...

Has Trump sent all those Illegal Aliens to Sanctuary Cities yet?

No?

What we've come to expect from the bloviating blowhard...

All Talk... No Action.
 
Democrat House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is so angry that as much as she likes OTHER PEOPLE ON THE BORDER having to foot the bill for educating, hospitalizing, incarcerating, and paying out of their own pockets for free meals for those awaiting their turn to become citizens that now she is saying it is ILLEGAL for President Trump to send them to Sanctuary Cities, namely San Francisco, where little cable cars climb half-way to the stars. What a hypocrit!!! The locals are very angry, too. They worked a long time to get a nice place in the town that wants to be sure you wear some flowers in your hair. tch, tch, tch.

They want those who live near the border to keep going bankrupt and giving up their children's teachers to take care of the border-crossing children.

If you're going to demand that everybody else does something, it doesn't take them long to say "It's your turn," and say it so cheerfully, too. Poor little Nancy.



From USA Today: Trump says 'strongly looking at' plan to send immigrants to sanctuary cities
"The Radical Left always seems to have an Open Borders, Open Arms policy – so this should make them very happy!" Trump said. The idea comes at a time of upheaval for Trump's immigration policy, and the Department of Homeland Security, which carries that policy out. The president has made many threats, such as a promise last month to seal the U.S.-Mexican border, that he has not carried out. On the other hand, he declared a "national emergency" at the border to free up more funding for his proposed wall. And many top DHS officials, including Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen, have left their jobs.

Democrats quickly blasted the idea of placing migrants in sanctuary cities, which Trump's own aides said would raise legal and practical questions to carry out. "It's just another notion that is unworthy of the presidency of the United States and disrespectful of the challenges that we face as a country, as a people, to address who we are: a nation of immigrants," House Speaker Pelosi, D-Calif., said Friday.

So-called sanctuary cities are jurisdictions that decline to cooperate with federal immigration agents in certain situations. Many decline to hold immigrants for an extended period in local jails at the request of Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials.​

Drown her in those ugly bastards
 
What? You mean Nimby Pelosi who hides in her house behind 20 foot walls doesn't welcome the illegals with open arms? Shocked! Shocked am I! Democrats are incredibly consistent. They are oh so generous as long as it isn't their money. And they are oh so welcoming as long as the problems don't land in their backyard.
Democrats are busy in SF trying to redefine what a criminal is as we speak. It's exactly the way they tried to redefine what an illegal alien was.....calling them undocumented refugees from persecution, or some other happy horseshit.

 
Democrat House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is so angry that as much as she likes OTHER PEOPLE ON THE BORDER having to foot the bill for educating, hospitalizing, incarcerating, and paying out of their own pockets for free meals for those awaiting their turn to become citizens that now she is saying it is ILLEGAL for President Trump to send them to Sanctuary Cities, namely San Francisco, where little cable cars climb half-way to the stars. What a hypocrit!!! The locals are very angry, too. They worked a long time to get a nice place in the town that wants to be sure you wear some flowers in your hair. tch, tch, tch.

They want those who live near the border to keep going bankrupt and giving up their children's teachers to take care of the border-crossing children.

If you're going to demand that everybody else does something, it doesn't take them long to say "It's your turn," and say it so cheerfully, too. Poor little Nancy.



From USA Today: Trump says 'strongly looking at' plan to send immigrants to sanctuary cities
"The Radical Left always seems to have an Open Borders, Open Arms policy – so this should make them very happy!" Trump said. The idea comes at a time of upheaval for Trump's immigration policy, and the Department of Homeland Security, which carries that policy out. The president has made many threats, such as a promise last month to seal the U.S.-Mexican border, that he has not carried out. On the other hand, he declared a "national emergency" at the border to free up more funding for his proposed wall. And many top DHS officials, including Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen, have left their jobs.

Democrats quickly blasted the idea of placing migrants in sanctuary cities, which Trump's own aides said would raise legal and practical questions to carry out. "It's just another notion that is unworthy of the presidency of the United States and disrespectful of the challenges that we face as a country, as a people, to address who we are: a nation of immigrants," House Speaker Pelosi, D-Calif., said Friday.

So-called sanctuary cities are jurisdictions that decline to cooperate with federal immigration agents in certain situations. Many decline to hold immigrants for an extended period in local jails at the request of Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials.​

California should insist on all foreign nationals in the US being known to the general government and federally identified for civil purposes, before being dropped off in "sanctuary cities."
 
Democrat House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is so angry that as much as she likes OTHER PEOPLE ON THE BORDER having to foot the bill for educating, hospitalizing, incarcerating, and paying out of their own pockets for free meals for those awaiting their turn to become citizens that now she is saying it is ILLEGAL for President Trump to send them to Sanctuary Cities, namely San Francisco, where little cable cars climb half-way to the stars. What a hypocrit!!! The locals are very angry, too. They worked a long time to get a nice place in the town that wants to be sure you wear some flowers in your hair. tch, tch, tch.

They want those who live near the border to keep going bankrupt and giving up their children's teachers to take care of the border-crossing children.

If you're going to demand that everybody else does something, it doesn't take them long to say "It's your turn," and say it so cheerfully, too. Poor little Nancy.



From USA Today: Trump says 'strongly looking at' plan to send immigrants to sanctuary cities
"The Radical Left always seems to have an Open Borders, Open Arms policy – so this should make them very happy!" Trump said. The idea comes at a time of upheaval for Trump's immigration policy, and the Department of Homeland Security, which carries that policy out. The president has made many threats, such as a promise last month to seal the U.S.-Mexican border, that he has not carried out. On the other hand, he declared a "national emergency" at the border to free up more funding for his proposed wall. And many top DHS officials, including Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen, have left their jobs.

Democrats quickly blasted the idea of placing migrants in sanctuary cities, which Trump's own aides said would raise legal and practical questions to carry out. "It's just another notion that is unworthy of the presidency of the United States and disrespectful of the challenges that we face as a country, as a people, to address who we are: a nation of immigrants," House Speaker Pelosi, D-Calif., said Friday.

So-called sanctuary cities are jurisdictions that decline to cooperate with federal immigration agents in certain situations. Many decline to hold immigrants for an extended period in local jails at the request of Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials.​

California should insist on all foreign nationals in the US being known to the general government and federally identified for civil purposes, before being dropped off in "sanctuary cities."

Just dump'em.
 
Democrat House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is so angry that as much as she likes OTHER PEOPLE ON THE BORDER having to foot the bill for educating, hospitalizing, incarcerating, and paying out of their own pockets for free meals for those awaiting their turn to become citizens that now she is saying it is ILLEGAL for President Trump to send them to Sanctuary Cities, namely San Francisco, where little cable cars climb half-way to the stars. What a hypocrit!!! The locals are very angry, too. They worked a long time to get a nice place in the town that wants to be sure you wear some flowers in your hair. tch, tch, tch.

They want those who live near the border to keep going bankrupt and giving up their children's teachers to take care of the border-crossing children.

If you're going to demand that everybody else does something, it doesn't take them long to say "It's your turn," and say it so cheerfully, too. Poor little Nancy.



From USA Today: Trump says 'strongly looking at' plan to send immigrants to sanctuary cities
"The Radical Left always seems to have an Open Borders, Open Arms policy – so this should make them very happy!" Trump said. The idea comes at a time of upheaval for Trump's immigration policy, and the Department of Homeland Security, which carries that policy out. The president has made many threats, such as a promise last month to seal the U.S.-Mexican border, that he has not carried out. On the other hand, he declared a "national emergency" at the border to free up more funding for his proposed wall. And many top DHS officials, including Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen, have left their jobs.

Democrats quickly blasted the idea of placing migrants in sanctuary cities, which Trump's own aides said would raise legal and practical questions to carry out. "It's just another notion that is unworthy of the presidency of the United States and disrespectful of the challenges that we face as a country, as a people, to address who we are: a nation of immigrants," House Speaker Pelosi, D-Calif., said Friday.

So-called sanctuary cities are jurisdictions that decline to cooperate with federal immigration agents in certain situations. Many decline to hold immigrants for an extended period in local jails at the request of Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials.​

California should insist on all foreign nationals in the US being known to the general government and federally identified for civil purposes, before being dropped off in "sanctuary cities."

Just dump'em.

There is no provision for excuses in our federal doctrine. Our welfare clause is General not common and we have a Commerce Clause, expressed not implied by right wing fantasy.
 
Democrat House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is so angry that as much as she likes OTHER PEOPLE ON THE BORDER having to foot the bill for educating, hospitalizing, incarcerating, and paying out of their own pockets for free meals for those awaiting their turn to become citizens that now she is saying it is ILLEGAL for President Trump to send them to Sanctuary Cities, namely San Francisco, where little cable cars climb half-way to the stars. What a hypocrit!!! The locals are very angry, too. They worked a long time to get a nice place in the town that wants to be sure you wear some flowers in your hair. tch, tch, tch.

They want those who live near the border to keep going bankrupt and giving up their children's teachers to take care of the border-crossing children.

If you're going to demand that everybody else does something, it doesn't take them long to say "It's your turn," and say it so cheerfully, too. Poor little Nancy.



From USA Today: Trump says 'strongly looking at' plan to send immigrants to sanctuary cities
"The Radical Left always seems to have an Open Borders, Open Arms policy – so this should make them very happy!" Trump said. The idea comes at a time of upheaval for Trump's immigration policy, and the Department of Homeland Security, which carries that policy out. The president has made many threats, such as a promise last month to seal the U.S.-Mexican border, that he has not carried out. On the other hand, he declared a "national emergency" at the border to free up more funding for his proposed wall. And many top DHS officials, including Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen, have left their jobs.

Democrats quickly blasted the idea of placing migrants in sanctuary cities, which Trump's own aides said would raise legal and practical questions to carry out. "It's just another notion that is unworthy of the presidency of the United States and disrespectful of the challenges that we face as a country, as a people, to address who we are: a nation of immigrants," House Speaker Pelosi, D-Calif., said Friday.

So-called sanctuary cities are jurisdictions that decline to cooperate with federal immigration agents in certain situations. Many decline to hold immigrants for an extended period in local jails at the request of Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials.​

Who says she's angry? :71: You?
 
All foreign nationals in the US should be known to the general Government and federally identified for civil purposes. We should have no illegals or illegal underclass simply Because we have a Naturalization clause not any implied right wing fantasy of immigration clause.

This becomes a sovereign State's right regarding its necessary and traditional, police power.

States have no basis to care if someone is from out of State or out of state since 1808.

Ideally, every adult paying taxes should have some voice and vote in politics.

Our Constitution provides a solution regarding foreign nationals and the franchise.

three fifths of all other Persons
 
Last edited:
Republicans don’t understand using poor people who are fleeing danger for the purpose of political punishment.
They don’t really see people as people unless they’re white.

And they have to be a certain kind of white. They can’t be educated or gay or liberal or atheist.

In fact, Republicans don’t even help their own white brothers and sisters in Appalachia.

The only people they feel are worth helping are “needy“ billionaires.
 
Democrat House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is so angry that as much as she likes OTHER PEOPLE ON THE BORDER having to foot the bill for educating, hospitalizing, incarcerating, and paying out of their own pockets for free meals for those awaiting their turn to become citizens that now she is saying it is ILLEGAL for President Trump to send them to Sanctuary Cities, namely San Francisco, where little cable cars climb half-way to the stars. What a hypocrit!!! The locals are very angry, too. They worked a long time to get a nice place in the town that wants to be sure you wear some flowers in your hair. tch, tch, tch.

They want those who live near the border to keep going bankrupt and giving up their children's teachers to take care of the border-crossing children.

If you're going to demand that everybody else does something, it doesn't take them long to say "It's your turn," and say it so cheerfully, too. Poor little Nancy.



From USA Today: Trump says 'strongly looking at' plan to send immigrants to sanctuary cities
"The Radical Left always seems to have an Open Borders, Open Arms policy – so this should make them very happy!" Trump said. The idea comes at a time of upheaval for Trump's immigration policy, and the Department of Homeland Security, which carries that policy out. The president has made many threats, such as a promise last month to seal the U.S.-Mexican border, that he has not carried out. On the other hand, he declared a "national emergency" at the border to free up more funding for his proposed wall. And many top DHS officials, including Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen, have left their jobs.

Democrats quickly blasted the idea of placing migrants in sanctuary cities, which Trump's own aides said would raise legal and practical questions to carry out. "It's just another notion that is unworthy of the presidency of the United States and disrespectful of the challenges that we face as a country, as a people, to address who we are: a nation of immigrants," House Speaker Pelosi, D-Calif., said Friday.

So-called sanctuary cities are jurisdictions that decline to cooperate with federal immigration agents in certain situations. Many decline to hold immigrants for an extended period in local jails at the request of Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials.​

California should insist on all foreign nationals in the US being known to the general government and federally identified for civil purposes, before being dropped off in "sanctuary cities."

Just dump'em.

There is no provision for excuses in our federal doctrine. Our welfare clause is General not common and we have a Commerce Clause, expressed not implied by right wing fantasy.

It’s pretty obvious no one wants them here
 
Democrat House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is so angry that as much as she likes OTHER PEOPLE ON THE BORDER having to foot the bill for educating, hospitalizing, incarcerating, and paying out of their own pockets for free meals for those awaiting their turn to become citizens that now she is saying it is ILLEGAL for President Trump to send them to Sanctuary Cities, namely San Francisco, where little cable cars climb half-way to the stars. What a hypocrit!!! The locals are very angry, too. They worked a long time to get a nice place in the town that wants to be sure you wear some flowers in your hair. tch, tch, tch.

They want those who live near the border to keep going bankrupt and giving up their children's teachers to take care of the border-crossing children.

If you're going to demand that everybody else does something, it doesn't take them long to say "It's your turn," and say it so cheerfully, too. Poor little Nancy.



From USA Today: Trump says 'strongly looking at' plan to send immigrants to sanctuary cities
"The Radical Left always seems to have an Open Borders, Open Arms policy – so this should make them very happy!" Trump said. The idea comes at a time of upheaval for Trump's immigration policy, and the Department of Homeland Security, which carries that policy out. The president has made many threats, such as a promise last month to seal the U.S.-Mexican border, that he has not carried out. On the other hand, he declared a "national emergency" at the border to free up more funding for his proposed wall. And many top DHS officials, including Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen, have left their jobs.

Democrats quickly blasted the idea of placing migrants in sanctuary cities, which Trump's own aides said would raise legal and practical questions to carry out. "It's just another notion that is unworthy of the presidency of the United States and disrespectful of the challenges that we face as a country, as a people, to address who we are: a nation of immigrants," House Speaker Pelosi, D-Calif., said Friday.

So-called sanctuary cities are jurisdictions that decline to cooperate with federal immigration agents in certain situations. Many decline to hold immigrants for an extended period in local jails at the request of Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials.​

California should insist on all foreign nationals in the US being known to the general government and federally identified for civil purposes, before being dropped off in "sanctuary cities."

Just dump'em.

There is no provision for excuses in our federal doctrine. Our welfare clause is General not common and we have a Commerce Clause, expressed not implied by right wing fantasy.

It’s pretty obvious no one wants them here

Only lousy capitalists don't want to make money under capitalism.
 
Democrat House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is so angry that as much as she likes OTHER PEOPLE ON THE BORDER having to foot the bill for educating, hospitalizing, incarcerating, and paying out of their own pockets for free meals for those awaiting their turn to become citizens that now she is saying it is ILLEGAL for President Trump to send them to Sanctuary Cities, namely San Francisco, where little cable cars climb half-way to the stars. What a hypocrit!!! The locals are very angry, too. They worked a long time to get a nice place in the town that wants to be sure you wear some flowers in your hair. tch, tch, tch.

They want those who live near the border to keep going bankrupt and giving up their children's teachers to take care of the border-crossing children.

If you're going to demand that everybody else does something, it doesn't take them long to say "It's your turn," and say it so cheerfully, too. Poor little Nancy.



From USA Today: Trump says 'strongly looking at' plan to send immigrants to sanctuary cities
"The Radical Left always seems to have an Open Borders, Open Arms policy – so this should make them very happy!" Trump said. The idea comes at a time of upheaval for Trump's immigration policy, and the Department of Homeland Security, which carries that policy out. The president has made many threats, such as a promise last month to seal the U.S.-Mexican border, that he has not carried out. On the other hand, he declared a "national emergency" at the border to free up more funding for his proposed wall. And many top DHS officials, including Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen, have left their jobs.

Democrats quickly blasted the idea of placing migrants in sanctuary cities, which Trump's own aides said would raise legal and practical questions to carry out. "It's just another notion that is unworthy of the presidency of the United States and disrespectful of the challenges that we face as a country, as a people, to address who we are: a nation of immigrants," House Speaker Pelosi, D-Calif., said Friday.

So-called sanctuary cities are jurisdictions that decline to cooperate with federal immigration agents in certain situations. Many decline to hold immigrants for an extended period in local jails at the request of Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials.​

California should insist on all foreign nationals in the US being known to the general government and federally identified for civil purposes, before being dropped off in "sanctuary cities."

Just dump'em.

There is no provision for excuses in our federal doctrine. Our welfare clause is General not common and we have a Commerce Clause, expressed not implied by right wing fantasy.

Sooo, Just dump'em.
 
Democrat House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is so angry that as much as she likes OTHER PEOPLE ON THE BORDER having to foot the bill for educating, hospitalizing, incarcerating, and paying out of their own pockets for free meals for those awaiting their turn to become citizens that now she is saying it is ILLEGAL for President Trump to send them to Sanctuary Cities, namely San Francisco, where little cable cars climb half-way to the stars. What a hypocrit!!! The locals are very angry, too. They worked a long time to get a nice place in the town that wants to be sure you wear some flowers in your hair. tch, tch, tch.

They want those who live near the border to keep going bankrupt and giving up their children's teachers to take care of the border-crossing children.

If you're going to demand that everybody else does something, it doesn't take them long to say "It's your turn," and say it so cheerfully, too. Poor little Nancy.



From USA Today: Trump says 'strongly looking at' plan to send immigrants to sanctuary cities
"The Radical Left always seems to have an Open Borders, Open Arms policy – so this should make them very happy!" Trump said. The idea comes at a time of upheaval for Trump's immigration policy, and the Department of Homeland Security, which carries that policy out. The president has made many threats, such as a promise last month to seal the U.S.-Mexican border, that he has not carried out. On the other hand, he declared a "national emergency" at the border to free up more funding for his proposed wall. And many top DHS officials, including Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen, have left their jobs.

Democrats quickly blasted the idea of placing migrants in sanctuary cities, which Trump's own aides said would raise legal and practical questions to carry out. "It's just another notion that is unworthy of the presidency of the United States and disrespectful of the challenges that we face as a country, as a people, to address who we are: a nation of immigrants," House Speaker Pelosi, D-Calif., said Friday.

So-called sanctuary cities are jurisdictions that decline to cooperate with federal immigration agents in certain situations. Many decline to hold immigrants for an extended period in local jails at the request of Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials.​

California should insist on all foreign nationals in the US being known to the general government and federally identified for civil purposes, before being dropped off in "sanctuary cities."

Just dump'em.

There is no provision for excuses in our federal doctrine. Our welfare clause is General not common and we have a Commerce Clause, expressed not implied by right wing fantasy.

Sooo, Just dump'em.

You can't do that once they are "subject to US jurisdiction."
 
Should send them ALL to sanctuary cities if the left wont let us send them home.
We should be generating revenue from every foreign national in the US. Tourism is the first, second, or third largest employer in twenty-nine States.

Capitalism works best, with diversity of metrics.
That's easy for you to say if you don't have a kid in an border-area public school and who doesn't learn anything while his teacher is preoccupied with making certain the Border kid in school for the first time makes the honor roll by the time he's twelve, which is 2 years away. Most of the border kids know very little if any English yet and have never done multiplication or division, much less how to spell "Mexican Border." The El Paso Democrats recruiting south-of-the-border families in order to gain re-election do nothing to help the school system. The border states are having to double down to educate both regular American kids and non-English-speaking border kids who may be from any one of a dozen or so nations who do not bother to educate peons or impoverished children. This puts intense fiscal demands on border areas, and in addition to humanitarian nonsupport of border crossers, these demons will come down harshly on poor schools who do not produce kids able to pass educational tests for their age-levels. So it's hustle and run on twice as many children as they had the same small amount of money to teach them with. I'd like to see Nancy Pelosi run out of Congress on a rail with hot waxed feathers plastered to her sorry butt for her shared hatred that interferes with the government of the United States of America. And a pox on her Communist professors who told her to create chaos to get what she damn well wanted in life.
 

Forum List

Back
Top