"Peer Review" now a Dead Letter

[Zander]

Damn, Rocks doesn't even know what peer review is.

Yet he plays at science.

He's a decrepit, illiterate, loser who loves being told what to do, when to do, and how to do it. He wants to give all of his worldly possessions to the Goremons, but alas, he has nothing but the stinking filthy clothes on his back.........

 

[Si modo]

Damn, Rocks doesn't even know what peer review is.

Yet he plays at science.

He's a decrepit, illiterate, loser who loves being told what to do, when to do, and how to do it. He wants to give all of his worldly possessions to the Goremons, but alas, he has nothing but the stinking filthy clothes on his back.........

Honestlty? That poster makes him look a hell of a lot better than he ever looked.

 

[flacaltenn]

Damn, Rocks doesn't even know what peer review is.

Yet he plays at science.

He's a decrepit, illiterate, loser who loves being told what to do, when to do, and how to do it. He wants to give all of his worldly possessions to the Goremons, but alas, he has nothing but the stinking filthy clothes on his back.........

Stop with the Erotic pictures already.. Somebody's gonna get excited..

 

[saveliberty]

Think Gore will burn those posters?

Wonder if they were soy based inks?

 

[daveman]

 

[CrusaderFrank]

As the the IPCC flagship, SS Goebbels Warming, takes yet another direct hit amidships....

The IAC reported that IPCC lead authors fail to give "due consideration ... to properly documented alternative views" (p. 20), fail to "provide detailed written responses to the most significant review issues identified by the Review Editors" (p. 21), and are not "consider[ing] review comments carefully and document[ing] their responses" (p. 22). In plain English: the IPCC reports are not peer-reviewed.

The IAC found that "the IPCC has no formal process or criteria for selecting authors" and "the selection criteria seemed arbitrary to many respondents" (p. 18). Government officials appoint scientists from their countries and "do not always nominate the best scientists from among those who volunteer, either because they do not know who these scientists are or because political considerations are given more weight than scientific qualifications" (p. 18). In other words: authors are selected from a "club" of scientists and nonscientists who agree with the alarmist perspective favored by politicians.

Read more: Articles: IPCC Admits Its Past Reports Were Junk

Remember when Einstein used the same technique after he posed the General Theory of Relativity?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

The bottom of the IPCC Flagship "Scientific Credibility" has been totally eaten away by ocean acidification!

10.4.2 Ocean Acidification Due to Increasing Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide <>

Increasing atmospheric CO2 concentrations lower oceanic pH and carbonate ion concentrations, thereby decreasing the saturation state with respect to calcium carbonate (Feely et al., 2004).

10.4.2 Ocean Acidification Due to Increasing Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide - AR4 WGI Chapter 10: Global Climate Projections

 

[Trakar]

The bottom of the IPCC Flagship "Scientific Credibility" has been totally eaten away by ocean acidification!

If this is your bar for who is in on the tinfoil hat conspiracy that you assert, include:
the National Academies of Science - http://portal.acs.org/portal/fileFetch/C/CNBP_025880/pdf/CNBP_025880.pdf

The American Association for the Advancement of Science - Acid Bath

the American Chemical Society - Global Climate Change Position Statement

American Physical Society - Climate Change

the Geological Society of America - https://gsa.confex.com/gsa/2010AM/finalprogram/session_26402.htm

The American Geophysical Union -
Inaugural AGU Science Policy Conference Recap

And virtually every other scientific body and organization upon the planet.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

The bottom of the IPCC Flagship "Scientific Credibility" has been totally eaten away by ocean acidification!

If this is your bar for who is in on the tinfoil hat conspiracy that you assert, include:
the National Academies of Science - http://portal.acs.org/portal/fileFetch/C/CNBP_025880/pdf/CNBP_025880.pdf

The American Association for the Advancement of Science - Acid Bath

the American Chemical Society - Global Climate Change Position Statement

American Physical Society - Climate Change

the Geological Society of America - https://gsa.confex.com/gsa/2010AM/finalprogram/session_26402.htm

The American Geophysical Union -
Inaugural AGU Science Policy Conference Recap

And virtually every other scientific body and organization upon the planet.

Only collectivist hive mind mentality can lead to everyone repeating the exact same lie like that

No one looking at the facts, just repeating the lie of "Ocean acidification" until it is accepted as "fact"

You're doubling down on a losing bet. There is no "ocean acidification" and all you're doing is listing all the co-conspirators.

The idea that there is an "Average ocean pH" to .1 is a farce to begin. Then the idea that a wisp of CO2 representing .000006% of this average ocean mass is going to make carbonic acid, (which instantly converts to CO2 and H2O on contact with water) and that increases ocean acidity 30% is a joke. It's an academic joke just to see who is actually thinking.

 

[Trakar]

The bottom of the IPCC Flagship "Scientific Credibility" has been totally eaten away by ocean acidification!

If this is your bar for who is in on the tinfoil hat conspiracy that you assert, include:
the National Academies of Science - http://portal.acs.org/portal/fileFetch/C/CNBP_025880/pdf/CNBP_025880.pdf

The American Association for the Advancement of Science - Acid Bath

the American Chemical Society - Global Climate Change Position Statement

American Physical Society - Climate Change

the Geological Society of America - https://gsa.confex.com/gsa/2010AM/finalprogram/session_26402.htm

The American Geophysical Union -
Inaugural AGU Science Policy Conference Recap

And virtually every other scientific body and organization upon the planet.

Only collectivist hive mind mentality can lead to everyone repeating the exact same lie like that

No one looking at the facts, just repeating the lie of "Ocean acidification" until it is accepted as "fact"

You're doubling down on a losing bet. There is no "ocean acidification" and all you're doing is listing all the co-conspirators.

The idea that there is an "Average ocean pH" to .1 is a farce to begin. Then the idea that a wisp of CO2 representing .000006% of this average ocean mass is going to make carbonic acid, (which instantly converts to CO2 and H2O on contact with water) and that increases ocean acidity 30% is a joke. It's an academic joke just to see who is actually thinking.

You have lost all touch with reasoned rationality and by extension reality.

 

[TakeAStepBack]

They will never rescind, folks. Never.

 

[skookerasbil]

Imagine asking public sector union people their opinions on the effectiveness of government regulations?

Or asking polar bears about the population of river salmon?


How about asking the people who make Gatorade if they are intersted in keeping Gatorade the official sports drink of the NFL?







For Christakes.........where do you think the Royal Society gets 70% of their funding from? Anybody with half a brain should know the answer in a split second................

Who funds the American Meteorological Society and Royal? - Yahoo! UK & Ireland Answers


Damn right their going to stack the deck with the data the government wants to see or its "no funding for you s0ns!!!!"



Amazingly........the environmental radicals truly believe that these associations actually believe all this crap they push..........funny chit yo's.

 

[saveliberty]

The weather goes in cycles. Things will change soon enough.

 

[RollingThunder]

Let's see if we can get this to sink in....

THE IPCC IS OPENLY ADMITTING THAT THEIR PEER REVIEW PROCESS WAS FRAUDULENT!

That only happened in the rightwingnut denier cult echo chamber and in your pathetically retarded and very diseased brain, screwball, not in the real world.

 

[saveliberty]

The real world? You mean the one where man has little to no effect on climate? I'm aware of that world. The IPCC is now too.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Let's see if we can get this to sink in....

THE IPCC IS OPENLY ADMITTING THAT THEIR PEER REVIEW PROCESS WAS FRAUDULENT!

That only happened in the rightwingnut denier cult echo chamber and in your pathetically retarded and very diseased brain, screwball, not in the real world.

"You tell 'em, Buddy!"

 

[Oddball]

Let's see if we can get this to sink in....

THE IPCC IS OPENLY ADMITTING THAT THEIR PEER REVIEW PROCESS WAS FRAUDULENT!

That only happened in the rightwingnut denier cult echo chamber and in your pathetically retarded and very diseased brain, screwball, not in the real world.

It happened because the scientific auditing outfit that the IPCC brought on board to check its work, found that work to be an affront to legitimate science.

You lose.

 

[Dot Com]

 

[Dot Com]

here you go 57 & Oddball:

 

[Dr.House]

Warmers are fucking funny...