"Peer Review" now a Dead Letter

Discussion in 'Environment' started by Oddball, Jul 17, 2012.

  1. Oddball
    Offline

    Oddball BANNED Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Messages:
    41,428
    Thanks Received:
    8,397
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Drinking wine, eating cheese, catching rays
    Ratings:
    +8,410
    As the the IPCC flagship, SS Goebbels Warming, takes yet another direct hit amidships....

    Read more: Articles: IPCC Admits Its Past Reports Were Junk
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 4
  2. Wry Catcher
    Offline

    Wry Catcher Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    33,035
    Thanks Received:
    4,388
    Trophy Points:
    1,160
    Location:
    San Francisco Bay Area
    Ratings:
    +8,860
    Rules/FAQ - American Thinker

    lol, no wonder odd-dude is so odd.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  3. iamwhatiseem
    Offline

    iamwhatiseem Gold Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2010
    Messages:
    15,093
    Thanks Received:
    3,172
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    Virginia
    Ratings:
    +6,452
    There is a phrase for this - "you scratch my back and I will scratch yours".
    For the "scientist"...boatloads of grant and seed money...
    For the IPCC...http://www.ipcc.ch/meetings/session29/doc3.pdf
    For the politicians...they get to say "we care".
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  4. Oddball
    Offline

    Oddball BANNED Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Messages:
    41,428
    Thanks Received:
    8,397
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Drinking wine, eating cheese, catching rays
    Ratings:
    +8,410
    The AT piece cites and links to the IPCC statement numerous times.

    You lose again, Danny Vermin. :lol:

    [​IMG]
     
  5. skookerasbil
    Offline

    skookerasbil Gold Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2009
    Messages:
    25,275
    Thanks Received:
    3,025
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    Not the middle of nowhere
    Ratings:
    +7,124
    LOL......been pointing this out for over 10 years..................


    Oddball FTMFW




    [​IMG]
     
  6. Wry Catcher
    Offline

    Wry Catcher Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    33,035
    Thanks Received:
    4,388
    Trophy Points:
    1,160
    Location:
    San Francisco Bay Area
    Ratings:
    +8,860
    Wrong again Danielle. No where in the primary source is the word "Junk" used; the only place "Junk" is used is in the partisan piece pubished by the right wing AT.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  7. Oddball
    Offline

    Oddball BANNED Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Messages:
    41,428
    Thanks Received:
    8,397
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Drinking wine, eating cheese, catching rays
    Ratings:
    +8,410
    Whatever...Fact is the IPCC has admitted that their "peer review" process was a flat-out fraud.

    Niggling parsing of semantics won't change that.
     
  8. Dot Com
    Offline

    Dot Com Nullius in verba Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2011
    Messages:
    51,107
    Thanks Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Location:
    Fairfax, NoVA
    Ratings:
    +17,189
    another newsmaxx article? :rolleyes:
     
  9. daveman
    Offline

    daveman Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2010
    Messages:
    51,299
    Thanks Received:
    5,693
    Trophy Points:
    1,775
    Location:
    On the way to the Dark Tower.
    Ratings:
    +5,759
    The IPCC is feeding you bullshit, and you like it. That's okay, but don't expect normal people to believe you when you tell us it's yummy.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  10. Old Rocks
    Offline

    Old Rocks Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    48,603
    Thanks Received:
    5,695
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    Portland, Ore.
    Ratings:
    +11,501
    Well now, all one has to do is look at independent articles in the many scientific journals. If they are showing evidence and data that is counter to what the IPCC report did, then there is a problem. But if they are not, and are reporting data and evidence that is supporting the IPCC data, then there is no problem.

    And if I wish information on any branch of science, the last place I go is to a political rag or think tank.
     

Share This Page