Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
honestly I don't see him as a sell out, just a guy smart enough to realize that if he pushes his position too far with too little public support he will do his position more harm than good. Make sense?Ryan is just like the rest of them. Obama butt licking sellout. Afraid of riots in the streets if they make him look stupid
-Geaux
honestly I don't see him as a sell out, just a guy smart enough to realize that if he pushes his position too far with too little public support he will do his position more harm than good. Make sense?Ryan is just like the rest of them. Obama butt licking sellout. Afraid of riots in the streets if they make him look stupid
-Geaux
honestly I don't see him as a sell out, just a guy smart enough to realize that if he pushes his position too far with too little public support he will do his position more harm than good. Make sense?Ryan is just like the rest of them. Obama butt licking sellout. Afraid of riots in the streets if they make him look stupid
-Geaux
No, he should of never signed or pushed this budget. Make sense?
-Geaux
EdwardB is correct, Geaux is derelict.
Ryan did the right thing.
Exactly, republicans here love to scream about how Obama wants to destroy this country, but on exactly what?.
For crying out loud Obama has taken us from 10 to 5% unemployment and grew the private sector more then Bush ever did.
No, no, no, and no: none of that.Exactly, republicans here love to scream about how Obama wants to destroy this country, but on exactly what?.
don't be stupid!! Obama was raised by 3 communist parents and voted to left of BErnie Sanders. He is America's enemy. For example, he is for single payer and for communism in general to the extent he can get away with it.
Do you have the IQ to understand?
The guy was a train wreck before he got here:
Paul Ryan is acting like every Democrat's wet dream.
XXXXX
o He's giving $1.6 billion to resettle illegal aliens rather than deport them.
o He is fully funding Obama's illegal amnesty.
o He is fully funding Obamacare.
o He is fully funding Planned Parenthood and their baby cutting tactics.
o He is allowing Obama to bring in hundreds of thousands of Muslim refugees.
o He is fully funding the EPA's program to shut down coal-fired power plants.
o He is going to add hundreds of billions of dollars to our national debt.
Ryan is an economy genius, or so talking heads told us regardless of his support for the TPP before he was speaker:
Ryan’s ‘Misperceptions’ on Trade Deal Unveiled, Reports Suggest
by Alex Swoyer17 Jun 2015
Ryan’s ‘Misperceptions’ on Trade Deal Unveiled, Reports Suggest - Breitbart
Be that as it may be, I want to address another topic that should frighten every AMERICAN. Paul Ryan follows the vice president in the presidential line of succession.
NOTE: Had Mitt Romney won the election in 2012 Paul Ryan would have been next in line. So you might say he was demoted!
Now consider a nightmare far worse than John Boehner or Typhoid Nancy Pelosi becoming president.
Here’s a reminder of who is in line:
With a nuclear attack in mind I want to comment on the presidential line of succession one more time.
The Constitution gives Congress the authority needed to change the presidential line of succession. Why should it be changed? Answer: Every bureaucrat on the current list is scarier than a thirsty Count Dracula. Check it out for yourself then tell me if there is one bureaucrat on the list that you want for president. Most of them should be run out of town on a rail never mind becoming president by a fluke:
United States presidential line of succession - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Years ago, I suggested changing the line; replacing the bureaucrats with state governors starting with the governor from the most populous state irrespective of political party. He or she would be followed by the governor from the least populous state; then alternate in the same way down through all of the governors. I would even put the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff in the current line before every bureaucrat including the Secretary of Defense.
Parenthetically, it was understood that Henry Kissinger and Madeleine Albright were not eligible when they were in the line of succession because they were naturalized citizens as was George W. Bush’s secretary of labor, Elaine Chao.
With or without changing the line of succession, Congress, and/or the Supreme Court, should eliminate all wiggle room for presidential eligibility in elections and succession.
Every bureaucrat in the line must be replaced by elected officials. Note that cabinet secretaries who once held elected positions are no exception when it comes to the line of succession.
And have you noticed that liberals scream the loudest about their sacred Right to vote for the people who govern them, yet nobody votes for the bureaucrats who fill the line of succession after the first three elected officials; the vice president, the speaker of the house, and the president pro tem of the Senate.
It got worse in 2011
The Presidential Line Of Succession Act of 2011 added ambassadors to the line if the others are wiped out. I looked for a complete list of everybody in the current line and could not find one that included the ambassadors first proposed by the 109th Congress. I wonder why it is such a secret?
How does America-hater Samantha Power for president grab you?
H.R. 1943 and S.920
These bills were introduced in the 109th Congress (2005-2006). Their provisions included adding the following positions to the end of the current line-of-succession:
Secretary of Homeland Security,
Ambassador to the United Nations, (Samantha Power)
Ambassador to Great Britain,
Ambassador to Russia,
Ambassador to China, and
Ambassador to France.
Presidential Succession
Here’s something to ponder. Karl Rove’s Republicans so hate conservative Americans they will do everything it takes to defeat Tea Party conservatives. The establishment’s hatred of everything the Tea Party advocates runs so deep they will never allow one Tea Party activist to make it onto the line of succession.
Think about it this way: Democrats and Republicans alike use bureaucracies to implement big government, global government, policies that could never be legislated; so there is not a chance a Tea Party conservative will ever head a federal bureaucracy let alone one that would place them in the line of succession where they might suddenly ascend to the presidency after a nuclear attack. For the same reason Democrats and Republicans will never replace bureaucrats with state governors as I suggested.
The Tea Party In The Presidential Line Of Succession? | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
And they wonder WHY TRUMP is 2-3 TIMES more popular than any of the REPUBLICAN POLITICIAN...... Can YOU find a difference?
And they wonder WHY TRUMP is 2-3 TIMES more popular than any of the REPUBLICAN POLITICIAN...... Can YOU find a difference?
Certainly we could of repealed the tax breaks, ended the wars and cut down on welfare. But the fact that you think it is good to gut infrastructure, science, r&d and educational funding makes you a fool.
Now just go fuck off.
The guy was a train wreck before he got here:
Paul Ryan is acting like every Democrat's wet dream.
XXXXX
o He's giving $1.6 billion to resettle illegal aliens rather than deport them.
o He is fully funding Obama's illegal amnesty.
o He is fully funding Obamacare.
o He is fully funding Planned Parenthood and their baby cutting tactics.
o He is allowing Obama to bring in hundreds of thousands of Muslim refugees.
o He is fully funding the EPA's program to shut down coal-fired power plants.
o He is going to add hundreds of billions of dollars to our national debt.
Ryan is an economy genius, or so talking heads told us regardless of his support for the TPP before he was speaker:
Ryan’s ‘Misperceptions’ on Trade Deal Unveiled, Reports Suggest
by Alex Swoyer17 Jun 2015
Ryan’s ‘Misperceptions’ on Trade Deal Unveiled, Reports Suggest - Breitbart
Be that as it may be, I want to address another topic that should frighten every AMERICAN. Paul Ryan follows the vice president in the presidential line of succession.
NOTE: Had Mitt Romney won the election in 2012 Paul Ryan would have been next in line. So you might say he was demoted!
Now consider a nightmare far worse than John Boehner or Typhoid Nancy Pelosi becoming president.
Here’s a reminder of who is in line:
With a nuclear attack in mind I want to comment on the presidential line of succession one more time.
The Constitution gives Congress the authority needed to change the presidential line of succession. Why should it be changed? Answer: Every bureaucrat on the current list is scarier than a thirsty Count Dracula. Check it out for yourself then tell me if there is one bureaucrat on the list that you want for president. Most of them should be run out of town on a rail never mind becoming president by a fluke:
United States presidential line of succession - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Years ago, I suggested changing the line; replacing the bureaucrats with state governors starting with the governor from the most populous state irrespective of political party. He or she would be followed by the governor from the least populous state; then alternate in the same way down through all of the governors. I would even put the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff in the current line before every bureaucrat including the Secretary of Defense.
Parenthetically, it was understood that Henry Kissinger and Madeleine Albright were not eligible when they were in the line of succession because they were naturalized citizens as was George W. Bush’s secretary of labor, Elaine Chao.
With or without changing the line of succession, Congress, and/or the Supreme Court, should eliminate all wiggle room for presidential eligibility in elections and succession.
Every bureaucrat in the line must be replaced by elected officials. Note that cabinet secretaries who once held elected positions are no exception when it comes to the line of succession.
And have you noticed that liberals scream the loudest about their sacred Right to vote for the people who govern them, yet nobody votes for the bureaucrats who fill the line of succession after the first three elected officials; the vice president, the speaker of the house, and the president pro tem of the Senate.
It got worse in 2011
The Presidential Line Of Succession Act of 2011 added ambassadors to the line if the others are wiped out. I looked for a complete list of everybody in the current line and could not find one that included the ambassadors first proposed by the 109th Congress. I wonder why it is such a secret?
How does America-hater Samantha Power for president grab you?
H.R. 1943 and S.920
These bills were introduced in the 109th Congress (2005-2006). Their provisions included adding the following positions to the end of the current line-of-succession:
Secretary of Homeland Security,
Ambassador to the United Nations, (Samantha Power)
Ambassador to Great Britain,
Ambassador to Russia,
Ambassador to China, and
Ambassador to France.
Presidential Succession
Here’s something to ponder. Karl Rove’s Republicans so hate conservative Americans they will do everything it takes to defeat Tea Party conservatives. The establishment’s hatred of everything the Tea Party advocates runs so deep they will never allow one Tea Party activist to make it onto the line of succession.
Think about it this way: Democrats and Republicans alike use bureaucracies to implement big government, global government, policies that could never be legislated; so there is not a chance a Tea Party conservative will ever head a federal bureaucracy let alone one that would place them in the line of succession where they might suddenly ascend to the presidency after a nuclear attack. For the same reason Democrats and Republicans will never replace bureaucrats with state governors as I suggested.
The Tea Party In The Presidential Line Of Succession? | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
This is as idiotic as it is wrong.
Eddy, you can't refute that this recovery has produced more jobs than either the Clinton or Bush recoveries. Fact. Also a fact is that you are a Mises type libertarian, so your opinion is near worthless.how stupid and liberal are you?
Its the worst recovery since the Great Depression, GDP is 2% and most people are earning less not more. Again, how stupid are you??.
To JakeStarkey: They can all beat her; even previous losers like John McCain and Mitt Romney.nominate a candidate who does have a real chance against HRC. Trump certainly does not.
