eflatminor
Classical Liberal
- May 24, 2011
- 10,643
- 1,669
- 245
mine was a very reasoned response .... Your questions were hyperbole.Ass? Why the hate? I haven't attacked you. I responded honestly to your OP. Geez.
If we could get back to the point at hand...like adults might...I would say you're correct that sanctions against Iraq are what many wanted. That doesn't change the fact that Paul would never support sanctions. You're also correct that the Saudi's allowed us to put a base near Mecca. Again, that doesn't change the fact that Paul would never have supported such a base. Lastly, Paul never said he "hates Jews", but he does stand against all foreign aid.
The point is, you've not addressed my and Dr Paul's point. So, I say again, if you're going to call bullshit on Paul's statement, you're going to have to convince us that Osama and his pals would still have launched the 9/11 attacks even if we were not doing any of the things they claimed to be offensive and worthy of a fatwa.
Debunked? I'm just hoping for a reasonable response!
But you haven't responded to my retort. Your OP states:
Ron Paul claimed that, had his people been in charge, thousands of victims from the 9/11 attacks would still be alive.
I showed you where Paul's policies would have completely removed the reasons cited for the 9/11 attacks. Tell us then how Paul's statement is incorrect. Please.