rhodescholar
Gold Member
- Banned
- #161
Both Arabs and Jews employed militia to terrorize the "enemy" during the '48 Arab-Israeli War and the Civil War that preceded it.
"Civil war"? As in the arab massacres of jews in hebron and jerusalem? Please do some further reading, and not from hate sites or other similar non-credible sources.
...my limited reading of history ...
At least you've made one claim with a factual basis...
This might be the best piece of advice I provide on this forum: do NOT under any circumstances use that website as a source, EVER, if you are trying to make a point and be considered as a credible poster.
You'll be instantly written off on any serious poli forum, and lumped in with the stormfront assholes. Not even arab supporters who are of good intent will go near it.
I say this b/c unlike some of the other filth here like shogun, tinmore, etc., who are mentally sick and have no interest in increasing their knowledge of the actual facts - they are merely jew-hating trash, your problem is simply a lack of knowledge, as it would appear you lack the same base jew-hatred they have.
believes his fellow combat vets weren't responsible for the theft of Arab property. He blames "..the rear echelon, the transport and quartermaster troops, the cronies of people in power, who came with lorries and trucks and loaded up everything they came across."
Again, this is why you do not use garbage web sites as a source...does that claim even make sense?
A country that formed basically hours before, with limited resources, has thousands of well-functioning trucks - supplied with lots of diesel, no less - to transfer HUNDREDS of thousands of arabs out of the area?
And how on earth, assuming you have any combat experience, could the jews possibly have an established, functional and organizationally structured army with distinctions between "front-line troops" - little more than holocaust survivors with WW1 rifles - not have a clue what their brothers in arms were doing near them?
THE STORY AND CLAIM MAKE NO SENSE. This is where the line between irrational hatred and thoughtful questioning of claims comes in.
First this writer claimed at one time that is was the troops who conducted the "attacks," now its the backing "operational" soldiers...how many more times will he change his story when exposed as a liar?
Before you look to this clown as credible, read a bit more about him, like how he wanted to attack arab regimes and overthrow their governments:
Uri Avnery - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I think it's at least as truthful to blame the investment bankers in London and New York who, along with their political and military handmaidens, saw how Greater Israel could be used to line their own pockets with the profits from Arab oil.
When i read ludicrous idiocies like this, i realize that you are likely 16 years old, and are just parroting what you think are some cool lines you picked up on the web.
If you ever met an "investment bankers in London and New York", you'd know that they could not give a flying fuck what israel and the arabs are doing. Clearly, you have no clue what an investment bank is or what it does, so another STRONG recommendation: do NOT throw out lines like that that expose you as either an imbecile or a clueless teen.
Last edited: