- Dec 6, 2009
- 77,863
- 4,177
- 1,815
Are you saying that the Mandate for Palestine did not have a Palestine?P F Tinmore, montelatici, et al,
No, I don't think you understand what "Palestine" means, as determined by the Allied Powers.
(COMMENT)The Mandate was a temporarily assigned administration. Palestine is the place.Palestinian is not an Arab Country. It is the territory to which the Mandate applies.
The territory of Palestine was defined by the Order n Council:
To "mandate" something is to issue and "an official order or commission to do something." It is what the word means. In this case the Mandate was an order adopted by the Council and outlined in a set of provisions. The degree of authority or control to be exercised by the Mandatory varies according to the character of the territory.
- The limits of this Order are the territories to which the Mandate for Palestine applies, hereinafter described as Palestine. - See more at: Mandate for Palestine - The Palestine Order in LoN Council - Mandatory order 10 August 1922
(COMMENT)Do you mean like the Palestinians want Palestine?NO! The Palestinians want everything either handed to them on a Silver Platter or to take it by force.
Shame on them.
The Arab Palestinians have no authority to assume a leadership role within such boundaries as may be determined by the Principal Allied Powers, under the terms of the Unconditional Surrender of the Ottoman Empire.
It is a matter of treaty and self-determination.
(COMMENT)Palestine was never called Trans-Jordania. Trans-Jordania was a separate territory included in the Mandate, as reported in the Mandatories 1921 Report in a separate section, X. separate from Palestine and whose boundaries are clearly defined:
AN INTERIM REPORT ON THE CIVIL ADMINISTRATION OF PALESTINE, during the period 1st JULY, 1920--30th JUNE, 1921."X.--TRANS-JORDANIA.
Included in the area of the Palestine Mandate is the territory of Trans-Jordania.
Trans-Jordan was clearly part of the Mandate. It is separate (because it was already promised to the Sharif of Mecca for one of his sons) yes --- but only as far as Article 25 of the Mandate applies. It was partitioned early on with the blessing of the other Allied Powers.
You guys periodically bring this issue up. And each time, I have to explain it again. You must use the interpretation of the Permanent Mandate Commission and not some lame brain pro-Palestinian trying to make some unsubstantiated point.
"INCLUDED" (the very key word here) "in the area of the Palestine Mandate is the territory of Trans-Jordania." The Arabs have, since the early years of the Mandate, make this suggestion that Trans-Jordania was not part of the Mandate for Palestine. When in fact it is all one Mandate. The portion of the mandate east of the Jordan River was subject to Article 25 and not to be considered part of the allow territory for Jewish Immigration or consideration for the Jewish National Home. But as the Mandatory made quite clear, when this was addressed in 1929:
Most Respectfully,M. ORTS quoted the end of the declaration of Lord Cushendun: said:1003. Palestine and Trans-Jordan: Agreement between Great Britain and the Amir of Trans-Jordan : Attitude of the Commission.
"There should be no doubt at all in the minds of the members of the Council that my Government regards itself as responsible to the Council for the proper application in Trans-Jordan of all the provisions of the Palestine mandate, except those which have been excluded under Article 25."
SOURCE: PERMANENT MANDATES COMMISSION MINUTES OF THE FIFTEENTH SESSION Held at Geneva from July 1st to 19th, 1929. including the
REPORT OF THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL
R