Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You are confused. Nothing was classified anymore. He had declassified them.You seem confused. He obstructed the subpoena seeking documents with classified markings. He had dozens of them that he hid from the FBI. That’s what they found when they raided his house.
People have been arrested for it, ya big goober!You realize even Project Veritas had to admit the diary could not be authenticated, right? But you go right on believing all the right wing media myths your little heart desires.
No we just believe what she said about what she wrote.You realize even Project Veritas had to admit the diary could not be authenticated, right? But you go right on believing all the right wing media myths your little heart desires.
But this thread is about whether you would vote for a convicted criminal in a case about Trump's efforts in subverting democracy.It's not delusional that most of the country disapprove of Biden, think the country is going in the wrong direction, Trump is far ahead in swing state polls, and betting venues are predicting a Trump win.
Irrelevant. The subpoena was for any documents with classified markings.You are confused. Nothing was classified anymore. He had declassified them.
You had democrats in charge and that is the sole reason Holder got away with defying congress.
First, there will be no convictions before the election. Second, it is democrats subverting democracy.But this thread is about whether you would vote for a convicted criminal in a case about Trump's efforts in subverting democracy.
See? Thanks for proving my point.How does that change the fact that your belief is unsubstantiated?
For what?People have been arrested for it, ya big goober!
Not true. Many perhaps. But no. Not all.Have you noticed every time a ruling goes against Trump you folks blame it on bias?
If — by your petty name calling — you are referencing President Trump, then the answer is no. Anybody is capable of committing a crime. But that’s the wrong question. The question is whether there s any valid basis upon which to accuse a person in the first place.Do you believe the Orange Messiah is incapable of committing a crime?
Bitch, please. WHO provides the legal instructions to a grand jury? If you said “the prosecutors,” you’d be correct.All the grand juries who have weighed the evidence do not believe that.
Of course. When you completely lack principles, 'making libz cry' seems like the perfect motivation for voting.I'm going to support Trump to the very end for no other reason than to make liberal trash cry. This whole silly thing is TDS driven nonsense, endless whining about a little spat years ago is childish and deserves nothing but contempt.
To the very end. Not a cult, right?I'm going to support Trump to the very end for no other reason than to make liberal trash cry. This whole silly thing is TDS driven nonsense, endless whining about a little spat years ago is childish and deserves nothing but contempt.
Keep hope alive (still delusional).It's not delusional that most of the country disapprove of Biden, think the country is going in the wrong direction, Trump is far ahead in swing state polls, and betting venues are predicting a Trump win.
Not just principles, policies to make life in America better.
by stating the manifestly accurate observation, "Trump has not been convicted of a crime."
If he is, since I believe the 1/6 trial is first up, convicted in that case of the serious criminal charges brought against him (understanding he will appeal), is that a deal breaker for your support?
It's well understood his moral failings do not persuade you to reconsider him being worthy of the presidency. What about a criminal conviction?
You triggered bitches are too funny. All your little catch phrases and whatnot only exasperate your fear of Trump.To the very end. Not a cult, right?
Nobody is crying, filth.