Over and over I read Trump's defenders, in effect, justify their continued support.......

[berg80]

by stating the manifestly accurate observation, "Trump has not been convicted of a crime."

If he is, since I believe the 1/6 trial is first up, convicted in that case of the serious criminal charges brought against him (understanding he will appeal), is that a deal breaker for your support?

It's well understood his moral failings do not persuade you to reconsider him being worthy of the presidency. What about a criminal conviction?

 

[Independentthinker]

by stating the manifestly accurate observation, "Trump has not been convicted of a crime."

If he is, since I believe the 1/6 trial is first up, convicted in that case of the serious criminal charges brought against him (understanding he will appeal), is that a deal breaker for your support?

It's well understood his moral failings do not persuade you to reconsider him being worthy of the presidency. What about a criminal conviction?

All you have to do is look at the state of the country and voters would beg to have a criminal as president. That's how bad Biden has been.

 

[Rogue AI]

I'm going to support Trump to the very end for no other reason than to make liberal trash cry. This whole silly thing is TDS driven nonsense, endless whining about a little spat years ago is childish and deserves nothing but contempt.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

And the above by I T shows why MAGAs lie. It's what they do. The Texas Rangers did not honestly win the World Series because they cheated in the MAGA norm.

 

[berg80]

All you have to do is look at the state of the country and voters would beg to have a criminal as president. That's how bad Biden has been.

Ludicrous rationalization #1.

 

[TNHarley]

Probably not. They would do the same thing biden supporters would do.
Not give a shit.

 

[berg80]

I'm going to support Trump to the very end for no other reason than to make liberal trash cry. This whole silly thing is TDS driven nonsense, endless whining about a little spat years ago is childish and deserves nothing but contempt.

So, owning the libs. Great reason. Ludicrous rationalization #2.

 

[Billo_Really]

by stating the manifestly accurate observation, "Trump has not been convicted of a crime."

If he is, since I believe the 1/6 trial is first up, convicted in that case of the serious criminal charges brought against him (understanding he will appeal), is that a deal breaker for your support?

It's well understood his moral failings do not persuade you to reconsider him being worthy of the presidency. What about a criminal conviction?

MAGA's want a criminal President! That's how they get their ya-ya's out.

 

[BackAgain]

This is a stupid thread.

The review would be a restatement of the old: “buy the premise, buy the plot.”

Since I don’t buy the premise, I don’t buy the plot.

Not one of the multiple cases against Trump makes any fucking legal sense. It’s clearly all political manipulation and abuse of our criminal justice system (except for the civil cases which are also abuses of our legal system for political purposes; except civil and not criminal).

 

[berg80]

Probably not. They would do the same thing biden supporters would do.
Not give a shit.

But Biden has no criminal cases pending cuz, you know, no indictments. Cuz, you know, no evidence.

 

[ThisIsMe]

by stating the manifestly accurate observation, "Trump has not been convicted of a crime."

If he is, since I believe the 1/6 trial is first up, convicted in that case of the serious criminal charges brought against him (understanding he will appeal), is that a deal breaker for your support?

It's well understood his moral failings do not persuade you to reconsider him being worthy of the presidency. What about a criminal conviction?

So, owning the libs. Great reason. Ludicrous rationalization #2.

lol, it’s what you all would do if you were in the same situation. So, why not!

 

[berg80]

This is a stupid thread.

The review would be a restatement of the old: “buy the premise, buy the plot.”

Since I don’t buy the premise, I don’t buy the plot.

Not one of the multiple cases against Trump makes any fucking legal sense. It’s clearly all political manipulation and abuse of our criminal justice system (except for the civil cases which are also abuses of our legal system for political purposes; except civil and not criminal).

Ludicrous rationalization #3. Gosh, you folks really love him.

 

[Rogue AI]

So, owning the libs. Great reason. Ludicrous rationalization #2.

You folks deserve nothing less. Not sure how anyone can take you TDS monkeys seriously, a seven year hissy fit is a bit absurd, and still not over, sad.

 

[berg80]

lol, it’s what you all would do if you were in the same situation. So, why not!

I'll take that as a yes to voting for a convicted criminal found liable for sexual abuse. Awesome.

 

[Robert W]

by stating the manifestly accurate observation, "Trump has not been convicted of a crime."

If he is, since I believe the 1/6 trial is first up, convicted in that case of the serious criminal charges brought against him (understanding he will appeal), is that a deal breaker for your support?

It's well understood his moral failings do not persuade you to reconsider him being worthy of the presidency. What about a criminal conviction?

That also applies to Biden. Do you still support Biden?

 

[berg80]

You folks deserve nothing less.

Don't all folks deserve better than a convicted criminal found liable for sexual abuse?

 

[berg80]

That also applies to Biden. Do you still support Biden?

See post #10.

 

[Dadoalex]

lol, it’s what you all would do if you were in the same situation. So, why not!

 

[BackAgain]

Ludicrous rationalization #3. Gosh, you folks really love him.

Nah. Just because I reject your partisan political love for the improper manipulation of the legal system doesn’t make it ludicrous.

You libturds just hate honesty or fairness or justice.

 

[BackAgain]

But Biden has no criminal cases pending cuz, you know, no indictments. Cuz, you know, no evidence.

Nah. That’s far from the reason. And you know it.