Oregon sheriff: 'Unconstitutional' gun control laws won't be enforced

Discussion in 'Law and Justice System' started by Sunni Man, Jan 16, 2013.

  1. Sunni Man
    Offline

    Sunni Man Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2008
    Messages:
    40,001
    Thanks Received:
    5,328
    Trophy Points:
    1,860
    Location:
    Patriotic American Muslim
    Ratings:
    +12,444
    (CNN) -- An Oregon sheriff says he will not enforce any federal regulation that President Barack Obama lays out in his package of gun control proposals Wednesday.

    Linn County Sheriff Tim Mueller joins several other public officials across the nation who have decided to square off with the White House even before it outlines what its plans are for expanded measures.

    Mueller sent a letter to Vice President Joe Biden this week saying he won't enforce any federal regulation "offending the constitutional rights of my citizens." He won't permit federal officers to come to his county to enforce such laws either, he said.

    Mueller's defiant stand exploded into a groundswell of support. His letter -- posted on the department's Facebook page -- earned more than 59,000 likes and shares -- and was growing by the minute.

    Over the weekend, Sheriff Denny Peyman of Jackson County, Kentucky, said that he too would disobey any directive from the administration. He told residents in a town hall meeting that the sheriff has more power than the federal government.

    "They need to go back and study that. We are a commonwealth. I can ask federal people to leave, they have to leave. I can ask state people to leave, they have to leave," he said.

    Oregon sheriff: 'Unconstitutional' gun control laws won't be enforced - CNN.com
     
  2. Mr. H.
    Offline

    Mr. H. Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2009
    Messages:
    44,117
    Thanks Received:
    9,265
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    A warm place with no memory.
    Ratings:
    +15,395
    And so it begins...
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  3. jillian
    Offline

    jillian Princess Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2006
    Messages:
    69,555
    Thanks Received:
    13,012
    Trophy Points:
    2,220
    Location:
    The Other Side of Paradise
    Ratings:
    +22,432
    some states didn't like civil rights laws either.

    seems the national guard had to address the twits who think states can tell the fed what to do.

    if something is unconstitutional, the remedy is the courts... not some grandstanding wacko refusing to enforce federal law.

    and what part of the as yet non-existent federal law is purportedly unconstitutional?
     
  4. C_Clayton_Jones
    Offline

    C_Clayton_Jones Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2011
    Messages:
    41,543
    Thanks Received:
    8,933
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    In a Republic, actually
    Ratings:
    +23,869
    Denny needs to go back and study the Constitution and its case law.
     
  5. Amelia
    Offline

    Amelia BANNED

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2011
    Messages:
    21,830
    Thanks Received:
    5,105
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Packerland!
    Ratings:
    +5,119
    The White House needs to go back and study what happens to nations when the government becomes too oppressive.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  6. C_Clayton_Jones
    Offline

    C_Clayton_Jones Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2011
    Messages:
    41,543
    Thanks Received:
    8,933
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    In a Republic, actually
    Ratings:
    +23,869
    It’s partisanism, not ‘oppression,’ just more of the right’s continued hissy-fit over losing two elections.
     
  7. martybegan
    Offline

    martybegan Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2010
    Messages:
    29,427
    Thanks Received:
    4,009
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +10,998
    The difference is that here he is SUPPORTING the rights of the people in his county. During the Jim Crow period, brought on by Plessey V. Fergueson, the local authorities were the ones being unconstitutional, and it took another court decsion to remedy the error made in the late 1800's.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  8. PratchettFan
    Offline

    PratchettFan Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2012
    Messages:
    7,238
    Thanks Received:
    745
    Trophy Points:
    190
    Ratings:
    +1,706
    Whether he effectively enforces laws is between him and the voters. However, if he thinks he can prevent federal officers from doing their job he is in for quite an experience.
     
  9. Katzndogz
    Offline

    Katzndogz Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2011
    Messages:
    65,659
    Thanks Received:
    7,418
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Ratings:
    +8,337
    He isn't obligated to enforce federal laws any more than the federal authorities are obligated to enforce local laws.
     
  10. Mad Scientist
    Offline

    Mad Scientist Deplorable Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    23,940
    Thanks Received:
    5,212
    Trophy Points:
    270
    Ratings:
    +7,683
    But it's ok when Obama refuses to enforce existing Federal Immigration Law isn't it? Because he's a Fed, and you think All Rights come from "The Fed"?

    You couldn't BE more wrong.

    Gov't Power comes from the People through the States. THE STATES are Sovereign over the Federal Gov't, The Federal Gov't has to listen to the States, NOT THE OTHER WAY AROUND! The Federal Government ONLY EXISTS because the States made it so!

    We are the United STATES of America, NOT the United Central Federal Gov't of America.
     

Share This Page