"Op-Ed Essay Is Nothing More Than Propaganda"

[Billy_Bob]

Well all you little Libbie's need to hang on to your diapers.

The Secret Service and the FBI are now looking into FOREIGN ACTORS in concert with the NYTimes and democrats promoting PROPAGANDA meant to sow seeds of discord and distrust... And you fucking left tards fell for it..

We'll hold on while Alex Jones gets to the bottom of it.

It's been apparent since the first Presidential Debate with Hillary Clinton, that Trump is unfit for the Presidency. That insiders recognize it, and periodically makes statements about, should surprise no one.

Seditious and treasonous acts are ok if the forward your agenda... Even working with foreign agents to remove a duly elected president.. You left tards should be proud!

See, Iove trhe right. They try to remove a duly elected President for getting head in the Oval Office & they act like it the most treasonous thing ever to remove a President that colluded with the Russians,. violated the campaign finance laws, and obstructed justice.

Nothing like pedophilia and defending it.. you people are sick defending the Clinton machine and all the lives they destroyed obstructing justice.

 

[joaquinmiller]

Well all you little Libbie's need to hang on to your diapers.

The Secret Service and the FBI are now looking into FOREIGN ACTORS in concert with the NYTimes and democrats promoting PROPAGANDA meant to sow seeds of discord and distrust... And you fucking left tards fell for it..

We'll hold on while Alex Jones gets to the bottom of it.

It's been apparent since the first Presidential Debate with Hillary Clinton, that Trump is unfit for the Presidency. That insiders recognize it, and periodically makes statements about, should surprise no one.

Seditious and treasonous acts are ok if the forward your agenda... Even working with foreign agents to remove a duly elected president.. You left tards should be proud!

See, Iove trhe right. They try to remove a duly elected President for getting head in the Oval Office & they act like it the most treasonous thing ever to remove a President that colluded with the Russians,. violated the campaign finance laws, and obstructed justice.

Nothing like pedophilia and defending it.. you people are sick defending the Clinton machine and all the lives they destroyed obstructing justice.

Pedophilia?

Link?

 

[joaquinmiller]

"The paper has a scandalous history of lying about the seniority of officials it quotes anonymously - especially when that source parrots their agenda.

"A few years back they were caught red-handed deceiving their readers in such a way.

"In a lengthy anti-fracking article they claimed that senior industry experts and insiders believed the industry to be little more than a “Ponzi scheme" ... "set up for failure".

"They even had the emails from a series of senior insiders where these doubts were expressed.

"According to the New York Times, one “energy analyst” wrote, “Am I just totally crazy, or does it seem like everyone and their mothers are endorsing shale gas without getting a really good understanding of the economics at the business level?”

"It turns out the federal analyst, the energy analyst and the officer turned out to be the same person who was actually an intern when he wrote the first email and in an entry level position when he wrote the other comments. Yes, that’s right, the “Paper of Record" misrepresented an intern/junior employee as a senior official to push an agenda.

"Was the New York Times embarrassed when their deception was uncovered? The Senate investigation did attract the attention of the New York Times Public Editor Arthur S Brisbane. “Can an intern be an “official”? It doesn’t sound right to me,” he stated.

"Well it sounded fine to the New York Times editorial board. They stood by their mislabelling of the intern/low level employees as a senior official. They later decided they didn’t want their stories to be second guessed in their own newspaper so they ended the role of public editor in the newspaper. And the reporter who misrepresented the intern, well, he was promoted. Ian Urbina is now a New York Times “investigative reporter based in Washington.” Maybe part of that investigation involved finding someone to write anti-Trump anonymous op/eds posing as a “senior official in the Trump administration.”

Phelim McAleer - The New York Times's History of Exaggerating Seniority of Anonymous Officials

Propagandists, liars, seditionists. Nothing more.

Another Trump supporter bitching about people lying. You stupid ass, you support the biggest liar of all, Trump.

The polygraph has been re-named the Trump Detector.

 

[joaquinmiller]

You sound like a friend of mine who blames everything on a Democratic plant in Republican circles when something goes awry in the GOP.

No, I often don't think that democrats are the bastion of all that is evil. However, this particular OP/ED is just a bit to perfect with perfect timing for it to be an Administration insider.

Your reasoning is valid, I think. I tend to believe it, but hesitate to call it truth.

However, there are so many reported bits of Trump's temper, of his pettiness to those he suspects of less than ultimate loyalty, his instinctive need to literally destroy anyone who opposes him thru lies and non-sourced rumor of his own making, if necessary. His defense of corrupters and corrupt practices is a negative too. Not to mention I think he is eyes-deep into his businesses and simply moonlighting as President, using the office for mere status and personal gain AND to feed his "I'm the Greatest" opinion of himself.

Need I explain I don't trust the guy?

I don't trust the guy either, but none of the reports of corruption or any of those other things are anywhere near accurate. They are more of a "The left sees what they want to see. Sort of like confirmation bias.

Regardless, the op/ed reeks of election tampering.

Darkwind, anybody who completely trusts any President is mushy-brained IMHO. But I am genuinely concerned that the checks and balances ignored by a compliant Congress are being destroyed bit by bit. And that this is the primary agenda of this current admin, to gather power quietly but firmly. Especially noticeable is when he calls an Op-Ed against him "treason" when I always thought treason is the passing of important secret data to a foreign agency in order to weaken the nation. And Trump says that the op-ed is a threat to 'national security'. Or when he slimes Sessions for doing what is Constitutionally required of him, which he considers personally disloyal.

I know my intellectual limits, and would never say I am not wrong. But I'm also old and my formative years were during WWII. The horrors of those years, and how they came to be in so advanced a nation are still with me. It started small, it started by scapegoating and demonizing groups and feeding fear a little more each year, by gaining a little more admin power and a little more legislative acquiescence each year. Hence my distrust at the disemboweling of the several defense organizations. It scares me, darkwind.

Well, I would ask you to consider two important items.

1. Those who claim Trump are corrupt cannot provide any verifiable proof of such a claim which leads to those who are trying to overthrow his legally elected administration as traitors.

2. Where were you when Clinton, Bush, and Obama were radically consolidating power into the office of President. There was a time in the late 80's and early 90's when Democrats rejected a unitarian president. Now they embrace such a notion as long as that president is a progressive.

He told you he would release his tax returns, and then he didn't. That's corrupt. You voted for him in spite of that, but it doesn't mean it wasn't corrupt.

 

[Crixus]

Yo, can`t read this Crap without laughing! It`s sad that a News Outlet would stoop so low to publish such Trash, Lies, period! I could see John McCain or Jeff Flake writing this Crap, but they didn`t, it`s a Socialist Puppet within the N.Y. Times who did this, yes, they have ties to George Soros, like all of the Socialist in the Country do!!!

This Letter is nothing more than a "Plea for Dummies," trying to recoup Voters that are walking away from a Democrat Party that has turned Communist, and Radical! Sure there are Puppet Socialist left in the ranks by Dictator "Hussein" Obama, but President Trump is still weeding them out, none of them wrote this Crap!!!

My choice of who might have wrote this Crap??? Sarah Jeong, a "Racist Socialist Chink," yes, that is a ethnic slur, just to show two can play her game! This waste of flesh, doesn`t know it, but the N.Y. Times hired her for Crap just like this Op-Ed, this way, if the N.Y. Times is caught? They can blame the Chink as a Racist, and admit she is a "Racist Liar" and Fire her, and no wrong done by the N.Y. Times, that`s called covering your ass!!!

This "Racist Chink" Sarah Jeong, was hired in August 2018, right after the N.Y. Times fired another Racist White Woman, called Quinn Norton, you can see the Type of Personnel the N.Y. Times prefer, you know who people are, by the people they hang with, reason I don`t believe anything this so-called Newspaper writes!!!

That is my opinion above, about the "Piece of Crap" in the N.Y. Times!

P.S. The Socialist Are Trying To Recruit More Trump Haters, Period!!!

I Am Part of the Resistance Inside the Trump Administration
I work for the president but like-minded colleagues and I have vowed to thwart parts of his agenda and his worst inclinations.

www.nytimes.com/2018/09/05/opinion/trump-white-house-anonymous-resistance.html

"GTP"
"""The Greatest President Ever"""

Lol, butt hurt a bit does it?

News outlets are supposed to publish things like this, a defector in the Whitehouse is huge news.

No they aren't. They are supposed to vet their information and provide proof that their stories are true.

An anon source that the New York Times is protecting is ludicrous to anyone who actually has critical thinking skills.

In todays world of advocate journalism, they wrote this in order to sow dissent and confusion in the Whitehouse and to influence the electorate before an election.

If that isn't true, then why are they protecting a Republican (a person they hate)?

I'll leave that as an exercise for you to figure out.

An anonymous source quoting an anonymous source. This ain’t even a first hand rant.

 

[Darkwind]

No, I often don't think that democrats are the bastion of all that is evil. However, this particular OP/ED is just a bit to perfect with perfect timing for it to be an Administration insider.

Your reasoning is valid, I think. I tend to believe it, but hesitate to call it truth.

However, there are so many reported bits of Trump's temper, of his pettiness to those he suspects of less than ultimate loyalty, his instinctive need to literally destroy anyone who opposes him thru lies and non-sourced rumor of his own making, if necessary. His defense of corrupters and corrupt practices is a negative too. Not to mention I think he is eyes-deep into his businesses and simply moonlighting as President, using the office for mere status and personal gain AND to feed his "I'm the Greatest" opinion of himself.

Need I explain I don't trust the guy?

I don't trust the guy either, but none of the reports of corruption or any of those other things are anywhere near accurate. They are more of a "The left sees what they want to see. Sort of like confirmation bias.

Regardless, the op/ed reeks of election tampering.

Darkwind, anybody who completely trusts any President is mushy-brained IMHO. But I am genuinely concerned that the checks and balances ignored by a compliant Congress are being destroyed bit by bit. And that this is the primary agenda of this current admin, to gather power quietly but firmly. Especially noticeable is when he calls an Op-Ed against him "treason" when I always thought treason is the passing of important secret data to a foreign agency in order to weaken the nation. And Trump says that the op-ed is a threat to 'national security'. Or when he slimes Sessions for doing what is Constitutionally required of him, which he considers personally disloyal.

I know my intellectual limits, and would never say I am not wrong. But I'm also old and my formative years were during WWII. The horrors of those years, and how they came to be in so advanced a nation are still with me. It started small, it started by scapegoating and demonizing groups and feeding fear a little more each year, by gaining a little more admin power and a little more legislative acquiescence each year. Hence my distrust at the disemboweling of the several defense organizations. It scares me, darkwind.

Well, I would ask you to consider two important items.

1. Those who claim Trump are corrupt cannot provide any verifiable proof of such a claim which leads to those who are trying to overthrow his legally elected administration as traitors.

2. Where were you when Clinton, Bush, and Obama were radically consolidating power into the office of President. There was a time in the late 80's and early 90's when Democrats rejected a unitarian president. Now they embrace such a notion as long as that president is a progressive.

He told you he would release his tax returns, and then he didn't. That's corrupt. You voted for him in spite of that, but it doesn't mean it wasn't corrupt.

Two things.

I did NOT vote for him.

Not keeping a campaign promise is NOT corrupt. Perhaps you should learn the meaning of words?

Unless of course, GITMO still being open is corrupt too?

 

[1stRambo]

No, I often don't think that democrats are the bastion of all that is evil. However, this particular OP/ED is just a bit to perfect with perfect timing for it to be an Administration insider.

Your reasoning is valid, I think. I tend to believe it, but hesitate to call it truth.

However, there are so many reported bits of Trump's temper, of his pettiness to those he suspects of less than ultimate loyalty, his instinctive need to literally destroy anyone who opposes him thru lies and non-sourced rumor of his own making, if necessary. His defense of corrupters and corrupt practices is a negative too. Not to mention I think he is eyes-deep into his businesses and simply moonlighting as President, using the office for mere status and personal gain AND to feed his "I'm the Greatest" opinion of himself.

Need I explain I don't trust the guy?

I don't trust the guy either, but none of the reports of corruption or any of those other things are anywhere near accurate. They are more of a "The left sees what they want to see. Sort of like confirmation bias.

Regardless, the op/ed reeks of election tampering.

Darkwind, anybody who completely trusts any President is mushy-brained IMHO. But I am genuinely concerned that the checks and balances ignored by a compliant Congress are being destroyed bit by bit. And that this is the primary agenda of this current admin, to gather power quietly but firmly. Especially noticeable is when he calls an Op-Ed against him "treason" when I always thought treason is the passing of important secret data to a foreign agency in order to weaken the nation. And Trump says that the op-ed is a threat to 'national security'. Or when he slimes Sessions for doing what is Constitutionally required of him, which he considers personally disloyal.

I know my intellectual limits, and would never say I am not wrong. But I'm also old and my formative years were during WWII. The horrors of those years, and how they came to be in so advanced a nation are still with me. It started small, it started by scapegoating and demonizing groups and feeding fear a little more each year, by gaining a little more admin power and a little more legislative acquiescence each year. Hence my distrust at the disemboweling of the several defense organizations. It scares me, darkwind.

Well, I would ask you to consider two important items.

1. Those who claim Trump are corrupt cannot provide any verifiable proof of such a claim which leads to those who are trying to overthrow his legally elected administration as traitors.

2. Where were you when Clinton, Bush, and Obama were radically consolidating power into the office of President. There was a time in the late 80's and early 90's when Democrats rejected a unitarian president. Now they embrace such a notion as long as that president is a progressive.

He told you he would release his tax returns, and then he didn't. That's corrupt. You voted for him in spite of that, but it doesn't mean it wasn't corrupt.

Yo, ANY LAW BROKEN? NO!!! You Want Corrupt? Take A Look At Barack "Hussein" Obama II And His Administration, From "Hussein" to the Janitor Miguel, They Were All Crooked, Miguel Had To Buy Food, Clothing, Car Payment, House Payment, Etc., And A New Sombrero For One of His 10 Grandkids On His Birthday, Below!!!

"Gracias Abuelo"

"GTP"