Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You cannot even say it falls into a pattern since the allegation from Stiers is different in the most crucial details.Again, a witness told investigators that Kavanaugh had his dick out at a party and it was placed in victim's hand. Victim refuses to confirm or deny this account.
Therefore, the original reporting of that witness account remains uncontradicted.
An the victim says she does not recall the incident. Sounds like denial to me. So the witness has nothing to corroborate his story. So, no evidence, no victim, no nothing.
Witness testimony is NOTHING? Since when?
It stands as evidence untill it is contradicted, which it has not been.
Without corroboration, you have absolutely nothing.
Corraboration:
[Ramirez] alleged that during a Yale dorm party, a drunken Kavanaugh exposed his penis and shoved it into her face, causing her to touch it when she tried to push him away.
Kavanaugh Accused of Exposing Himself to a Second Yale Classmate
Will you now move the goal posts and still claim nothing?
Ramirez is a separate allegation that could go to a pattern, however the victim doesn't recall the incident and the witness can't be used if their is no victim. The alleged witness is Max Steir a former Clinton lawyer, which brings up a whole lot of questions as to how politics plays into his whole story.
Tough sell. I say investigate and see what happens. The evidence as with Ford is very suspect.
Wrong.No she did not, she refused to comment publicly. But investigators say she did say to them it was true.
Not according to the Times article.
Quote it.
New York Times clarifies article detailing new Kavanaugh allegations
The book reports that the female student declined to be interviewed and friends say that she does not recall the incident. That information has been added to the article.”
Again, a witness told investigators that Kavanaugh had his dick out at a party and it was placed in victim's hand. Victim refuses to confirm or deny this account.
Therefore, the original reporting of that witness account remains uncontradicted.
You are lying again.
She did not refuse to confirm or deny.
She stated she had no memory which is in fact a refutation of the account.
The original report has been contradicted
Wrong.Not according to the Times article.
Quote it.
New York Times clarifies article detailing new Kavanaugh allegations
The book reports that the female student declined to be interviewed and friends say that she does not recall the incident. That information has been added to the article.”
Again, a witness told investigators that Kavanaugh had his dick out at a party and it was placed in victim's hand. Victim refuses to confirm or deny this account.
Therefore, the original reporting of that witness account remains uncontradicted.
You are lying again.
She did not refuse to confirm or deny.
She stated she had no memory which is in fact a refutation of the account.
The original report has been contradicted
Moron, someone saying they don’t remember is not a denial that it happened as recalled by someone who DOES remember.
Wrong.Not according to the Times article.
Quote it.
New York Times clarifies article detailing new Kavanaugh allegations
The book reports that the female student declined to be interviewed and friends say that she does not recall the incident. That information has been added to the article.”
Again, a witness told investigators that Kavanaugh had his dick out at a party and it was placed in victim's hand. Victim refuses to confirm or deny this account.
Therefore, the original reporting of that witness account remains uncontradicted.
You are lying again.
She did not refuse to confirm or deny.
She stated she had no memory which is in fact a refutation of the account.
The original report has been contradicted
Moron, someone saying they don’t remember is not a denial that it happened as recalled by someone who DOES remember.
No she did not, she refused to comment publicly. But investigators say she did say to them it was true.
Not according to the Times article.
Quote it.
New York Times clarifies article detailing new Kavanaugh allegations
The book reports that the female student declined to be interviewed and friends say that she does not recall the incident. That information has been added to the article.”
Again, a witness told investigators that Kavanaugh had his dick out at a party and it was placed in victim's hand. Victim refuses to confirm or deny this account.
Therefore, the original reporting of that witness account remains uncontradicted.
What "investigators"? There is no investigation going on against Kavanaugh.
Wrong.Not according to the Times article.
Quote it.
New York Times clarifies article detailing new Kavanaugh allegations
The book reports that the female student declined to be interviewed and friends say that she does not recall the incident. That information has been added to the article.”
Again, a witness told investigators that Kavanaugh had his dick out at a party and it was placed in victim's hand. Victim refuses to confirm or deny this account.
Therefore, the original reporting of that witness account remains uncontradicted.
You are lying again.
She did not refuse to confirm or deny.
She stated she had no memory which is in fact a refutation of the account.
The original report has been contradicted
Moron, someone saying they don’t remember is not a denial that it happened as recalled by someone who DOES remember.
And how the hell do you forget having a dick handed to you? You either handle tons of hand over dicks or you do remember something like that, but are not really sure if that was Kavanaugh’s dick...of course another explanation is that the victim simply wants no part of any of this.
Wrong.Quote it.
New York Times clarifies article detailing new Kavanaugh allegations
The book reports that the female student declined to be interviewed and friends say that she does not recall the incident. That information has been added to the article.”
Again, a witness told investigators that Kavanaugh had his dick out at a party and it was placed in victim's hand. Victim refuses to confirm or deny this account.
Therefore, the original reporting of that witness account remains uncontradicted.
You are lying again.
She did not refuse to confirm or deny.
She stated she had no memory which is in fact a refutation of the account.
The original report has been contradicted
Moron, someone saying they don’t remember is not a denial that it happened as recalled by someone who DOES remember.
So why is this imaginary person who "does remember" not wanting an investigation?
Not according to the Times article.
Quote it.
New York Times clarifies article detailing new Kavanaugh allegations
The book reports that the female student declined to be interviewed and friends say that she does not recall the incident. That information has been added to the article.”
Again, a witness told investigators that Kavanaugh had his dick out at a party and it was placed in victim's hand. Victim refuses to confirm or deny this account.
Therefore, the original reporting of that witness account remains uncontradicted.
What "investigators"? There is no investigation going on against Kavanaugh.
It was an FBI background check, which could have possibly been influenced by the White House, since it wasn’t a criminal investigation.
It absolutely is a denial when the person who does not remember is one of the alleged victims.Wrong.Not according to the Times article.
Quote it.
New York Times clarifies article detailing new Kavanaugh allegations
The book reports that the female student declined to be interviewed and friends say that she does not recall the incident. That information has been added to the article.”
Again, a witness told investigators that Kavanaugh had his dick out at a party and it was placed in victim's hand. Victim refuses to confirm or deny this account.
Therefore, the original reporting of that witness account remains uncontradicted.
You are lying again.
She did not refuse to confirm or deny.
She stated she had no memory which is in fact a refutation of the account.
The original report has been contradicted
Moron, someone saying they don’t remember is not a denial that it happened as recalled by someone who DOES remember.
And how the hell do you forget having a dick handed to you? You either handle tons of hand over dicks or you do remember something like that, but are not really sure if that was Kavanaugh’s dick...of course another explanation is that the victim simply wants no part of any of this.
Either way, it’s not contradictory to the positive evidence available that it was Kavanaugh, even if that evidence is not conclusive proof.
Wrong.Quote it.
New York Times clarifies article detailing new Kavanaugh allegations
The book reports that the female student declined to be interviewed and friends say that she does not recall the incident. That information has been added to the article.”
Again, a witness told investigators that Kavanaugh had his dick out at a party and it was placed in victim's hand. Victim refuses to confirm or deny this account.
Therefore, the original reporting of that witness account remains uncontradicted.
You are lying again.
She did not refuse to confirm or deny.
She stated she had no memory which is in fact a refutation of the account.
The original report has been contradicted
Moron, someone saying they don’t remember is not a denial that it happened as recalled by someone who DOES remember.
And how the hell do you forget having a dick handed to you? You either handle tons of hand over dicks or you do remember something like that, but are not really sure if that was Kavanaugh’s dick...of course another explanation is that the victim simply wants no part of any of this.
Future Clinton lawyer after 30 plus years and comes forward about him allegedly seeing Kavanaugh handing his dick to a woman. That the woman doesn't recall might mean it didn't happen and a former Clinton attorney may have made it up. Maybe the former Clinton attorney thought it was Kavanaugh however he was so drunk he made a mistake and it turned out to be someone else, like say Bill Clinton.
Wrong.New York Times clarifies article detailing new Kavanaugh allegations
The book reports that the female student declined to be interviewed and friends say that she does not recall the incident. That information has been added to the article.”
Again, a witness told investigators that Kavanaugh had his dick out at a party and it was placed in victim's hand. Victim refuses to confirm or deny this account.
Therefore, the original reporting of that witness account remains uncontradicted.
You are lying again.
She did not refuse to confirm or deny.
She stated she had no memory which is in fact a refutation of the account.
The original report has been contradicted
Moron, someone saying they don’t remember is not a denial that it happened as recalled by someone who DOES remember.
So why is this imaginary person who "does remember" not wanting an investigation?
People have a wide spectrum of response to that kind of situation. Some feel like a victim, others may find it funny.
Name them.Wrong.New York Times clarifies article detailing new Kavanaugh allegations
The book reports that the female student declined to be interviewed and friends say that she does not recall the incident. That information has been added to the article.”
Again, a witness told investigators that Kavanaugh had his dick out at a party and it was placed in victim's hand. Victim refuses to confirm or deny this account.
Therefore, the original reporting of that witness account remains uncontradicted.
You are lying again.
She did not refuse to confirm or deny.
She stated she had no memory which is in fact a refutation of the account.
The original report has been contradicted
Moron, someone saying they don’t remember is not a denial that it happened as recalled by someone who DOES remember.
And how the hell do you forget having a dick handed to you? You either handle tons of hand over dicks or you do remember something like that, but are not really sure if that was Kavanaugh’s dick...of course another explanation is that the victim simply wants no part of any of this.
Future Clinton lawyer after 30 plus years and comes forward about him allegedly seeing Kavanaugh handing his dick to a woman. That the woman doesn't recall might mean it didn't happen and a former Clinton attorney may have made it up. Maybe the former Clinton attorney thought it was Kavanaugh however he was so drunk he made a mistake and it turned out to be someone else, like say Bill Clinton.
7 people are saying they saw Kavanaugh dicking around, I’d say there is a VERY good reason to think that Kavanaugh is not the choir boy he presented himself at the hearing.
Quote it.
New York Times clarifies article detailing new Kavanaugh allegations
The book reports that the female student declined to be interviewed and friends say that she does not recall the incident. That information has been added to the article.”
Again, a witness told investigators that Kavanaugh had his dick out at a party and it was placed in victim's hand. Victim refuses to confirm or deny this account.
Therefore, the original reporting of that witness account remains uncontradicted.
What "investigators"? There is no investigation going on against Kavanaugh.
It was an FBI background check, which could have possibly been influenced by the White House, since it wasn’t a criminal investigation.
Yeah, right. Alex Jones just called and said he'd like to book you as a guest on his show...
Wrong.Again, a witness told investigators that Kavanaugh had his dick out at a party and it was placed in victim's hand. Victim refuses to confirm or deny this account.
Therefore, the original reporting of that witness account remains uncontradicted.
You are lying again.
She did not refuse to confirm or deny.
She stated she had no memory which is in fact a refutation of the account.
The original report has been contradicted
Moron, someone saying they don’t remember is not a denial that it happened as recalled by someone who DOES remember.
So why is this imaginary person who "does remember" not wanting an investigation?
People have a wide spectrum of response to that kind of situation. Some feel like a victim, others may find it funny.
Right. A "victim" of losing a presidential election in 2016, I guaran-damned-t you.
That explains it all right there.
With every passing post you make.New York Times clarifies article detailing new Kavanaugh allegations
The book reports that the female student declined to be interviewed and friends say that she does not recall the incident. That information has been added to the article.”
Again, a witness told investigators that Kavanaugh had his dick out at a party and it was placed in victim's hand. Victim refuses to confirm or deny this account.
Therefore, the original reporting of that witness account remains uncontradicted.
What "investigators"? There is no investigation going on against Kavanaugh.
It was an FBI background check, which could have possibly been influenced by the White House, since it wasn’t a criminal investigation.
Yeah, right. Alex Jones just called and said he'd like to book you as a guest on his show...
What did I say that is anything less than fact?
New York Times clarifies article detailing new Kavanaugh allegations
The book reports that the female student declined to be interviewed and friends say that she does not recall the incident. That information has been added to the article.”
Again, a witness told investigators that Kavanaugh had his dick out at a party and it was placed in victim's hand. Victim refuses to confirm or deny this account.
Therefore, the original reporting of that witness account remains uncontradicted.
What "investigators"? There is no investigation going on against Kavanaugh.
It was an FBI background check, which could have possibly been influenced by the White House, since it wasn’t a criminal investigation.
Yeah, right. Alex Jones just called and said he'd like to book you as a guest on his show...
What did I say that is anything less than fact?
With every passing post you make.Again, a witness told investigators that Kavanaugh had his dick out at a party and it was placed in victim's hand. Victim refuses to confirm or deny this account.
Therefore, the original reporting of that witness account remains uncontradicted.
What "investigators"? There is no investigation going on against Kavanaugh.
It was an FBI background check, which could have possibly been influenced by the White House, since it wasn’t a criminal investigation.
Yeah, right. Alex Jones just called and said he'd like to book you as a guest on his show...
What did I say that is anything less than fact?
Again, a witness told investigators that Kavanaugh had his dick out at a party and it was placed in victim's hand. Victim refuses to confirm or deny this account.
Therefore, the original reporting of that witness account remains uncontradicted.
What "investigators"? There is no investigation going on against Kavanaugh.
It was an FBI background check, which could have possibly been influenced by the White House, since it wasn’t a criminal investigation.
Yeah, right. Alex Jones just called and said he'd like to book you as a guest on his show...
What did I say that is anything less than fact?
"could have possibly been influenced by the White House," is not a fact. That is a speculation with nothing to substantiate it.
Thats a long list.New York Times clarifies article detailing new Kavanaugh allegations
The book reports that the female student declined to be interviewed and friends say that she does not recall the incident. That information has been added to the article.”
Again, a witness told investigators that Kavanaugh had his dick out at a party and it was placed in victim's hand. Victim refuses to confirm or deny this account.
Therefore, the original reporting of that witness account remains uncontradicted.
What "investigators"? There is no investigation going on against Kavanaugh.
It was an FBI background check, which could have possibly been influenced by the White House, since it wasn’t a criminal investigation.
Yeah, right. Alex Jones just called and said he'd like to book you as a guest on his show...
What did I say that is anything less than fact?
Wrong.New York Times clarifies article detailing new Kavanaugh allegations
The book reports that the female student declined to be interviewed and friends say that she does not recall the incident. That information has been added to the article.”
Again, a witness told investigators that Kavanaugh had his dick out at a party and it was placed in victim's hand. Victim refuses to confirm or deny this account.
Therefore, the original reporting of that witness account remains uncontradicted.
You are lying again.
She did not refuse to confirm or deny.
She stated she had no memory which is in fact a refutation of the account.
The original report has been contradicted
Moron, someone saying they don’t remember is not a denial that it happened as recalled by someone who DOES remember.
And how the hell do you forget having a dick handed to you? You either handle tons of hand over dicks or you do remember something like that, but are not really sure if that was Kavanaugh’s dick...of course another explanation is that the victim simply wants no part of any of this.
Future Clinton lawyer after 30 plus years and comes forward about him allegedly seeing Kavanaugh handing his dick to a woman. That the woman doesn't recall might mean it didn't happen and a former Clinton attorney may have made it up. Maybe the former Clinton attorney thought it was Kavanaugh however he was so drunk he made a mistake and it turned out to be someone else, like say Bill Clinton.
7 people are saying they saw Kavanaugh dicking around, I’d say there is a VERY good reason to think that Kavanaugh is not the choir boy he presented himself at the hearing.
