Soupnazi630
Gold Member
- Dec 9, 2013
- 17,949
- 5,211
- 265
You cannot even say it falls into a pattern since the allegation from Stiers is different in the most crucial details.Again, a witness told investigators that Kavanaugh had his dick out at a party and it was placed in victim's hand. Victim refuses to confirm or deny this account.
Therefore, the original reporting of that witness account remains uncontradicted.
An the victim says she does not recall the incident. Sounds like denial to me. So the witness has nothing to corroborate his story. So, no evidence, no victim, no nothing.
Witness testimony is NOTHING? Since when?
It stands as evidence untill it is contradicted, which it has not been.
Without corroboration, you have absolutely nothing.
Corraboration:
[Ramirez] alleged that during a Yale dorm party, a drunken Kavanaugh exposed his penis and shoved it into her face, causing her to touch it when she tried to push him away.
Kavanaugh Accused of Exposing Himself to a Second Yale Classmate
Will you now move the goal posts and still claim nothing?
Ramirez is a separate allegation that could go to a pattern, however the victim doesn't recall the incident and the witness can't be used if their is no victim. The alleged witness is Max Steir a former Clinton lawyer, which brings up a whole lot of questions as to how politics plays into his whole story.
Tough sell. I say investigate and see what happens. The evidence as with Ford is very suspect.
His limited description of events indicates that Kavanugh was a victim along with the unknown alleged female victim who does not recall it.