Only this administration could call THIS a victory.

Discussion in 'Law and Justice System' started by RetiredGySgt, Nov 17, 2010.

  1. RetiredGySgt
    Offline

    RetiredGySgt Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    40,968
    Thanks Received:
    6,333
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +10,811
  2. Kevin_Kennedy
    Offline

    Kevin_Kennedy Defend Liberty

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2008
    Messages:
    17,999
    Thanks Received:
    1,611
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Location:
    Ohio
    Ratings:
    +2,169
    A victory for the rule of law.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 2
  3. Revere
    Offline

    Revere BANNED

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2010
    Messages:
    7,427
    Thanks Received:
    416
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Watching you in my profile page
    Ratings:
    +417
    What law says terrorists are entitled to civilian trials?
     
  4. uscitizen
    Offline

    uscitizen Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    45,941
    Thanks Received:
    4,790
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    My Shack
    Ratings:
    +4,808
    Mission accompolished?
     
  5. Kevin_Kennedy
    Offline

    Kevin_Kennedy Defend Liberty

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2008
    Messages:
    17,999
    Thanks Received:
    1,611
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Location:
    Ohio
    Ratings:
    +2,169
    The Constitution only sets up one system of judiciary for trying criminals. It doesn't establish a separate system for those who commit politically motivated crimes.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  6. JakeStarkey
    Offline

    JakeStarkey BANNED Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2009
    Messages:
    152,416
    Thanks Received:
    13,722
    Trophy Points:
    2,165
    Ratings:
    +41,974
    Then Revere is safe in that he will be tried like everybody else when he gets stupid.

    Revere, the question has been settled, you get your opinion, and who cares?
     
    Last edited: Nov 17, 2010
  7. Revere
    Offline

    Revere BANNED

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2010
    Messages:
    7,427
    Thanks Received:
    416
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Watching you in my profile page
    Ratings:
    +417
    Enemy combatants have been tried in military courts.
     
  8. Kevin_Kennedy
    Offline

    Kevin_Kennedy Defend Liberty

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2008
    Messages:
    17,999
    Thanks Received:
    1,611
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Location:
    Ohio
    Ratings:
    +2,169
    Where does the Constitution give authority for the government to declare somebody an enemy combatant, and where does the Constitution spell out any such authority for military courts?

    Nowhere, that's where.
     
  9. uscitizen
    Offline

    uscitizen Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    45,941
    Thanks Received:
    4,790
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    My Shack
    Ratings:
    +4,808
    The whole enemy combatant thing is unconstitutional.

    As I say be careful for what you wish you may get it.
    Strict constitutional intrepretation will have many unliked consequences for many/most.
     
    Last edited: Nov 17, 2010
  10. Revere
    Offline

    Revere BANNED

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2010
    Messages:
    7,427
    Thanks Received:
    416
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Watching you in my profile page
    Ratings:
    +417
    Most were captured overseas, for crimes not on American soil.

    FDR shot them all the time.
     

Share This Page