OMG!!! BREAKING!!! FBI Reopening Crooked Hillary's Email Case!!!

What if copies of Hillary's deleted 30,000 emails are in those 650,000 emails, she deleted them not knowing someone else already had copies of them.

why would someone else have them? Again, this is sounding more and more unlikely.

Hillary was only Secretary of State for 4 years. If she had 650,000 emailes, that meant she was sending 500 emails a DAY.


You posting drunk?

Let us go slooooowww for you to understand

Hillary deleted 30,000 emails sent and received..using bleach bit

Huma was a top aid to hillary

They found 650,000 emails on her husbands computer..some of Hillary's emails to or forum huma could be on there, ya know some of the 30,000 missing.


.


yeah, and they smashed how many devices using sledge hammers? Whats with that?
 
And why do Dems just accept an oligarchy? It's almost as bad as a dictatorship.
You're kidding, right? There is nothing progressives desire more than a dictatorship. Why do you think they say every bat-shit crazy thing from "the U.S. Constitution is a living, breathing document" all the way to "the U.S. Constitution is irrelevant". An oligarchy is the next best thing to their deepest desire.


Its in their very definition of PROGRESSIVE. Progress can be subjective but they want to incrementally skew language and culture in their favor till anything other than their viewpoint is seen as being a denier or racist or country bumpkin. They will never be satisfied until they can pass their rulings with no objection or resistance.
True Liberals on the other hand are good people, many of them are my friends. This progressivism is really something else
 
It's been proven by records you dumb-shit. You have no idea what is going on in the United States and it shows.
No it hasn't.
And the dumb Aussie strikes again. No matter how many times you deny reality, it doesn't change reality. Here is but the smallest fraction of her offenses...

Hillary Clinton failed to declare $400k in private jets and vacations gifted to Bill | Daily Mail Online

Nothing but supposition again. When are you loons going to post facts?
 
It's been proven by records you dumb-shit. You have no idea what is going on in the United States and it shows.
No it hasn't.
And the dumb Aussie strikes again. No matter how many times you deny reality, it doesn't change reality. Here is but the smallest fraction of her offenses...

Hillary Clinton failed to declare $400k in private jets and vacations gifted to Bill | Daily Mail Online

Nothing but supposition again. When are you loons going to post facts?
Why don't you start...:lol:
 
It's been proven by records you dumb-shit. You have no idea what is going on in the United States and it shows.
No it hasn't.
And the dumb Aussie strikes again. No matter how many times you deny reality, it doesn't change reality. Here is but the smallest fraction of her offenses...

Hillary Clinton failed to declare $400k in private jets and vacations gifted to Bill | Daily Mail Online

Nothing but supposition again. When are you loons going to post facts?
So the idiot Aussie now denies links to news stories. Enough said. He's the same idiot that insisted that all of the Bill Clinton / Monica Lewinsky stuff was "supposition". Right up until the moment when Slick Willy went on national television and admitted that it was all true and that Republican's had it right all along.
 
sorry to burst your bubble hete
State Dept confirms FBI got it wrong, none of Hillary Clinton’s emails were classified at the time

Hillary Clinton insisted all along that none of the emails she sent or received on her private email server during her tenure as Secretary of State was marked classified at the time. That was contradicted by the Director of the FBI yesterday when he claimed that a “very small number” of her emails were in fact classified at the time. The New York Times then determined that that number was just two. And now the State Department has confirmed that the two emails in question weren’t actually classified at the time, and had merely been marked incorrectly during the course of the investigation.


In yet another development which helps make clear that Clinton did nothing demonstrably wrong with her email, the two emails sent to her by her aides in 2012 were harmless in nature. Both were merely used to schedule phone calls with foreign leaders, and on their face, clearly could not have possibly been classified at the time. Sure enough, a spokesman for the State Department has confirmed that they were not classified.

This comes just hours after CBS News reported that Hillary Clinton had asked the NSA for a secure smartphone for her email immediately upon taking office as Secretary of State, and had been turned down. One by one, the details coming out are making clear that despite having spent so many months running an investigation and despite having been given full cooperation by Clinton and her team, the conclusions made by the FBI Director yesterday were far removed from the actual facts involved.


With Hillary Clinton now having been fully cleared of any potential charges, this may be a moot point in terms of the outcome; she’s off the hook and she remains the clear frontrunner in the 2016 presidential race. But these new details surfacing today make clear that the FBI Director didn’t come close to getting his facts right when he personally criticized her email usage yesterday. Here’s

So much bull shit in one post.... Deviod of facts..
 
What the fuck is up with Crooked Hillary who probably has not had heterosexual sex since Webb Hubbell doing some kind of weird "spirit cooking" madness using blood, sperm and breastmilk? Sounds like they are trying medieval, Paracelsus type "magic," or maybe this is variation of middle east baal worship?

Crooked Hillary's campaign executive apparently does this stuff according to his emails.

 
Last edited:
sorry to burst your bubble hete
State Dept confirms FBI got it wrong, none of Hillary Clinton’s emails were classified at the time

Hillary Clinton insisted all along that none of the emails she sent or received on her private email server during her tenure as Secretary of State was marked classified at the time. That was contradicted by the Director of the FBI yesterday when he claimed that a “very small number” of her emails were in fact classified at the time. The New York Times then determined that that number was just two. And now the State Department has confirmed that the two emails in question weren’t actually classified at the time, and had merely been marked incorrectly during the course of the investigation.


In yet another development which helps make clear that Clinton did nothing demonstrably wrong with her email, the two emails sent to her by her aides in 2012 were harmless in nature. Both were merely used to schedule phone calls with foreign leaders, and on their face, clearly could not have possibly been classified at the time. Sure enough, a spokesman for the State Department has confirmed that they were not classified.

This comes just hours after CBS News reported that Hillary Clinton had asked the NSA for a secure smartphone for her email immediately upon taking office as Secretary of State, and had been turned down. One by one, the details coming out are making clear that despite having spent so many months running an investigation and despite having been given full cooperation by Clinton and her team, the conclusions made by the FBI Director yesterday were far removed from the actual facts involved.


With Hillary Clinton now having been fully cleared of any potential charges, this may be a moot point in terms of the outcome; she’s off the hook and she remains the clear frontrunner in the 2016 presidential race. But these new details surfacing today make clear that the FBI Director didn’t come close to getting his facts right when he personally criticized her email usage yesterday. Here’s

So much bull shit in one post.... Deviod of facts..
actually moron, it comes from the state department ... I realize stupidity runs ramped in the republican party this is true, but the state department are the ones who classifies documents ... that fact that you can't accept that fact is your problem not mine
 
The real amazing thing is that you dumbass Moon Bat Libtards are giving this Crooked Hillary a pass on being the most corrupt, dishonest and incompetent person to ever run for President. Mind boggling, isn't it?

Of course you are the same idiots that voted for that asshole Obama's "hope and change" so we know you aren't exactly the best and brightest.

poor uneducated trumpster.

yes, everyone except for uneducated white males (the only demographic you win) is stupid.

i think you have it backwards. but that's no surprise from alt right scum.

Everyone who votes for a criminal is kinda dumb...

you mean like scum who bribes prosecutors and doesn't pay taxes?

:rofl:

Trump hasn't ever committed tax fraud you idiot.

jeeze you're a moron. first, your orange sociopath has never shown you losers his tax returns. second, what do you think it is to lauder money through his foundation and use it for his personal bills?

thank you for once again proving why the uneducated angry white males think the clown is an acceptable candidate for president.
don't you mean the uneducated deplorables
 
What if copies of Hillary's deleted 30,000 emails are in those 650,000 emails, she deleted them not knowing someone else already had copies of them.

why would someone else have them? Again, this is sounding more and more unlikely.

Hillary was only Secretary of State for 4 years. If she had 650,000 emailes, that meant she was sending 500 emails a DAY.


You posting drunk?

Let us go slooooowww for you to understand

Hillary deleted 30,000 emails sent and received..using bleach bit

Huma was a top aid to hillary

They found 650,000 emails on her husbands computer..some of Hillary's emails to or forum huma could be on there, ya know some of the 30,000 missing.


.
isn't important
 
What if copies of Hillary's deleted 30,000 emails are in those 650,000 emails, she deleted them not knowing someone else already had copies of them.

why would someone else have them? Again, this is sounding more and more unlikely.

Hillary was only Secretary of State for 4 years. If she had 650,000 emailes, that meant she was sending 500 emails a DAY.


You posting drunk?

Let us go slooooowww for you to understand

Hillary deleted 30,000 emails sent and received..using bleach bit

Huma was a top aid to hillary

They found 650,000 emails on her husbands computer..some of Hillary's emails to or forum huma could be on there, ya know some of the 30,000 missing.


.


yeah, and they smashed how many devices using sledge hammers? Whats with that?
you do know they are suppose to distroy them don't you??/? that's the law
 
It's been proven by records you dumb-shit. You have no idea what is going on in the United States and it shows.
No it hasn't.
And the dumb Aussie strikes again. No matter how many times you deny reality, it doesn't change reality. Here is but the smallest fraction of her offenses...

Hillary Clinton failed to declare $400k in private jets and vacations gifted to Bill | Daily Mail Online

Nothing but supposition again. When are you loons going to post facts?
Why don't you start...:lol:
fact: she hasn't violated any law
 
actually moron, it comes from the state department ... I realize stupidity runs ramped in the republican party this is true, but the state department are the ones who classifies documents ... that fact that you can't accept that fact is your problem not mine

The thing that uneducated low information Moon Bats like you don't understand is that Crooked Hillary violated the procedures for handling classified documents. Comey even said she did but let her skate with that pathetic "no intent" excuse because she is rich and powerful.

You stupid Moon Bats are hell bent on voting for the worst Presidential candidate ever to run for the office. A pathological liar who is corrupt and incompetent.

You Moon Bats screwed up this country when you elected that jackass Obama and it looks like you are going to make an even bigger mistake voting for this Crooked Hillary piece of shit. You idiots always do the wrong thing, don't you?

.
 
good deflection. :thup: He's better than "pay- to- play" Clinton who put govt contracts up for sale to the highest bidder (thats illegal BTW :eusa_shhh: )

But she didn't. Nice try. No ceegar.
This is why foreigners shouldn't hop on American political boards. Their opinions are completely uninformed. It's already been proven that Hitlery Clinton used the Clinton Foundation to put the U.S. government up for sale to the highest bidders.

It has not in any way.
Please provide it.
 
When the definitive post mortem of this dismal election is finally published, it should go something like this: The Republican establishment was foolish; the Democratic establishment was ruthless. The Republicans fumbled around incompetently and spinelessly in the face of an unforeseen challenge; the Democrats willfully and intentionally did all they could to carry a corrupt politician over the finish line, forcing the American public to choose between one known liar and another. Let’s review the facts:
  • The FBI continues to investigate Hillary Clinton’s maybe-criminal abuse of the Clinton Foundation as a front for systematic influence-peddling and her maybe-criminal mishandling of our nation’s secrets. Neither of these scandals is new. They both predate the launch of her presidential campaign.
  • Questions have swirled around the Clinton Foundation since Hillary was confirmed as secretary of state. Damaging evidence of outright influence-peddling — including evidence of large-scale donations made to the foundation as the State Department considered a crucial uranium deal — broke less than two weeks after her campaign announcement.
  • On April 23, 2015, the New York Times published an extraordinary story detailing the amount of money that was funneled to the Clinton Foundation (and to Bill Clinton directly) as the State Department considered whether to sign off on the sale of “one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States” to a Russian-controlled corporation. The chairman of the corporation donated $2.35 million to the Clinton Foundation, and a Russian investment bank promoting Uranium One stock paid Bill Clinton a whopping $500,000 to give a speech in Moscow. The Clintons violated an agreement with the White House to “publicly identify all donors” by failing to disclose the Uranium One contributions. Hillary’s State Department approved the deal.
  • One month before the Uranium One story, as Clinton was preparing to announce her candidacy, the Times broke the news that still dominates the campaign today: Hillary “exclusively used a personal email account to conduct government business.” Given the Clintons’ longstanding history of personal corruption, it should have been obvious to Democrats then that Hillary’s scandals were going to dog the party throughout the campaign, and, if she won, throughout her presidency. It would be a repeat of the 1990s, when an entire party was hijacked into relentlessly defending conduct that they would loudly condemn if it were attributed to any Republican.
  • Instead, the party did far more than merely acquiesce in Hillary’s decision to run. It did virtually everything it could to guarantee her victory. Scandal-free progressive politicians such as Elizabeth Warren and Joe Biden stood aside. Superdelegates signed on with Hillary en masse. The DNC put its thumb on the scales to such an extent that Debbie Wasserman Schultz was ultimately fired to appease the Sanders holdouts. When angry Trump voters were accusing incompetent Republicans of “rigging” the system against their man, ruthless Democrats were were actually rigging the system for Hillary.
The Democratic Establishment Has Enabled Hillary’s Corruption at Every Turn
you do realize your post is a partisan piece based on allegations and not proven facts don't you
"Allegations"?!? Let's review...

It is a fact that Hitlery Clinton has a foundation called the Clinton Foundation

It is a fact that Hitlery Clinton was Secretary of State

It is a fact that the chairman of a Russian corporation made a $2.5 million donation to the Clinton Foundation

It is a fact that that Russian Corporation was then granted 1/5 of all uranium from the U.S.

It is a fact that Russia is our enemy

It is a fact that uranium is used in the production of nuclear weapons

It is a fact that Hitlery Clinton failed to report this donor per her agreement with the White House

It is a fact that Debbie Wasserman Schultz was ultimately fired after emails revealed that she was part of a scandal to rig the primary in favor of Hitlery Clinton

You do realize that you sound like a partisan hack proclaiming indisputable facts as "partisan allegations"?
so far all I've seen you write here are partial facts with a whole lot of iinnuendos so I ask you again what law did she violate ???

as for uranium
In a TV ad, Donald Trump falsely claims that Hillary Clinton “handed over American uranium rights to the Russians” as part of a “pay-to-play” scheme to get “filthy rich.” Clinton did not have the authority to unilaterally approve that deal.

As secretary of state, Clinton was one of nine voting members of the foreign investment committee in 2010 that approved the uranium deal, which was then approved by the president and passed through the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

The ad, titled “Corruption,” has aired on national cable and in 12 states this month, most heavily in Florida, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, according to Kantar Media’s Campaign Media Analysis Group. The ad makes several shaky claims as it tries to link the income Bill and Hillary Clinton have earned since leaving political office with donations to the Clinton Foundation.

“The Clintons: from dead broke to worth hundreds of millions. So how did Hillary end up filthy rich?” the ad asks. “Pay to play politics. Staggering amounts of cash poured into the Clinton Foundation from criminals, dictators, countries that hate America.”

But the Clintons didn’t pocket money that was donated to the nonprofit Clinton Foundation, set up by Bill Clinton after his time as president. Instead, they made their money outside of office by giving speeches and writing books, as the Fortune.com article the ad cites explains. That article doesn’t say anything about the foundation and puts the Clintons’ estimated net worth at $110 million (which isn’t “hundreds of millions,” the claim in the ad).

The foundation, which says it has more than 330,000 contributors, has been criticized for accepting foreign donations while Clinton was secretary of state, including from Algeria, Kuwait, Qatar and Oman, and for accepting Saudi Arabia’s money before and after her tenure. As the Washington Post noted, some of those countries have “complicated diplomatic, military and financial relationships with the U.S. government.” But it’s a stretch to classify them as “countries that hate America.”

There are other examples of the citations in the ad not quite supporting the claims, but the most egregious is the uranium example. So we’ll start there.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top