Oh OH- I guess Palin's Political career isn't OVER after all.

[rightwinger]

Palin Outraises Romney, Rivals
SNIP:
By Jeremy P. Jacobs
January 31, 2011 | 3:19 PM
Share Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin led her potential rivals for the 2012 Republican presidential nomination in end-of-the-year fundraising, nosing ahead of her closest competitor, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney.
Both Palin and Romney filed impressive year-end fundraising reports, due Monday at the Federal Election Commission. From Nov. 23 and Dec. 31, Palin's Sarah PAC hauled in $279,000. She finished the year with $1.3 million in her campaign account.

Palin's total is particularly striking because she outraised Romney using only a federal political action committee. Romney's series of state level PACs set up in Alabama, Iowa, Michigan, New Hampshire and South Carolina, detailed in a New York Times report last year, allows big donors to max out both to Romney's federal committee, the Free and Strong America PAC, and to his state organizations, which often have higher contribution limits.

That state network helped Romney outraise Palin in the previous reporting period, which covered mid-October to the end of November. He wasn't as fortunate in the final reporting period of the year. In the last five weeks of 2010, Romney's federal PAC raised almost $175,000 and his state PACs hauled in $36,000, bringing his total haul to almost $211,000 -- less than Palin's take for the same period.

Even so, Romney started out 2011 with more cash on hand than Palin. He has more than $1.44 million in his state and federal campaign coffers. Romney also outraised Palin for all of 2010, hauling in $6.3 million to Palin's $3.6 million.


Palin's fundraising success suggests that her unorthodox political strategy -- appearances on Fox News, occasional posts on her Facebook page and Twitter accounts -- has cultivated a dedicated network of contributors.

read it all here.
Palin Outraises Romney, Rivals - Hotline On Call

Great news.....maybe she will run after all

 

[DiveCon]

Her political career is far from over, alas.

But she'll never win an elected office, at least on a national level.

I wouldn't be saying never, they said the same thing about Reagan, and we saw how that turned out.

reagan didn't quit

in fact, he completed all his terms he was elected to

 

[DiveCon]

I wouldn't be saying never, they said the same thing about Reagan, and we saw how that turned out.

reagan didn't quit

oh please, not you too.
she gave her reasons, evidently most people understood it, except you lefties spreading that BS. oh well, it doesn't seem to be working judging from the above article.

the reasons were a cop out

 

[Ravi]

reagan didn't quit

Sadly.

i never had much use for him, but considering what we've had since, he doesn't look as bad.

Fair enough...I still think he was the worst president evah.

 

[MaggieMae]

Her political career is far from over, alas.

But she'll never win an elected office, at least on a national level.

I wouldn't be saying never, they said the same thing about Reagan, and we saw how that turned out.

If you're comparing Sarah Palin to Ronald Reagan, please, the man already does too many turns in his grave without THAT insult.

 

[DiveCon]

reagan didn't quit

oh please, not you too.
she gave her reasons, evidently most people understood it, except you lefties spreading that BS. oh well, it doesn't seem to be working judging from the above article.

Well it is a fact that she quit. Her reasons were BS. She said the Alaska government was too corrupt, and she couldn't work there-my question is what better position to help out Alaska, and a corrupt government than being the state's governor?

actually, that wasnt the reason i heard
what i head was she was being unfairly attacked with frivolous ethics charges and it was costing both her personally, and the state too much money
but it was a bill SHE pushed through the state legislature that allowed that to happen in the first place
then she left without fixing the problem SHE created

 

[DiveCon]

Sadly.

i never had much use for him, but considering what we've had since, he doesn't look as bad.

Fair enough...I still think he was the worst president evah.

did you miss Carter?

 

[Stephanie]

Palin Outraises Romney, Rivals
SNIP:
By Jeremy P. Jacobs
January 31, 2011 | 3:19 PM
Share Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin led her potential rivals for the 2012 Republican presidential nomination in end-of-the-year fundraising, nosing ahead of her closest competitor, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney.
Both Palin and Romney filed impressive year-end fundraising reports, due Monday at the Federal Election Commission. From Nov. 23 and Dec. 31, Palin's Sarah PAC hauled in $279,000. She finished the year with $1.3 million in her campaign account.

Palin's total is particularly striking because she outraised Romney using only a federal political action committee. Romney's series of state level PACs set up in Alabama, Iowa, Michigan, New Hampshire and South Carolina, detailed in a New York Times report last year, allows big donors to max out both to Romney's federal committee, the Free and Strong America PAC, and to his state organizations, which often have higher contribution limits.

That state network helped Romney outraise Palin in the previous reporting period, which covered mid-October to the end of November. He wasn't as fortunate in the final reporting period of the year. In the last five weeks of 2010, Romney's federal PAC raised almost $175,000 and his state PACs hauled in $36,000, bringing his total haul to almost $211,000 -- less than Palin's take for the same period.

Even so, Romney started out 2011 with more cash on hand than Palin. He has more than $1.44 million in his state and federal campaign coffers. Romney also outraised Palin for all of 2010, hauling in $6.3 million to Palin's $3.6 million.


Palin's fundraising success suggests that her unorthodox political strategy -- appearances on Fox News, occasional posts on her Facebook page and Twitter accounts -- has cultivated a dedicated network of contributors.

read it all here.
Palin Outraises Romney, Rivals - Hotline On Call

Great news.....maybe she will run after all

maybe, but remember, Just last week you all had her career OVER.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Palin Outraises Romney, Rivals
SNIP:
By Jeremy P. Jacobs
January 31, 2011 | 3:19 PM
Share Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin led her potential rivals for the 2012 Republican presidential nomination in end-of-the-year fundraising, nosing ahead of her closest competitor, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney.
Both Palin and Romney filed impressive year-end fundraising reports, due Monday at the Federal Election Commission. From Nov. 23 and Dec. 31, Palin's Sarah PAC hauled in $279,000. She finished the year with $1.3 million in her campaign account.

Palin's total is particularly striking because she outraised Romney using only a federal political action committee. Romney's series of state level PACs set up in Alabama, Iowa, Michigan, New Hampshire and South Carolina, detailed in a New York Times report last year, allows big donors to max out both to Romney's federal committee, the Free and Strong America PAC, and to his state organizations, which often have higher contribution limits.

That state network helped Romney outraise Palin in the previous reporting period, which covered mid-October to the end of November. He wasn't as fortunate in the final reporting period of the year. In the last five weeks of 2010, Romney's federal PAC raised almost $175,000 and his state PACs hauled in $36,000, bringing his total haul to almost $211,000 -- less than Palin's take for the same period.

Even so, Romney started out 2011 with more cash on hand than Palin. He has more than $1.44 million in his state and federal campaign coffers. Romney also outraised Palin for all of 2010, hauling in $6.3 million to Palin's $3.6 million.


Palin's fundraising success suggests that her unorthodox political strategy -- appearances on Fox News, occasional posts on her Facebook page and Twitter accounts -- has cultivated a dedicated network of contributors.

read it all here.
Palin Outraises Romney, Rivals - Hotline On Call

Great news.....maybe she will run after all

maybe, but remember, Just last week you all had her career OVER.

the fact that people will throw money at her doesn't mean she has a chance.

Ron Paul 2008, anyone??

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

i never had much use for him, but considering what we've had since, he doesn't look as bad.

Fair enough...I still think he was the worst president evah.

did you miss Carter?

We're in the midst of Carter II right now. Especially with regard to foreign policy and economics and utter cluelessness.

With any luck, Obama will turn a blind eye while Islamic fundamentalists setup shop in Egypt (Can you say Shah?)..... oh... wait...

 

[JScott]

Palin Outraises Romney, Rivals
SNIP:
By Jeremy P. Jacobs
January 31, 2011 | 3:19 PM
Share Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin led her potential rivals for the 2012 Republican presidential nomination in end-of-the-year fundraising, nosing ahead of her closest competitor, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney.
Both Palin and Romney filed impressive year-end fundraising reports, due Monday at the Federal Election Commission. From Nov. 23 and Dec. 31, Palin's Sarah PAC hauled in $279,000. She finished the year with $1.3 million in her campaign account.

Palin's total is particularly striking because she outraised Romney using only a federal political action committee. Romney's series of state level PACs set up in Alabama, Iowa, Michigan, New Hampshire and South Carolina, detailed in a New York Times report last year, allows big donors to max out both to Romney's federal committee, the Free and Strong America PAC, and to his state organizations, which often have higher contribution limits.

That state network helped Romney outraise Palin in the previous reporting period, which covered mid-October to the end of November. He wasn't as fortunate in the final reporting period of the year. In the last five weeks of 2010, Romney's federal PAC raised almost $175,000 and his state PACs hauled in $36,000, bringing his total haul to almost $211,000 -- less than Palin's take for the same period.

Even so, Romney started out 2011 with more cash on hand than Palin. He has more than $1.44 million in his state and federal campaign coffers. Romney also outraised Palin for all of 2010, hauling in $6.3 million to Palin's $3.6 million.


Palin's fundraising success suggests that her unorthodox political strategy -- appearances on Fox News, occasional posts on her Facebook page and Twitter accounts -- has cultivated a dedicated network of contributors.

read it all here.
Palin Outraises Romney, Rivals - Hotline On Call

Great news.....maybe she will run after all

maybe, but remember, Just last week you all had her career OVER.

Thats right, its been you and me Stephanie. Palin all the way!

 

[del]

oh please, not you too.
she gave her reasons, evidently most people understood it, except you lefties spreading that BS. oh well, it doesn't seem to be working judging from the above article.

Well it is a fact that she quit. Her reasons were BS. She said the Alaska government was too corrupt, and she couldn't work there-my question is what better position to help out Alaska, and a corrupt government than being the state's governor?

she took on the corrupt government when she ran, she beat out a Entranced good ole boy Republican with a 80% approval rating.. I think that is what you are talking about.

no,we're talking about her quitting. and it's entrenched, assmunch.

entranced is what you palin assclowns are.

 

[rightwinger]

But then again...

There is only so much lipstick you can put on a pig

 

[NYcarbineer]

Her political career is far from over, alas.

But she'll never win an elected office, at least on a national level.

I wouldn't be saying never, they said the same thing about Reagan, and we saw how that turned out.

Actually, 'they' never said that about Reagan.


You must be thinking of Goldwater.

 

[NYcarbineer]

You GOPers are going to need a double dip recession, at LEAST, to beat Obama in 2012.

So, you have something to wish for.

 

[MaggieMae]

I wouldn't be saying never, they said the same thing about Reagan, and we saw how that turned out.

reagan didn't quit

oh please, not you too.
she gave her reasons, evidently most people understood it, except you lefties spreading that BS. oh well, it doesn't seem to be working judging from the above article.

What were her reasons for quitting? I never quite understood, and I'm not alone. She certainly didn't "explain" anything in her jumbled speech, nor has she followed up in any credible way to explain herself. The only thing I do recall is something about saving taxpayers money by not having to support a lame duck governor. Of course that implies that ANY governor who runs for a second (or last) term is useless, which is hardly the case.

 

[del]

reagan didn't quit

oh please, not you too.
she gave her reasons, evidently most people understood it, except you lefties spreading that BS. oh well, it doesn't seem to be working judging from the above article.

What were her reasons for quitting? I never quite understood, and I'm not alone. She certainly didn't "explain" anything in her jumbled speech, nor has she followed up in any credible way to explain herself. The only thing I do recall is something about saving taxpayers money by not having to support a lame duck governor. Of course that implies that ANY governor who runs for a second (or last) term is useless, which is hardly the case.

i think it's pretty obvious that she quit to make money.

fine by me

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

Well it is a fact that she quit. Her reasons were BS. She said the Alaska government was too corrupt, and she couldn't work there-my question is what better position to help out Alaska, and a corrupt government than being the state's governor?

she took on the corrupt government when she ran, she beat out a Entranced good ole boy Republican with a 80% approval rating.. I think that is what you are talking about.

no,we're talking about her quitting. and it's entrenched, assmunch.

entranced is what you palin assclowns are.

Hey, you're the ones on here day after day after day after day after day with your thongs in a bunch over Sarah Palin. Seems like you guys are more than a bit entranced.... you're obsessed.

Actually. I love it!!!

 

[del]

she took on the corrupt government when she ran, she beat out a Entranced good ole boy Republican with a 80% approval rating.. I think that is what you are talking about.

no,we're talking about her quitting. and it's entrenched, assmunch.

entranced is what you palin assclowns are.

Hey, you're the ones on here day after day after day after day after day with your thongs in a bunch over Sarah Palin. Seems like you guys are more than a bit entranced.... you're obsessed.

Actually. I love it!!!

get a list of all the palin threads i started and we'll talk, saggy.

 

[Stephanie]

reagan didn't quit

oh please, not you too.
she gave her reasons, evidently most people understood it, except you lefties spreading that BS. oh well, it doesn't seem to be working judging from the above article.

What were her reasons for quitting? I never quite understood, and I'm not alone. She certainly didn't "explain" anything in her jumbled speech, nor has she followed up in any credible way to explain herself. The only thing I do recall is something about saving taxpayers money by not having to support a lame duck governor. Of course that implies that ANY governor who runs for a second (or last) term is useless, which is hardly the case.

From your post, you evidently DID understand the reason she gave.
Also the 19 frivolous lawsuits, all NINETEEN DISMISSED was costing the state.