Official Impeachment Thread 2.0: House Judiciary Committee Hearings

[BS Filter]

And your are as dumb as a bag of fucking hammers.

Claiming one guy is innocent exists as no proof whatsoever that another is guilty.

I wasn't asked to prove guilt, dope. I was asked for evidence that it was politically motivated.

Obviously if there was no investigation then there was no corruption.
Obviously then, Trump's motive was not corruption but political advantage.

Oh yeah, and Joe Biden's son was on the Barisma board at $50,000 a month because he's just a damn genius in the energy industry. Out of all the places in the world, it's just a coincidence that Joe Biden is the point man for Obama in Ukraine and Hunter Biden is on the board. We aren't as dumb as you think we are.

We aren't as dumb as you think we are.

You are indeed. So much so that you will never understand that you are.

There was no investigation for Biden to have corruptly halted by the removal of Shokin.

That means nothing. The Democrat party corruption has become normal operating procedure.

It means nothing?
It's exactly what the president referenced in his phone conversation, dope.

You better call Pelosi. Democrats are defecting. Moron.

 

[Zorro!]

Barr emphasizes:

“Their case collapsed after the election and they never told the FISA court and they kept on getting renewals on these FISA applications. The question really is: what was the agenda after the election? They kept on pressing ahead after their case collapsed. This is the president of the United States they continued to investigate.”​

(All dates in 2016):

“What I find particularly inexplicable is that the Obama administration talked to the Russians, but not to the Trump presidential campaign. On August 4 Brennan briefed the head of Russian intelligence; he calls the head of Russian intelligence and says, ‘We know what you’re up to. You better stop it.’ He did it again later in August. And then President Obama talked to President Putin in September and said, ‘We know what you’re up to. You better cut it out.’ So they go and confront the Russians, who clearly are the bad buys, and they won’t go and talk to the Trump campaign…”
​

Those conversations were essentially "planted evidence" The Russians, and by Russians, I mean The Russian Government may have been up to absolutely nothing.

Going through all the evidence,t exts, emails, conversations, it is easy to see that they wanted to Oust Trump the second they realized he had beating Hillary Cankles McPutin.

Bill Barr has revealed himself time and time again, to be willing to lie to the American people to curry favour with Trump. Barr didn't review all of the evidence. He is ignoring everything that the IG said and reverting to Trump's lie that his campaign was spied upon, just like he ignored the 400+ pages of the Mueller Report and spent 6 weeks selling the lie of "no collusion, no obstruction". Barr was lying then, and he's lying now.

This is the Pinnocchio Administration of Donald J. Trump.

What a pile of nonsense. You slander two good men.

THIS COULDN’T HAVE BEEN EASY FOR THEM: Even MSNBC Is Forced to Admit: FBI Made ‘Pretty Egregious, Very Clear Mistakes.’

MSNBC's Andrea Mitchell has actually gone on record admitting the painfully obvious, that the FBI did a horrible job in the FISA process.

"There were very clear mistakes made by the FBI in the first approval and subsequent reapproval submissions for authorization by the FISA court," Mitchell told MSNBC viewers.​

"A particular point of something that is pretty egregious," she went on to say, "which is the altering of a document to not inform the court..."
​

Also known as lying and forging so that you are "authorized" to engage in illegal spying on an American Citizen.

and to not inform others that Carter Page, who was a former associate, Trump campaign associate, of the president, was actually also, at times, a confidential source of the CIA."​

Yeah, concealing that point through 4 warrant submissions, despite John Brennan repeatedly informing the DOJ and FBI of that is certainly "egregious". In fact an email that confirmed he WAS a source had "Not a" inserted so that it read that he was "NOT A Source" when the email stated that "he was a source" for the Agency (CIA).

That, Mitchell clearly felt herself being forced to admit (just look at her facial expression), is a very serious issue.

"To not share that information," she explained, "which would have been obviously exculpatory, which might have led the judge to not approve the surveillance warrant on him."
​

No kidding?

 

[BS Filter]

Who appointed James Comey?

 

[Zorro!]

Barr emphasizes:

“Their case collapsed after the election and they never told the FISA court and they kept on getting renewals on these FISA applications. The question really is: what was the agenda after the election? They kept on pressing ahead after their case collapsed. This is the president of the United States they continued to investigate.”​

(All dates in 2016):

“What I find particularly inexplicable is that the Obama administration talked to the Russians, but not to the Trump presidential campaign. On August 4 Brennan briefed the head of Russian intelligence; he calls the head of Russian intelligence and says, ‘We know what you’re up to. You better stop it.’ He did it again later in August. And then President Obama talked to President Putin in September and said, ‘We know what you’re up to. You better cut it out.’ So they go and confront the Russians, who clearly are the bad buys, and they won’t go and talk to the Trump campaign…”
​

Those conversations were essentially "planted evidence" The Russians, and by Russians, I mean The Russian Government may have been up to absolutely nothing.

Well, what's interesting is that while neither Ukraine nor Russian interference affected the outcome of the Election, and they both meddled, Russia did their for their own benefit, whereas Ukraine did theirs at the bidding of the Obama Administration, for the Obama Administration, Crooked Hillary and the Democrat's benefit.

Meddling, Collusion, And Ukraine Vs. Russia.

A Ukrainian court has certified that it thinks Ukraine meddled in the U.S. election.​

But the real issue is whether Americans leveraged cooperation from Ukraine to behave unethically – and possibly to behave criminally – in the 2016 election. Ukraine’s actions could not have any significant effect, undertaken without the complicity of Americans.​

Russia’s demonstrated actions, unlike Ukraine’s, were of such a kind that they might conceivably have had an impact without intentional collusion by Americans. Russians inaugurated an interference campaign for their own purposes and agenda. That’s different from the premise of “Ukrainian interference.”​

 

[FA_Q2]

No one is reading this crap.

“Abuse of Power” and “Obstruction of Congress” are not even found in The US code and are not crimes.

Article 1 of Bill Clinton's impeachment:

Article One: In his conduct while President of the United States . . . in violation of his constitutional oath to faithfully execute the office of the President . . . has . . . undermined the integrity of his office . . . betrayed his trust as President . . . and acted in a manner subversive of the rule of law

Also not in the US code.



“You don’t even have to be convicted of a crime to lose your job in this constitutional republic if this body determines that your conduct as a public official is clearly out of bounds in your role. Impeachment is not about punishment. Impeachment is about cleansing the office. Impeachment is about restoring honor and integrity to the office.” - Lindsay Graham

LOL.

While true that is not a good example - that impeachment failed

 

[beagle9]

Watching some of this bullcrap on TV right now, and it's absolutely unbelievable knowing the admitted criminal activity of the politicians on the left, the activist deep state along with these butt hurt 2016 crazies, that any of these people can sit there in their total obsurdity trying to roast President Trump like some Dean Martin TV special..... LOL.... And worse trying to do it with any kind of realistic value or substance in doing so. Good grief, what a riot.

 

[basquebromance]

THE DEMOCRATS ARE RIPPING ASUNDER OUR VOTES! THEY'RE SAYING 63 MILLION AMERICANS DONT COUNT!

These people are full of shit.

 

[Ame®icano]

No one is reading this crap.

“Abuse of Power” and “Obstruction of Congress” are not even found in The US code and are not crimes.

Article 1 of Bill Clinton's impeachment:

Article One: In his conduct while President of the United States . . . in violation of his constitutional oath to faithfully execute the office of the President . . . has . . . undermined the integrity of his office . . . betrayed his trust as President . . . and acted in a manner subversive of the rule of law

Also not in the US code.



“You don’t even have to be convicted of a crime to lose your job in this constitutional republic if this body determines that your conduct as a public official is clearly out of bounds in your role. Impeachment is not about punishment. Impeachment is about cleansing the office. Impeachment is about restoring honor and integrity to the office.” - Lindsay Graham

Ever heard of Clinton lying under oath to grand jury?

 

[Ame®icano]

The "whistle-blower compliant" was triggered by Trump's phone call with Zelensky and filed on August 12, which is about two and half weeks after the phone call.

One of the first sentences in the complain is:

"Over the past four months, more than half a dozen U.S. officials have informed me of various facts related to this effort."

Four months? That would means in April, more than three months before the phone call. How is that possible, since there was nothing that Democrats complained about during that period, everything in this impeachment is about phone call and after the phone call.

"Half a dozen US officials have informed me". If so, whoever whistleblower is, must be someone high ranked to have so many people to inform him/her.

Even there is talk about this Ciarmella guy (and he is nobody important enough that half of dozen people would inform him), I think this is all Schiff. From changing rules who can be the whistleblower, to moving impeachment to intelligence committee, to arranging star chamber interviews, to protecting whistleblower name.

 

[BluesLegend]

The latest Dem anti Trump scheme blows up in their face

 

[Zorro!]

During the Impeachment debate, while tensions were high, Ben Franklin asked: "What was the practice before this, in cases where the chief Magistrate rendered himself obnoxious?" Well, they knew that answer: Assassination.

With that, you deprive them of life and chance to defend.

Your point?

 

[basquebromance]

During the Impeachment debate, while tensions were high, Ben Franklin asked: "What was the practice before this, in cases where the chief Magistrate rendered himself obnoxious?" Well, they knew that answer: Assassination.

With that, you deprive them of life and chance to defend.

Your point?

ahh, simpler times!

 

[Zorro!]

No one is reading this crap.

“Abuse of Power” and “Obstruction of Congress” are not even found in The US code and are not crimes.

Article 1 of Bill Clinton's impeachment:

Article One: In his conduct while President of the United States . . . in violation of his constitutional oath to faithfully execute the office of the President . . . has . . . undermined the integrity of his office . . . betrayed his trust as President . . . and acted in a manner subversive of the rule of law

Also not in the US code.



“You don’t even have to be convicted of a crime to lose your job in this constitutional republic if this body determines that your conduct as a public official is clearly out of bounds in your role. Impeachment is not about punishment. Impeachment is about cleansing the office. Impeachment is about restoring honor and integrity to the office.” - Lindsay Graham

LOL.

While true that is not a good example - that impeachment failed

As is this one, it too will fail.

Deep State Lying Forging Evidence Planting Scum To Support Illegal Spying On Americans:

SWAMPLAND: DOJ IG Horowitz Says FBI Employee Who Misled DOJ in Russia Probe Still Works There.

Lock 'em Up!

 

[Zorro!]

During the Impeachment debate, while tensions were high, Ben Franklin asked: "What was the practice before this, in cases where the chief Magistrate rendered himself obnoxious?" Well, they knew that answer: Assassination.

With that, you deprive them of life and chance to defend.

Your point?

ahh, simpler times!

You long for political assassinations?

 

[basquebromance]

During the Impeachment debate, while tensions were high, Ben Franklin asked: "What was the practice before this, in cases where the chief Magistrate rendered himself obnoxious?" Well, they knew that answer: Assassination.

With that, you deprive them of life and chance to defend.

Your point?

ahh, simpler times!

You long for political assassinations?

i have no further comment.

 

[Zorro!]

Trump’s Popularity Surges After Nation Learns He May Have Obstructed Congress.

Heh.

 

[Zorro!]

IN CASE YOU FORGOT, THE IMPEACHMENT CLOWNSHOW IS STILL UNDERWAY, SORT OF:

‘Nadler’s integrity is zero’: Ranking GOP House Judiciary member erupts after ‘violation of trust’ that postponed impeachment vote.

 

[the other mike]

 

[Ame®icano]

Barr emphasizes:

“Their case collapsed after the election and they never told the FISA court and they kept on getting renewals on these FISA applications. The question really is: what was the agenda after the election? They kept on pressing ahead after their case collapsed. This is the president of the United States they continued to investigate.”​

(All dates in 2016):

“What I find particularly inexplicable is that the Obama administration talked to the Russians, but not to the Trump presidential campaign. On August 4 Brennan briefed the head of Russian intelligence; he calls the head of Russian intelligence and says, ‘We know what you’re up to. You better stop it.’ He did it again later in August. And then President Obama talked to President Putin in September and said, ‘We know what you’re up to. You better cut it out.’ So they go and confront the Russians, who clearly are the bad buys, and they won’t go and talk to the Trump campaign…”
​

Those conversations were essentially "planted evidence" The Russians, and by Russians, I mean The Russian Government may have been up to absolutely nothing.

Going through all the evidence,t exts, emails, conversations, it is easy to see that they wanted to Oust Trump the second they realized he had beating Hillary Cankles McPutin.

Bill Barr has revealed himself time and time again, to be willing to lie to the American people to curry favour with Trump. Barr didn't review all of the evidence. He is ignoring everything that the IG said and reverting to Trump's lie that his campaign was spied upon, just like he ignored the 400+ pages of the Mueller Report and spent 6 weeks selling the lie of "no collusion, no obstruction". Barr was lying then, and he's lying now.

This is the Pinnocchio Administration of Donald J. Trump.

I hate to break it to you, but Hillary is not the president.

 

[Ame®icano]

IN CASE YOU FORGOT, THE IMPEACHMENT CLOWNSHOW IS STILL UNDERWAY, SORT OF:

‘Nadler’s integrity is zero’: Ranking GOP House Judiciary member erupts after ‘violation of trust’ that postponed impeachment vote.

Zorro, is this you?