Official Impeachment Thread 2.0: House Judiciary Committee Hearings

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Nostra, Dec 4, 2019.

  1. mudwhistle
    Online

    mudwhistle Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2009
    Messages:
    90,197
    Thanks Received:
    16,710
    Trophy Points:
    2,220
    Location:
    Clarksville, TN...Born in Missoula MT
    Ratings:
    +56,155
    Exactly

    To Democrats this makes sense.

    Mostly because they're told to think that way.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  2. Claudette
    Offline

    Claudette Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2009
    Messages:
    35,425
    Thanks Received:
    5,593
    Trophy Points:
    1,130
    Ratings:
    +24,855
    Nah. The Dems have nothing as usual. Just personal opinions. No first hand anything.

    You are obviously full of shit.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
  3. easyt65
    Offline

    easyt65 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2015
    Messages:
    57,999
    Thanks Received:
    12,724
    Trophy Points:
    2,290
    Ratings:
    +66,907
    Hey, look who decided to resurface?! Since you are here, DL, perhaps you can finally deliver on posting the link to the non-existent Law you and Schiff claim DOES exist that affords non-qualifying whistle blowers the protections of 'Anonymity' and 'Immunity'.....

    Hopefully you won't run away again and can finally provide the evidence of what you and Schiff claim is 'fact'.
     
  4. Slade3200
    Offline

    Slade3200 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2016
    Messages:
    27,842
    Thanks Received:
    2,226
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +10,240
    Yes and both Judge Napolitano and Andy McCarty agreed that Turley was wrong in his analysis... how is congress subpoenaing first hand witnesses to the heart of an impeachment inquiry abusing their power? Can you explain that?
     
  5. Slade3200
    Offline

    Slade3200 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2016
    Messages:
    27,842
    Thanks Received:
    2,226
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +10,240
    they are law professors giving legal testimony. They are literally presenting legal arguments. Brains not working very well today huh? Try taking a nap
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  6. Slade3200
    Offline

    Slade3200 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2016
    Messages:
    27,842
    Thanks Received:
    2,226
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +10,240
    So what?
     
  7. Nostra
    Offline

    Nostra Gold Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2019
    Messages:
    3,840
    Thanks Received:
    600
    Trophy Points:
    180
    Ratings:
    +3,930
    Your bullshit is too easy to destroy.

    In Seeking to Join Suit Over Subpoena Power, Mulvaney Goes Up Against the President
     
  8. easyt65
    Offline

    easyt65 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2015
    Messages:
    57,999
    Thanks Received:
    12,724
    Trophy Points:
    2,290
    Ratings:
    +66,907
    1st-hand witnesses? To date, there have been NONE.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  9. The Original Tree
    Offline

    The Original Tree Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2016
    Messages:
    24,125
    Thanks Received:
    4,362
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    OHIO
    Ratings:
    +27,444
    Because a hearing is Official Government Business and The Constitution Guarantees DUE PROCESS in any Official Government Proceedings. Since Due Process is being denied, the Subpoena is Invalid.

    It's an abuse of power to issue a subpoena to a person to appear before a committee and then deny them DUE PROCESS and CIVIL RIGHTS in that committee hearing.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  10. Nostra
    Offline

    Nostra Gold Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2019
    Messages:
    3,840
    Thanks Received:
    600
    Trophy Points:
    180
    Ratings:
    +3,930
    More OPINIONS based on the OPINIONS of Schifferbrain's Star Witnesses' OPINIONS.
     

Share This Page