Discussion in 'Politics' started by Nostra, Dec 4, 2019.
To Democrats this makes sense.
Mostly because they're told to think that way.
Nah. The Dems have nothing as usual. Just personal opinions. No first hand anything.
You are obviously full of shit.
Hey, look who decided to resurface?! Since you are here, DL, perhaps you can finally deliver on posting the link to the non-existent Law you and Schiff claim DOES exist that affords non-qualifying whistle blowers the protections of 'Anonymity' and 'Immunity'.....
Hopefully you won't run away again and can finally provide the evidence of what you and Schiff claim is 'fact'.
Yes and both Judge Napolitano and Andy McCarty agreed that Turley was wrong in his analysis... how is congress subpoenaing first hand witnesses to the heart of an impeachment inquiry abusing their power? Can you explain that?
they are law professors giving legal testimony. They are literally presenting legal arguments. Brains not working very well today huh? Try taking a nap
Your bullshit is too easy to destroy.
In Seeking to Join Suit Over Subpoena Power, Mulvaney Goes Up Against the President
1st-hand witnesses? To date, there have been NONE.
Because a hearing is Official Government Business and The Constitution Guarantees DUE PROCESS in any Official Government Proceedings. Since Due Process is being denied, the Subpoena is Invalid.
It's an abuse of power to issue a subpoena to a person to appear before a committee and then deny them DUE PROCESS and CIVIL RIGHTS in that committee hearing.
More OPINIONS based on the OPINIONS of Schifferbrain's Star Witnesses' OPINIONS.
Separate names with a comma.