Pressuring a change in government staffing is not an investigation. The President is not authorized to request of Kiev an investigation into a treaty-covered matter. As for the President's attorney: The same applies. The relevant clause is cited in the OP.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!
(Red Hatter Banzai Attack Is Showing!)
 
Pressuring a change in government staffing is not an investigation. The President is not authorized to request of Kiev an investigation into a treaty-covered matter. As for the President's attorney: The same applies. The relevant clause is cited in the OP.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!
(Red Hatter Banzai Attack Is Showing!)
The President doesn't require "authorization" to pursue his agenda, moron.
 
See Britpat9643 post, "The President doesn't require "authorization' to pursue his agenda, moron," for how the likely trial could come to a successful ouster of Donald Trump from the Office of President of the United States.

The President has no arbitrary and capricious authority to pursue anyone, any policy, any jurisdiction, dispute or other matter but is bound to Faithfully Executive the Laws of the United States.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Red-Hatter salutes now raising the arm, even at the bars of America!
 
Grady.PNG
 
About the Treaty: Signed at Kiev in 1999, referred to the Senate, approved October, 2000.

What matters is that by-passing the law--The Attorney General is authorized in the proceedings, and in writing it must be: By-Passing the law Is beyond High Crimes and just possibly an Act of War. If other means are used, than those in writing, then Attorney General has to put the details in writing within 10 days!

Text - Treaty Document 106-16 - Treaty with Ukraine on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Red-Hatters Not the Law, but a group of goons in all the advertising, even!
Please quote the line where it says Giuliani can't do his own investigating.
Who said Giuliani can't? Although Giuliani, the president's personal attorney, can't solicit a foreign national to contribute to his client's campaign.
When did Giuliani do that? Snowflakes believe everything the president does is an illegal campaign contribution.
He solicited a foreign national to investigate one of Trump's political rivals...

Former Ukraine prosecutor says he saw no evidence of wrongdoing by Biden

KYIV, Ukraine —

Ukraine’s former top law enforcement official says he repeatedly rebuffed demands by President Trump’s personal lawyer to investigate Joe Biden and his son, insisting he had seen no evidence of wrongdoing that he could pursue.

In an interview, Yuri Lutsenko said while he was Ukraine’s prosecutor general he told Rudolph W. Giuliani that he would be happy to cooperate if the FBI or other U.S. authorities began their own investigation of the former vice president and his son Hunter but insisted they had not broken any Ukrainian laws to his knowledge. Lutsenko, who was fired as prosecutor general last month, said he had urged Giuliani to launch a U.S. inquiry and go to court if he had any evidence but not to use Ukraine to conduct a political vendetta that could affect the U.S. election.

“I said, ‘Let’s put this through prosecutors, not through presidents,’ ” Lutsenko told The Times.

“I told him I could not start an investigation just for the interests of an American official,” he said.
 
Pressuring a change in government staffing is not an investigation. The President is not authorized to request of Kiev an investigation into a treaty-covered matter. As for the President's attorney: The same applies. The relevant clause is cited in the OP.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!
(Red Hatter Banzai Attack Is Showing!)
The President doesn't require "authorization" to pursue his agenda, moron.
He does have to abide by the prerequisites of the treaty the yahoo right is claiming allows Trump to ask Ukraine to investigate Biden.
 
The Law Enforcement Assistance and Cooperation Treaty with Ukraine specifies that the designated officials of the two nations are the US Attorney General and the Ukraine Minister of Justice, (3.1.d.). The treaty binds those two offices--and so the usual rules in both nations, regarding those offices: In the Treaty. So from the New York Times, about the phone--Barbarous Anti-American sentiment is apparently what the White House has documented.

"A Justice Department official said that Mr. Barr had no knowledge of the call until the director of national intelligence and the intelligence community’s inspector general sent the department the whistle-blower’s criminal referral late last month, and that Mr. Trump has not spoken with the attorney general “about having Ukraine investigate anything relating to former Vice President Biden or his son.”

Political interference is not considered cause, stated in the Treaty provisions.

https://www.congress.gov/106/cdoc/tdoc16/CDOC-106tdoc16.pdf

Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!
(Red-Hatter waving takes on a new appearance. "Banzai! Surprise!" Attack on the USA apparently is supported--or on Ukraine, or Crimea!)

Da' glove don't fit!
You gotta (well, you know the rest....deep thinker.)
 
See Britpat9643 post, "The President doesn't require "authorization' to pursue his agenda, moron," for how the likely trial could come to a successful ouster of Donald Trump from the Office of President of the United States.

The President has no arbitrary and capricious authority to pursue anyone, any policy, any jurisdiction, dispute or other matter but is bound to Faithfully Executive the Laws of the United States.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Red-Hatter salutes now raising the arm, even at the bars of America!
There was nothing arbitrary or capricious about it. Biden is a corrupt politicians who took bribes from a foreign government.
 
Pressuring a change in government staffing is not an investigation. The President is not authorized to request of Kiev an investigation into a treaty-covered matter. As for the President's attorney: The same applies. The relevant clause is cited in the OP.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!
(Red Hatter Banzai Attack Is Showing!)
The President doesn't require "authorization" to pursue his agenda, moron.
He does have to abide by the prerequisites of the treaty the yahoo right is claiming allows Trump to ask Ukraine to investigate Biden.
Which prerequisite is he violating?
 
About the Treaty: Signed at Kiev in 1999, referred to the Senate, approved October, 2000.

What matters is that by-passing the law--The Attorney General is authorized in the proceedings, and in writing it must be: By-Passing the law Is beyond High Crimes and just possibly an Act of War. If other means are used, than those in writing, then Attorney General has to put the details in writing within 10 days!

Text - Treaty Document 106-16 - Treaty with Ukraine on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Red-Hatters Not the Law, but a group of goons in all the advertising, even!
Please quote the line where it says Giuliani can't do his own investigating.
Who said Giuliani can't? Although Giuliani, the president's personal attorney, can't solicit a foreign national to contribute to his client's campaign.
When did Giuliani do that? Snowflakes believe everything the president does is an illegal campaign contribution.
He solicited a foreign national to investigate one of Trump's political rivals...

Former Ukraine prosecutor says he saw no evidence of wrongdoing by Biden

KYIV, Ukraine —

Ukraine’s former top law enforcement official says he repeatedly rebuffed demands by President Trump’s personal lawyer to investigate Joe Biden and his son, insisting he had seen no evidence of wrongdoing that he could pursue.

In an interview, Yuri Lutsenko said while he was Ukraine’s prosecutor general he told Rudolph W. Giuliani that he would be happy to cooperate if the FBI or other U.S. authorities began their own investigation of the former vice president and his son Hunter but insisted they had not broken any Ukrainian laws to his knowledge. Lutsenko, who was fired as prosecutor general last month, said he had urged Giuliani to launch a U.S. inquiry and go to court if he had any evidence but not to use Ukraine to conduct a political vendetta that could affect the U.S. election.

“I said, ‘Let’s put this through prosecutors, not through presidents,’ ” Lutsenko told The Times.

“I told him I could not start an investigation just for the interests of an American official,” he said.
That's the guy who replaced the guy Biden wanted fired, right? Yeah, big surprise that he would defend Biden.
 
So the Treaty establishes the prerequisites to be followed in the matter of Treaty Compliance. Those the President refused to honor, did not use Attorney General Barr--and famously was not too fond of Attorney General, Jeff Sessions either.

Now the President is better said estranged from the Law itself, (aka "Outlaw"), and likely Jeff Sessions knows what rope is really for. . . .and maybe even bullwhips(?).

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(What good is a Red Hat, anyway(?)! Good for all kinds of. . .criminal. . .pursuits!)
 
The Law Enforcement Assistance and Cooperation Treaty with Ukraine specifies that the designated officials of the two nations are the US Attorney General and the Ukraine Minister of Justice, (3.1.d.). The treaty binds those two offices--and so the usual rules in both nations, regarding those offices: In the Treaty. So from the New York Times, about the phone--Barbarous Anti-American sentiment is apparently what the White House has documented.

"A Justice Department official said that Mr. Barr had no knowledge of the call until the director of national intelligence and the intelligence community’s inspector general sent the department the whistle-blower’s criminal referral late last month, and that Mr. Trump has not spoken with the attorney general “about having Ukraine investigate anything relating to former Vice President Biden or his son.”

Political interference is not considered cause, stated in the Treaty provisions.

https://www.congress.gov/106/cdoc/tdoc16/CDOC-106tdoc16.pdf

Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!
(Red-Hatter waving takes on a new appearance. "Banzai! Surprise!" Attack on the USA apparently is supported--or on Ukraine, or Crimea!)

mascale Provide a link to the quoted material.
 
So the Treaty establishes the prerequisites to be followed in the matter of Treaty Compliance. Those the President refused to honor, did not use Attorney General Barr--and famously was not too fond of Attorney General, Jeff Sessions either.

Now the President is better said estranged from the Law itself, (aka "Outlaw"), and likely Jeff Sessions knows what rope is really for. . . .and maybe even bullwhips(?).

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(What good is a Red Hat, anyway!)


So tell the class how many times Trump asked for cooperation with the AG during the call?

.
 
We don't even know who the alleged "whistle blower" is. Witnesses seem to have gotten their information from the NYT. The whistle blower's attorney is on record in planning treason (a political coup) on the day of the President's inauguration and the little cabal in the basement is falling apart. Meanwhile the good old angry crazy ignorant radical left has the President of the United States convicted. Sometimes you have to wonder about these people.
 
The Law Enforcement Assistance and Cooperation Treaty with Ukraine specifies that the designated officials of the two nations are the US Attorney General and the Ukraine Minister of Justice, (3.1.d.). The treaty binds those two offices--and so the usual rules in both nations, regarding those offices: In the Treaty. So from the New York Times, about the phone--Barbarous Anti-American sentiment is apparently what the White House has documented.

"A Justice Department official said that Mr. Barr had no knowledge of the call until the director of national intelligence and the intelligence community’s inspector general sent the department the whistle-blower’s criminal referral late last month, and that Mr. Trump has not spoken with the attorney general “about having Ukraine investigate anything relating to former Vice President Biden or his son.”

Political interference is not considered cause, stated in the Treaty provisions.

https://www.congress.gov/106/cdoc/tdoc16/CDOC-106tdoc16.pdf

Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!
(Red-Hatter waving takes on a new appearance. "Banzai! Surprise!" Attack on the USA apparently is supported--or on Ukraine, or Crimea!)
Is this true, or did you hear it on CNN?
 
You gutless Dem clowns do something about it DO IT impeach Trump. :auiqs.jpg:
LOL

Figures you nut jobs would call fof his impeachment before the hearings are over. Of course, that reveals how nervous you are about what's coming out that you want him impeached before it does.

:dance:

You fuckers were calling for it before he was sworn in.

Or do you disavow that stupid bitch Maxine Waters ?
 
The Law Enforcement Assistance and Cooperation Treaty with Ukraine specifies that the designated officials of the two nations are the US Attorney General and the Ukraine Minister of Justice, (3.1.d.). The treaty binds those two offices--and so the usual rules in both nations, regarding those offices: In the Treaty. So from the New York Times, about the phone--Barbarous Anti-American sentiment is apparently what the White House has documented.

"A Justice Department official said that Mr. Barr had no knowledge of the call until the director of national intelligence and the intelligence community’s inspector general sent the department the whistle-blower’s criminal referral late last month, and that Mr. Trump has not spoken with the attorney general “about having Ukraine investigate anything relating to former Vice President Biden or his son.”

Political interference is not considered cause, stated in the Treaty provisions.

https://www.congress.gov/106/cdoc/tdoc16/CDOC-106tdoc16.pdf

Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!
(Red-Hatter waving takes on a new appearance. "Banzai! Surprise!" Attack on the USA apparently is supported--or on Ukraine, or Crimea!)

There will be no impeachment, there may be an assassination attempt.
 
The US Message Board thread, starting with the OP, is self-contained. The matter is the Treaty cited, and whether or not the goons on the Tyrannically illegal phone call to the Ukaine president--requesting implication in tyrannical atrocity--aka, Civil Rights violations--was as clearly not lawful as it was.

The US message board thread, herein: Contains the relevant documentation.

The posts clearly contending for outlaw responses are from Sun Devil 92, Ev Metro, Whitehall, and the others already mentioned: Clearly intending not only desecration of graves on Veteran's Day Memorial Weekend, but also the US Message Board itself: Which accurately contain the Mascale posts. The Mascale posts document what is widely known, and even widely unknown.

Then there are the US Message Board denigrators, already posted.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Red Hats eligible for being chased to death by US law enforcement: Maybe emerging!)
 

Forum List

Back
Top