OCTAs, Your Chance to Say it Directly to Victims Families

Discussion in 'Conspiracy Theories' started by CurveLight, Dec 3, 2009.

  1. CurveLight
    Offline

    CurveLight BANNED

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2009
    Messages:
    9,768
    Thanks Received:
    315
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +315
    With all the moaning and complaints about those who don't buy the OCT, specifically saying those who don't accept it are morons, dumbasses, idiots, etc, I thought it would be nice to give those who make these claims the opportunity to say it to the victims' families and first responders. Below is contact info for NYC CAN (New York City Coalition for Accountability Now). The challenge is simple:

    Email the group and tell them they are fucking morons for not accepting the OCT.

    I doubt anyone has the balls to actually do it and I would ask others who don't accept the OCT to link this page every single time they are told they are fucking morons for not believing the OCT. The purpose is to get OCTAs to follow through with their accusations or strongly curb their appetite for constant name calling every time they can't address the facts.

    If any OCTAs
    send the group emails saying how stupid they are then please post the correspondence in this thread so we may all see you stand by your conviction.

    Info on the group:

    "We, the undersigned Families, First Responders and Survivors of September 11 raise our voice with those from across our country and around the world in support of NYC CAN and the establishment of an independent, impartial subpoena powered investigation into the events surrounding the September 11 attacks on our nation."

    Website:

    NYC Coalition For Accountability Now

    Contact Info:

    Info@NYCCAN.org


    We look forward to seeing how well OCTAs
    stand by their own claims. Cheers!
     
  2. Gamolon
    Offline

    Gamolon VIP Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2009
    Messages:
    3,117
    Thanks Received:
    274
    Trophy Points:
    85
    Ratings:
    +356
    Can you show me where, in any of the questions from those families or people, there are questions concerning "explosive", "controlled", "demolition", "thermite", "fake", "conspiracy", "molten", "column", "freefall", etc.?

    I did a search through the PDF document and could not find ONE instance of those words.
    These people are asking questions dealing with what they think are major breakdowns in communication and procedures leading up to and dealing with the attacks. Nothing to do with controlled demolitions, missiles, fake airplanes, etc. They want answers as to WHY it happened the way it did and WHY there were procedural breakdowns that lead to us getting attacked with our pants down.

    To FURTHER that line of thinking, here is a link to an article directly from NYCCAn website,
    9/11 survivors call for renewed probe as 8th anniversary approaches | Bob Braun - NJ.com, in which it is stated:

    I don't doubt that people somewhere along the lines effed up and should be held accountable. By all means, let them investigate. They deserve answers to their questions. What I have a problem with is people using this and other things as proof of people wanting an investigation because they believe that the towers were demolished, hit with missiles, hit with beam weapons, etc.

    Totally crazy.

    Go read the NYCCAN mission statement and tell be if they wnat to know why the Twin Towers were demolished, why a missile hit the Pentagon, or why a plane flew North of the Citgo station.

    Below is a quote from the Mission part of NYCCAN's site. (My bolding)
    Quote from the "Moving Forward" paragraph on their Mission page. (My bolding)
    Anyone despicable enough to turn these people's request for answers into proof that they want an investigation because they think the buildings were demolished or hit with a beam weapon should ashamed of themselves.

    If these people feel that their questions have not been answered to their full satisfaction, then they DO deserve an investigation. For example, people being told that the air was safe to breath at ground zero. Obviously someone was wrong and people are dying from that mistake. Someone needs to be held accountable for that.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  3. WillowTree
    Online

    WillowTree Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    68,147
    Thanks Received:
    10,164
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Ratings:
    +14,703
    I wanna know if all involved are certain enough to ante up the money it will take for an investigation?
     
  4. CurveLight
    Offline

    CurveLight BANNED

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2009
    Messages:
    9,768
    Thanks Received:
    315
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +315
    Nice try but we all know OCTAs
    label everyone as crazy if they don't accept bush's version.
     
  5. Gamolon
    Offline

    Gamolon VIP Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2009
    Messages:
    3,117
    Thanks Received:
    274
    Trophy Points:
    85
    Ratings:
    +356
    Can you show me where I said that in my above post?
     
  6. WillowTree
    Online

    WillowTree Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    68,147
    Thanks Received:
    10,164
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Ratings:
    +14,703
    Yes,, We'll wait.
     
  7. CurveLight
    Offline

    CurveLight BANNED

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2009
    Messages:
    9,768
    Thanks Received:
    315
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +315

    Obviously you accidentally posted that in the wrong thread and I know you wouldn't purposefully ignore the op.
     
  8. CurveLight
    Offline

    CurveLight BANNED

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2009
    Messages:
    9,768
    Thanks Received:
    315
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +315

    I didn't say you said it. It's no secret those, like myself, who say we don't know what happened get labeled as troofer whackjobs.
     
  9. Gamolon
    Offline

    Gamolon VIP Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2009
    Messages:
    3,117
    Thanks Received:
    274
    Trophy Points:
    85
    Ratings:
    +356
    Let me say this again in case you didn't understand my first post above.

    I don't speak for everyone, only for myself. I think that there was certainly some lacks in procedure, mistakes, and screw-ups leading up to, on, and after 9/11. These need to be investigated and addressed.

    Especially in the case of people getting the ok to walk around and breathe the air around ground zero, saying it was safe.

    It's when people point at the above petition as proof that people responsible for said petition, want an investigation into why the towers were demolished, etc.

    I found no question in their document that asks anything about the conspiracies I mention.
     
  10. CurveLight
    Offline

    CurveLight BANNED

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2009
    Messages:
    9,768
    Thanks Received:
    315
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +315

    That is exactly why your first post was a strawman. I never said they wanted a new investigation based on demolition or other theories.
     

Share This Page