Salt Jones
Rookie
- Mar 22, 2011
- 6,900
- 511
- 0
- Banned
- #101
Shut Up. YOU will NOT speak unless YOU clear it with me.*I* OWN YOU...YOU will NOT speak unless YOU clear it with ME.
Hahaha. Where's Daveman with his e-thug picture?
Hahahahaha.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Shut Up. YOU will NOT speak unless YOU clear it with me.*I* OWN YOU...YOU will NOT speak unless YOU clear it with ME.
Hahaha. Where's Daveman with his e-thug picture?
If you don't think the U.S. is incrementally becoming a police state there is much you need to learn about contemporary reality. The following is excerpted from a Cato Institute article. I urge you to read the full article because I think you'll find it enlightening.[...]
So if anyone is worried that a "Police State" will evolve where local cops are beating down your door to take your guns or money or gold.......or whatever "police state" ideals one has, I think there is 0% chance of that.
[...]
But a Stalin-like police state being implemented with our current local cops? No chance. They'd never do it. They already CHOOSE not to enforce dumbass petty laws that mayors and governors pass on a daily basis. A law is nothing but ink on paper without people to enforce it.
All those evil nations or regimes they listed (Pol Pot, Stalin, etc).............do the OWS people not realize that those nations followed THE SAME ideology that 95% of OWS folks are cheering for to come here? Big gov't control, resource redistribution, etc, etc?????
Dumbasses never fail to remind me how dumb they are.
Link?
Link to what? That Stalin was a communist? The left wingers want the same ideals that Pol Pot, Stalin, Lenin, etc, all advocated to become reality here? Redistribution of resources? That can ONLY be done by force. As Stalin and Lenin showed us.
Link?
Link to what? That Stalin was a communist? The left wingers want the same ideals that Pol Pot, Stalin, Lenin, etc, all advocated to become reality here? Redistribution of resources? That can ONLY be done by force. As Stalin and Lenin showed us.
Nope. Most people who finished 8th grade in the US know who Stalin, Pol Pot, and Lenin were.
I'm looking for the 95% claim. It would be no more fair, if someone were to say: "Oh the Tea Partiers were 80% racist, 40% fundamentalist Christian, 50% anti semitic, etc..."
That's right folks, according to the OWS crowd, changing society "almost always requires" killing law enforcement officers. Law enforcement officers in the Grand Canyon state have been placed on high alert and the Arizona Counter-Terrorism Information Center has published a safety memo in response to the threats of unapologetic cop killing.
Could this be what Obama is backing? Counting upon to suspend everything? Take over reigns of power? Could it spread?
Unfortunately, the media and Hollywood have painted a picture of cops that is less than flattering. And most people are morons enough to believe it's reality.
Occupy Phoenix: Fliers Titled "When Should You Shoot a Cop" Found at Demonstration - Phoenix News - Valley Fever....
The two-page fliers outline scenarios where it's appropriate to kill "any government agent" who violates a person's Constitutional rights.
Some of those scenarios include airport security checkpoints, the border, and sobriety checkpoints.
....
Occupy Phoenix: Fliers Titled "When Should You Shoot a Cop" Found at Demonstration - Phoenix News - Valley Fever....
The two-page fliers outline scenarios where it's appropriate to kill "any government agent" who violates a person's Constitutional rights.
Some of those scenarios include airport security checkpoints, the border, and sobriety checkpoints.
....
Who wants to try to convince me that there is not violent intent here?
Did you ask a question? How am I so sure the OWS didn't do it? Because, that is not their mission or gripe.My, my. Moral equivalence arguments and raw, festering hatred of college students all in one thread.
Who would have thought rightwingloons were this batshit crazy?
I notice you haven't answered the question. You are a liar and a hypocrite as well as a moron. Keep proving it.
Did you ask a question? How am I so sure the OWS didn't do it? Because, that is not their mission or gripe.My, my. Moral equivalence arguments and raw, festering hatred of college students all in one thread.
Who would have thought rightwingloons were this batshit crazy?
I notice you haven't answered the question. You are a liar and a hypocrite as well as a moron. Keep proving it.
I wouldn't doubt if someone like you did it to spread hatred. I would not doubt it at all from people that stand by and cheer people like Breitbart for doing similar things.
They diid and still do call them baggers
On specifically whose part?Occupy Phoenix: Fliers Titled "When Should You Shoot a Cop" Found at Demonstration - Phoenix News - Valley Fever....
The two-page fliers outline scenarios where it's appropriate to kill "any government agent" who violates a person's Constitutional rights.
Some of those scenarios include airport security checkpoints, the border, and sobriety checkpoints.
....
Who wants to try to convince me that there is not violent intent here?
They are being distributed at OWS. I have no evidence that they are not anyone other than OWS.On specifically whose part?Occupy Phoenix: Fliers Titled "When Should You Shoot a Cop" Found at Demonstration - Phoenix News - Valley Fever....
The two-page fliers outline scenarios where it's appropriate to kill "any government agent" who violates a person's Constitutional rights.
Some of those scenarios include airport security checkpoints, the border, and sobriety checkpoints.
....
Who wants to try to convince me that there is not violent intent here?
Have you read the subject pamphlets?
Do you know who is distributing them?
Do you know what agents provocateur are?
Are you poised to draw negative conclusions about the protest and its participants?
"Where is the violence?"The Occupy Wall Street movement has, from the beginning, stressed non violence. The blog post that got the "ball rolling":
On the 17th of September, we want to see 20,000 people to flood into lower Manhattan, set up beds, kitchens, peaceful barricades and occupy Wall Street for a few months, one statement says. Like our brothers and sisters in Egypt, Greece, Spain, and Iceland, we plan to use the revolutionary Arab Spring tactic of mass occupation to restore democracy in America. We also encourage the use of nonviolence to achieve our ends and maximize the safety of all participants.
Notice where non violence is stressed by the people that started this movement?
These pamphlets were left at an Occupy protest. There is no source for these pamphlets and could very well have come from the likes of a Breitbart or O'Keefe...who have proven time and again that they will go to ANY lengths to create a story.
Have any prominent supporters of the OWS movement made incendiary statements? Have radio talk show hosts like Joyce Kaufman made on air comments like If ballots dont work, bullets will.
Have candidates running for public office who happen to support the OWS movement made comments about "2nd Amendment Remedies" and "taking out" a US Senator?
Surely you've all heard of Agent Provocateurs haven't you?
Welcome to Occupy Phoenix, the latest violent embarrassment to American society. This group of occupiers is asking, "When should you shoot a cop?" Pamphlets asking this question and laying out justifications for doing so were left at the Occupy Wall Street location in Phoenix, Arizona and found by a Maricopa County Sheriff Deputy.
When Should You Shoot A Cop?
That question, even without an answer, makes most law-abiding taxpayers go into knee-jerk conniptions. The indoctrinated masses all race to see who can be first, and loudest to proclaim that it is NEVER okay to forcibly resist law enforcement. In doing so, they also inadvertently demonstrate why so much of human history has been plagued by tyranny and oppression.
In an ideal world, cops would do nothing except protect people from thieves and attackers, in which case shooting a cop would never be justified. In the real world, however, far more injustice, violence, torture, theft, and outright murder has been committed IN THE NAME of law enforcement, than has been committed in spite of it. To get a little perspective, try watching a documentary or two about some of the atrocities committed by the regimes of Stalin, or Lenin, or Chaiman Mao, or Hitler, or Pol Pot, or any number of other tyrants in history. Pause the film when the jackboots are about to herd innocent people into cattle cars, or gun them down as they stand on the edge of a ditch, and THEN ask yourself the question, When should you shoot a cop?
Occupy Phoenix Asks: When Should You Shoot a Cop? - Katie Pavlich
Whenever there is a protest gathering of substantial size, regardless of how conscientiously determined to remain peaceful the majority of protesters are there almost always are a few individuals who have their own ideas. If one or two individuals decide to toss things at the police or destroy property their actions serve as justifiable provocation for police to move aggressively against the entire gathering, as we have recently seen."Where is the violence?"
Watch the news. Read the reports.