Obstructionism, good or bad?

AmyNation

Road Warrior
Aug 6, 2012
9,021
1,026
48
Currently stationed at the kitchen table
The last 4 years congress has broken records for the filibuster and redefined "obstructionism". However, I've seen some debate on whether having a productive congress is actually a good thing or not.

So, better to have a gridlocked congress or a productive one thats ruled by the opposition?
 
What's their approval, 12%? Could be bad.

The Pubs won't vote for the type of Jobs Act they always did...a disgrace.

"No compromise, Un-American Tea Party GOP" (TIME).

Assume the position, "Our only goal is a one term Obama" a-holes.
 
Last edited:
stop it for christ sakes, what the hell people when teh republicans didnt have enough people to generate a paycheck did you scream obstuction, NO you freaking screamed "we are going to change it all up" now that EVEN your own party didnt get on board, you're screaming "the repubs stopped us" no they didnt. for 6 months obama had the super majority 60? what did he get thru that nothing could stop? What? What did he get thru? This was the man that was going to change it all up for the dems and unite the country and part the seas and play pool with his dick, what went wrong? The dems went wrong. Get used to it.
 
stop it for christ sakes, what the hell people when teh republicans didnt have enough people to generate a paycheck did you scream obstuction, NO you freaking screamed "we are going to change it all up" now that EVEN your own party didnt get on board, you're screaming "the repubs stopped us" no they didnt. for 6 months obama had the super majority 60? what did he get thru that nothing could stop? What? What did he get thru? This was the man that was going to change it all up for the dems and unite the country and part the seas and play pool with his dick, what went wrong? The dems went wrong. Get used to it.

Quit lying. It's getting old.

Where's the part about Republicans controlling both houses, the Supreme Court and the presidency for 6 years? You know, when Republicans worked to destroy the country. They did more than al Qaeda.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
They produced the most important social (PUB) health reform ever, and stopped the meltdown in its tracks, and financial reform- if Pubs would allow implementation. And they had 60 votes for 24 days in session. Change the channel. Passing the Jobs act would have produed 2% more growth and 1% UE- can't have that!
 
Last edited:
They produced the most important social (PUB) health reform ever, and stopped the meltdown in its tracks, and financial reform- if Pubs would allow implementation. And they had 60 votes for 24 days in session. Change the channel. Passing the Jobs act would have produed 2% more groth and 1% UE- can't have that!



show me the proof.
 
stop it for christ sakes, what the hell people when teh republicans didnt have enough people to generate a paycheck did you scream obstuction, NO you freaking screamed "we are going to change it all up" now that EVEN your own party didnt get on board, you're screaming "the repubs stopped us" no they didnt. for 6 months obama had the super majority 60? what did he get thru that nothing could stop? What? What did he get thru? This was the man that was going to change it all up for the dems and unite the country and part the seas and play pool with his dick, what went wrong? The dems went wrong. Get used to it.

Quit lying. It's getting old.

Where's the part about Republicans controlling both houses, the Supreme Court and the presidency for 6 years? You know, when Republicans worked to destroy the country. They did more than al Qaeda.



how am i lying, look it up as TM will tell you facts are facts,. Obama has the 60 vote majority for 6 months what did he do?
 
The last 4 years congress has broken records for the filibuster and redefined "obstructionism". However, I've seen some debate on whether having a productive congress is actually a good thing or not.

So, better to have a gridlocked congress or a productive one thats ruled by the opposition?

That would depend on what you are Obstructing.
 
The last 4 years congress has broken records for the filibuster and redefined "obstructionism". However, I've seen some debate on whether having a productive congress is actually a good thing or not.

So, better to have a gridlocked congress or a productive one thats ruled by the opposition?

That would depend on what you are Obstructing.

Should it though?
 

Forum List

Back
Top