Obama’s threatened Executive Order amnesty __ a meaningless piece of paper!

[johnwk]

.

There is an important principle of law that an unconstitutional act, although masquerading as “law”, “imposes no duties, confers no rights, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection, and justifies no acts performed under it.” ___ 16 Am Jur 2d, Sec 177 late 2d, Sec 256


What this means is, if Obama should write on a piece of paper that millions of aliens who have invaded our borders and are here illegally should meet conditions arbitrarily decided upon by Obama, shall then no longer be subjected to deportation, that piece of paper would have no more legal force and effect than used toilet paper, and would provide no privileges or immunities to illegal entrants, nor protect them from future deportation. In fact, if Obama took this approach it would give illegal entrants and their families a false hope, and they would be in for a very, very rude awakening in the future!


Of course, the above contention is based upon the assumption that our president is not vested with legislative powers. And this assumption turns out to be correct because Congress, the People’s elected Representatives from each State, are vested with the exclusive power to adopt legislation, and this includes legislating laws dealing with aliens and naturalization. On the other hand President Obama, under our Constitution, is specifically and emphatically commanded to be faithful to our Constitution and execute laws passed by Congress! The president is not vested with power to disregard the policy making decisions enacted by the People’s Representatives and supplant his own policy in its place.


So why is our establishment media continually telling us Obama will be signing an Executive Order granting amnesty to tens of millions of illegal entrants this Thanksgiving day? Is our establishment media trying to convince us that if Obama pens an Executive Order as described above it would have the force of law, and these illegal entrants would no longer be subject to deportation under existing statutory law? Is it not crystal clear that if Obama does write an Executive Order as described above he would be engaging in an act of sedition? Why is our big media trying to brainwash us into thinking President Obama has authority to ignore our Constitution and statutory laws passed by Congress which deal with illegal entrants and naturalization, and supplant his own arbitrarily created legislation? And what about our law enforcement agencies across the nation? Are they to enforce Obama’s declarations or our Constitution and laws passed by Congress?


As to the immediate action which the House and Senate should take if Obama does carry out his threat, Congress should pass a joint resolution declaring Obama’s Executive Order is unconstitutional, is an act of sedition, and it “imposes no duties, confers no rights, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection, and justifies no acts performed under it.” By doing so, it would put our law enforcement agencies across America on notice to ignore Obama’s sedition, while likewise putting illegal entrants on notice that Obama’s unlawful act is null and void and provides no protection to them!


JWK



The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny. ___ Madison, Federalist Paper No. 47

 

[johnwk]

Let us recall what Representative BURKE says during our Nations` first debate on a RULE OF NATURALIZATION, FEB. 3RD, 1790

Mr. BURKE thought it of importance to fill the country with useful men, such as farmers, mechanics, and manufacturers, and, therefore, would hold out every encouragement to them to emigrate to America. This class he would receive on liberal terms; and he was satisfied there would be room enough for them, and for their posterity, for five hundred years to come. There was another class of men, whom he did not think useful, and he did not care what impediments were thrown in their way; such as your European merchants, and factors of merchants, who come with a view of remaining so long as will enable them to acquire a fortune, and then they will leave the country, and carry off all their property with them. These people injure us more than they do us good, and, except in this last sentiment, I can compare them to nothing but leeches. They stick to us until they get their fill of our best blood, and then they fall off and leave us. I look upon the privilege of an American citizen to be an honorable one, and it ought not to be thrown away upon such people. There is another class also that I would interdict, that is, the convicts and criminals which they pour out of British jails. I wish sincerely some mode could be adopted to prevent the importation of such; but that, perhaps, is not in our power; the introduction of them ought to be considered as a high misdemeanor.

So, as it turns out, allowing the kind of foreigners who are now invading our borders [the poorly educated, low skilled, disease carrying and impoverished] should be considered as a "high misdemeanor" which happens to be an impeachable offense!


JWK


The Obama Administration is employing the same cowardly tactics used by the Hamas. It hides behind woman and children while flooding our country with the poverty stricken, disease carrying populations of other countries!

 

[johnwk]

Keep in mind that Obama’s tyranny cannot be carried out unless there are federal employees willing to do his bidding and subvert our constitutionally limited system of government.

To find out who would be in charge of carrying out Obama’s illegal amnesty in your state and the physical address of the facility CLICK HERE and scroll down to the map and click on your state. For example, if you click on Texas you will find there are six field offices:

Dallas Field Office
This office is located at: 6500 Campus Circle Drive East Irving, TX 75063.

El Paso Field Office
This office is located at: 1545 Hawkins Boulevard El Paso, TX 79925.

Harlingen Field Office
This office is located at: 1717 Zoy Street Harlingen, TX 78552.

Houston Field Office
This office is located at: 126 Northpoint Drive Houston, TX 77060.

San Antonio Field Office
This office is located at: 8940 Fourwinds Drive San Antonio, TX 78239

And if you click on the specific field office, e.g., the Dallas Field Office, you then find those who would be asked to enforce and carry out Obama's Executive Ordered amnesty. In this case that would be field office Director: Tracy Tarango, District Director: Lisa Kehl

These two would have to make a decision to obey Obama’s wishes, or obey our Constitution and statutory law.

It may be helpful to write a letter to the field officer director and district director in your state and remind them that they took an oath to be faithful to our Constitution, and not to a president who has decided to ignore our Constitution and impose his will upon the people. Obama’s tyranny cannot take place unless he has willing accomplices!

JWK



We are here today and gone tomorrow, but what is most important is what we do in between, and is what our children will inherit and remember us by.

 

[Mr. H.]

He has a pen and a phone.

The pen is mightier than the sword.

The phone... well, it's just a phone.

We'll see where this Arab-Kenyan's delusions ultimately fail.

He's a one-trick pony. Errr... jackass.

 

[jon_berzerk]

He has a pen and a phone.

The pen is mightier than the sword.

The phone... well, it's just a phone.

We'll see where this Arab-Kenyan's delusions ultimately fail.

He's a one-trick pony. Errr... jackass.

he has a pen a phone and nicorette chewing gum

 

[johnwk]

Why Congress must adopt a joint resolution condemning Obama’s E.O. amnesty

An immediate joint resolution by Congress condemning Obama’s Executive Order amnesty would have a very important legal meaning involved with acceptance by acquiescence!


Congress, and only Congress, has power to enact law, and that includes law dealing with naturalization and illegal entrants. If Obama carries through with his E.O. amnesty threat and dictates a policy dealing with illegal entrants which is contrary to Congress’ intended legislation dealing with the matter, a failure of Congress to not adopt an immediate joint resolution condemning Obama’s Executive Order would be a signal that Congress is acquiescing and deferring to Obama’s Executive Order amnesty by its silence!

A House/Senate Joint Resolution in response to Obama’s E.O. amnesty condemning it and stating specific reasons for condemnation would preempt the argument of Congress’ acquiescence; it would establish a legally recognizable good faith effort in the matter on Congress’ part; it would provide a necessary legal tool to have the Court grant an immediate injunction against Obama’s E.O., and it would put illegal entrants on notice that Obama’s Executive order carries no weight and offers them no legal protection from being punished and deported in the future . . . forewarned is forearmed!

Let us see if our new Congress is willing to confront Obama, and carry out the will of the American People.

JWK


The Obama Administration is employing the same cowardly tactics used by the Hamas. It hides behind woman and children while flooding our country with the poverty stricken, disease carrying populations of other countries!

 

[Claudette]

Yup. And lets see how many Dems back his play knowing they will pay the price at the polls in 16.

America doesn't want all these illegals to be given amnesty. In fact most Americans want them deported.

Reagan tried amnesty and it backfired. Guess the Law Professor didn't read the history of amnesty in America.

 

[johnwk]

Obama to divulge his decided actions dealing with illegal entrants on Thursday

SEE: President Obama to announce executive action on immigration Thursday


"According to a senior Democrat familiar with the plans, Obama will announce on Thursday that he is providing temporary protections to up to 5 million undocumented immigrants. His orders will make up to 4 million undocumented immigrants eligible for temporary protective status and provide relief to another 1 million through other means."


The question is, under what power delegated to the president under Article II of our Constitution may Obama grant “temporary protections” to up to 5 million foreigners who have invaded our borders?

Keep in mind Congress has been granted exclusive power to set public policy with regard to naturalization and aliens who enter our Country illegally. Perhaps I’m wrong but I suspect President Obama will not identify the delegated power contained in our Constitution during his announcement tomorrow which authorizes his stated actions. In fact I am almost certain Obama will merely say some such thing as he is acting under his “lawful authority as president” without identifying the wording in our Constitution which actually authorizes the President to do what Obama will allege he has power to do.

In response to Obama’s actions _ should he not identify the wording in our Constitution granting the power he will assume and exercise __ the House and Senate must immediately adopt a joint resolution declaring Obama's order to be without constitutional authority and therefore it “imposes no duties, confers no rights, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection, and justifies no acts performed under it.” By doing so Congress would put our law enforcement agencies and administrative offices across America on notice to ignore Obama’s sedition, while likewise putting illegal entrants on notice that Obama’s order is null and void and provides no protection to them!

Finally, Congress’ next move would be to immediately file for an injunction to prohibit any federal or state agency to yield to Obama’s order while the constitutionality of Obama’s actions are being litigated.

JWK

"The Constitution is the act of the people, speaking in their original character, and defining the permanent conditions of the social alliance; and there can be no doubt on the point with us, that every act of the legislative power contrary to the true intent and meaning of the Constitution, is absolutely null and void. ___ Chancellor James Kent, in his Commentaries on American Law (1858)