Obama's Contempt for Christian Values Takes a Kick in the Balls

[tererun]

It's clear that's your problem. You "THINK" you know what others think and feel and then you shit all over the boards based on your assumptions.
I'm good with the injunction and we're just getting started sweetie...believe it.

Oh you did not just quote the orange fail ninja. Anyway, that was a long way to go to tell me that I am right and this was not a decision on the case, just the the court takes into consideration both sides and is allowing the argument to be presented without forcing the rules until this new argument is decided. It is good that you can see how incorrect you are, now if you could only admit to yourself that i was right you would be much better off.

Oh, and in the future when you make incorrect statements like the court decided against obamacare despite there clearly being no decision on whether it is right or wrong, you might want to expect your general reputation to go down with people who like the truth.

Reading comprehension much?
I read the article and was under no impression nor did I imply that the mandate had been "overturned".

You're utterly fucking hopeless you know it...

Oh, so when you implied that obama got a kick in the balls you must have meant that the case is to be decided? Just like most republicans you cannot even back your own thoughts when cornered. not that i expected otherwise, i just enjoy you people running away from your own statements.

 

[IGetItAlready]

Oh you did not just quote the orange fail ninja. Anyway, that was a long way to go to tell me that I am right and this was not a decision on the case, just the the court takes into consideration both sides and is allowing the argument to be presented without forcing the rules until this new argument is decided. It is good that you can see how incorrect you are, now if you could only admit to yourself that i was right you would be much better off.

Oh, and in the future when you make incorrect statements like the court decided against obamacare despite there clearly being no decision on whether it is right or wrong, you might want to expect your general reputation to go down with people who like the truth.

Reading comprehension much?
I read the article and was under no impression nor did I imply that the mandate had been "overturned".

You're utterly fucking hopeless you know it...

Oh, so when you implied that obama got a kick in the balls...

I SAID it. That's what I'd call it. Sorry you don't like it but the mandate is currently not being imposed on Hercules Industries and that is a hit to Obama. Not to mention this is but one of dozens of similar cases with more being filed all the time.
This has nothing to do with MY personal opinion of the courts and how you even came to that conclusion defies all expectations of rational thought.

You don't like the story so you want to attack the source and intentionally misinterpret my post so as to create something to flame about. You write these ridiculously long rambling posts that say or do absolutely nothing but to illustrate your intellectual bankruptcy and then you want to get all butt hurt when no one bothers to address what YOU consider to be valid points.

I'm not going to debate with you what constitutes a figurative "kick in the balls" and again, your making THAT an issue warranting such an idiotic display of stupid leaves me questioning your mental health.

You need to learn to read, comprehend what you read and articulate a rational response in as few words as possible...As I know that's not going to happen you should simply get bent and do your very best to not make such an utter fool of yourself.

 

[JoeB131]

in fact - "granting an estimated 47 million women access to free contraception and a raft of preventive health services" - is now the Law of the Land.

.

Nothing is free.

Okay, that's a valid complaint. Unless you are rich, someone else is paying for your health care, unless you are healthy, and you are paying for other people's health care through taxes and insurance payments and payments made on your behalf by your employer.

So whenever I hear a Wingnut or Teabagger complain about "Soooooocialism", I have to laugh, because it's all a form of socialism, really.

So doing a cost benefit analysis, what is more beneficial? Paying for birth control for women who are priotizing their jobs, or paying for unwanted pregnancies. Well, the answer is simple enough, which is why you don't hear the insurance companies bitch about this. They are totally fine with it, and they won't even increase the premiums of their customers to provide it.

Now letting somene who isn't a religious institution say, "Well, covering this violates my religion, so I don't want to!" is pretty much rendering the law meaningless. Do Jehovah Witlesses have the right to deny transfusions to their employees? Do Christian Scientist employers have the right to deny all medical coverage? Even if their business is not a church, and even if their employees are not members of their faith?

You see the problem here? Once you start creating exemptions, you don't stop. Heck, people might start their own religions just to avoid paying for insurance at all.

 

[Noomi]

first, old news.

Second, shitty news source.

Third, the lawsuit continues and it is not terribly surprising the courts granted an injunction while the lawsuit goes on. It is pretty normal for the courts to grant these injunctions even if the case would be victorious. This is why despite the courts continue to side with gay marriage in california, they also continue to keep gay marriages from continuing until the higher courts deal with it.

Fourth, no your religion does not allow you to violate laws and practice discrimination. The denial of health care for women, which birth control qualifies as because it has medicinal purposes for women who have certain dangerous medical conditions, is discrimination based on religious values. You cannot base your sexist policies in for profit secular business on your religious values.

So yeah, not a victory, just a delay while the courts deal with the case.

Actually it does, the first admendment is free exercise of religion, where is descrimination? And are you saying under no circumstances you cant descriminate? You do know the word is more than just racist, right, so I'd be careful tossing it around so cavalierly

An employer should have no right to force their religious beliefs on their employees.