Yarddog
Diamond Member
- Jun 13, 2014
- 17,473
- 11,733
- 1,255
Not really, the OP is talking about spending money on equipment that already works and is depended on by our soldiers, that is a huge difference.But that's okay according to the OP we just need to spend more. Problem solved.So you think it's time to cut and run on the F-35?Dont be a Moron. This is an example of government waste, they started building the planes before they had the bugs out of the design. You make something work before you mass produce it, start selling it and start depending on it. UNLESS you work for the government, then you don't give a shit. Do you work for the government?We,ve gutted the militaryyyyy!!!!!
So you want to stop funding it?! You want to GUT THE MILITARY???Fail! The $400 Billion Military Jet That Can't Fly in Cloudy Weather
Weve spent a fortune on the F35 which is supposed to replace a lot of these other planes. It has worked out badly sucking away funds from the ret of the fighter wing, including funds for maintenance
Its kind of late now isn't it? It never should have gone this far until they worked out a WORKING AIRCRAFT. What I did ,is just provide an example of government waste. To you think the way they handled the production and development, while starving funds from working aircraft is a GOOD thing?