Truthmatters
Diamond Member
- May 10, 2007
- 80,182
- 2,272
- 1,283
- Banned
- #41
Did you know its NOT illegal to lie in a book?
I want proof.
COURT DOCUMENTED PROOF!
I want proof.
COURT DOCUMENTED PROOF!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Give us the convictions.
Lets see the names and cases.
Its public record go get it
How does that stop felons from getting on the rolls? Wouldn't a felons legally issues state ID match his own name?By matching voter rolls to a know ID device such as a Driver's Liscence or State ID. Right now Dems fight every effort to clean out the rolls, because they know it helps them.
It would provide a numbered document that could then be compared against the States bureau of prisons, would have the same numbered document on file.
Right now most voter rolls are by name and address, both of which can be duplicated or misunderstood rather easily, and in the case of address, can be transient.
Also, as I stated, every time a state tries to remove inelligble voters, or even search for them, the state democratic parties scream SUPPRESSION!!!, because they know certian classes of inellgible voters skew to them.
you people cant produce the court records of these claimed convictions?
you people cant produce the court records of these claimed convictions?
Report with names of those convicted:
http://www.electionintegritywatch.com/documents/2011-Report-Voter-Fraud-Convictions.pdf
From the court records:
Enter "Paula Jean Smith" 1/24/1963 and get the record.
http://pa.courts.state.mn.us/Search.aspx?ID=100&NodeID=174%2c151%2c160%2c131%2c132%2c146%2c111%2c175%2c161%2c191%2c176%2c147%2c133%2c119%2c134%2c120%2c121%2c113%2c162%2c1303%2c1301%2c1305%2c1302%2c1306%2c122%2c178%2c192%2c179%2c135%2c193%2c163%2c180%2c164%2c148%2c114%2c136%2c137%2c183%2c184%2c138%2c115%2c165%2c154%2c155%2c123%2c139%2c140%2c141%2c185%2c124%2c186%2c194%2c142%2c187%2c166%2c188%2c143%2c167%2c125%2c144%2c189%2c116%2c195%2c117%2c157%2c126%2c168%2c1491%2c1492%2c1493%2c169%2c158%2c170%2c127%2c159%2c128%2c145%2c171%2c129%2c197%2c172%2c190%2c181%2c182%2c153%2c156%2c177%2c173%2c150%2c152%2c11810%2c11811%2c11812%2c11813%2c11815%2c11822%2c11823%2c11817%2c11818%2c11819%2c11820%2c1304%2c13041%2c13042%2c13043%2c13044%2c1961%2c1962%2c1308%2c11201%2c11202%2c13045%2c11203&NodeDesc=All+MNCIS+Sites+-+Case+Search
How does that stop felons from getting on the rolls? Wouldn't a felons legally issues state ID match his own name?
It would provide a numbered document that could then be compared against the States bureau of prisons, would have the same numbered document on file.
I'm sorry, I haven't seen any Voter ID laws that would require poll workers compare each voter's ID to a list of felons. Probably because it would take forever for someone to actually vote.
Right now most voter rolls are by name and address, both of which can be duplicated or misunderstood rather easily, and in the case of address, can be transient.
Also, as I stated, every time a state tries to remove inelligble voters, or even search for them, the state democratic parties scream SUPPRESSION!!!, because they know certian classes of inellgible voters skew to them.
Usually because eligible voters are being tossed out with the ineligible ones. But it seems you'd have no problem preventing 10 legal votes to stop 1 illegal vote.
At Least Barry H. Teleprompter can say he was the first to do that....
York: When 1,099 felons vote in race won by 312 ballots | WashingtonExaminer.com
convictions are a matter of public record.
GO GET THE RECORDS!
Yet every time someone tries to clean up the voter rolls using this information, people like you scream VOTER SUPPRESSION.
Just admit you like it when felons and illegals vote, because you know they vote like you.
ok...let's just nip this in the bud now....
first off "Obamacare" was passed 60-39 in the Senate. In the House, it was passed by reconciliation(a simple majority) in a 219-212 vote.
Simply put, if you put Franken's vote and changed it to a "nay"....it still would have passed 218-213.
your premise is false.
you people cant produce the court records of these claimed convictions?
Report with names of those convicted:
http://www.electionintegritywatch.com/documents/2011-Report-Voter-Fraud-Convictions.pdf
From the court records:
Enter "Paula Jean Smith" 1/24/1963 and get the record.
http://pa.courts.state.mn.us/Search.aspx?ID=100&NodeID=174%2c151%2c160%2c131%2c132%2c146%2c111%2c175%2c161%2c191%2c176%2c147%2c133%2c119%2c134%2c120%2c121%2c113%2c162%2c1303%2c1301%2c1305%2c1302%2c1306%2c122%2c178%2c192%2c179%2c135%2c193%2c163%2c180%2c164%2c148%2c114%2c136%2c137%2c183%2c184%2c138%2c115%2c165%2c154%2c155%2c123%2c139%2c140%2c141%2c185%2c124%2c186%2c194%2c142%2c187%2c166%2c188%2c143%2c167%2c125%2c144%2c189%2c116%2c195%2c117%2c157%2c126%2c168%2c1491%2c1492%2c1493%2c169%2c158%2c170%2c127%2c159%2c128%2c145%2c171%2c129%2c197%2c172%2c190%2c181%2c182%2c153%2c156%2c177%2c173%2c150%2c152%2c11810%2c11811%2c11812%2c11813%2c11815%2c11822%2c11823%2c11817%2c11818%2c11819%2c11820%2c1304%2c13041%2c13042%2c13043%2c13044%2c1961%2c1962%2c1308%2c11201%2c11202%2c13045%2c11203&NodeDesc=All+MNCIS+Sites+-+Case+Search
I see now arrest or conviction court document there either