Truthmatters
Diamond Member
- May 10, 2007
- 80,182
- 2,272
- 1,283
- Banned
- #81
gee great evidence
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You people are without a doubt the dumbest fucking Americans to ever get the right to vote.
I still would fight for your right to vote
you gonna wear that costume again this halloween
"As of August 10th, 2011, 113 individuals are now known to have been convicted for voter fraud committed in 2008," the report from Minnesota Majority, a right-leaning group, states.
Minnesota Majority may be in range, but it is difficult to pin down a precise number.
In Hennepin County, 23 people have been convicted of voter fraud and eight cases are pending. In Ramsey County, 36 convictions have resulted from the 2008 elections as of last spring, including cases involving ineligible voters who registered, but who did not end up voting.
PoliGraph also requested voter fraud conviction data for every county in the state. The data, collected by the Minnesota Supreme Court, shows that 144 people have been convicted of voter fraud since 2009.
The Supreme Court numbers are not a perfect comparison to the Minnesota Majority's report because the data include some cases associated with the 2010 election, and are not limited to cases involving felons who voted illegally.
Ramsey County Elections Manager Joe Mansky, who sits on the governor's special committee and is widely considered to be a state expert on voting, said that the vast majority of such cases involve people who have been convicted of a felony, are ineligible to vote, but do anyway.
But these are isolated cases that could not be solved by implementing a voter identification law, he said. And unlike other states, there's no evidence that Minnesota has had large, organized attempts to violate the law, Mansky said.
Furthermore, those who were found to violate the law represent far less than 1 percent of the roughly 2.9 million Minnesotans who voted in the 2008 election.
Based on independent information, it appears that Minnesota Majority's estimate that 113 people have been convicted of voter fraud may be in the ballpark, though a precise number is elusive.
As a result, their claim rates inconclusive.
So you want criminals determining who will rule in the country?At Least Barry H. Teleprompter can say he was the first to do that....
York: When 1,099 felons vote in race won by 312 ballots | WashingtonExaminer.com
In Minnesota felons may legally vote after they've served all their prison, parole, and probation.
Fail to see your point.
Either way, according to the Constitution, each respective house of Congress has the authority to determine whether or not a Senator is the lawful Senator of a state. Did anyone in the Senate even object to Franken's seating? Or are you just against the Constitution?
The Senate are all convicted criminals?So you want criminals determining who will rule in the country?At Least Barry H. Teleprompter can say he was the first to do that....
York: When 1,099 felons vote in race won by 312 ballots | WashingtonExaminer.com
In Minnesota felons may legally vote after they've served all their prison, parole, and probation.
Fail to see your point.
Either way, according to the Constitution, each respective house of Congress has the authority to determine whether or not a Senator is the lawful Senator of a state. Did anyone in the Senate even object to Franken's seating? Or are you just against the Constitution?
So there's no prison terms in Maine and Vermont? who knew!If they are given votes, wait till criminals figure out they can become a lobby and start demanding no prison terms for convicts! Once that is accomplished, your state will be crawling with criminals you can't put behind bars.
Once that happens, you will have to render justice null and void, because the convicts want to hang the judges who say they must be incarcerated.
Why they can even lie that someone else committed the crime and demand their word to be considered valid, putting the innocent behind bars for their crimes. Oh, wait. They already figured out how to do that. That's why 17% of people convicted of crimes are in no way connected to it by any forensics evidence. False accusers band together and get rid of people off the roads of society they become free to plunder with good sense gone out the door!
Do you want to see everybody behind bars but people who commit chaotic acts of murder, theft, maiming and disfiguring, cheating and routing their way to the most animalistic society imaginable?
At Least Barry H. Teleprompter can say he was the first to do that....
York: When 1,099 felons vote in race won by 312 ballots | WashingtonExaminer.com
At Least Barry H. Teleprompter can say he was the first to do that....
York: When 1,099 felons vote in race won by 312 ballots | WashingtonExaminer.com
At Least Barry H. Teleprompter can say he was the first to do that....
York: When 1,099 felons vote in race won by 312 ballots | WashingtonExaminer.com
No, Deacon. My rant had nothing to do with the Senate.The Senate are all convicted criminals?So you want criminals determining who will rule in the country?In Minnesota felons may legally vote after they've served all their prison, parole, and probation.
Fail to see your point.
Either way, according to the Constitution, each respective house of Congress has the authority to determine whether or not a Senator is the lawful Senator of a state. Did anyone in the Senate even object to Franken's seating? Or are you just against the Constitution?
So there's no prison terms in Maine and Vermont? who knew!If they are given votes, wait till criminals figure out they can become a lobby and start demanding no prison terms for convicts! Once that is accomplished, your state will be crawling with criminals you can't put behind bars.
Do you see that none of your rant changes the fact its the Senate the determines the validity of elections for Senator?Once that happens, you will have to render justice null and void, because the convicts want to hang the judges who say they must be incarcerated.
Why they can even lie that someone else committed the crime and demand their word to be considered valid, putting the innocent behind bars for their crimes. Oh, wait. They already figured out how to do that. That's why 17% of people convicted of crimes are in no way connected to it by any forensics evidence. False accusers band together and get rid of people off the roads of society they become free to plunder with good sense gone out the door!
Do you want to see everybody behind bars but people who commit chaotic acts of murder, theft, maiming and disfiguring, cheating and routing their way to the most animalistic society imaginable?
At Least Barry H. Teleprompter can say he was the first to do that....
York: When 1,099 felons vote in race won by 312 ballots | WashingtonExaminer.com