Obama Supports Al Qaeda?

[Vel]

By the time Obama gets done, he'll have installed Al Qaeda into leadership in most of the Middle -eastern countries. U.S. taxpayer dollars given to those that kill U.S. soldiers.

 

[Sallow]

Obama supports al Qaeda. By killing them.

Bush's way was better. He let them go.

The syrian rebels are al Qaeda

Assad is supported by the Russians.

 

[Sallow]

By the time Obama gets done, he'll have installed Al Qaeda into leadership in most of the Middle -eastern countries. U.S. taxpayer dollars given to those that kill U.S. soldiers.

As opposed to giving taxpayer dollars to Gaddafi and Osama Bin Laden..who killed American Civilians.

And what about Israel?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Liberty_incident

 

[Vel]

Obama supports al Qaeda. By killing them.

Bush's way was better. He let them go.

The syrian rebels are al Qaeda

Assad is supported by the Russians.

So? According to your team, the Russians are our friends.

 

[Trajan]

Alex Jones? Holy shit...

this has been reported in several other places as well, I told this all to sallow the shallow a week and a half ago in his vomited up stupidity on prisoners being held etc. in Benghazi....

obama unwittingly has been arming the jihadist forces in the Syrain rebellion grps... the munitions guns, Surface to Air 'manpacks' etc, winding up in AQ and AQ affiliate hands is on of the reason why the Benhgazi thing has been smoke-screened by the Admin. from day 1.

Of course you and Sallow are to fucking stupid to believe it yet I am sure one of you will burp up the Mujahideen stupidity to force a hypocritical reference to gloss this over, good luck with that Tontoette.

 

[Katzndogz]

obama has always supported Al Quaeda. When will he come out as an operative? That's the question. According to obama, he's been killing them. But, we never quite see a body, just the government report.

 

[P@triot]

Obama supports al Qaeda. By killing them.

Bush's way was better. He let them go.

So lets get this straight.... you cried like the little bitch that you are when Bush held terrorists indefinitely, and you cried like the little bitch that you are when Bush poured a little water on them. But you crow with pride that Obama executes those same people without due process?

Any wonder why the dumbocrats are the party of hypocrisy?

 

[konradv]

It sure looks that way.
*********************************************************
Hillary Clinton has admitted that Al-Qaeda is supporting the Syrian rebels, who are backed by the Obama administration with $200 million dollars in aid. According to McClatchy Newspapers one of these groups, Al Nusra Front, an Al-Qaeda affiliate, is now conducting “the heaviest frontline fighting” in Syria and has been responsible for terrorist attacks.

The petition is timely given that 29 different Syrian opposition groups this week pledged their allegiance to Al Nusra, an Al-Qaeda-affiliated group which, as the New York Times reported on Saturday, “killed numerous American troops in Iraq,” dismissing the notion that Al Nusra is merely is one “bad apple” amongst the rebels. In reality, the United States is backing an uprising that has placed the imposition of Sharia law and the ultimate destruction of the United States at the core of its long term agenda once Assad is deposed.


» Syrian Rebels Pledge Allegiance to Al-Qaeda Group That Killed U.S. Troops Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!

Did you miss the part where certain factions of the Syrian opposition were blacklisted by the U.S. or just ignored it, because it didn't fit your slant?

U.S. blacklists al-Nusra Front fighters in Syria - CNN.com

 

[BlindBoo]

So, the circus continues. While the masses are distracted by the two parties antics on the neverending election campaigns, the business of the empire (selling weapons and other interventionist activities) continues.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h3wtUCPWmeI]AMERICA'S NAVY[/ame]

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Obama supports al Qaeda. By killing them.

Bush's way was better. He let them go.

The syrian rebels are al Qaeda

Assad is supported by the Russians.

irrelevant it violates U.S. LAW to give aid to al Qaeda

 

[tjvh]

I look forward to Obama's THIRD term.

That would be Bush's fifth term.

 

[rdean]

Obama supports al Qaeda. By killing them.

Bush's way was better. He let them go.

Giving them weapons is a weird way of killing them. So is standing by while they kill our ambassador.

Give me a break. You have John McCain and the rest of the Republican Party screaming for Obama to give rebels in every country in the Middle East weapons. If ignorant Republicans were in charge, we would have 10 Iraq's. What do you expect from people who think education is for snobs?

 

[Desperado]

Obama supports al Qaeda. By killing them.

Bush's way was better. He let them go.

The syrian rebels are al Qaeda

Which is the perfect reason we should not be involved in Syria in any way.
We need to end our involvement there.

 

[Trajan]

Obama supports al Qaeda. By killing them.

Bush's way was better. He let them go.

The syrian rebels are al Qaeda

Assad is supported by the Russians.

and Babrak Karmal? He was assisted by Russia in Afghanistan in 1979...right? gosh are you a slobbering back flip flopping moron with zero integrity, truly, you've pulled off a Three'fer

so Reagan assisting the Mujahedeen as you described it is/was BAD, BUT Obama dealing arms to those opposed to Assad is GOOD, because- Assad is sppted by Russia....

 

[Trajan]

By the time Obama gets done, he'll have installed Al Qaeda into leadership in most of the Middle -eastern countries. U.S. taxpayer dollars given to those that kill U.S. soldiers.

As opposed to giving taxpayer dollars to Gaddafi and Osama Bin Laden..who killed American Civilians.

And what about Israel?

USS Liberty incident - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

god you're a lunatic....you see see something somewhere and make some miniscule gotcha/Ahah!connection in your pea brain and wham, you're off to the races.....

you should go back to the hostage/prisoner scenario you forwarded shallow.....we told you then it was arms, AQ and affiliates, thats what the big secret was and the admin. was trying to for shoe away from,....and now you're stuck becasue you're a drooling Obamabot who lacks the integrity to speak the truth or just stfu, then again you need some level of sentience to recognize the truth so, that may be a bridge to far for you.

 

[GoneBezerk]

Liberals didn't like Reagan giving stuff to Saddam to fight our enemy Iran back in the 80s....but they have no problem with Obamination giving weapons to terrorists in Egypt, Libya and Syria......fucking insanity.

In the 80s....Saddam wasn't our enemy. In 2012....islamic terrorists are our enemy and have been for decades, long before Reagan supported Saddam.

 

[BlindBoo]

Liberals didn't like Reagan giving stuff to Saddam to fight our enemy Iran back in the 80s....but they have no problem with Obamination giving weapons to terrorists in Egypt, Libya and Syria......fucking insanity.

In the 80s....Saddam wasn't our enemy. In 2012....islamic terrorists are our enemy and have been for decades, long before Reagan supported Saddam.

If President Obama policies helped supplied the rebels in any ME country with what the West supplied Saddam with as a result of President Rayguns policy then both Cons and Lib should be upset. Not to mention them selling Iran missiles and illegally diverting the profits to the Contra Mercenaries.

"...not only did Ronald Reagan’s Washington turn a blind-eye to the Hussein regime’s repeated use of chemical weapons against Iranian soldiers and Iraq’s Kurdish minority, but the US helped Iraq develop its chemical, biological and nuclear weapons programs."

How Reagan Armed Saddam with Chemical Weapons » Counterpunch: Tells the Facts, Names the Names

Iraq's 11,000-page report to the UN Security Council lists 150 foreign companies, including some from America, Britain, Germany and France, that supported Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction program, a German newspaper said yesterday.

Berlin's left-wing Die Tageszeitung newspaper said it had seen a copy of the original Iraqi dossier which was vetted for sensitive information by US officials before being handed to the five permanent Security Council members two weeks ago. An edited version was passed to the remaining 10 members of the Security Council last night.

British officials said the list of companies appeared to be accurate. Eighty German firms and 24 US companies are reported to have supplied Iraq with equipment and know-how for its weapons programs from 1975 onwards and in some cases support for Baghdad's conventional arms program had continued until last year.

It is not known who leaked the report, but it could have come from Iraq. Baghdad is keen to embarrass the US and its allies by showing the close involvement of US, German, British and French firms in helping Iraq develop its weapons of mass destruction when the country was a bulwark against the much feared spread of Iranian revolutionary fervor to the Arab world.

The list contained the names of long-established German firms such as Siemens as well as US multinationals. With government approval, Siemens exported machines used to eliminate kidney stones which have a "dual use" high precision switch used to detonate nuclear bombs. Ten French companies were also named along with a number of Swiss and Chinese firms. The newspaper said a number of British companies were cited, but did not name them.

Leaked Report Says German and US Firms Supplied Arms to Saddam

 

[Katzndogz]

Of course obama supports al quaeda. When will he come out as an operative? That's the only question.

 

[liarintheWH]

I look forward to Obama's THIRD term.

I look forward to you getting hit by a bus and never posting again.

 

[Trajan]

Liberals didn't like Reagan giving stuff to Saddam to fight our enemy Iran back in the 80s....but they have no problem with Obamination giving weapons to terrorists in Egypt, Libya and Syria......fucking insanity.

In the 80s....Saddam wasn't our enemy. In 2012....islamic terrorists are our enemy and have been for decades, long before Reagan supported Saddam.

If President Obama policies helped supplied the rebels in any ME country with what the West supplied Saddam with as a result of President Rayguns policy then both Cons and Lib should be upset. Not to mention them selling Iran missiles and illegally diverting the profits to the Contra Mercenaries.

"...not only did Ronald Reagan’s Washington turn a blind-eye to the Hussein regime’s repeated use of chemical weapons against Iranian soldiers and Iraq’s Kurdish minority, but the US helped Iraq develop its chemical, biological and nuclear weapons programs."

How Reagan Armed Saddam with Chemical Weapons » Counterpunch: Tells the Facts, Names the Names

Iraq's 11,000-page report to the UN Security Council lists 150 foreign companies, including some from America, Britain, Germany and France, that supported Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction program, a German newspaper said yesterday.

Berlin's left-wing Die Tageszeitung newspaper said it had seen a copy of the original Iraqi dossier which was vetted for sensitive information by US officials before being handed to the five permanent Security Council members two weeks ago. An edited version was passed to the remaining 10 members of the Security Council last night.

British officials said the list of companies appeared to be accurate. Eighty German firms and 24 US companies are reported to have supplied Iraq with equipment and know-how for its weapons programs from 1975 onwards and in some cases support for Baghdad's conventional arms program had continued until last year.

It is not known who leaked the report, but it could have come from Iraq. Baghdad is keen to embarrass the US and its allies by showing the close involvement of US, German, British and French firms in helping Iraq develop its weapons of mass destruction when the country was a bulwark against the much feared spread of Iranian revolutionary fervor to the Arab world.

The list contained the names of long-established German firms such as Siemens as well as US multinationals. With government approval, Siemens exported machines used to eliminate kidney stones which have a "dual use" high precision switch used to detonate nuclear bombs. Ten French companies were also named along with a number of Swiss and Chinese firms. The newspaper said a number of British companies were cited, but did not name them.

Leaked Report Says German and US Firms Supplied Arms to Saddam

ah cool, maybe shallow can provide you a benediction, wave his arms over you , or others who insist by doing what you just did, in attempting to make excuses for the hypocrisy.

Either you don't have a problem sppting thru use of arms, foreign nationalists or, you do. Either you are down with the gut check level slimy game of Geo-politics or, you're not.

I am all for it, I thought reagans iran-contra thing was genious, sell arms to one batch of maniacs to kill the other, then use the proceeds to arm an anti commie paramilitary.

I had and said so, no issue with obama selling giving guns to anti Assad forces BUT , as I noted then, it was too late, we had waited to long and we had blown our opportunity to influence who would wind up ahead at the end when assad falls, thats the flaw and 1 big reason why that reference top AQ and affiliates was wiped from the talking points after Benghazi went down.