Obama Speech Sounds Like ISIS Wrote It

[protectionist]

Listening to the speech Obama gave just a little while ago, one is left wondering if it wasn't written by al Baghdadi himself. Just about every sentence was something advantageous to ISIS. Just about every one could be easily refuted.

In of the highlights of his speech Obama flashed the prolific "recruitment" card. This is the talking point very often mentioned by political correctness plagued liberals, that tries to preach that by villainizing Islam, that will recruit many more Muslims into the fight. Obama mentioned the Muslim Ban proposal of Donald Trump, without mentioning his name.

There are a few rather strong arguments to be made against this recruitment theory however. It is not conclusive with any evidence that banning Muslim immigration to the US would have any effect on jihadist recruitment. Secondly, it is possible that it could work to just the opposite of that. Already, millions of people who call themselves Muslims are that in name only. They don't subscribe to the mass genocide commands so common in the Koran, don't engage in wife-beating, pedophilia, or other trashy things in that vile book of hate.

As such, those millions of Muslims probably understand quite well why the US would have a ban on Muslim immigration, and they might wish there were less Muslims in their own countries as well. And those who agree with the Koran's trash (or at least they PUBLICLY) say they do, are not being recruited to what they already believe anyway.

But Obama has this approach totally backwards. His PC policies of kissing jihadist ass, just serves to empower jihad all the more. In his website, Dr. Sebastian Gorka, author of the 2016 book, Defeating Jihad: The Winnable War, he takes Obama to task for these improper and dangerous PC policies of his, which were clearly evident in his speech today.

Gorka states "The time for political correctness is behind us. The idea that federal agencies, armed services, and law enforcement are not allowed to discuss the religious motivation and ideology of our enemies, and that words such as jihad have to be censored out of our lexicon of counter-terrorism and military training has to end.

If this administration persists in ignoring the reality that jihadi terrorism is a global phenomenon that has reached our shores, and continues to focus instead on concepts such as “lone wolf,” “hate crime,” and “the proliferation of weapons in private hands,” we will continue to see Americans die on U.S. soil.

Obama has done nothing more with his anti-Trump speech, and his anti-Muslim ban policy, than further confirm how wrong his policies are, how badly he has taken us down a very wrong path, and how necessary it is for us to use words like JIHAD, and to recognize Islam itself and its Koran as the basis of the war against us.

Obama's speech also seems as though it could have been written by CAIR (Council on American-Islamic Relations) chief Nihad Awad (often called "Jihad" Awad by FBI agents). Just like Obama, CAIR has been a persistent thorn in the side of those working on behalf of US national security. In a class action lawsuit against CAIR and its Canadian affiliate, lawyers for the estate of John P. O'Neill, former security director in the World Trade Center (who was killed in the 9-11 attack), state >> ?

"Both organizations have actively sought to hamper govt anti-terrorism efforts, bydirect propoganda activities aimed at police, first responders, intelligence agencies, through so-called sensitivity training. Their goal is to create as much self-doubt, hesitation, fear of name calling, and litigation within police departments and intelligence agencies, as possible, so as to render such authorities ineffective in pursuing international and domestic terrorist entities."

This same "wall" of defense for jihadists was evident in the case of Tampa jihadist, Sami al Arian (Palestinian Islamic Jiha) back in his University of South Florida connected days. Prior to the 9-11 attacks, PC restrictions imposed by the Clinton Justice Dept. prevented the FBI's counterterrorism agents from communicating effectively with criminal investigators and Justice dept prosecutors. This was the Clinton Justice Dept's infamous "wall". Consequently, al-Arian was able to carry on his
deadly business for years. It wasn't until the "wall" was destroyed, that agents connected the intelligence dots that produced a prosecutable case.

This is exactly the stonewalling that Obama, in his speech today, is engaging in. As far I'm concerned, he's one of them.

Obama must declare war, drop political correctness and save lives | The Gorka Briefing

500 Service Unavailable Error

Andrew C. McCarthy, The Grand Jihad: How Islam and the Left Sabotage America, pg 153-154, 369.

To be fair to Obama, sanitizing of US govt speech involving Muslims occured before Obama became president, as in 2008, during the Bush administration, when the Homeland Security and NCTC (National Counterterrorism Center) issued staffwide memos imposing a restrictive speech code. It became a no-no to use words like "jihadist", "Islamist",or even "Islamic terrorist" Acceptable alternatives, they were told, include "violent extremist", or just the word"terrorist"

Also excluded were the words "jihad", "Islamofacism", and "caliphate". Also in the memos were these gems >> "Don't invoke Islam, in any way"......."Avoid inflating the religious bases"......" and "make no overt reference to Islam" lest you "cause offense"

P. David Gaubatz & Paul Sperry, Muslim Mafia, pg. 104, 106.

 

[protectionist]

Besides the liberal press, the FBI has to contend with America's internal enemies. I'm talking about the real players in this internal jihad war. The EEOC for one. These enemies have backed up more than 14 Arab and Muslim FBI employees, and has gotten the FBI petrified of the bigot-branding machine of CAIR, and other Muslim Brotherhood front groups, who team up with the ACLU to go after the FBI.

The FBI is afraid of the lawsuits from these Islamist enemies, even they they are generally frivolous. The ACLU is an active enemy of the FBI and attacks it whether asked to or not. They have asked CAIR for FBI ethnicity related cases", according to notes obtained from a meeting between the ACLU and CAIR, in Washington, DC.

No one should be unaware also of the mind-boggling responses that the FBI has engaged in to deflect criticism, and neutralize the bigot brand. Their solution to the problem couldn't more wrongheaded. They have gone literally diversity-crazy. Whether this is an attempt to save their jobs (in a jihad-friendly Justice Dept) or not, I don't know, but their actions have been insane.

Talk about "RECRUITMENT", check out this doozy. FBI director Robert Mueller launched a national hiring blitz that included setting up recruitment booths at ISNA conventions. ISNA (Islamic Society of N. America) is the largest and most powerful of all the many Muslim Brotherhood front organizations in America. They are known as he "nucleus". They also tried to recruit ISNA jihadists into the FBI, by placing full-page recruiting ads in ISNA's magazine, Islamic Horizons.

That's right folks. "Our" FBI recruited among Muslim Brotherthood fronts (all sworn to destroy America). They have claimed to be recruiting for Arabic speakers to be translators, and have also gone to jihadist mosques for recruits >> Example: the ADAMS Center (endorsed by CAIR, and singled out by the Freedom House as one of the top distributors of Saudi-sponsored anti-Semitic and anti-Christian dogma. All this going on while the FBI systematically rejects Jewish Arabic speakers for translator jobs, so as to not offend the Muslims already working there.

Needless to say, these Muslim Arabic translators, recruited from Muslim Brotherhood sources have been involved in numerous treasonous offenses, such as refusing to tape-record Muslim suspects, withholding relevant chatter, dispensing false information, and espionage like the arrest of Nadia Prouty, for spying for Hezbollah.

 

[protectionist]

Obama said "We shouldn't paint all Muslims with a broad brush."

EARTH TO OBAMA: "WE" are not "painting" anything. All Muslims ARE painted with a broad brush, and have been for 1400 years. That "broad brush" is the Koran, and Muslims are painted to it, simply by being Muslims. Don't want to be painted by the terrible stuff in the Koran ? Don't be a Muslim.

Islam Watch - About Us

 

[Old Rocks]

But then you are nobody and will remain so. And your opinion will be totally as irrelevant as it has been for the past 7 and 1/2 years for the next 8 years as Hillary serves out her terms as President.

 

[protectionist]

It's about time that this PC crap, coupled with bigot-branding all of us for just TELLING THE TRUTH, is getting the spotlight shined on it. I have been wondering for years how the Obamans have been getting away with all that the pro-jihad stuff that they have. Looks like it just took one very high level person to speak out on it forcefully. Finally we have that >> Donald Trump.

We need to not let this issue die. It needs to be pumped up. Long overdue.

 

[protectionist]

But then you are nobody and will remain so. And your opinion will be totally as irrelevant as it has been for the past 7 and 1/2 years for the next 8 years as Hillary serves out her terms as President.

I am one of the millions of people who will put Donald Trump in the White House, and then all you jihadists will be eliminated in one way or another.

 

[Old Rocks]

You are one of the millions of the mentally incompetent that we will be laughing at in November. That is, if the GOP does not realize before the Convention what a disaster Trump is, and totally disavow him. If they do not, it is very conceivable that the GOP will lose the House, Senate, and Executive this November.

 

[froggy]

Obama's has alway tried to cast guilt on those who oppose him.

 

[tigerred59]

Listening to the speech Obama gave just a little while ago, one is left wondering if it wasn't written by al Baghdadi himself. Just about every sentence was something advantageous to ISIS. Just about every one could be easily refuted.

In of the highlights of his speech Obama flashed the prolific "recruitment" card. This is the talking point very often mentioned by political correctness plagued liberals, that tries to preach that by villainizing Islam, that will recruit many more Muslims into the fight. Obama mentioned the Muslim Ban proposal of Donald Trump, without mentioning his name.

There are a few rather strong arguments to be made against this recruitment theory however. It is not conclusive with any evidence that banning Muslim immigration to the US would have any effect on jihadist recruitment. Secondly, it is possible that it could work to just the opposite of that. Already, millions of people who call themselves Muslims are that in name only. They don't subscribe to the mass genocide commands so common in the Koran, don't engage in wife-beating, pedophilia, or other trashy things in that vile book of hate.

As such, those millions of Muslims probably understand quite well why the US would have a ban on Muslim immigration, and they might wish there were less Muslims in their own countries as well. And those who agree with the Koran's trash (or at least they PUBLICLY) say they do, are not being recruited to what they already believe anyway.

But Obama has this approach totally backwards. His PC policies of kissing jihadist ass, just serves to empower jihad all the more. In his website, Dr. Sebastian Gorka, author of the 2016 book, Defeating Jihad: The Winnable War, he takes Obama to task for these improper and dangerous PC policies of his, which were clearly evident in his speech today.

Gorka states "The time for political correctness is behind us. The idea that federal agencies, armed services, and law enforcement are not allowed to discuss the religious motivation and ideology of our enemies, and that words such as jihad have to be censored out of our lexicon of counter-terrorism and military training has to end.

If this administration persists in ignoring the reality that jihadi terrorism is a global phenomenon that has reached our shores, and continues to focus instead on concepts such as “lone wolf,” “hate crime,” and “the proliferation of weapons in private hands,” we will continue to see Americans die on U.S. soil.

Obama has done nothing more with his anti-Trump speech, and his anti-Muslim ban policy, than further confirm how wrong his policies are, how badly he has taken us down a very wrong path, and how necessary it is for us to use words like JIHAD, and to recognize Islam itself and its Koran as the basis of the war against us.

Obama's speech also seems as though it could have been written by CAIR (Council on American-Islamic Relations) chief Nihad Awad (often called "Jihad" Awad by FBI agents). Just like Obama, CAIR has been a persistent thorn in the side of those working on behalf of US national security. In a class action lawsuit against CAIR and its Canadian affiliate, lawyers for the estate of John P. O'Neill, former security director in the World Trade Center (who was killed in the 9-11 attack), state >> ?

"Both organizations have actively sought to hamper govt anti-terrorism efforts, bydirect propoganda activities aimed at police, first responders, intelligence agencies, through so-called sensitivity training. Their goal is to create as much self-doubt, hesitation, fear of name calling, and litigation within police departments and intelligence agencies, as possible, so as to render such authorities ineffective in pursuing international and domestic terrorist entities."

This same "wall" of defense for jihadists was evident in the case of Tampa jihadist, Sami al Arian (Palestinian Islamic Jiha) back in his University of South Florida connected days. Prior to the 9-11 attacks, PC restrictions imposed by the Clinton Justice Dept. prevented the FBI's counterterrorism agents from communicating effectively with criminal investigators and Justice dept prosecutors. This was the Clinton Justice Dept's infamous "wall". Consequently, al-Arian was able to carry on his
deadly business for years. It wasn't until the "wall" was destroyed, that agents connected the intelligence dots that produced a prosecutable case.

This is exactly the stonewalling that Obama, in his speech today, is engaging in. As far I'm concerned, he's one of them.

Obama must declare war, drop political correctness and save lives | The Gorka Briefing

500 Service Unavailable Error

Andrew C. McCarthy, The Grand Jihad: How Islam and the Left Sabotage America, pg 153-154, 369.

To be fair to Obama, sanitizing of US govt speech involving Muslims occured before Obama became president, as in 2008, during the Bush administration, when the Homeland Security and NCTC (National Counterterrorism Center) issued staffwide memos imposing a restrictive speech code. It became a no-no to use words like "jihadist", "Islamist",or even "Islamic terrorist" Acceptable alternatives, they were told, include "violent extremist", or just the word"terrorist"

Also excluded were the words "jihad", "Islamofacism", and "caliphate". Also in the memos were these gems >> "Don't invoke Islam, in any way"......."Avoid inflating the religious bases"......" and "make no overt reference to Islam" lest you "cause offense"

P. David Gaubatz & Paul Sperry, Muslim Mafia, pg. 104, 106.

Uh, Putin in Russia endorses Trump......and Trump wants to fuck his own daughter.....uh if I were you, I'd find another battle this one isn't going anywhere, ya think?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Listening to the speech Obama gave just a little while ago, one is left wondering if it wasn't written by al Baghdadi himself. Just about every sentence was something advantageous to ISIS. Just about every one could be easily refuted.

In of the highlights of his speech Obama flashed the prolific "recruitment" card. This is the talking point very often mentioned by political correctness plagued liberals, that tries to preach that by villainizing Islam, that will recruit many more Muslims into the fight. Obama mentioned the Muslim Ban proposal of Donald Trump, without mentioning his name.

There are a few rather strong arguments to be made against this recruitment theory however. It is not conclusive with any evidence that banning Muslim immigration to the US would have any effect on jihadist recruitment. Secondly, it is possible that it could work to just the opposite of that. Already, millions of people who call themselves Muslims are that in name only. They don't subscribe to the mass genocide commands so common in the Koran, don't engage in wife-beating, pedophilia, or other trashy things in that vile book of hate.

As such, those millions of Muslims probably understand quite well why the US would have a ban on Muslim immigration, and they might wish there were less Muslims in their own countries as well. And those who agree with the Koran's trash (or at least they PUBLICLY) say they do, are not being recruited to what they already believe anyway.

But Obama has this approach totally backwards. His PC policies of kissing jihadist ass, just serves to empower jihad all the more. In his website, Dr. Sebastian Gorka, author of the 2016 book, Defeating Jihad: The Winnable War, he takes Obama to task for these improper and dangerous PC policies of his, which were clearly evident in his speech today.

Gorka states "The time for political correctness is behind us. The idea that federal agencies, armed services, and law enforcement are not allowed to discuss the religious motivation and ideology of our enemies, and that words such as jihad have to be censored out of our lexicon of counter-terrorism and military training has to end.

If this administration persists in ignoring the reality that jihadi terrorism is a global phenomenon that has reached our shores, and continues to focus instead on concepts such as “lone wolf,” “hate crime,” and “the proliferation of weapons in private hands,” we will continue to see Americans die on U.S. soil.

Obama has done nothing more with his anti-Trump speech, and his anti-Muslim ban policy, than further confirm how wrong his policies are, how badly he has taken us down a very wrong path, and how necessary it is for us to use words like JIHAD, and to recognize Islam itself and its Koran as the basis of the war against us.

Obama's speech also seems as though it could have been written by CAIR (Council on American-Islamic Relations) chief Nihad Awad (often called "Jihad" Awad by FBI agents). Just like Obama, CAIR has been a persistent thorn in the side of those working on behalf of US national security. In a class action lawsuit against CAIR and its Canadian affiliate, lawyers for the estate of John P. O'Neill, former security director in the World Trade Center (who was killed in the 9-11 attack), state >> ?

"Both organizations have actively sought to hamper govt anti-terrorism efforts, bydirect propoganda activities aimed at police, first responders, intelligence agencies, through so-called sensitivity training. Their goal is to create as much self-doubt, hesitation, fear of name calling, and litigation within police departments and intelligence agencies, as possible, so as to render such authorities ineffective in pursuing international and domestic terrorist entities."

This same "wall" of defense for jihadists was evident in the case of Tampa jihadist, Sami al Arian (Palestinian Islamic Jiha) back in his University of South Florida connected days. Prior to the 9-11 attacks, PC restrictions imposed by the Clinton Justice Dept. prevented the FBI's counterterrorism agents from communicating effectively with criminal investigators and Justice dept prosecutors. This was the Clinton Justice Dept's infamous "wall". Consequently, al-Arian was able to carry on his
deadly business for years. It wasn't until the "wall" was destroyed, that agents connected the intelligence dots that produced a prosecutable case.

This is exactly the stonewalling that Obama, in his speech today, is engaging in. As far I'm concerned, he's one of them.

Obama must declare war, drop political correctness and save lives | The Gorka Briefing

500 Service Unavailable Error

Andrew C. McCarthy, The Grand Jihad: How Islam and the Left Sabotage America, pg 153-154, 369.

To be fair to Obama, sanitizing of US govt speech involving Muslims occured before Obama became president, as in 2008, during the Bush administration, when the Homeland Security and NCTC (National Counterterrorism Center) issued staffwide memos imposing a restrictive speech code. It became a no-no to use words like "jihadist", "Islamist",or even "Islamic terrorist" Acceptable alternatives, they were told, include "violent extremist", or just the word"terrorist"

Also excluded were the words "jihad", "Islamofacism", and "caliphate". Also in the memos were these gems >> "Don't invoke Islam, in any way"......."Avoid inflating the religious bases"......" and "make no overt reference to Islam" lest you "cause offense"

P. David Gaubatz & Paul Sperry, Muslim Mafia, pg. 104, 106.

Uh, Putin in Russia endorses Trump......and Trump wants to fuck his own daughter.....uh if I were you, I'd find another battle this one isn't going anywhere, ya think?

Bathhouse Barry is striking fear in the hearts of the jihadists.

 

[tigerred59]

Listening to the speech Obama gave just a little while ago, one is left wondering if it wasn't written by al Baghdadi himself. Just about every sentence was something advantageous to ISIS. Just about every one could be easily refuted.

In of the highlights of his speech Obama flashed the prolific "recruitment" card. This is the talking point very often mentioned by political correctness plagued liberals, that tries to preach that by villainizing Islam, that will recruit many more Muslims into the fight. Obama mentioned the Muslim Ban proposal of Donald Trump, without mentioning his name.

There are a few rather strong arguments to be made against this recruitment theory however. It is not conclusive with any evidence that banning Muslim immigration to the US would have any effect on jihadist recruitment. Secondly, it is possible that it could work to just the opposite of that. Already, millions of people who call themselves Muslims are that in name only. They don't subscribe to the mass genocide commands so common in the Koran, don't engage in wife-beating, pedophilia, or other trashy things in that vile book of hate.

As such, those millions of Muslims probably understand quite well why the US would have a ban on Muslim immigration, and they might wish there were less Muslims in their own countries as well. And those who agree with the Koran's trash (or at least they PUBLICLY) say they do, are not being recruited to what they already believe anyway.

But Obama has this approach totally backwards. His PC policies of kissing jihadist ass, just serves to empower jihad all the more. In his website, Dr. Sebastian Gorka, author of the 2016 book, Defeating Jihad: The Winnable War, he takes Obama to task for these improper and dangerous PC policies of his, which were clearly evident in his speech today.

Gorka states "The time for political correctness is behind us. The idea that federal agencies, armed services, and law enforcement are not allowed to discuss the religious motivation and ideology of our enemies, and that words such as jihad have to be censored out of our lexicon of counter-terrorism and military training has to end.

If this administration persists in ignoring the reality that jihadi terrorism is a global phenomenon that has reached our shores, and continues to focus instead on concepts such as “lone wolf,” “hate crime,” and “the proliferation of weapons in private hands,” we will continue to see Americans die on U.S. soil.

Obama has done nothing more with his anti-Trump speech, and his anti-Muslim ban policy, than further confirm how wrong his policies are, how badly he has taken us down a very wrong path, and how necessary it is for us to use words like JIHAD, and to recognize Islam itself and its Koran as the basis of the war against us.

Obama's speech also seems as though it could have been written by CAIR (Council on American-Islamic Relations) chief Nihad Awad (often called "Jihad" Awad by FBI agents). Just like Obama, CAIR has been a persistent thorn in the side of those working on behalf of US national security. In a class action lawsuit against CAIR and its Canadian affiliate, lawyers for the estate of John P. O'Neill, former security director in the World Trade Center (who was killed in the 9-11 attack), state >> ?

"Both organizations have actively sought to hamper govt anti-terrorism efforts, bydirect propoganda activities aimed at police, first responders, intelligence agencies, through so-called sensitivity training. Their goal is to create as much self-doubt, hesitation, fear of name calling, and litigation within police departments and intelligence agencies, as possible, so as to render such authorities ineffective in pursuing international and domestic terrorist entities."

This same "wall" of defense for jihadists was evident in the case of Tampa jihadist, Sami al Arian (Palestinian Islamic Jiha) back in his University of South Florida connected days. Prior to the 9-11 attacks, PC restrictions imposed by the Clinton Justice Dept. prevented the FBI's counterterrorism agents from communicating effectively with criminal investigators and Justice dept prosecutors. This was the Clinton Justice Dept's infamous "wall". Consequently, al-Arian was able to carry on his
deadly business for years. It wasn't until the "wall" was destroyed, that agents connected the intelligence dots that produced a prosecutable case.

This is exactly the stonewalling that Obama, in his speech today, is engaging in. As far I'm concerned, he's one of them.

Obama must declare war, drop political correctness and save lives | The Gorka Briefing

500 Service Unavailable Error

Andrew C. McCarthy, The Grand Jihad: How Islam and the Left Sabotage America, pg 153-154, 369.

To be fair to Obama, sanitizing of US govt speech involving Muslims occured before Obama became president, as in 2008, during the Bush administration, when the Homeland Security and NCTC (National Counterterrorism Center) issued staffwide memos imposing a restrictive speech code. It became a no-no to use words like "jihadist", "Islamist",or even "Islamic terrorist" Acceptable alternatives, they were told, include "violent extremist", or just the word"terrorist"

Also excluded were the words "jihad", "Islamofacism", and "caliphate". Also in the memos were these gems >> "Don't invoke Islam, in any way"......."Avoid inflating the religious bases"......" and "make no overt reference to Islam" lest you "cause offense"

P. David Gaubatz & Paul Sperry, Muslim Mafia, pg. 104, 106.

Uh, Putin in Russia endorses Trump......and Trump wants to fuck his own daughter.....uh if I were you, I'd find another battle this one isn't going anywhere, ya think?

Bathhouse Barry is striking fear in the hearts of the jihadists.

And Todd the tity rapist is striking fear in the hearts of men!!

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Listening to the speech Obama gave just a little while ago, one is left wondering if it wasn't written by al Baghdadi himself. Just about every sentence was something advantageous to ISIS. Just about every one could be easily refuted.

In of the highlights of his speech Obama flashed the prolific "recruitment" card. This is the talking point very often mentioned by political correctness plagued liberals, that tries to preach that by villainizing Islam, that will recruit many more Muslims into the fight. Obama mentioned the Muslim Ban proposal of Donald Trump, without mentioning his name.

There are a few rather strong arguments to be made against this recruitment theory however. It is not conclusive with any evidence that banning Muslim immigration to the US would have any effect on jihadist recruitment. Secondly, it is possible that it could work to just the opposite of that. Already, millions of people who call themselves Muslims are that in name only. They don't subscribe to the mass genocide commands so common in the Koran, don't engage in wife-beating, pedophilia, or other trashy things in that vile book of hate.

As such, those millions of Muslims probably understand quite well why the US would have a ban on Muslim immigration, and they might wish there were less Muslims in their own countries as well. And those who agree with the Koran's trash (or at least they PUBLICLY) say they do, are not being recruited to what they already believe anyway.

But Obama has this approach totally backwards. His PC policies of kissing jihadist ass, just serves to empower jihad all the more. In his website, Dr. Sebastian Gorka, author of the 2016 book, Defeating Jihad: The Winnable War, he takes Obama to task for these improper and dangerous PC policies of his, which were clearly evident in his speech today.

Gorka states "The time for political correctness is behind us. The idea that federal agencies, armed services, and law enforcement are not allowed to discuss the religious motivation and ideology of our enemies, and that words such as jihad have to be censored out of our lexicon of counter-terrorism and military training has to end.

If this administration persists in ignoring the reality that jihadi terrorism is a global phenomenon that has reached our shores, and continues to focus instead on concepts such as “lone wolf,” “hate crime,” and “the proliferation of weapons in private hands,” we will continue to see Americans die on U.S. soil.

Obama has done nothing more with his anti-Trump speech, and his anti-Muslim ban policy, than further confirm how wrong his policies are, how badly he has taken us down a very wrong path, and how necessary it is for us to use words like JIHAD, and to recognize Islam itself and its Koran as the basis of the war against us.

Obama's speech also seems as though it could have been written by CAIR (Council on American-Islamic Relations) chief Nihad Awad (often called "Jihad" Awad by FBI agents). Just like Obama, CAIR has been a persistent thorn in the side of those working on behalf of US national security. In a class action lawsuit against CAIR and its Canadian affiliate, lawyers for the estate of John P. O'Neill, former security director in the World Trade Center (who was killed in the 9-11 attack), state >> ?

"Both organizations have actively sought to hamper govt anti-terrorism efforts, bydirect propoganda activities aimed at police, first responders, intelligence agencies, through so-called sensitivity training. Their goal is to create as much self-doubt, hesitation, fear of name calling, and litigation within police departments and intelligence agencies, as possible, so as to render such authorities ineffective in pursuing international and domestic terrorist entities."

This same "wall" of defense for jihadists was evident in the case of Tampa jihadist, Sami al Arian (Palestinian Islamic Jiha) back in his University of South Florida connected days. Prior to the 9-11 attacks, PC restrictions imposed by the Clinton Justice Dept. prevented the FBI's counterterrorism agents from communicating effectively with criminal investigators and Justice dept prosecutors. This was the Clinton Justice Dept's infamous "wall". Consequently, al-Arian was able to carry on his
deadly business for years. It wasn't until the "wall" was destroyed, that agents connected the intelligence dots that produced a prosecutable case.

This is exactly the stonewalling that Obama, in his speech today, is engaging in. As far I'm concerned, he's one of them.

Obama must declare war, drop political correctness and save lives | The Gorka Briefing

500 Service Unavailable Error

Andrew C. McCarthy, The Grand Jihad: How Islam and the Left Sabotage America, pg 153-154, 369.

To be fair to Obama, sanitizing of US govt speech involving Muslims occured before Obama became president, as in 2008, during the Bush administration, when the Homeland Security and NCTC (National Counterterrorism Center) issued staffwide memos imposing a restrictive speech code. It became a no-no to use words like "jihadist", "Islamist",or even "Islamic terrorist" Acceptable alternatives, they were told, include "violent extremist", or just the word"terrorist"

Also excluded were the words "jihad", "Islamofacism", and "caliphate". Also in the memos were these gems >> "Don't invoke Islam, in any way"......."Avoid inflating the religious bases"......" and "make no overt reference to Islam" lest you "cause offense"

P. David Gaubatz & Paul Sperry, Muslim Mafia, pg. 104, 106.

Uh, Putin in Russia endorses Trump......and Trump wants to fuck his own daughter.....uh if I were you, I'd find another battle this one isn't going anywhere, ya think?

Bathhouse Barry is striking fear in the hearts of the jihadists.

And Todd the tity rapist is striking fear in the hearts of men!!

Did you flunk out of high school?

 

[protectionist]

The aspect of PC is under fire now like never before. We had Nidal Hasan in 2009, who was openly jihadist. But military brass engaged in a coverup, not wanting to be called a racist, and invite lawsuits form the traitors the ACLU, the EEOC, et al. So Hasan went on and on, emboldened all the more by America's permissive pandering to him. Result ? 13 unarmed soldiers shot to death, and 35 others badly wounded.

It happened again in Chattanooga to more military servicemen, unarmed with Obama's gun-free zone policies. Then again in San Bernardino, as unarmed, defenseless citizens were mowed down by lunatic jihadists. And now we've had the Orlando massacre. All these are the results of ceaseless pandering and appeasing of jihad by Obama and other liberals. Omar Mateen's security company employers didn't fire him and covered up his radicalism, again, afraid of EEOC, ACLU, CAIR, et al. Time to put all these creeps where they belong. Out of business.

George Washington once said >> "When the nation is imperiled, it is incumbent on the citizens to defend the nation."

Obama, on the other hand, does not defend the nation. He hasn't fought against ISIS as much as he should. Or the Taliban. And inside the US, every time something bad happens, and jihadists kill people, all Obama seems to do is talk about how we must not blame Muslims. He doesn't seem to heed George Washington's words. He seems to be more interested in defending the jihadists, than the nation. IMO he's one of them.

 

[protectionist]

Uh, Putin in Russia endorses Trump......and Trump wants to fuck his own daughter.....uh if I were you, I'd find another battle this one isn't going anywhere, ya think?

I think you have no idea what the hell you're talking about.

 

[protectionist]

It's no wonder Obama's speech souded like ISIS wrote it. Or someone from the Muslim Brotherhood (the less violent equivalent of ISIS) He's BEEN doing that all along. What do you think his gun-free zones on military property policy is doing ? You think it helped the 48 soldiers shot in Fort Hood ? Or the ones killed in Arkansas and Chattanooga, Tennessee ? Or any veterans in VA hospitals if they attack there, while we're unarmed, because of his moronic policy.

Then there's his censoring of language in Pentagon and FBI counterterrorism manuals. His having agents take sensitivity classes (Bush did this too). And how about when FBI director Robert Mueller went to Muslim Brotherhood organizations (ISNA & the ADAMS Center) to RECRUIT FBI agents from the jihadists ? His Cairo speech.

And how about all the Muslim Brotherhood people he has allowed to work in the White House ?

Obama Administration = the Muslim Brotherhood

Dalia Mogahed - was appointed in April 2009 to the White House Advisory Council on Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships.

And who can forget this fiasco ? >>

Or the dozens of GITMO prisoners he has released, only to have them return to the battlefield and kill our boys in uniform.

We could go on and on with this.

 

[protectionist]

Here he is with some of his Muslim Brotherhood friends. The bearded guy is Mohamed Magid. Director of ISNA (Islamic Society of North America) the largest Muslim Brotherhood front organization in America, and the "nucleus" of all of them. ISNA was identified by the prosecution in the 2008 Holy Land Foundation trial regarding funding to Hamas, as an unindicted co-conspirator, a designation that was upheld by four federal judges on the basis of the evidence produced by the government.

Magid used his “relationship” with the FBI to get Director Robert Mueller to capitulate to demands by the ISNA (Islamic Society of North America) and other Muslim Brotherhood fronts, that the Bureau’s files be reviewed for documents and briefing materials offensive to Islamists. On February 8, 2012, Mueller announced to a group that included Magid, that 700 such documents and 300 briefings had been purged. Note that all this is part of Obama's Justice Department.

Magid is also the imam at the All-Dulles Area Muslim Society (ADAMS) Center in Sterling, Virginia. The Center has seven branches throughout the Northern Virginia region, making it one of the largest mosque complexes in the Washington D.C. area and in the nation. It is also considered one of the most radical in its promotion of Sharia and other Islamist principles.

 

[froggy]