Obama proposes cuts in Social Security

The rich would see tax increases, the poor and the elderly would get smaller annual increases in their benefits, and middle income taxpayers would slip into higher tax brackets despite Obama's repeated vows not to add to the tax burden of the middle class. His proposed changes, once phased in, would mean a cut in Social Security benefits of nearly $1,000 a year for an average 85-year-old, smaller cuts for younger retirees.



Anything to get his way......
 
The rich would see tax increases, the poor and the elderly would get smaller annual increases in their benefits, and middle income taxpayers would slip into higher tax brackets despite Obama's repeated vows not to add to the tax burden of the middle class. His proposed changes, once phased in, would mean a cut in Social Security benefits of nearly $1,000 a year for an average 85-year-old, smaller cuts for younger retirees.



Anything to get his way......

This is exactly what the GOP has asked for. They want cuts in entitlements. This is their chance to get them but they will walk away when the tax rate on the wealthy is included. Get your facts straight.

Republicans say they want entitlement cuts. But they want Dems to own them.
 
Obama seeks deal, proposes cuts to Social Security

So Obama is willing to put something on the table that he hates to do. Both the left and the right are dismissing his proposal. GET REAL PEOPLE!

The plan, if ever enacted, could touch almost all Americans. The rich would see tax increases, the poor and the elderly would get smaller annual increases in their benefits, and middle income taxpayers would slip into higher tax brackets despite Obama's repeated vows not to add to the tax burden of the middle class.

Yeah... for cutting social security we get all that added bonus.. LMAO

Not to mention it is for cutting benefits to the elderly now who have paid in.. instead of offering a way to start eliminating it for current participants in the workforce and future generations


But nice try at a talking point chant, Jim
 
You would think Republicans would jump at the offer to make it even more difficult for the elderly. Isn't that partly why they created all that debt in the first place?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You would think Republicans would jump at the offer to make it even more difficult for the elderly. Isn't that partly why they created all that debt in the first place?

Then why is it Democrats are taking this and running with it? Oh so they can blame Bush for it later, when it blows up in their face.
 
The rich would see tax increases, the poor and the elderly would get smaller annual increases in their benefits, and middle income taxpayers would slip into higher tax brackets despite Obama's repeated vows not to add to the tax burden of the middle class. His proposed changes, once phased in, would mean a cut in Social Security benefits of nearly $1,000 a year for an average 85-year-old, smaller cuts for younger retirees.



Anything to get his way......

Well, once Obamacare fully kicks in, we won't have many elderly people collecting social security anyway since they'll be gone.

Never, ever do they suggest cutting down on some welfare benefits despite some people getting too much money. I think they should crack down on fraud with all these government programs and they'd save some money.
 
Obama seeks deal, proposes cuts to Social Security

So Obama is willing to put something on the table that he hates to do. Both the left and the right are dismissing his proposal. GET REAL PEOPLE!

He won't get anything done when he insists on raising taxes on people.

You mean the Republicans will stop anything from getting done when they refuse to compromise.

I showed thru what was offered that it was not a compromise... and it was a cut in the parts of SS that most cons and libertarians do not want to cut in SS... but just gloss over that, per usual
 
Obama find a cure for cancer and the rebulicans would bitch that it would put doctors out of work. He needs to understand that anything he does will be lampooned by the cons. Hell he came out with a healthcare plan which included mandates, which was first proposed by the Heritage Foundation, and you saw what happened there.
 
Last edited:
O-care will fix Medicare and Medicaid, cutting health costs in general. Raise payroll taxes on the bloated rich to fix SS. Feck Pubs and their silly dupes..
 
He won't get anything done when he insists on raising taxes on people.

You mean the Republicans will stop anything from getting done when they refuse to compromise.

I showed thru what was offered that it was not a compromise... and it was a cut in the parts of SS that most cons and libertarians do not want to cut in SS... but just gloss over that, per usual

What DO Pubs want cut? They're totally FOS and the dupes are totally clueless. Yes, YOU LOL.
 
The President's proposal to cut the social safety net may someday look as retrograde as Clinton signing DOMA.

President Obama reportedly is unveiling a budget using the chained CPI inflation measure to cheat elderly Americans out of the benefits they were promised. In two previous posts I’ve explained the perversity of the current debate about Social Security. The tax-favored private components of America’s mixed private-public retirement system — programs like employer pensions, 401Ks and IRAs — are inefficient, volatile and subject to manipulation by overcompensated, fee-extracting money managers. In contrast, the Social Security program is simple and efficient, and has low overhead costs. And yet the bipartisan establishment, including many “progressive” Democrats as well as Republicans, wants to cut Social Security — the part that works — and expand tax-favored private savings, the inefficient, unstable and inequitable part.

While cutting Social Security makes no sense at all in terms of economics or public policy, it makes excellent sense in terms of the selfish class interests of the super-rich. They have extracted about half the gains from economic growth in the U.S. in the last half-century and recycle some of their profits to fund politicians, and lobbyists, as well as mercenary propagandists who pose as neutral think tank experts. Social Security’s contribution to the retirement income of the rich is negligible, while the top 20 percent receives around 80 percent of the income from tax-favored private retirement savings accounts like 401Ks. Naturally many of America’s oligarchs want the public discussion to be solely about cutting Social Security benefits for the bottom 80 percent, rather than 401Ks for the top 20 percent. To paraphrase Leona Helmsley, Social Security is for the little people. And if we cannot afford all of our present public-plus-private retirement system … well, as the saying in Tsarist Russia had it, let any shortage be shared among the peasants.

More: Obama making historic mistake on Social Security - BY MICHAEL LIND/Salon.com
 
Obama find a cure for cancer and the rebulicans would bitch that it would put doctors out of work. He needs to understand that anything he does will be lampooned by the cons. Hell he came out with a healthcare plan which included mandates, which was first proposed by the Heritage Foundation, and you saw what happened there.

Exactly, the GOP knows that they are on the edge of extinction. They will dig their heels in on anything that makes Obama look good. Their plan to remove the uppity black man from the WH failed when they settled on Willard, the walking disaster. On to plan B....
 
Obama find a cure for cancer and the rebulicans would bitch that it would put doctors out of work. He needs to understand that anything he does will be lampooned by the cons. Hell he came out with a healthcare plan which included mandates, which was first proposed by the Heritage Foundation, and you saw what happened there.


So you're for cutting social security now? WOW if a democrat says it, you're for it......wow

PS I'm ok with it, this is just to point our YOUR and Obama's hypocrisy, not really to criticize the actual plan. So where is the commercial showing Obama throwing granny off a cliff?
 
Obama find a cure for cancer and the rebulicans would bitch that it would put doctors out of work. He needs to understand that anything he does will be lampooned by the cons. Hell he came out with a healthcare plan which included mandates, which was first proposed by the Heritage Foundation, and you saw what happened there.


So you're for cutting social security now? WOW if a democrat says it, you're for it......wow

PS I'm ok with it, this is just to point our YOUR and Obama's hypocrisy, not really to criticize the actual plan. So where is the commercial showing Obama throwing granny off a cliff?
 
You would think Republicans would jump at the offer to make it even more difficult for the elderly. Isn't that partly why they created all that debt in the first place?

Then why is it Democrats are taking this and running with it? Oh so they can blame Bush for it later, when it blows up in their face.

When what blows up? The Bush tax cuts for the wealthy? The two unpaid for wars? The deregulated Wall Street? The Drugs for votes bill costing trillions? The cost of taking care of tens of thousands maimed in Iraq?

They are already here.
 
Obama seeks deal, proposes cuts to Social Security

So Obama is willing to put something on the table that he hates to do. Both the left and the right are dismissing his proposal. GET REAL PEOPLE!

Not sure what you mean by "get real." Our financial obligations are growing so fast that almost any proposal is window dressing. Completely eliminating COLAs wouldn't even solve the problem (but it would be a start). Means-tested rationing is on its way. Everybody happy?
 
They need to cut welfare first. Since WE pay into social security.. Welfare is just a free ride for a lot of people .. Generations after generation living on someone else dime
 

Forum List

Back
Top