Obama - Our Constitutional No Knothing - Part 8

[JakeStarkey]

Listening is not interested in spelling, only in that she is butt hurt.

 

[RightDown]

Well,

Here we go again.

Obama says electing him will show the GOP that Americans want us to follow his policies.

If Obama wins, it will be a slight margin. He won last time with 53%. That means that 47% didn't vote for him (and by reasoning voted against him). That is essentially half the country.

That is why we have an electoral college (it is theoretically possible to win the presidency with 35% of the popular vote) and a HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES.

It is also why we have a 10th amendment.

This guy knows nothing or (worse) cares nothing about the Constitution.

The guy in the office next to mine knows more about the Constitution than Obama (and he's from India).

http://www.desmoinesregister.com/ar...epublicans?odyssey=tab|topnews|text|Frontpage

******************

If you read the article...you'll see that Obama blames Bush for 90% of the debt. Obama just could not cut spending at all. He's so powerless. But he needs 4 more years. With a GOP House and a more GOP Senate (likely to be a majority). 4 more years of lame duck and blaming bush.

And still knows nothing about the Constitution.

Unbelievable.

I have no idea what you are trying to convey. What's a 'no nothing'?

The tenth amendment is a relatively weak amendment that is rarely employed in Sup. Ct. jurisprudence. The level of judicial review of state laws does increase dramatically for several things: A state's law concerning the health, safety or welfare of its citizens. Those are really the only meaningful examples where a state's law gets deference in scrutiny of its contitutionality. B/c the US Constitution is the supreme law of the land.

Can you explain what you mean in your post?

 

[Moonglow]

Well,

Here we go again.

Obama says electing him will show the GOP that Americans want us to follow his policies.

If Obama wins, it will be a slight margin. He won last time with 53%. That means that 47% didn't vote for him (and by reasoning voted against him). That is essentially half the country.

That is why we have an electoral college (it is theoretically possible to win the presidency with 35% of the popular vote) and a HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES.

It is also why we have a 10th amendment.

This guy knows nothing or (worse) cares nothing about the Constitution.

The guy in the office next to mine knows more about the Constitution than Obama (and he's from India).

http://www.desmoinesregister.com/ar...epublicans?odyssey=tab|topnews|text|Frontpage

******************

If you read the article...you'll see that Obama blames Bush for 90% of the debt. Obama just could not cut spending at all. He's so powerless. But he needs 4 more years. With a GOP House and a more GOP Senate (likely to be a majority). 4 more years of lame duck and blaming bush.

And still knows nothing about the Constitution.

Unbelievable.

I have no idea what you are trying to convey. What's a 'no nothing'?

The tenth amendment is a relatively weak amendment that is rarely employed in Sup. Ct. jurisprudence. The level of judicial review of state laws does increase dramatically for several things: A state's law concerning the health, safety or welfare of its citizens. Those are really the only meaningful examples where a state's law gets deference in scrutiny of its contitutionality. B/c the US Constitution is the supreme law of the land.

Can you explain what you mean in your post?

Lincoln won his first presidency with 40% of the popular vote. yet she does not bitch about this, since she is old enough to remember.

 

[SwimExpert]

Well,

Here we go again.

Obama says electing him will show the GOP that Americans want us to follow his policies.

If Obama wins, it will be a slight margin. He won last time with 53%. That means that 47% didn't vote for him (and by reasoning voted against him). That is essentially half the country.

That is why we have an electoral college (it is theoretically possible to win the presidency with 35% of the popular vote) and a HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES.

It is also why we have a 10th amendment.

This guy knows nothing or (worse) cares nothing about the Constitution.

The guy in the office next to mine knows more about the Constitution than Obama (and he's from India).

http://www.desmoinesregister.com/ar...epublicans?odyssey=tab|topnews|text|Frontpage

******************

If you read the article...you'll see that Obama blames Bush for 90% of the debt. Obama just could not cut spending at all. He's so powerless. But he needs 4 more years. With a GOP House and a more GOP Senate (likely to be a majority). 4 more years of lame duck and blaming bush.

And still knows nothing about the Constitution.

Unbelievable.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D4Ha_XjCuA8]Billy Madison - Ultimate Insult [HD] - YouTube[/ame]

 

[JakeStarkey]

Well,

Here we go again.

Obama says electing him will show the GOP that Americans want us to follow his policies.

If Obama wins, it will be a slight margin. He won last time with 53%. That means that 47% didn't vote for him (and by reasoning voted against him). That is essentially half the country.

That is why we have an electoral college (it is theoretically possible to win the presidency with 35% of the popular vote) and a HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES.

It is also why we have a 10th amendment.

This guy knows nothing or (worse) cares nothing about the Constitution.

The guy in the office next to mine knows more about the Constitution than Obama (and he's from India).

http://www.desmoinesregister.com/ar...epublicans?odyssey=tab|topnews|text|Frontpage

******************

If you read the article...you'll see that Obama blames Bush for 90% of the debt. Obama just could not cut spending at all. He's so powerless. But he needs 4 more years. With a GOP House and a more GOP Senate (likely to be a majority). 4 more years of lame duck and blaming bush.

And still knows nothing about the Constitution.

Unbelievable.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D4Ha_XjCuA8]Billy Madison - Ultimate Insult [HD] - YouTube[/ame]

^^^^^ this

 

[Listening]

I realize you need others to talk for you Jake....given that your head is up your ass about half the time.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Can't discuss, can you; losers yell and are foul, yes?

 

[Listening]

Can't discuss, can you; losers yell and are foul, yes?

I brought the thread back asshole...what did you chose to discuss ?

Nothing.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Can't discuss, can you; losers yell and are foul, yes?

I brought the thread back asshole...what did you chose to discuss ? Nothing.

You have been shown to wrong, again, and so you yell.

 

[Listening]

Well,

Here we go again.

Obama says electing him will show the GOP that Americans want us to follow his policies.

If Obama wins, it will be a slight margin. He won last time with 53%. That means that 47% didn't vote for him (and by reasoning voted against him). That is essentially half the country.

That is why we have an electoral college (it is theoretically possible to win the presidency with 35% of the popular vote) and a HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES.

It is also why we have a 10th amendment.

This guy knows nothing or (worse) cares nothing about the Constitution.

The guy in the office next to mine knows more about the Constitution than Obama (and he's from India).

http://www.desmoinesregister.com/ar...epublicans?odyssey=tab|topnews|text|Frontpage

******************

If you read the article...you'll see that Obama blames Bush for 90% of the debt. Obama just could not cut spending at all. He's so powerless. But he needs 4 more years. With a GOP House and a more GOP Senate (likely to be a majority). 4 more years of lame duck and blaming bush.

And still knows nothing about the Constitution.

Unbelievable.

I have no idea what you are trying to convey. What's a 'no nothing'?

The tenth amendment is a relatively weak amendment that is rarely employed in Sup. Ct. jurisprudence. The level of judicial review of state laws does increase dramatically for several things: A state's law concerning the health, safety or welfare of its citizens. Those are really the only meaningful examples where a state's law gets deference in scrutiny of its contitutionality. B/c the US Constitution is the supreme law of the land.

Can you explain what you mean in your post?

Which part.

The U.S. Constitution limits the federal government (if they followed it). There is a completely different thread on this is the CDZ.

As to it being weak ? It was never followed like some think it should have been...but it was the FDR court that really turned it's back on the intent of the USC.

 

[Listening]

Can't discuss, can you; losers yell and are foul, yes?

I brought the thread back asshole...what did you chose to discuss ? Nothing.

You have been shown to wrong, again, and so you yell.

You've never shown anything except that whoever "educated" you ripped you off.

 

[JakeStarkey]

I brought the thread back asshole...what did you chose to discuss ? Nothing.

You have been shown to wrong, again, and so you yell.

You've never shown anything except that whoever "educated" you ripped you off.

Do you have anything On Topic or are you going to continue yelling?

 

[LoneLaugher]

Well,

Here we go again.

Obama says electing him will show the GOP that Americans want us to follow his policies.

If Obama wins, it will be a slight margin. He won last time with 53%. That means that 47% didn't vote for him (and by reasoning voted against him). That is essentially half the country.

That is why we have an electoral college (it is theoretically possible to win the presidency with 35% of the popular vote) and a HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES.

It is also why we have a 10th amendment.

This guy knows nothing or (worse) cares nothing about the Constitution.

The guy in the office next to mine knows more about the Constitution than Obama (and he's from India).

http://www.desmoinesregister.com/ar...epublicans?odyssey=tab|topnews|text|Frontpage

******************

If you read the article...you'll see that Obama blames Bush for 90% of the debt. Obama just could not cut spending at all. He's so powerless. But he needs 4 more years. With a GOP House and a more GOP Senate (likely to be a majority). 4 more years of lame duck and blaming bush.

And still knows nothing about the Constitution.

Unbelievable.

Eye wunder if he no's tha difrense between "no" and "know"?

 

[Listening]

We can bring this one back and see if LoneLaugher and JakeTheFake will continue to give each other electronic hand jobs.

 

[Dot Com]

The ad hom is you describing yourself in the mirror.

The thread does not matter, because we lost the election, and you have since failed to honor your wager.

Your lack of integrity is expected.

^ that.

 

[Dot Com]

I may be guilty of a few things but not honoring wagers isn't one of them

 

[Listening]

I may be guilty of a few things but not honoring wagers isn't one of them

I am sure you are guilty of a lot of things.

Being smart isn't one of them either.

 

[Dot Com]

says the welcher

It wouldn't have been so bad if you weren't such a self-righteous blowhard like 007 before you lost your wager.

 

[Listening]

says the welcher

It wouldn't have been so bad if you weren't such a self-righteous blowhard like 007 before you lost your wager.

Let me know when you want to debate something, dumbass.

Until then, do your self a favor and STFU.

 

[Dot Com]

says the guy whose not even supposed to be here