Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
JRoc posts two articles from right wing/neocon publications that are whirling like dervishes to try and sully the FACT that you had a Gitmo detainee tried and convicted and sentenced on US soil in a US court.
Nothing changes that fact....so JRoc and his ilk STILL yell that the fix is in for the Taliban/Al Qaeda operatives to get off scott free.
As for the article on Holder....since he's not active in any cases and does hold a law firm in his name....it's just a lot of sour grapes about Gitmo folk getting representation in a court of law.
Well, Ghailani had a lawyer....he got convicted. That's the system, neocons...and it worked under Obama no matter how much you bitch and moan about it.
First: Holder does not have a law firm.
Second: Holder does not have a law firm.
Third: Holder does not have a law firm.
---
Fourth: definition of a conflict of interest.
your point?"Democrats can do no wrong." Just type that next time and save keystrokes.
I'm not a Democrat. I am a liberal. I did not vote for Obama in 2008 in either the primary or the general, and I voted in each
Translation: the neocon Libability (in every sense of the word) was faced with a few FACTS that he couldn't BS away with his rhetoric....hence his pathetic response.
Guys like Liability just can't handle the FACT that this case is a win for the USA on the international stage...our justice system works, so we don't have to sandbag arabs & muslims like some gulag toting 3rd world nation or old style Soviet bloc nation.
Nope, Libability isn't about the country, isn't about Americas future....Liability's all about getting OBAMA, getting the LIBBIES, getting those muslims, getting those arabs.....truth, justice and the American way be damned.
Tackylib is responding to the post of another member, erroneously thinks he's responding to me, then makes a complete fool of himself. Again.
Classic liberoidal douche bag.
And, tackylib, you moron, I am not a neocon. I am a conservative. Thee's a big difference, there, but schmucks like you who can't even understand who you are talking to have no chance to understand those differences, sadly.
You Marxists/socialist/leftists/liberals/"progressives" need to work on your ability to comprehend the words you bandy about.
Once again, this mental Liability demonstrates how dense he is. Post #45 shows mudwhistle's reponse, which was to my last post. If Mudwhistle was responding to Libability, then he posted in the wrong place, and I will apologize accordingly.
But as you can see, our intellectually impotent Liability is more hyped about a simple response posting error than the actual content of the discussion. He cannot deal with the FACTS of this case...because to do so would mean acknowledging that ALL the neocon driven GOP pundits and partisans were WRONG. So he just avoids it at any point.
Liability claims he's a conservative and not a neocon....someone needs to clue the dumb bunny in that a true conservative does NOT support the Constitution bending/law breaking/dishonest BS that the Shrub and company pulled for 8 years. But as this and past posts have shown, Liability has been a staunch supporter of every neocon, anti-Obama bullhorn that has come down the pike. His denial of such a mindset in leiu of the record is absurd, but what can one expect from someone who thinks "liberoidal", and "Tackylib" are rational, comparative counters to being called a new conservative (or neocon for short).
Tackylib therefore has my permission to call me a "neocon" all he wants despite the fact that he's flatly wrong. Like his attempts at offering logical arguments in general, so too his labels are devoid of meaning.
Translation: the neocon Libability (in every sense of the word) was faced with a few FACTS that he couldn't BS away with his rhetoric....hence his pathetic response.
Guys like Liability just can't handle the FACT that this case is a win for the USA on the international stage...our justice system works, so we don't have to sandbag arabs & muslims like some gulag toting 3rd world nation or old style Soviet bloc nation.
Nope, Libability isn't about the country, isn't about Americas future....Liability's all about getting OBAMA, getting the LIBBIES, getting those muslims, getting those arabs.....truth, justice and the American way be damned.
Tackylib is responding to the post of another member, erroneously thinks he's responding to me, then makes a complete fool of himself. Again.
Classic liberoidal douche bag.
And, tackylib, you moron, I am not a neocon. I am a conservative. Thee's a big difference, there, but schmucks like you who can't even understand who you are talking to have no chance to understand those differences, sadly.
You Marxists/socialist/leftists/liberals/"progressives" need to work on your ability to comprehend the words you bandy about.
Once again, this mental Liability demonstrates how dense he is. Post #45 shows mudwhistle's reponse, which was to my last post. If Mudwhistle was responding to Libability, then he posted in the wrong place, and I will apologize accordingly.
But as you can see, our intellectually impotent Liability is more hyped about a simple response posting error than the actual content of the discussion. He cannot deal with the FACTS of this case...because to do so would mean acknowledging that ALL the neocon driven GOP pundits and partisans were WRONG. So he just avoids it at any point.
Liability claims he's a conservative and not a neocon....someone needs to clue the dumb bunny in that a true conservative does NOT support the Constitution bending/law breaking/dishonest BS that the Shrub and company pulled for 8 years. But as this and past posts have shown, Liability has been a staunch supporter of every neocon, anti-Obama bullhorn that has come down the pike. His denial of such a mindset in leiu of the record is absurd, but what can one expect from someone who thinks "liberoidal", and "Tackylib" are rational, comparative counters to being called a new conservative (or neocon for short).
He gets to insist on same gender groping and NO ONE IS THE WISER!!!! 
Translation: the neocon Libability (in every sense of the word) was faced with a few FACTS that he couldn't BS away with his rhetoric....hence his pathetic response.
Guys like Liability just can't handle the FACT that this case is a win for the USA on the international stage...our justice system works, so we don't have to sandbag arabs & muslims like some gulag toting 3rd world nation or old style Soviet bloc nation.
Nope, Libability isn't about the country, isn't about Americas future....Liability's all about getting OBAMA, getting the LIBBIES, getting those muslims, getting those arabs.....truth, justice and the American way be damned.
Tackylib is responding to the post of another member, erroneously thinks he's responding to me, then makes a complete fool of himself. Again.
Classic liberoidal douche bag.
And, tackylib, you moron, I am not a neocon. I am a conservative. Thee's a big difference, there, but schmucks like you who can't even understand who you are talking to have no chance to understand those differences, sadly.
You Marxists/socialist/leftists/liberals/"progressives" need to work on your ability to comprehend the words you bandy about.
Once again, this mental Liability demonstrates how dense he is. Post #45 shows mudwhistle's reponse, which was to my last post. If Mudwhistle was responding to Libability, then he posted in the wrong place, and I will apologize accordingly.
But as you can see, our intellectually impotent Liability is more hyped about a simple response posting error than the actual content of the discussion. He cannot deal with the FACTS of this case...because to do so would mean acknowledging that ALL the neocon driven GOP pundits and partisans were WRONG. So he just avoids it at any point.
Liability claims he's a conservative and not a neocon....someone needs to clue the dumb bunny in that a true conservative does NOT support the Constitution bending/law breaking/dishonest BS that the Shrub and company pulled for 8 years. But as this and past posts have shown, Liability has been a staunch supporter of every neocon, anti-Obama bullhorn that has come down the pike. His denial of such a mindset in leiu of the record is absurd, but what can one expect from someone who thinks "liberoidal", and "Tackylib" are rational, comparative counters to being called a new conservative (or neocon for short).
Interesting.
Tackylib is responding to the post of another member, erroneously thinks he's responding to me, then makes a complete fool of himself. Again.
Classic liberoidal douche bag.
And, tackylib, you moron, I am not a neocon. I am a conservative. Thee's a big difference, there, but schmucks like you who can't even understand who you are talking to have no chance to understand those differences, sadly.
You Marxists/socialist/leftists/liberals/"progressives" need to work on your ability to comprehend the words you bandy about.
Once again, this mental Liability demonstrates how dense he is. Post #45 shows mudwhistle's reponse, which was to my last post. If Mudwhistle was responding to Libability, then he posted in the wrong place, and I will apologize accordingly.
But as you can see, our intellectually impotent Liability is more hyped about a simple response posting error than the actual content of the discussion. He cannot deal with the FACTS of this case...because to do so would mean acknowledging that ALL the neocon driven GOP pundits and partisans were WRONG. So he just avoids it at any point.
Liability claims he's a conservative and not a neocon....someone needs to clue the dumb bunny in that a true conservative does NOT support the Constitution bending/law breaking/dishonest BS that the Shrub and company pulled for 8 years. But as this and past posts have shown, Liability has been a staunch supporter of every neocon, anti-Obama bullhorn that has come down the pike. His denial of such a mindset in leiu of the record is absurd, but what can one expect from someone who thinks "liberoidal", and "Tackylib" are rational, comparative counters to being called a new conservative (or neocon for short).
The recent elections have been a bitter pill for the NeoGOP criminal enterprise to swallow. The moronic gloating has subsided and reality has sunk in. They are now the victims of thier own false rhetoric. "No Spending" OK bitches... earmarks and special corporate deals have been your bread and butter..NOW WHAT? Blaming everything on OBAMA won't help you now. Liability is still chanting the old montra but doesn't yet realise that there will have to be a change of course if the Boners and the other thieves of the NewGOP want to continue stealing from the American Public. I forsee some screeching to privatise SS and Medicare. Not so much crying about GM...OOPS!! Did OBAMA do someting that WORKED??? NO he dittant!!!
TSA??? We all know that's where Liability goes for sex! OH YA....Those "shuttles"...If ya know what I mean!!
Interesting.
nothing you say is interesting. It's always lunacy.
Interesting.
nothing you say is interesting. It's always lunacy.
Interesting.
nothing you say is interesting. It's always lunacy.
* * * *
Once again, this mental Liability demonstrates how dense he is. Post #45 shows mudwhistle's reponse, which was to my last post. If Mudwhistle was responding to Libability, then he posted in the wrong place, and I will apologize accordingly.
But as you can see, our intellectually impotent Liability is more hyped about a simple response posting error than the actual content of the discussion. He cannot deal with the FACTS of this case...because to do so would mean acknowledging that ALL the neocon driven GOP pundits and partisans were WRONG. So he just avoids it at any point.
Liability claims he's a conservative and not a neocon....someone needs to clue the dumb bunny in that a true conservative does NOT support the Constitution bending/law breaking/dishonest BS that the Shrub and company pulled for 8 years. But as this and past posts have shown, Liability has been a staunch supporter of every neocon, anti-Obama bullhorn that has come down the pike. His denial of such a mindset in leiu of the record is absurd, but what can one expect from someone who thinks "liberoidal", and "Tackylib" are rational, comparative counters to being called a new conservative (or neocon for short).
The recent elections have been a bitter pill for the NeoGOP criminal enterprise to swallow. The moronic gloating has subsided and reality has sunk in. They are now the victims of thier own false rhetoric. "No Spending" OK bitches... earmarks and special corporate deals have been your bread and butter..NOW WHAT? Blaming everything on OBAMA won't help you now. Liability is still chanting the old montra but doesn't yet realise that there will have to be a change of course if the Boners and the other thieves of the NewGOP want to continue stealing from the American Public. I forsee some screeching to privatise SS and Medicare. Not so much crying about GM...OOPS!! Did OBAMA do someting that WORKED??? NO he dittant!!!
TSA??? We all know that's where Liability goes for sex! OH YA....Those "shuttles"...If ya know what I mean!!
Sorry, Smugs, but just as your labels are wrong (for example, you still are unable to even define "neocon") so too is your child-like "analysis."
Conservatives are plenty pleased with the midterm election outcomes.
What many liberal idiots (I realize that's often utterly redundant) and bombastic simpletons like YOU cannot grasp is that nobody on the right is taking the election outcome at face value. Because the American people have clearly expressed their disgust with the way the liberals (like this empty headed President) have been doing business, the mutts got their asses handed to them. The GOP majority now in the House is on parole. The intelligent Republicans have figured this much out.
If they do manage to do what they were actually SENT there to do, they will get electorally rewarded. If they don't toe that line, you can bet on it: they will get electorally punished. And I do believe that this time IS different.
I couldn't care LESS if they are unable to pass any legislation this term. Gridlock is fine by me. The one thing they can all be counted on to do is fund the government with some half-assed continuing budget resolution until they can extricate themselves (somehow) from gridlock. But beyond that, if they can't even figure out a way how to agree to a luncheon recess, I am more than happy.
As for your fraudulent arguments about the TSA gropers and your incoherent blather about Boehner and Obama and earmarks, suffice it to say that you are only proving yet again that you don't get it. You don't understand. It's not your fault. You're just kind of dim.
The recent elections have been a bitter pill for the NeoGOP criminal enterprise to swallow. The moronic gloating has subsided and reality has sunk in. They are now the victims of thier own false rhetoric. "No Spending" OK bitches... earmarks and special corporate deals have been your bread and butter..NOW WHAT? Blaming everything on OBAMA won't help you now. Liability is still chanting the old montra but doesn't yet realise that there will have to be a change of course if the Boners and the other thieves of the NewGOP want to continue stealing from the American Public. I forsee some screeching to privatise SS and Medicare. Not so much crying about GM...OOPS!! Did OBAMA do someting that WORKED??? NO he dittant!!!
TSA??? We all know that's where Liability goes for sex! OH YA....Those "shuttles"...If ya know what I mean!!
Sorry, Smugs, but just as your labels are wrong (for example, you still are unable to even define "neocon") so too is your child-like "analysis."
Conservatives are plenty pleased with the midterm election outcomes.
What many liberal idiots (I realize that's often utterly redundant) and bombastic simpletons like YOU cannot grasp is that nobody on the right is taking the election outcome at face value. Because the American people have clearly expressed their disgust with the way the liberals (like this empty headed President) have been doing business, the mutts got their asses handed to them. The GOP majority now in the House is on parole. The intelligent Republicans have figured this much out.
If they do manage to do what they were actually SENT there to do, they will get electorally rewarded. If they don't toe that line, you can bet on it: they will get electorally punished. And I do believe that this time IS different.
I couldn't care LESS if they are unable to pass any legislation this term. Gridlock is fine by me. The one thing they can all be counted on to do is fund the government with some half-assed continuing budget resolution until they can extricate themselves (somehow) from gridlock. But beyond that, if they can't even figure out a way how to agree to a luncheon recess, I am more than happy.
As for your fraudulent arguments about the TSA gropers and your incoherent blather about Boehner and Obama and earmarks, suffice it to say that you are only proving yet again that you don't get it. You don't understand. It's not your fault. You're just kind of dim.
Well this "bombastic simpleton" isn't OK with gridlock. * * * *
Sorry, Smugs, but just as your labels are wrong (for example, you still are unable to even define "neocon") so too is your child-like "analysis."
Conservatives are plenty pleased with the midterm election outcomes.
What many liberal idiots (I realize that's often utterly redundant) and bombastic simpletons like YOU cannot grasp is that nobody on the right is taking the election outcome at face value. Because the American people have clearly expressed their disgust with the way the liberals (like this empty headed President) have been doing business, the mutts got their asses handed to them. The GOP majority now in the House is on parole. The intelligent Republicans have figured this much out.
If they do manage to do what they were actually SENT there to do, they will get electorally rewarded. If they don't toe that line, you can bet on it: they will get electorally punished. And I do believe that this time IS different.
I couldn't care LESS if they are unable to pass any legislation this term. Gridlock is fine by me. The one thing they can all be counted on to do is fund the government with some half-assed continuing budget resolution until they can extricate themselves (somehow) from gridlock. But beyond that, if they can't even figure out a way how to agree to a luncheon recess, I am more than happy.
As for your fraudulent arguments about the TSA gropers and your incoherent blather about Boehner and Obama and earmarks, suffice it to say that you are only proving yet again that you don't get it. You don't understand. It's not your fault. You're just kind of dim.
Well this "bombastic simpleton" isn't OK with gridlock. * * * *
I took the liberty of snipping the balance of your verbose mindless bombast, Smugs. Why? Because you are getting pretty boring. So, let's just focus on the one thing you said that is worthy of a reply.
You SHOULD be ok with gridlock, Smugs.
(A) with any luck, it's coming.
(B) you might as well get used to it and embrace it.
(C) in the short run, it may not be "good" for you and other folks with their lips forever ready to suckle at the public tit; but it will be good for the Republic overall, and in the longer run, that means you will be benefited.
"Gridlock, for lack of a better word, is Good!"
Well this "bombastic simpleton" isn't OK with gridlock. * * * *
I took the liberty of snipping the balance of your verbose mindless bombast, Smugs. Why? Because you are getting pretty boring. So, let's just focus on the one thing you said that is worthy of a reply.
You SHOULD be ok with gridlock, Smugs.
(A) with any luck, it's coming.
(B) you might as well get used to it and embrace it.
(C) in the short run, it may not be "good" for you and other folks with their lips forever ready to suckle at the public tit; but it will be good for the Republic overall, and in the longer run, that means you will be benefited.
"Gridlock, for lack of a better word, is Good!"
As usual you assume... Or is entrepanureship now one of your dreaded public enemies???
The "tit" I prefer is private non corporate investment in my inventions. Corporations have money but they want to steal everything that is not nailed down to get involved. That money(private investment) I am open to working with is temporary on hold awaiting a more liquid environment. Unlike you my good times don't rely on bullshit to make headway. Must I dig into the bad bag of bad lawyer jokes???
I took the liberty of snipping the balance of your verbose mindless bombast, Smugs. Why? Because you are getting pretty boring. So, let's just focus on the one thing you said that is worthy of a reply.
You SHOULD be ok with gridlock, Smugs.
(A) with any luck, it's coming.
(B) you might as well get used to it and embrace it.
(C) in the short run, it may not be "good" for you and other folks with their lips forever ready to suckle at the public tit; but it will be good for the Republic overall, and in the longer run, that means you will be benefited.
"Gridlock, for lack of a better word, is Good!"
As usual you assume... Or is entrepanureship now one of your dreaded public enemies???
The "tit" I prefer is private non corporate investment in my inventions. Corporations have money but they want to steal everything that is not nailed down to get involved. That money(private investment) I am open to working with is temporary on hold awaiting a more liquid environment. Unlike you my good times don't rely on bullshit to make headway. Must I dig into the bad bag of bad lawyer jokes???
Sorry Smugs, but you lost all cred when you claimed to have paid off a judge.
You have less than zero notion of how I'm doing, but you do enjoy speculating.
Maybe you should spend of your hard stolen (errr- earned) money to buy a clue!
As usual you assume... Or is entrepanureship now one of your dreaded public enemies???
The "tit" I prefer is private non corporate investment in my inventions. Corporations have money but they want to steal everything that is not nailed down to get involved. That money(private investment) I am open to working with is temporary on hold awaiting a more liquid environment. Unlike you my good times don't rely on bullshit to make headway. Must I dig into the bad bag of bad lawyer jokes???
Sorry Smugs, but you lost all cred when you claimed to have paid off a judge.
You have less than zero notion of how I'm doing, but you do enjoy speculating.
Maybe you should spend of your hard stolen (errr- earned) money to buy a clue!
You not knowing something has little to do with the price of tea in China.
If you had even the most remote amount of curiosity you could verify "Law Day" existed in West Plam Beach County Florida back in the 80's. Here is the number for Belle Glade HS. Ask for someone that has been there at least 25 years. (561) 993-4400
I just tried calling them and got a recording.. Schools probably already out for the day. When you get through to the right individual I expect a VERY public apollogy for your pissant lack of faith.
Of course they cannot attest to the bribery ..you'll just have to take my word for that. But since you think I made the whole story up.. This is your GOLDEN opportunity to prove me a liar!!!! Have at it half wit!!!
When you get the right person on the line make sure you ask about "Law Day" that used to be conducted in the school Library in the old Belle Glade High School.
I'll be expecting your submission shortly... Or are you one of those pussy attorneys that is always seeking a continuance???
Sorry Smugs, but you lost all cred when you claimed to have paid off a judge.
You have less than zero notion of how I'm doing, but you do enjoy speculating.
Maybe you should spend of your hard stolen (errr- earned) money to buy a clue!
You not knowing something has little to do with the price of tea in China.
If you had even the most remote amount of curiosity you could verify "Law Day" existed in West Plam Beach County Florida back in the 80's. Here is the number for Belle Glade HS. Ask for someone that has been there at least 25 years. (561) 993-4400
I just tried calling them and got a recording.. Schools probably already out for the day. When you get through to the right individual I expect a VERY public apollogy for your pissant lack of faith.
Of course they cannot attest to the bribery ..you'll just have to take my word for that. But since you think I made the whole story up.. This is your GOLDEN opportunity to prove me a liar!!!! Have at it half wit!!!
When you get the right person on the line make sure you ask about "Law Day" that used to be conducted in the school Library in the old Belle Glade High School.
I'll be expecting your submission shortly... Or are you one of those pussy attorneys that is always seeking a continuance???
That you are totally full of shit is without doubt. I don't care about "law day." That's irrelevant to your claim to have paid off a judge. And you discussing your views on the importance of avoiding gridlock because you value what you couldn't spell properly (entrepreneurship) is merely laughable when you've made your money (in part at least, if you were at all honest) in smuggling drugs. It's also all irrelevant to the topic.
And no. I wouldn't take your word on almost anything without verification. As I noted before, Smugs, you have no cred.
This is not God's plan, this is God's judgement!
Really? I had no idea America was a theocracy! You'd better hop right over to the nearest Fox News affiliate and spread the word.
Where did I state that we were a theocracy? I see you use the well worn Fox News is bad argument.
Tackylib is responding to the post of another member, erroneously thinks he's responding to me, then makes a complete fool of himself. Again.
Classic liberoidal douche bag.
And, tackylib, you moron, I am not a neocon. I am a conservative. Thee's a big difference, there, but schmucks like you who can't even understand who you are talking to have no chance to understand those differences, sadly.
You Marxists/socialist/leftists/liberals/"progressives" need to work on your ability to comprehend the words you bandy about.
Once again, this mental Liability demonstrates how dense he is. Post #45 shows mudwhistle's reponse, which was to my last post. If Mudwhistle was responding to Libability, then he posted in the wrong place, and I will apologize accordingly.
But as you can see, our intellectually impotent Liability is more hyped about a simple response posting error than the actual content of the discussion. He cannot deal with the FACTS of this case...because to do so would mean acknowledging that ALL the neocon driven GOP pundits and partisans were WRONG. So he just avoids it at any point.
Liability claims he's a conservative and not a neocon....someone needs to clue the dumb bunny in that a true conservative does NOT support the Constitution bending/law breaking/dishonest BS that the Shrub and company pulled for 8 years. But as this and past posts have shown, Liability has been a staunch supporter of every neocon, anti-Obama bullhorn that has come down the pike. His denial of such a mindset in leiu of the record is absurd, but what can one expect from someone who thinks "liberoidal", and "Tackylib" are rational, comparative counters to being called a new conservative (or neocon for short).
Interesting. Tackylib, the drooling liberal moron, is unable to simply acknowledge that he made a mistake. The moron responded TO a comment by mudwhistle, even quoting mudwhistle's post, but tackylib incorrectly assumed that he was talking to me, and now can't even admit as much.
Too funny.
