CrusaderFrank
Diamond Member
- May 20, 2009
- 148,629
- 71,938
- 2,330
Booooooooosh he stole the Florida chads, my precious!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Capturing Osama Bin Laden was supposed to be our #1 priority after invading Iraq, remember?
Obama promised the same thing no?
Your boy bin Laden died at Tora Bora
Got proof, or are you simply talking out of your ass again?
Capturing Osama Bin Laden was supposed to be our #1 priority after invading Iraq, remember?
Obama promised the same thing no?
Your boy bin Laden died at Tora Bora
Got proof, or are you simply talking out of your ass again?
But it is certainly above where he said it would be with his government expansion and money grabbing agenda
Obama promised the same thing no?
Your boy bin Laden died at Tora Bora
Got proof, or are you simply talking out of your ass again?
Bin Laden is deader than Obama's campaign promise to go through the budget with a fine toothed comb, sorry if that upsets you.
It's been bad for Progressive Heroes, bin Laden dead and Mooky Al Sadr was supposed to be the real power in Iraq and he's gone too. Wahh
Booooooooooooooooooooooosh! Boooosh! The Chads!
Lunatic
Barry's wishlist of policies are adding to our problem, and a lot of people think that the unemployment numbers may stay high.
The job market is caught in a vicious circle: Without more jobs, U.S. consumers will have a hard time increasing their spending; but without that spending, businesses might see little reason to start hiring.
Many small and midsize businesses are still struggling to obtain bank loans, impeding their expansion plans and constraining overall economic growth.
Higher-income households are spending less because of big losses on their homes, retirement plans and other investments. Lower-income households are cutting back because they can't borrow like they once did.
That the recovery in jobs will be long and drawn out is something on which economists and policy makers can basically agree, even as their proposals for remedies vary widely.
Retrenching businesses will be slow in hiring back or replacing workers they laid off. Many of the 7.2 million jobs the economy has shed since the recession began in December 2007 may never come back.
Higher jobless rates could be new normal
Barry's wishlist of policies are adding to our problem, and a lot of people think that the unemployment numbers may stay high.
The job market is caught in a vicious circle: Without more jobs, U.S. consumers will have a hard time increasing their spending; but without that spending, businesses might see little reason to start hiring.
Many small and midsize businesses are still struggling to obtain bank loans, impeding their expansion plans and constraining overall economic growth.
Higher-income households are spending less because of big losses on their homes, retirement plans and other investments. Lower-income households are cutting back because they can't borrow like they once did.
That the recovery in jobs will be long and drawn out is something on which economists and policy makers can basically agree, even as their proposals for remedies vary widely.
Retrenching businesses will be slow in hiring back or replacing workers they laid off. Many of the 7.2 million jobs the economy has shed since the recession began in December 2007 may never come back.
Higher jobless rates could be new normal
Lets not forget (and something the administration will nevber reveal to the naive)...
An extension of unemployment benefits will be a further strain on the employers making it even MORE difficult to have the capital to hire.
Unemployment numbers (both the official ones and the real ones) are abysmal.
Agreed.
That the entir e proeblem can laid at the foot of this either POTUS or the previous POTUS?
Now that takes a particularly kind of willful ignorance to believe.
Naturally, we are now finding partisans on both sides of the aisle advancing such drivel.
Unemployment numbers (both the official ones and the real ones) are abysmal.
Agreed.
That the entir e proeblem can laid at the foot of this either POTUS or the previous POTUS?
Now that takes a particularly kind of willful ignorance to believe.
Naturally, we are now finding partisans on both sides of the aisle advancing such drivel.
Stimulus was supposed to keep it under 8%, remember?
Oil revenues from Iraqi oil fields were supposed to pay for our invasion, remember?