Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
http://www.cnn.com/2013/04/17/politi...ate-guns-vote/....After the votes, Obama angrily criticized the NRA and senators who voted against the expanded background checks for rejecting a compromise he said was supported by a strong majority of Americans.
"Instead of supporting this compromise, the gun lobby and its allies willfully lied about the bill," Obama told White House reporters.
http://www.cnn.com/2013/04/17/politi...ate-guns-vote/....After the votes, Obama angrily criticized the NRA and senators who voted against the expanded background checks for rejecting a compromise he said was supported by a strong majority of Americans.
"Instead of supporting this compromise, the gun lobby and its allies willfully lied about the bill," Obama told White House reporters.
Can anyone tell us - specifically - what expansion of gun rights the Obama and/or the supporters of this new law offered gun owners in exchange for a new AW ban and/or universal background checks? That is - what compromise did The Obama offer?
http://www.cnn.com/2013/04/17/politi...ate-guns-vote/....After the votes, Obama angrily criticized the NRA and senators who voted against the expanded background checks for rejecting a compromise he said was supported by a strong majority of Americans.
"Instead of supporting this compromise, the gun lobby and its allies willfully lied about the bill," Obama told White House reporters.
Can anyone tell us - specifically - what expansion of gun rights the Obama and/or the supporters of this new law offered gun owners in exchange for a new AW ban and/or universal background checks? That is - what compromise did The Obama offer?
No compromise, or even consideration of a compromise until the Feds do what they have to do to force places like NYC to stop infringing on firearm rights. I shouldn't have to wait 3-6 months and pay $1000 for a freaking home use permit for a revolver.
http://www.cnn.com/2013/04/17/politi...ate-guns-vote/....After the votes, Obama angrily criticized the NRA and senators who voted against the expanded background checks for rejecting a compromise he said was supported by a strong majority of Americans.
"Instead of supporting this compromise, the gun lobby and its allies willfully lied about the bill," Obama told White House reporters.
Can anyone tell us - specifically - what expansion of gun rights the Obama and/or the supporters of this new law offered gun owners in exchange for a new AW ban and/or universal background checks? That is - what compromise did The Obama offer?
No compromise, or even consideration of a compromise until the Feds do what they have to do to force places like NYC to stop infringing on firearm rights. I shouldn't have to wait 3-6 months and pay $1000 for a freaking home use permit for a revolver.
So if NYC pulls back it's law you'd be ok with this fed bill?
http://www.cnn.com/2013/04/17/politi...ate-guns-vote/....After the votes, Obama angrily criticized the NRA and senators who voted against the expanded background checks for rejecting a compromise he said was supported by a strong majority of Americans.
"Instead of supporting this compromise, the gun lobby and its allies willfully lied about the bill," Obama told White House reporters.
Can anyone tell us - specifically - what expansion of gun rights the Obama and/or the supporters of this new law offered gun owners in exchange for a new AW ban and/or universal background checks? That is - what compromise did The Obama offer?
No compromise, or even consideration of a compromise until the Feds do what they have to do to force places like NYC to stop infringing on firearm rights. I shouldn't have to wait 3-6 months and pay $1000 for a freaking home use permit for a revolver.
So if NYC pulls back it's law you'd be ok with this fed bill?
No, I would be more open to discussing it.
So... you cannot show where the Obama, et al, actually offered a compromise to the NRA, et al.Light on details but the story mentions
However, fierce opposition by the powerful National Rifle Association led a backlash by conservative Republicans and a few Democrats from pro-gun states that doomed key proposals in the gun package, even after they had been watered down to try to satisfy opponents.
Probably had to deal wh background check expansion .
http://www.cnn.com/2013/04/17/politi...ate-guns-vote/....After the votes, Obama angrily criticized the NRA and senators who voted against the expanded background checks for rejecting a compromise he said was supported by a strong majority of Americans.
"Instead of supporting this compromise, the gun lobby and its allies willfully lied about the bill," Obama told White House reporters.
Can anyone tell us - specifically - what expansion of gun rights the Obama and/or the supporters of this new law offered gun owners in exchange for a new AW ban and/or universal background checks? That is - what compromise did The Obama offer?
The NYC permit is a local, not federal issue; the Obama, et al, cannot affect a change in NYC laws.No, I would be more open to discussing it.http://www.cnn.com/2013/04/17/politi...ate-guns-vote/....After the votes, Obama angrily criticized the NRA and senators who voted against the expanded background checks for rejecting a compromise he said was supported by a strong majority of Americans.
"Instead of supporting this compromise, the gun lobby and its allies willfully lied about the bill," Obama told White House reporters.
Can anyone tell us - specifically - what expansion of gun rights the Obama and/or the supporters of this new law offered gun owners in exchange for a new AW ban and/or universal background checks? That is - what compromise did The Obama offer?
No compromise, or even consideration of a compromise until the Feds do what they have to do to force places like NYC to stop infringing on firearm rights. I shouldn't have to wait 3-6 months and pay $1000 for a freaking home use permit for a revolver.
So if NYC pulls back it's law you'd be ok with this fed bill?
http://www.cnn.com/2013/04/17/politi...ate-guns-vote/....After the votes, Obama angrily criticized the NRA and senators who voted against the expanded background checks for rejecting a compromise he said was supported by a strong majority of Americans.
"Instead of supporting this compromise, the gun lobby and its allies willfully lied about the bill," Obama told White House reporters.
Can anyone tell us - specifically - what expansion of gun rights the Obama and/or the supporters of this new law offered gun owners in exchange for a new AW ban and/or universal background checks? That is - what compromise did The Obama offer?
No compromise, or even consideration of a compromise until the Feds do what they have to do to force places like NYC to stop infringing on firearm rights. I shouldn't have to wait 3-6 months and pay $1000 for a freaking home use permit for a revolver.
So if NYC pulls back it's law you'd be ok with this fed bill?
No, I would be more open to discussing it.
Pfffffffffffffffffft.
http://www.cnn.com/2013/04/17/politi...ate-guns-vote/....After the votes, Obama angrily criticized the NRA and senators who voted against the expanded background checks for rejecting a compromise he said was supported by a strong majority of Americans.
"Instead of supporting this compromise, the gun lobby and its allies willfully lied about the bill," Obama told White House reporters.
Can anyone tell us - specifically - what expansion of gun rights the Obama and/or the supporters of this new law offered gun owners in exchange for a new AW ban and/or universal background checks? That is - what compromise did The Obama offer?
No compromise, or even consideration of a compromise until the Feds do what they have to do to force places like NYC to stop infringing on firearm rights. I shouldn't have to wait 3-6 months and pay $1000 for a freaking home use permit for a revolver.
The NYC permit is a local, not federal issue; the Obama, et al, cannot affect a change in NYC laws.No, I would be more open to discussing it.http://www.cnn.com/2013/04/17/politi...ate-guns-vote/....After the votes, Obama angrily criticized the NRA and senators who voted against the expanded background checks for rejecting a compromise he said was supported by a strong majority of Americans.
"Instead of supporting this compromise, the gun lobby and its allies willfully lied about the bill," Obama told White House reporters.
Can anyone tell us - specifically - what expansion of gun rights the Obama and/or the supporters of this new law offered gun owners in exchange for a new AW ban and/or universal background checks? That is - what compromise did The Obama offer?
No compromise, or even consideration of a compromise until the Feds do what they have to do to force places like NYC to stop infringing on firearm rights. I shouldn't have to wait 3-6 months and pay $1000 for a freaking home use permit for a revolver.
So if NYC pulls back it's law you'd be ok with this fed bill?
Thus, any such promise is hollow at best,
http://www.cnn.com/2013/04/17/politi...ate-guns-vote/
Can anyone tell us - specifically - what expansion of gun rights the Obama and/or the supporters of this new law offered gun owners in exchange for a new AW ban and/or universal background checks? That is - what compromise did The Obama offer?
No compromise, or even consideration of a compromise until the Feds do what they have to do to force places like NYC to stop infringing on firearm rights. I shouldn't have to wait 3-6 months and pay $1000 for a freaking home use permit for a revolver.
So if NYC pulls back it's law you'd be ok with this fed bill?
No, I would be more open to discussing it.
Pfffffffffffffffffft.
Moron.
http://www.cnn.com/2013/04/17/politi...ate-guns-vote/....After the votes, Obama angrily criticized the NRA and senators who voted against the expanded background checks for rejecting a compromise he said was supported by a strong majority of Americans.
"Instead of supporting this compromise, the gun lobby and its allies willfully lied about the bill," Obama told White House reporters.
Can anyone tell us - specifically - what expansion of gun rights the Obama and/or the supporters of this new law offered gun owners in exchange for a new AW ban and/or universal background checks? That is - what compromise did The Obama offer?
No compromise, or even consideration of a compromise until the Feds do what they have to do to force places like NYC to stop infringing on firearm rights. I shouldn't have to wait 3-6 months and pay $1000 for a freaking home use permit for a revolver.
I don't live in NYC, they can handle this.
The NYC permit is a local, not federal issue; the Obama, et al, cannot affect a change in NYC laws.No, I would be more open to discussing it.http://www.cnn.com/2013/04/17/politi...ate-guns-vote/
Can anyone tell us - specifically - what expansion of gun rights the Obama and/or the supporters of this new law offered gun owners in exchange for a new AW ban and/or universal background checks? That is - what compromise did The Obama offer?
No compromise, or even consideration of a compromise until the Feds do what they have to do to force places like NYC to stop infringing on firearm rights. I shouldn't have to wait 3-6 months and pay $1000 for a freaking home use permit for a revolver.
So if NYC pulls back it's law you'd be ok with this fed bill?
Thus, any such promise is hollow at best,
If a locality is breaching the constitution, why can't the federal government step in to assure my rights and privileges as a US citizen?
No compromise, or even consideration of a compromise until the Feds do what they have to do to force places like NYC to stop infringing on firearm rights. I shouldn't have to wait 3-6 months and pay $1000 for a freaking home use permit for a revolver.
So if NYC pulls back it's law you'd be ok with this fed bill?
No, I would be more open to discussing it.
Pfffffffffffffffffft.
Moron.
Now you're just beng hurtful.
The NYC permit is a local, not federal issue; the Obama, et al, cannot affect a change in NYC laws.No, I would be more open to discussing it.No compromise, or even consideration of a compromise until the Feds do what they have to do to force places like NYC to stop infringing on firearm rights. I shouldn't have to wait 3-6 months and pay $1000 for a freaking home use permit for a revolver.
So if NYC pulls back it's law you'd be ok with this fed bill?
Thus, any such promise is hollow at best,
If a locality is breaching the constitution, why can't the federal government step in to assure my rights and privileges as a US citizen?
Why is it some gun nuts are so irrational?
http://www.cnn.com/2013/04/17/politi...ate-guns-vote/....After the votes, Obama angrily criticized the NRA and senators who voted against the expanded background checks for rejecting a compromise he said was supported by a strong majority of Americans.
"Instead of supporting this compromise, the gun lobby and its allies willfully lied about the bill," Obama told White House reporters.
Can anyone tell us - specifically - what expansion of gun rights the Obama and/or the supporters of this new law offered gun owners in exchange for a new AW ban and/or universal background checks? That is - what compromise did The Obama offer?
No compromise, or even consideration of a compromise until the Feds do what they have to do to force places like NYC to stop infringing on firearm rights. I shouldn't have to wait 3-6 months and pay $1000 for a freaking home use permit for a revolver.
I don't live in NYC, they can handle this.
So if you don't live in Alabama you wouldn't have an issue with them outlawing abortion or gay marriage?
The NYC permit is a local, not federal issue; the Obama, et al, cannot affect a change in NYC laws.No, I would be more open to discussing it.So if NYC pulls back it's law you'd be ok with this fed bill?
Thus, any such promise is hollow at best,
If a locality is breaching the constitution, why can't the federal government step in to assure my rights and privileges as a US citizen?
Why is it some gun nuts are so irrational?
Are you going to actually add anything to the topic, or are you just some mouth breathing twat-waddle?
