Nevadamedic
Senior Member
Oh, I thought the big announcement was he was putting a special team of advisors and appointing a special Czar to determine how to blame Haiti on President Bush. I guess that will be his next announcement.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
CaféAuLait;1943957 said:Entire board? Where did I said such?
LOL, it's your dishonesty. I never said that which you try to claim. Have fun skewing the facts AGAIN.
Your last lines. The only one skewing anything is you when you try to claim that everyone calls you a racist for being against Obama. To be quite honest, at this point I feel you probably make racist jokes or something else if your claims are true. I talk to people of all ages who support Obama and when I disagree with the guy, none of them call me racist.
CaféAuLait;1943967 said:You are still not making any sense. You put words into my posts over and over. Have fun trying to revise what is two posts back-- which anyone can read. LOL
I guess only the irrational visit this forum, eh? None are anywhere else?
Oh, I thought the big announcement was he was putting a special team of advisors and appointing a special Czar to determine how to blame Haiti on President Bush. I guess that will be his next announcement.
CaféAuLait;1943967 said:You are still not making any sense. You put words into my posts over and over. Have fun trying to revise what is two posts back-- which anyone can read. LOL
You said this:
I guess only the irrational visit this forum, eh? None are anywhere else?
Again, you've been bitching all day and now you're bitching in this thread. Take it back to the original thread.
You can keep trying to say that I was speaking of this forum I visit about once a week or less or you can see I was speaking about my life outside of this board. It is up to you. Seems you like call names and infer the worst-- have at it. Either way my point is in black, white and red above and I'm sure all over this forum too by those you deem irrational. I guess only the irrational visit this forum, eh? None are anywhere else?
CaféAuLait;1943973 said:Oh, I thought the big announcement was he was putting a special team of advisors and appointing a special Czar to determine how to blame Haiti on President Bush. I guess that will be his next announcement.
Well-- that's next-- Or Chavez will blame it on our Earthquake weapon developed by Bush.
U.S. earthquake weapon used on Haiti says Chavez
U.S. earthquake weapon used on Haiti says Chavez
CaféAuLait;1943973 said:Oh, I thought the big announcement was he was putting a special team of advisors and appointing a special Czar to determine how to blame Haiti on President Bush. I guess that will be his next announcement.
Well-- that's next-- Or Chavez will blame it on our Earthquake weapon developed by Bush.
U.S. earthquake weapon used on Haiti says Chavez
U.S. earthquake weapon used on Haiti says Chavez
Earthquake weapon? You mean Janet Reno running down the street making the ground shake by her weight? LMAO.
CaféAuLait;1943985 said:I was being sarcastic by saying that there are only irrational people here??? there can't be any at anywhere else???-- like my place of work who state that those who don't like Obama are racist? OMG man get a grip man!!
My quote in context:
You can keep trying to say that I was speaking of this forum I visit about once a week or less or you can see I was speaking about my life outside of this board. It is up to you. Seems you like call names and infer the worst-- have at it. Either way my point is in black, white and red above and I'm sure all over this forum too by those you deem irrational. I guess only the irrational visit this forum, eh? None are anywhere else?
CaféAuLait;1943985 said:I was being sarcastic by saying that there are only irrational people here??? there can't be any at anywhere else???-- like my place of work who state that those who don't like Obama are racist? OMG man get a grip man!!
My quote in context:
You can keep trying to say that I was speaking of this forum I visit about once a week or less or you can see I was speaking about my life outside of this board. It is up to you. Seems you like call names and infer the worst-- have at it. Either way my point is in black, white and red above and I'm sure all over this forum too by those you deem irrational. I guess only the irrational visit this forum, eh? None are anywhere else?
Considering your whining post after post, how am I suppose to know you're being sarcastic?
And where the hell do you work where they state these things? Must not be anywhere professional.
CaféAuLait;1943923 said:The problem is these infrastructure project haven't started moving. We know that if we invest in America and rebuild our infrastructure, you can't go wrong. That is one part of the economy that will make jobs, produce revenue and add to the tax base. It's a no brainer. So why doesn't it happen.
Well, you have Democrats who are made up of many different factions who need to take a concensus to get anything done and who are afraid of the monolithic Republicans.
Then you have the Republican who have publicly stated the want the President to fail. They are very curious. One one hand screaming for jobs, on the other wailing they want to government to stop doing anything.
We know Republicans can get things done. They started two wars. They trashed the economy. They moved the wealth of the nation from the middle class to the top 3%. They stopped health care for millions of Americans who will die or go bankrupt. Those may be bad things, but it proves they ARE very effective. When they have a goal, they are single minded, no doubt about it.
Now imagine if those same Republicans actually got behind rebuilding America's infrastructure? It would happen. It would be incredible. But it won't happen. Republicans hate having a black president so bad, they call him terrible names, Nazi, Socialist and other names. They want him to fail no matter how much it damages the country.
And the Republcian Ideas they want to go back to? Invade more countries. More death. Cut taxes for the rich. Cut funding for education. No health care reform of any kind. It's like they have a "national death wish". I don't see anything positive happening until Obama stands up to the Republican leadership and challenges them into doing the right thing.
Thank you!!! This was true during the campaign. It is absolutely true that there are people out there that are very racist and will never accept a black president. These people say that when they don't agree with Obama they are called racists. That is such crap. There are a lot of people that don't agree with Obama that are not racists and nobody calls them that.
The racists are not hard to spot. Their terminology, the names they call Obama, and the signs they carry are a dead giveaway. Then they have the nerve to get all bent out of shape when they are called on it.
So you agree with someone saying 'Republicans hate having a black president' and you claim as you emphasis it in red that is not painting with a broad brush? I am not republican but those are the insults I was speaking of in the other thread that I hear and see at work and from the TH and those who support Obama. I see a very broad brush and not even the word 'some' or a few.
The other thing that is assumed is at work and by people I know, if I do not like Obama or his policy I must be rebublican too. That one is irritating.
CaféAuLait;1943923 said:Thank you!!! This was true during the campaign. It is absolutely true that there are people out there that are very racist and will never accept a black president. These people say that when they don't agree with Obama they are called racists. That is such crap. There are a lot of people that don't agree with Obama that are not racists and nobody calls them that.
The racists are not hard to spot. Their terminology, the names they call Obama, and the signs they carry are a dead giveaway. Then they have the nerve to get all bent out of shape when they are called on it.
So you agree with someone saying 'Republicans hate having a black president' and you claim as you emphasis it in red that is not painting with a broad brush? I am not republican but those are the insults I was speaking of in the other thread that I hear and see at work and from the TH and those who support Obama. I see a very broad brush and not even the word 'some' or a few.
The other thing that is assumed is at work and by people I know, if I do not like Obama or his policy I must be rebublican too. That one is irritating.
Can you please read the first paragraph of my first post?? I think that explains my position and that I don't think only Republicans do not want a black prez. I don't think you can take a group of people and make a sweeping generalization. It can't be done.
I did highlight the sentence where the word "Republican" was used. Apparently I didn't notice it. Thanks for pointing it out.
CaféAuLait;1943939 said:CaféAuLait;1943933 said:Ahhh so it does not count-- that what I spoke of earlier is happening -- and it does not count because they are too far left? How silly of me.
You act as if rational people are saying these things. Would you like me to take the words of Fred Phelps and say they are the words you believe in as well?
I do not spend enough time here to know who you deem rational or irrational. Either way it happens. Something you and Article15 claims does not happen on this forum and neither of you can claim does not happen in my place of work or those I know or as we both know it does happen with the news articles I linked to in the other thread.
Claimed it doesn't happen here?
LMAO!
No such claim was ever made.
But I can certainly show you plenty of threads where Obama's policies are being criticized and there are not accusations of racism in them.
You got your butt kicked in that thread ... are you really looking for another round?
CaféAuLait;1943923 said:So you agree with someone saying 'Republicans hate having a black president' and you claim as you emphasis it in red that is not painting with a broad brush? I am not republican but those are the insults I was speaking of in the other thread that I hear and see at work and from the TH and those who support Obama. I see a very broad brush and not even the word 'some' or a few.
The other thing that is assumed is at work and by people I know, if I do not like Obama or his policy I must be rebublican too. That one is irritating.
Can you please read the first paragraph of my first post?? I think that explains my position and that I don't think only Republicans do not want a black prez. I don't think you can take a group of people and make a sweeping generalization. It can't be done.
I did highlight the sentence where the word "Republican" was used. Apparently I didn't notice it. Thanks for pointing it out.
Republican's hate black people so much that we elected a black person Chairman of the nationial committee.
If you do something two times and it fails to work, or actually makes the problem worse, why should you do it a third time?
The stimulus spending last time was more than the government took in in taxes for the year. Most of us on this side think if you are going to throw that much down the toilet, then you should just declare a tax holiday for the year. Costs less, money is in peoples hands today, and tax cuts do stimulate. As opposed to passing money to favored politicians.
This kind of stimulus is the worst kind of trickle down. give it to your freinds, and they will spend the economy into prosperity. As opposed to giving it to productive folks and have them spend money productively.
Actually, BM, The MARXIST Muslim PC Protector Obami Salami is a helluva lot more creative than you think.
The Messiah of the Obamarrhoids and his Stooge, the Hapless Atty Gen have another one of their brainstorms to help destroy the finances of our Country: The Khalid Sheik Mohammed trial in New York has been estimated at $200 million a year. And, only Allah knows how long that will take.
Allahu Akbar !!!
STIMULUS WATCH: Unemployment unchanged by projects - Yahoo! News
STIMULUS WATCH: Unemployment unchanged by projects
Yeah give me more of that stimulus
The total number of unemployed has nothing to do with those who have been employed by projects using stimulus funds. If 50,000 jobs are added in one month and 50,000 others become unemployed elsewhere, it's a wash.
If you do something two times and it fails to work, or actually makes the problem worse, why should you do it a third time?
The stimulus spending last time was more than the government took in in taxes for the year. Most of us on this side think if you are going to throw that much down the toilet, then you should just declare a tax holiday for the year. Costs less, money is in peoples hands today, and tax cuts do stimulate. As opposed to passing money to favored politicians.
This kind of stimulus is the worst kind of trickle down. give it to your freinds, and they will spend the economy into prosperity. As opposed to giving it to productive folks and have them spend money productively.