Obama-linked activists have a ‘training manual’ for protesting Trump

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Shocking... Not.

Obama-linked activists have a ?training manual? for protesting Trump | New York Post

No, totally not shocking that people have a training manual. It's called being organized.

A training manual organizing subversion.
I don't remember who the other subversive president was before obama.

Some call it subversion, others call it PROTESTING. It's protected by the Constitution, isn't it?

Subversion? No.

Ah, but then you didn't prove it was subversion, you merely decided it was subversion because you don't like it.

When people within a government work to undermine that government it's subversion. Democrats should not be allowed to vote.

 

[Iceweasel]

Bill Ayers taught Obama well.

 

[frigidweirdo]

No, totally not shocking that people have a training manual. It's called being organized.

A training manual organizing subversion.
I don't remember who the other subversive president was before obama.

Some call it subversion, others call it PROTESTING. It's protected by the Constitution, isn't it?

Subversion? No.

Ah, but then you didn't prove it was subversion, you merely decided it was subversion because you don't like it.

When people within a government work to undermine that government it's subversion. Democrats should not be allowed to vote.

But then again many people voted for Trump in the hope that he would undermine the government, didn't they?

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

A training manual organizing subversion.
I don't remember who the other subversive president was before obama.

Some call it subversion, others call it PROTESTING. It's protected by the Constitution, isn't it?

Subversion? No.

Ah, but then you didn't prove it was subversion, you merely decided it was subversion because you don't like it.

When people within a government work to undermine that government it's subversion. Democrats should not be allowed to vote.

But then again many people voted for Trump in the hope that he would undermine the government, didn't they?

No, they voted for him in the hope that he might restore constitutionality and give rights back to the states. Repealing Obamacare and paring down education Dept and EPA go a long way to that end.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Some call it subversion, others call it PROTESTING. It's protected by the Constitution, isn't it?

Subversion? No.

Ah, but then you didn't prove it was subversion, you merely decided it was subversion because you don't like it.

When people within a government work to undermine that government it's subversion. Democrats should not be allowed to vote.

But then again many people voted for Trump in the hope that he would undermine the government, didn't they?

No, they voted for him in the hope that he might restore constitutionality and give rights back to the states. Repealing Obamacare and paring down education Dept and EPA go a long way to that end.

Rubbish did they.

Stop pretending that they had good motives for all of this. Most voted for him because he promised their sad little lives hope, and they wanted that hope. They'll never get the reality, but hey.

Restore constitutionality? Er... most people don't give a shit about the constitution as long as they get what they want. Paring down education, yeah, they probably wanted education diminished so these young upstarts don't get more intelijent than them.