Obama is gonna take your guns!!

[Si modo]

I realize that a lot of Americans believe that the federal government is ready to take action against gun owners. Barack Obama says he's "committed" and "we must do something".

Yeah, right......

The best indication of Obama's "commitment" is that he has put Joe Biden in charge of the whole operation. The Vice President has no power and Joe Biden is a laughingstock. That's how "committed" Obama is.....

Let me tell you what is going to happen with "Gun Control" in the US.

NOTHING. NADA. SQUAT.

The gun control movement is politically impotent.

Don't let the 'war on women' crowd know their hysterics are just as impotent.

Merry Christmas!

 

[Intense]

I realize that a lot of Americans believe that the federal government is ready to take action against gun owners. Barack Obama says he's "committed" and "we must do something".

Yeah, right......

The best indication of Obama's "commitment" is that he has put Joe Biden in charge of the whole operation. The Vice President has no power and Joe Biden is a laughingstock. That's how "committed" Obama is.....

Let me tell you what is going to happen with "Gun Control" in the US.

NOTHING. NADA. SQUAT.

The gun control movement is politically impotent.

In NY State the reaction seems pretty Totalitarian. Who knew? ..... The Empire State..... You must this.... You must that...... It seems that the folks with the power and the money are obsessed with controlling others, I'm thinking, for the pure enjoyment of it. Shhhhh!!! Don't let it get out.

 

[Darkwind]

I realize that a lot of Americans believe that the federal government is ready to take action against gun owners. Barack Obama says he's "committed" and "we must do something".

Yeah, right......

The best indication of Obama's "commitment" is that he has put Joe Biden in charge of the whole operation. The Vice President has no power and Joe Biden is a laughingstock. That's how "committed" Obama is.....

Let me tell you what is going to happen with "Gun Control" in the US.

NOTHING. NADA. SQUAT.

The gun control movement is politically impotent.

In NY State the reaction seems pretty Totalitarian. Who knew? ..... The Empire State..... You must this.... You must that...... It seems that the folks with the power and the money are obsessed with controlling others, I'm thinking, for the pure enjoyment of it. Shhhhh!!! Don't let it get out.

lol

 

[rightwinger]

Obama is going to take away some of your toys

Get used to it

 

[Darkwind]

Obama is going to take away some of your toys

Get used to it

What color is the sky in your world?

You do realize that obama is NOT king and cannot just take them away because he wants to, right?

 

[LordBrownTrout]

We can't take their guns. Then all they'll have to cling to is their bibles.

Let's take their bibles too. Then all they'll have is NASCAR.

Good one.

But, no matter how the gun nuts twist and turn, they cannot make a good case for the US being a police state.

Wow, three all captured in one, who would love to take rights away. Not surprising though.

 

[Zander]

Obama is going to take away some of your toys

Get used to it

Yeah! and Obama's "investment" in GM will turn a profit too!!

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

I realize that a lot of Americans believe that the federal government is ready to take action against gun owners. Barack Obama says he's "committed" and "we must do something".

Yeah, right......

The best indication of Obama's "commitment" is that he has put Joe Biden in charge of the whole operation. The Vice President has no power and Joe Biden is a laughingstock. That's how "committed" Obama is.....

Let me tell you what is going to happen with "Gun Control" in the US.

NOTHING. NADA. SQUAT.

The gun control movement is politically impotent.

For the first, and likely last time, we agree – but for different reasons.

The Executive Branch can’t enact legislation. And regardless the commitment of the president, or who is placed in charge of a given intuitive, or the competence of those involved, there won’t be any bans or restrictions simply because the House will never sign-off on any such measures.

 

[Lakhota]

The 2nd Amendment is no longer applicable, and will eventually be changed.

 

[rightwinger]

Obama is going to take away some of your toys

Get used to it

Yeah! and Obama's "investment" in GM will turn a profit too!!

Never claimed we were in it for a profit

Saved the auto industry and a million jobs though

 

[Si modo]

The 2nd Amendment is no longer applicable, and will eventually be changed.

I bet your neighbor lawyer told you that.

 

[JoeB131]

They won't take the guns...

But you will see tighter licensing requirements, restrictions on the type of ammo to be sold, and probably insurance requirements.

If they really wanted to deal a blow to the gun industry, do what they did to the tobacco industry- make them liable for the costs of their product to society.

 

[rightwinger]

The 2nd Amendment is no longer applicable, and will eventually be changed.

Given we no longer rely on militias, it is as relevant as the third amendment

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Marxist wet dreams: abolish the second

 

[Zander]

Obama is going to take away some of your toys

Get used to it

Yeah! and Obama's "investment" in GM will turn a profit too!!

Never claimed we were in it for a profit

Saved the auto industry and a million jobs though

You're full of shit....

 

[tjvh]

The 2nd Amendment is no longer applicable, and will eventually be changed.

Given we no longer rely on militias, it is as relevant as the third amendment

I love how you idiots cherry pick the Second Amendment. Perhaps you'd care to explain the next line: the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Good luck with that.

 

[rightwinger]

The 2nd Amendment is no longer applicable, and will eventually be changed.

Given we no longer rely on militias, it is as relevant as the third amendment

I love how you idiots cherry pick the Second Amendment. Perhaps you'd care to explain the next line: the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Good luck with that.

Two parts


A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state,

the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”

Once the first part is gone.....no need for the second part is there?

Obsolete

 

[tjvh]

Given we no longer rely on militias, it is as relevant as the third amendment

I love how you idiots cherry pick the Second Amendment. Perhaps you'd care to explain the next line: the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Good luck with that.

Two parts


A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state,

the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”

Once the first part is gone.....no need for the second part is there?

Obsolete

Obsolete if you consider tyranny, and slavery forward thinking.

 

[rightwinger]

I love how you idiots cherry pick the Second Amendment. Perhaps you'd care to explain the next line: the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Good luck with that.

Two parts


A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state,

the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”

Once the first part is gone.....no need for the second part is there?

Obsolete

Obsolete if you consider tyranny, and slavery forward thinking.

We have banned those already

Time to go after guns

 

[Si modo]

Given we no longer rely on militias, it is as relevant as the third amendment

I love how you idiots cherry pick the Second Amendment. Perhaps you'd care to explain the next line: the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Good luck with that.

Two parts


A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state,

the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”

Once the first part is gone.....no need for the second part is there?

Obsolete

I had no idea you were really this stupid.